Source: Facebook

  • THE SUM OF OUR DIFFERENCES MEME 1) Sum of Our Differences: Normative Commons are

    THE SUM OF OUR DIFFERENCES MEME

    1) Sum of Our Differences: Normative Commons are constructed of continuous payments of forgone opportunities to take discounts

    2) Sum of Our Differences: Normative Commons are constructed of continuous payments of forgone opportunities to take discounts.

    This is one of the opposition’s techniques: offering discounts in order to escape payments for the commons. In other words, they preach cheating.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 16:07:00 UTC

  • Sum of Our Differences: Normative Commons are constructed of continuous payments

    Sum of Our Differences: Normative Commons are constructed of continuous payments of forgone opportunities to take discounts. #mattyglesias


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 16:02:00 UTC

  • Sum of our differences: “There is a difference between promise of return on a co

    Sum of our differences: “There is a difference between promise of return on a cost, and a promise of a discount avoiding one.” #mattyglesias


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 16:01:00 UTC

  • NO AUTHORITIES, NO MONOPOLIES. ONLY MARKETS An old friend from Ottawa Canada who

    NO AUTHORITIES, NO MONOPOLIES. ONLY MARKETS

    An old friend from Ottawa Canada who I both respect and like very much, inspired me to explain my research program in contextual terms. I think it’s worth repeating.

    —” I should say that I still view your politics, views on society, and race to be profound anathema to everything I believe in – but I miss the challenges you presented too.”—

    You see, I sympathize with moral men, seeking to do good, from any point of the political compass, any tribe, any race. I just prefer that we seek to find voluntary means of voluntary exchange to construct commons, rather than to find authoritarian monopolies with which to construct commons. Any ideology under majoritarian rule is by definition an authoritarian position that advances one’s interests against those of others. I don’t seek my authority, any one else’s, nor to tolerate the authority of others.

    Hence my research program goals:



    I do my job. It’s only by the truth that we create a market for compromise between reproductive strategies, that is free of fraud.

    To a very large degree, that is what I see myself engaged in the process of doing: creating a formal logic of social science independent of experiential valuation – a valuation that is nothing more than a measure of agreement or disagreement with reproductive strategy over which we have little or no control, and even less influence.

    I know it is easy to look at my contrarianism as an appeal for an opposite position – but I am the opposite of a totalitarian – in fact, I seek to construct a market for the exchange of commons that forces compromises and exchanges rather than the current continuous reinforcement of extremes that is caused by majoritarian monopoly representative democracy. I seek to restore a market of exchanges between the classes that existed prior to classical liberalism.

    Moreover, the hard right has picked up on my work and is running with it. And the truth is, they are fine with the compromise. What they are not fine with is a perpetuation of postmodern propaganda and lying, cultural conquest, genocide of their people, and a second conversion of rome to a second pseudoscientific rather than mystical christianity.

    So my “no more lies” is a campaign for ending a century and a half of lying, propaganda, and pseudoscience. And restoring rule of law, a market for commons, and the norm of truth telling.

    Which, is somewhat difficult of a position to oppose without justifying nearly any action no matter how extreme of one’s opposition.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 15:28:00 UTC

  • It’s Logical that some groups of people, lacking aesthetic ability, would practi

    It’s Logical that some groups of people, lacking aesthetic ability, would practice gossip as their art.

    Once you realize that ‘the others’ have weaponized the feminine reproductive and intellectual strategy, you understand them and women much more clearly.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 15:09:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 10:49:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 10:01:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://t.co/yLOf7Ibet9

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 10:01:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 10:00:00 UTC

  • Um. Can I make an honest, arrogant and impolitic statement? They’re our jews. Yo

    Um. Can I make an honest, arrogant and impolitic statement?

    They’re our jews. You can’t kill them. You can’t have them. They’re ours. Yes they have been a more of a disaster than a benefit for all of mankind for the 19th and 20th centuries. Just as they were more of a disaster than benefit for all of mankind before the 19th and 20th centuries.

    But they are a disaster only because we did not know how to limit their parasitic instinctual and cultural behavior when living off the opportunities of a high trust society. However, we do now. So since we know how, we can force them into good and productive behavior, like we have forced everyone else into good and productive behavior.

    Now, they won’t like it. Just as we won’t like having to pay the cost of truthful speech in matters of the commons. Incremental suppression of parasitism is a technology in philosophy and law that must keep pace with innovations in parasitism. But when you deny people survival via parasitism and turn their talents to productive work, they produce goods as expertly as they previously produced bads.

    So my “OMG DID YOU JUST SAY THAT?” position is that they’re an asset if they cannot engage in parasitism. Not that they’re going to like the impact not only the prohibition on parasitism will have on them in our countries, but around the world.

    But that’s OK. That’s what they need to learn in order to have their own reformation and to complete their own enlightenment. Just as truth telling is how we complete our enlightenment.

    So they’re ours. They’re useful. We paid a high price for keeping them. And their ours. Sorry. Hand’s off our assets. OK? 😉

    (yeah. I definitely tried to say that with sarcastic inflammatory humor. But sarcastic humor aside, that’s actually my position.)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 08:12:00 UTC