Source: Facebook

  • LET’S GIVE EVERYONE A PRECISE LANGUAGE AND FOR THE DISCUSSION OF RELIGION. (wort

    LET’S GIVE EVERYONE A PRECISE LANGUAGE AND FOR THE DISCUSSION OF RELIGION.

    (worth repeating)

    We have been misled to thinking that ‘religion’ requires superstition. But that idea is a product of the authoritarian dogma created by the church under christianity. It’s simply not true.

    DECONFLATED, RELIGION CONSISTS OF:

    1) Narrative: historical, mythical, supernatural

    2) Metaphysical Judgments: (in many forms)

    3) Group Evolutionary Strategy: (in many forms )

    4) Normative Rules: (in many forms)

    5) Registries of Familial Property (birth, maturity, marriage, death)

    5) Rituals both private and public: (mindfulness in its forms)

    6) Feasts, Sports, Arts, and Festivals:(in their many forms)

    RELIGION ‘WORKS’ BY:

    1 – providing some variation on ‘mindfulness’ in which we can escape the problem of being honest with ourselves independently of all our accumulated intuitions and biases.

    2 – Forming associations between the ‘pack-response’ and group participation, and eliminating the problem of stress from post-tribal life’s lack of feedback, thereby extending trust bonds across kin groups, class groups, and market groups, which decreases transaction costs of all kinds in all walks of life.

    3 – Establishing normative rules for familial and cross familial behavior, that made (and continue to) reduce natural frictions between genetic variations in gender, class, tribe, race that (truthfully) translate in to different demands for association, reproduction, economic cooperation, and rule – and the status-seeking that affects each of those demands, dramatically.

    THE FUNCTIONAL PROBLEM OF WESTERN RELIGION

    1 – Separation of education and religion

    ……..a – The failure of religions to reform in response to the scientific enlightenment.

    ……..b – The failure of religions to reform in response to Darwin.

    ……..c – The Academy’s seizure of the functions of the church upon the failure of the church to reform.

    ……..d – The End of western separation and competition between Religion and State by the adoption of the synthesis of jewish cosmopolitan and puritan postmodern by the State, Academy, Media complex the current generation of thinkers refers to as “The Cathedral Complex”, or just “The Cathedral” for short.

    ……..e – The beginning of state-financed New Indulgences (we call them ‘college diplomas’) that promise a middle or upper class level of consumption instead of forgiveness of sins and entry into heaven – when the postwar economic boom that made possible the rapid expansion of the consumer class was just a temporary product of the combined tragedies of the Great European Civil War’s destruction of centuries of accumulated production capacity, plus the destruction of, and delay of expansion of, world production caused by the movement we call world communism (and now, its inheritor, world islamism).

    2 – the academy seized control of the commercial education and the ‘religious’ education (liberalism), but failed to seize familial education – and in most cases, assisted the state in the destruction first of black families, then white families, and now all families, in order to (a) provide women with child care (schooling), force them into the labor pool (feminism), and then consume the entire proceeds of women’s labor so that the war and boomer generation could retire early and lie on the next generation’s labor, and then immigrating third world labor to provide cheap labor (social programs) that cannot replace the prior generation because of lesser aggregate abilities. The family destruction was increased by attempt to create a mobile workforce and thereby deprive women of the multi-generational support necessary to raise more than one child without exhaustion. And now it is impossible for women to return to childbearing and child-rearing because of the tax demands placed upon their earnings by the immigration of underclasses and the dependency of the aged yet healthy enough to work.

    3 – The state-sponsored secular ‘religion’ that we currently teach is pseudoscientific (false, and dishonest), where the content of Christian religion (the extension of kinship forgiveness to non-kin) was ‘true’ but conveyed by nonsense and authoritarianism.

    4 – One of the unstated drivers for the current conflict in america is not just the decline of the white population and the ascent of the colored cities, but because science has caught up and since 1990 has been aggressively disproving the universalist, globalist, equalitarian democratic secular socialist religion. And those who are aware of this are … angry … and full of conviction that their traditions and intuitions were correct. Therefore they feel betrayed and deceived.

    THE WEST HAS ALWAYS BEEN POLYTHEISTIC

    While it is the secret to the west’s competitive advantage, we are sometimes misled by our (false) historical narrative:

    The west never engaged in conflation, by creating ‘one book’ so to speak. We have always had:

    …. 1) Law (limits) for the Ruling (fathering) Classes,

    …. 2) Commerce (pragmatism) for the producing classes.

    …. 3) Religion (utopianism) for Science / pseudoscience, philosophy / pseudorationalism, and Theology / fraud for the Educating (mothering) classes (church/academy).

    And have always maintained the three estates of the realm using the three methods of coercion

    1) Law/Limits: Force / ostracization from movement/ resources / life itself.

    2) Exchange/Utility: Payment / Remuneration / Ostracization from consumption.

    3) Religion: Gossip / Rallying / Shaming / Ostracization from opportunity for insurance from the tribe.

    THE WEST’S ADMINISTRATIVE RELIGION IS THE COMMON SOVEREIGN INDO-EUROPEAN/ARISTOCRATIC/ANGLO SAXON LAW, AND ITS PRIEST’S ARE OUR JUDGES

    Reason, empiricism, science, and now ‘testimonialism’ (the completion of the scientific method) all evolved out of western empirical common law.

    There is no reason our founding myths:

    1) Homer, takes of kings, princes and princesses: the germanic myths, legends, and fairy tales;

    2) History and the lives of the great thinkers;

    3) the tales of jesus and the saints;

    Cannot be taught as ‘religion’ and their contributions celebrated.

    RELIGION IS NECESSARY FOR EVOLUTIONARY REASONS, BUT SUPERSTITION, PSEUDO-RATIONALISM, PSEUDOSCIENCE, CONFLATION AND DECEPTION ARE NOT.

    THE CYCLE OF REVOLUTIONS (TRUTHS) AND COUNTER REVOLUTIONS (LIES)

    ———————————

    1) REVOLUTION: The invention of aristocracy (horse, bronze, wheel).

    =>COUNTER-REVOLUTION: organized conflationary superstitious advisory religion.

    2) REVOLUTION: The invention of truth, reason, deconflation, competition.

    =>COUNTER-REVOLUTION: Conflationary Monotheistic Authoritarian Religion

    3) REVOLUTION: Empricism

    =>COUNTER REVOLUTIONS:

    – French Pseudoscientific Moralism: Rousseau et al.

    – Russian literary nihilism.

    – German pseudo-rational philosophy.

    4) REVOLUTION: Science: Darwin (evolution), spencer (operationalism), poincare(mathematical realism), maxwell (electromagnetism), nietzsche (restoration of aristocratic aesthetics)

    =>COUNTER REVOLUTION:

    – Jewish Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience: Boaz (anthropology), Marx (economics and sociology: cooperation), Freud (psychology), Adorno et al (Aesthetics).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 11:14:00 UTC

  • HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION Posted by October 23rd, 2018 4:48 PM IT’S NO

    HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION

    Posted by October 23rd, 2018 4:48 PM

    IT’S NOT JUST THE 19TH – HERE IS HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION BY DESTROYING OUR UNIQUENESS: MERITOCRATIC, HIGH TRUST NORMS, LAWS, AND INSTITUTIONS.

    THIS IS HOW IT WAS DONE:

    They:

    1) increased the voting pool, then

    2) used immigration, to sink the pool, then

    3) used the sunk voting pool to stack the court (left), then

    4) funding selected cases before the courts to overthrow the constitution by legislation from the bench – what could not be achieved by pursuading the population to vote.

    5) Added women to the work force, then consumed all female generated taxes for redistribution, and forcibly redistributed middle class reproduction to the lower classes, underclasses, and third world immigrants.

    6) Using forced integration (immigration act), and then forced relocation (johnson,clinton,obama), and then unregulated immigration to undermine the high trust norms developed over centuries.

    7) This is before we address the financialization of the economy and the extraction of retirement and reproduction from the middle classes, or both spending down accumulated intergenerational capital, and borrowing against future production within the same (Boomer) generation.

    VOTING

    1 – white single women are the only defectors from any group

    2 – if women had never had the vote, we never would have had a liberal president

    3 – women originally defended against marxism (male labor), but were converted by postmodernism (female labor)

    4 – *white single women are the primary customers of the Postmodern Academy (pseudosciences and literature), Market Economy via Hyper Consumption of signals (70% of consumer spending), and Virtue Signaling (political) marketplaces.

    WHY IT MATTERS

    Without white women exclusively defecting, none of the cultural divisiveness would have occurred, and the end of western civilization as the only high trust policy outside of east asia – and the only civil society to survive.

    THE LEFT’S SCRIPT

    They followed the soviet script for moving low trust russians into baltic, eastern european and european high trust populations in order to undermine the high trust norms of europeans such that they would be obedient as Russians who had only been free of serfdom (slavery) for a generation, had no middle class, no middle class norms, and no traditions necessary for the voluntary organization of innovation, investment, production distribution and trade, thereby generating DEMAND FOR STATE CONTROL of every aspect of society.

    UNDERMINING THE AMENDMENTS

    The 14th (Federal Dominion over States)

    The 15th (Race color condition – eliminating segregation)

    The 17th (Senators by popular vote – eliminating state government power)

    The 19th (By Sex – eliminating the male-female compromise of the meritocracy of one family one vote )

    The 24th (By Poll Tax – eliminating even the lowest contribution and and property requirements)

    The 26th (By 18 yrs – eliminating all life experience requirements.)

    UNDERSTANDING THIS LIST OF ‘LEGISLATION FROM THE BENCH IN MATTERS OF NORMS’

    https://en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_landmark_court…

    AND IN PARTICULAR

    Brown v. Board of Education (1954) “Separate is not equal”

    Cooper v. Aaron (1958) Holding: States cannot nullify decisions of the federal courts.

    Engel v. Vitale (1962) Holding: School initiated-prayer in the public school system violates the First Amendment.

    Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Holding: Colleges and universities have a legitimate interest in promoting diversity.

    New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Holding: In order to prove libel, a public official must show that what was said against them was made with actual malice.

    Zelma v. Simmons-Harris (2002) Holding: Certain school voucher programs are constitutional.

    UNIQUENESS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION:

    Who, on this earth, other than property owning western males, has the agency to preserve nomocracy (rule of law)? What evidence do we have that ANYONE ELSE has the agency to produce or preserve rule of law?

    NO ONE.

    AGENCY IS A SCARCITY AND ONLY WESTERN MAN PRODUCED IT. BECAUSE ONLY WESTERN MAN WAS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE MERIT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH REGARDLESS OF THE COST TO THE DOMINANCE HIERARCHY.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 10:46:00 UTC

  • FYI: Restoring a pro-social ‘religion’ that is ‘not false’.Updated Dec 1, 2019,

    FYI: Restoring a pro-social ‘religion’ that is ‘not false’.Updated Dec 1, 2019, 10:44 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 10:44:00 UTC

  • CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD (worth repeating) A conservative questions the overestim

    CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD

    (worth repeating)

    A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. Conservatism is familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital.

    As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).

    A Conservative requires empirical results – and where empirical fails, the traditional is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality.

    A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.

    Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly noble families.

    Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.

    In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke, smith, hume, adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.

    The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.

    As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.

    1 – Sovereignty requires reciprocity

    2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.

    3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.

    4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.

    5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.

    6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**

    DOMESTICATION

    Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.

    CONSERVATIVES

    Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.) Conservatives also are actively suppressed in academy and media.

    This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.)

    AUTHORS TO READ

    Burke, Hayek, Burnham, Sowell, Buchanan, Murray, and maybe Nietzsche. Veblen.

    (The essayists are nonsense)

    Anyone in Hoover or Heritage institutions.

    READING LIST

    Propertarianism’s Reading List (https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/).

    My reading list (above) contains most of the science we�ve been looking for, while the pseudosciences dominated the mid to late 20th century under the marxist-postmodernists.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 10:43:00 UTC

  • ”WHAT DO CONSERVATIVES MEAN BY LIBERAL ELITE?” They mean: … 1 – Virtue Signali

    ”WHAT DO CONSERVATIVES MEAN BY LIBERAL ELITE?”

    They mean:

    … 1 – Virtue Signaling class vs Virtue Demonstrating class

    … 2 – Talking class vs Productive Class

    … 3 – Others Pay For It class vs Pay Your Own Way class.

    … 4 – Cosmopolitan Class (territorial communism) vs Nationalist Class (territorial nationalism)

    Technically speaking, the “Cathedral Complex” consisting of the alliance of the talking class and the underclass:

    “Those who profit without warranty.”

    … 1 – The Academy,

    … 2 – The State,

    … 3 – The Media (News, Info-tainment, Entertainment, Advertising, Marketing),

    … 4 – The Financial Sector.

    We use the term ‘Cathedral Complex’ to refer to the replacement of the aristocratic, rule of law, commercial, military and industrial complex (The people who do) with the propaganda complex (the people who talk.)

    When the church failed to reform, the academy replaced the church. It’s not complicated. We don’t have a separation of church and state any longer. We have a state-sponsored church of democratic socialist secular humanism spread by Marxist pseudoscience and postmodern pseudorationalism, and outright denial of science.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 10:40:00 UTC

  • QUESTION: WHY IS INTERRUPTION ADVERTISING LEGAL? What would happen if we prohibi

    QUESTION: WHY IS INTERRUPTION ADVERTISING LEGAL?

    What would happen if we prohibited interruption advertising. in other words, the only advertising possible would be destination. Wouldn’t every company create its own internet channel? Wouldn’t a much smaller number of media companies sell content people wanted rather than advertisers wanted? Why wouldn’t that be better than today?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 09:17:00 UTC

  • “The important part isn’t the war itself but, the conditions in Weimar that lead

    —“The important part isn’t the war itself but, the conditions in Weimar that lead to the war. Who was behind it and why is it happening in the West again.?”—Zach Quarry


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 08:58:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGINS OF NATURAL RELIGION What’s the difference between the hunt and resul

    THE ORIGINS OF NATURAL RELIGION

    What’s the difference between the hunt and resulting feast, throwing a piece of meat on the fire to thank nature for her bounty, dancing around a fire that night to tell the story with moral heroic or tragic framing, with everyone drumming, chanting, singing, or reciting along – and religion?

    Absolutely nothing. That’s the purpose religion fulfills: the pack is happy together, and we are happy, calm, safe, ‘belonging’, within it: mindfulness.

    Then there are people who use religion for evil: and those are the fundamentalists who have lost the point, either out of insecurity or need for sense of agency – when they have none.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 08:55:00 UTC

  • NO. MATH IS TRIVIAL. THAT’S WHY ITS USEFUL. At present, aside from testimony and

    NO. MATH IS TRIVIAL. THAT’S WHY ITS USEFUL.

    At present, aside from testimony and reciprocity I think I understand this problem (mathematical foundations) better than anyone else, for reasons I’m still … exasperated by.

    Math is a language. It consists of one dimension: positional names. Positional names consist of one constant relation: position (ordinality). Names are unique. Positional names are unique. Positions are scale independent. Positional names can be assigned to any referent in any dimension. We can assign names to any set of dimensions, just as we assign names to any set of referents within it, and as such we can used dimensional order or name, and position order or name, to describe ANY CONSTANT RELATIONS at any scale or combination of scales relative to the observer, and we can scale this technique of dimensional and positional names to any comprehensible scale.

    So it’s not that math is unreasonably useful, it’s that it’s fucking OBVIOUSLY useful in describing the natural world, because like the natural world mathematics is SIMPLE (consisting of constant relations). However, like anything else, we learn it’s constitution by it’s failure. And mathematics is terrible at inconstant relations (economics, sentience), and at that point of failure we must move from positional (linear) language (averages) to operations language (discrete operations).

    So for example, as far as I know, the reason that physics is frozen is Einstein published before Hilbert solved the underlying problem by Einstein NOT solving the problem of the underlying structure, by the presumption that the wave (calculus) was the primitive, rather than the operations that averaged into the wave – demonstrating that Einstein like many mathematicians understood the application of the language of mathematics without understanding it’s construction relative to ALL languages.

    In fact, if I had my druthers, I would have people learn the abacus, the gear, the computer, and the shape to learn mathematics, not just memorization by wrote repetition.

    Welcome to continue this but it’s not possible that I’m wrong.

    Foundations of language of which mathematics is the simplest because it consists of only one property, and our brains evolved to grasp the world as spaces first by very similar (geometric) means, an understanding of which usually awes the audience.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 08:51:00 UTC

  • DEFINITION: “HAZARD”, “BAITING INTO MORAL HAZARD” (worth repeating) “HAZARD” In

    DEFINITION: “HAZARD”, “BAITING INTO MORAL HAZARD”

    (worth repeating)

    “HAZARD”

    In old English law. An unlawful game at dice, those who play at it being called ‘hazardors’.�In modern law. Any game of chance or wagering.

    In insurance law. The risk, danger, or probability that the event Insured against may happen, varying with the circumstances of the particular case.

    Moral hazard. In fire insurance. The risk or danger of the destruction of the insured property by fire, as measured by the character and interest of the insured owner, his habits as a prudent and careful man or the reverse, his known integrity or his bad reputation, and the amount of loss he would suffer by the destruction of the property or the gain he would make by suffering it to burn and collecting the insurance.

    “A tiger trap presents a hazard not only to the tiger, but to man.”

    “BAITING INTO MORAL HAZARD”

    1) I lend you money at usurious prices that will entrap you.

    2) I lend you money or extend you credit to gamble.

    3) I lend you money or extend you credit to buy alcohol or drugs.

    4) A woman implies access to friendship, affection, or sex, which she will never deliver.

    5) I promise you life after death if you obey and undermine the upper classes. (abrahamism)

    6) I promise you power and equality if you undermine the political system (marx)

    7) I promise you equality if you undermine men (feminism)

    8) I promise you status if you undermine the status hierarchy (postmodernism)

    9) I appeal to your morality and pass the hart cellar immigration act.

    These are all lies that bait you into hazard (risk and loss).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 08:15:00 UTC