Source: Facebook

  • LETS KEEP PRAISE OF PUTIN TO WHAT HE’S ACTUALLY DOING WELL (from Elsewhere) Well

    LETS KEEP PRAISE OF PUTIN TO WHAT HE’S ACTUALLY DOING WELL

    (from Elsewhere)

    Well, lets just say that American Utopianism is a failed experiment because only Protestants have been able to construct a high trust society. The Anglo mythos is that oppressed people need to be free, rather than strong government and strong institutions are require in low trust societies in order to maintain any semblance of order.

    American (and Anglo) utopianism has worked where it spread consumer capitalism (property rights, contracts, rule of law, fiat money and credit). But the Democratic experiment has been a catastrophe. Democratic utopianism has failed because only Germanic peoples have been able to construct a high trust society reasonably free of corruption.

    Other societies cannot do this without generations of a functional middle class, and as aggressive a campaign to suppress the rates of reproduction of the lower classes, and prohibition on cousin marriage. The west hung 1% of people a year for most of its history. They starved those who were unproductive over harsh winters.

    So it is disingenuous for westerners to criticize the harsh punishment of developing societies. It was only since 1900 that the west stopped aggressive use of hanging, and it has led to vast numbers of incarcerated peoples.

    Most other polities cannot imagine a society with as little small crime as america has. This is because of aggressive prosecution in order to preserve their high trust society and the economic velocity that results from it. America has much violent crime among its minorities, but about the same violent crime as Europe among whites.

    So american high trust society is dying from aggressive immigration of underclasses that reverse 3000 years of history – it was started in the 1960s by our ‘left’ (socialists) as a means to seize power by immigration where they could not achieve it in a predominantly germanic country by persuasion and propaganda.

    Putin is a reasonably good Czar who has managed to seize most of the heavy industry in the country for personal purposes. Most of those personal purposes are designed to restore Russia to what he considers its history (despite the rather murderous history of the Soviets, Ivan the Terrible, and the Mongols.)

    If Putin were simply HONEST and said “I must do this to change my society” most of the world would agree with him.

    If Putin had purchased Crimea from Ukraine (by asking the west to force the deal – they would have) for discounted oil and gas, he would not have caused the entire western world to pivot to contain Russia again in fear that another group of soviet lunatics had seized power. Instead eastern Europe is simply waiting for the ability to acquire nuclear weapons to keep Moscow at bay. This was foolish.

    If Putin simply stated why he was doing what he does the world would agree with him because westerners KNOW that democracy has failed us. We KNOW that decadence has been spread by our left and its alliance with feminism.

    If Putin would stop the RT propaganda that is totally fabricated then the western conservatives would support the growth of Russian power as the SAVIOR of the west rather than anther lunatic they need to contain.

    If Putin stayed on message that the western liberal model has been a failure he would lead the world, not by fear of lunacy, but by being THE ONLY RATIONAL MAN STANDING.

    There is no need to LIE when you are RIGHT, and when everyone AGREES with you. It’s ridiculous.

    Thankfully Syria has provided a means for Russia to obtain a Pipeline south, and taken responsibility from the states for policing the muslim world. Also this lets Putin demonstrate wisdom and strength to his people, and allow Russian warriors to gain some experience, without scaring neighbors further and causing more damage to the Russian economy.

    The Russian empire can never expand into the east again. it was a disaster the last time. Soviet Occupation was intolerable and the people of eastern Europe fear Russians more than they ever feared nazis.

    However, all of the islamic world needs adult supervision and Russia is the only adult in the neighborhood. And pretty clearly, utopian westerners are unfit to parent primitive peoples into modernity.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 09:42:00 UTC

  • A RUSSIAN CRITIC OF PUTIN ADVISES PRO PUTIN LIBERTARIANS The thing that bothers

    A RUSSIAN CRITIC OF PUTIN ADVISES PRO PUTIN LIBERTARIANS

    The thing that bothers me is the theft of your business if you build one. The Putin Oligarchs are fine for the poor, but not for the entrepreneurial class. And therefore not eventually for anyone.

    ——–

    (POSTED NOT LINKED) I CANNOT FIGURE OUT HOW TO LINK TO IT. SO HERE IS THE COPY AND PASTE

    Vera Kichanova shared Tatiana Moroz’s post — feeling angry.

    November 22 at 3:51pm · Kyiv ·

    I am mad as hell. A friend of mine and a libertarian star Tatiana Moroz asked her fb friends (mostly American libertarians) what they think about Putin https://www.facebook.com/tatiana.moroz/posts/10153258040193595. Many answered they “trust him 100%” because he is “anti-communist” and “opposing New World Order”. As a person who has lived under Putin most of my life (I was 9 when he came to power for the first time) I have a lot to say in response to this:

    “Modern Russia is much less socialist than the US and Putin is blantly anti communist.”

    Some westerners admire Putin for being “not openly a communist”. Well, I fondly hoped that whenever statism changes its name libertarians can still recognize it. Half of Russian economy is officially owned by state, and all the big monopolies that are de jure private actually belong to Putin’s friends, relatives or judo sparring partners—and now their children are already being appointed executives, thus, half of Russian economy is ruled by few dynasties.

    At the same time, when someone creates a successful business and refuses to play by their rules, they find a way to take it away in favor of someone more loyal. See the story of Pavel Durov, a libertarian hero who created a “Russian Facebook”, the major IT-company in Russia, and was forced to sell it to Putin’s friend after he refused to show the personal data of some Ukrainian activists (he is in exile now) http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandcu…/…/24279/1/pavel-durov

    A very popular argument for Putin being “anti-communist” is a flat taxation in Russia. Yes, that was a great improvement made during his first term, and it was implemented by his former economic advisor Andrei Illarionov, now a Cato Senior Fellow and a prominent Putin’s critic. Ten years ago (!) he resigned declaring that “Russia has become a different country. It is no longer a democratic country. It is no longer a free country”. There are no free market supporters in Putin’s administration now.

    But even if you prefer symbols to actions, a modern Russian ideology is still a mix of Stalinism and Orthodoxy. Other post-communist countries (like Baltic states and now Ukraine) have gone through decommunization process, but not Russia. The main street in almost every town is still called Lenin Street. Moscow authorities are planning to rebuild a monument of Felix Dzerzhinsky, founder of the Soviet secret police and the most bloody person in our history. The head of state is a former KGB officer, and there is no such thing as a “former KGB man”. None of the top officials who were Communist Party members in Soviet times (and most of them were) ever renounced the communist ideology.

    At the same time, the Russian Orthodox Church has become an influential political force. The Cossacks were allowed to “patrol the morals” in the streets. The construction of 200 (!) new churches in Moscow was sponsored by the Moscow government. One can receive a prison term for offending “religious feelings” of other people http://www.telegraph.co.uk/…/Russia-introduces-jail-terms-f… Further, religious education is mandatory in all Russian schools. The Russian Patriarch calls Putin’s reign a “miracle of God”.

    As you probably know, two years ago a famous “gay propaganda law” was enacted making it illegal to equate straight and gay relationships and to show public affection. Soon after I and my fellows were beaten for “looking gay” in a bar owned by a representative of Moscow’s mayor. Three months later, my friend from Petersburg was attacked by two masked men at the meeting for the LGBT community. He sustained serious damage in one eye after being shot with a pneumatic pistol http://www.politico.com/…/03/russia-putin-lgbt-violence-116… Do I have to mention that Russian investigators refused to search for the thugs in both cases?

    Russia is a de-facto single-party state, just like the USSR. The laws on the majority of issues are being passed unanimously, since, as the State Duma speaker famously said, the “parliament is no place for discussions.” Independent parties are not allowed to participate in elections. Last summer, I was attacked by unknown criminals who broke my street booth and tore all the signatures I had collected in support of myself as a candidate for Moscow City Council.

    “The media will always demonize Putin because they work for “The Man” whose agenda is complete world dominance. Putin is one of a few remaining leaders who is standing in the way. The people of Russia, for the most part, are very happy with him. Not the brainwashed ones who are all for “globalism”.”

    Not brainwashed, right? The first thing Putin did when he became president was taking control over the media. Every country-wide channel now is controlled by the government, including your favorite Russia Today, which receives $300 million dollars from the Russian government every year. The opposition blogs are routinely blacklisted and online news outlets censored. For instance, Russian Wikipedia was temporarily blocked because of the article “Cannabis smoking”, a number of Bitcoin-related websites were blacklisted because “it contributes to shadow economy”, and my article on Siberia was blocked as promoting separatism http://studentsforliberty.org/…/journalist-vera-kichanova-…/

    As for anti-Putin movement, in 2011, we had the biggest civil uprising since the 1990s. As a result, 28 demonstrators were accused of inciting a riot and violence against the police—not celebrated opposition leaders but a random selection of the 100,000 protesters. In fact, Russian government set up this lottery to make us all afraid. “For an injured policeman, the liver of demonstrators should be smeared on the asphalt”, said Putin’s spokesman.

    Now, if a protester is detained for the second time, he or she risks receiving up to five years in prison. By the way, I have been arrested six times for peacefully protesting and once as a reporter http://www.forbes.com/…/ive-been-arrested-at-six-anti-puti…/ Despite that, 50,000 of my fellow countrymen went out in the streets of Moscow last year in protest of our government’s aggressive actions in Crimea. Have you seen it on Russia Today? No need to ask.

    “[Putin] seems to be the only head of state in power that uses common sense.. .also seems like he actually cares for the well being of humanity…”

    “He’s for restoring and preserving his nation. That’s more than I can say for our leader!”

    “Surely Russia’s wealth has increased and he’s not exactly imposing his footprint that much, although there are certainly some questionable issues on his foreign policy I’m sure

    Questionable issues, really?!

    Putin admitted that Russian troops took over Crimea, removing any doubt that it was an occupation and not a popular uprising. (The same kind of referendum is illegal in Russia: public calls for actions violating the territorial integrity of country are punishable by 4 years in prison.) Many separatists fighting in Ukraine are Russian citizens, some of their commanders formerly served for Russian special services. If you need more facts on Russia’s regime comparing to Ukraine I recommend you to read this: http://libertarian-party.ru/…/an-appeal-to-western-libertar…

    In addition, Russian military budget is the second largest in the world. Russia, by the way, still has a conscription army, and many those fighting in Ukraine and Syria are subject to a military draft. Journalists who investigated secret burials of Russians paratroopers killed in Ukraine were severely attacked

    http://www.rferl.org/…/russia-pskov-politicia…/26558191.html Russian officials, however, finally admitted there were regular army soldiers in Ukraine, but said they were fighting voluntarily while being “on vacation.”

    “Anytime the US media demonizes someone there’s something good about them.”

    Would you join ISIS just because Obama said it’s evil? The enemy of my enemy is not always my friend. I don’t want to spend my whole life proving this obvious thing, and I’d appreciate if you help me to spread the truth.

    Don’t be Confused Pro-Putin Libertarians, please.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 08:33:00 UTC

  • ON SO CALLED BANNED BOOKS THAT ARE MERELY INCOMPETENT (re: RT story on supposedl

    ON SO CALLED BANNED BOOKS THAT ARE MERELY INCOMPETENT

    (re: RT story on supposedly banned books that aren’t)

    Cosmopolitan (Ashkenazi) Marxist Critique in the form of Conspiracy Theories that can be explained as rational political incentives necessary to constrain the murderous expansion of Cosmopolitan (Ashkenazi) Marxist World Communism, by immoral people who have no moral intuitions, and no moral tradition, and no history of their own ability to hold territory against encroaching evil.

    Some of the easiest markers of ‘critique’ are (a) the heaping of undue praise not met by market evidence, (b) the use of loaded and framed language rather than the analysis of rational incentives of the individuals involved (c) the use of moral argument instead of economic argument, (d) emphasis on the criticism of competing ideas rather than defense of the proposed idea.

    The person being interviewed demonstrates all four of these (a, b,c, d) methods of Cosmopolitan (Ashkenazi) Marxist Critique, as well as borderline schizophrenic paranoia.

    Books are marginalized because they demonstrate leaps of logic only possible for the borderline schizophrenic. That is because conspiracy theories that can be explained by Occam’s Razor as the result of rational incentives by normal moral people, can ONLY be analyzed as does the speaker and the books’ authors as the bias of borderline schizophrenic minds.

    I’ll tell you all you need to know about the CIA: It’s a bunch of nerds trying to collect gossip and rumor in order to prevent the politicians from fantasizing just like this speaker does. The purpose of intelligence is to CONSTRAIN political action whenever possible. And that’s what the nerds pretty much do.

    This man will undoubtably be ignored just as all the books he mentions, as well as all his ilk are. Because they’re laughable.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 06:44:00 UTC

  • SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY

    http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 05:35:00 UTC

  • VERY SHORT COURSE IN DECIDABILITY It’s very simple. Is the information sufficien

    http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/07/30/a-very-short-course-in-decidability/A VERY SHORT COURSE IN DECIDABILITY

    It’s very simple. Is the information sufficient or must I add it? (The Axiom of Choice)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 05:34:00 UTC

  • SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING (worth repeating)

    http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/09/26/a-short-course-in-propertarian-reasoning/A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 05:33:00 UTC

  • THREE CULTS The cult of consumption (progressive-feminine)- Gossip – Optimism Th

    THREE CULTS

    The cult of consumption (progressive-feminine)- Gossip – Optimism

    The cult of production (libertarian-masculine) – Exchange – Utility

    The cult of saving (conservative-masculine) – Force – Pessimism

    The intertemporal division of reproductive perception, cognition, labor.and advocacy.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 05:31:00 UTC

  • THE CHURCH OF TED Why does TED function as a ‘Church’ for progressives? (Because

    THE CHURCH OF TED

    Why does TED function as a ‘Church’ for progressives?

    (Because TED sells the promise of infinite bounty – consumption without constraint).

    And there are no heterosexual males involved in its production.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 05:27:00 UTC

  • THE TRUTH VIRUS It’s really fascinating to watch Truth, High Trust, and various

    THE TRUTH VIRUS

    It’s really fascinating to watch Truth, High Trust, and various other ideas working their way across the web into different arguments. I hear echoes of this or that almost every day.

    We are so privileged to live in this era and participate in one of the great shifts in human history.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 02:33:00 UTC

  • SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIANISM’S TESTIMONIAL TRUTH (worth repeating)

    http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIANISM’S TESTIMONIAL TRUTH

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 02:19:00 UTC