Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • spook gossip is that Russia is using the Syrian conflict to add troops and weapo

    —-spook gossip is that Russia is using the Syrian conflict to add troops and weapons into Ukraine, and that an initiative is building—-

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 01:55:00 UTC

  • THE TRUTH —The Truth was enough to create the west, and it is enough to restor

    THE TRUTH

    —The Truth was enough to create the west, and it is enough to restore the west. But we must suppress the liars as we have murder, violence, theft, and fraud. That is because like air, land, and sea, information is a precious commons that cannot tolerate pollution if truth is to survive.—

    Punish the wicked. We require truth. If requiring fails, what follows is bloody constraint: hand, fist and boot, whip, noose, cross, fire, impale.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 01:54:00 UTC

  • see this kind of thing every day, and I just cant understand it. motherhood stil

    http://www.kaotic.com/video/W9uGMoI4_2016108121857I see this kind of thing every day, and I just cant understand it. motherhood still in the horse and cart era.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 17:13:00 UTC

  • (memories) I remember being at 4H camp, I was no more than maybe 13? And the pri

    (memories)

    I remember being at 4H camp, I was no more than maybe 13?

    And the prize we won at the competition that day, was that the ‘grownup’ girl counsellors would tuck us in kiss us good night.

    I didn’t think that was terribly good at the time.

    I can still smell her hair, and feel her kiss on my cheek, and the pressure of the sheets and blankets as she tucked me in.

    I was probably stunned and stupified for a week…

    Not erotic at all. Just stunned.

    It was awesome. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 13:43:00 UTC

  • OUR NUMBERS INCREASE SLOWLY BUT SURELY Well, we have a number of people trying t

    OUR NUMBERS INCREASE SLOWLY BUT SURELY

    Well, we have a number of people trying to catch up to the present by reading the web site.

    And it seems that we have someone who has sufficient knowledge to grasp the sum of propertarianism and testimonialism Unfortunately this fellow does not want to be public here on Facebook, even though he’s active on reddit. But given the questions he’s asking me and the criticisms he’s putting forth I’d have to argue that he’s got it. Which is no trivial task.

    He confirms the common sense judgement that we should value STEM degrees and treat the rest as recreation.

    I don’t have a good grasp of how long it takes to learn it. I suspect that if you have been taught to be a scientist, and have also had the good fortune to study a bit of the philosophy of science, and do some non-trivial programming, and especially exposure to Austrian economics, it’s probably a bit easier.

    I think if you have enough general knowledge to understand the explanatory power you can make use of the arguments even if you cannot construct them.

    I think if you can intuit that the arguments propose a viable solution for western man, that you can act upon them with confidence.

    Not everyone has to master every level of understanding any more than people who fight for marxism can argue marxist economics and class theory.

    In the end, we merely need to act together.

    And in that end, we win.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 12:58:00 UTC

  • post. I’ll add a little context by way of political economy, and say that the wo

    https://medium.com/@gutanaka/there-is-something-extraordinary-happening-10492495c715#.rlfvpy4sqHeartwarming post.

    I’ll add a little context by way of political economy, and say that the world (a)first organized by household and slaves in the agrarian era by kinship relations, then (b) organized militarily and monarchally for the unskilled for the seasonal production cycle with extended relations, (c) then industrially and socialistically for the semi-skilled medium term production cycle of heavy capital and long term medium term relationships between firms, and is (d) currently organizing entrepreneurially and social democratically for the educated ‘discretionary worker’ for short term production cycles, highly distributed capital, and temporary networks of firms wherever it can do so.

    But meanwhile (a) labor was never of much value in contrast to organizing production, and is of still declining value (b) marginal difference in firms was created by capital, and is now created by talent and creativity, (c) the duration of organizations (firms) has continued to decline along with the duration of networks of production. (d) Those countries playing catch-up will not sustain their growth because (e) institutions (trust and corruption) prevent them from doing so. So good institutions are less valuable than not having bad institutions. Worse, it appears that (f) good genetic capital is not as important as not having bad genetic capital. As France is illustrating, you can reverse the Flynn effect (benefit from transitioning from many individual rules to few simple general scientific principles of universal applicability).

    We are engaged in the third world war at present, and it has no sign of improvement. And neither temporary networks of production nor the governments that facilitate may be able to survive the combination of a third world war, a slowing of growth, and a continued expansion of population of the underclasses for whom gainful labor is decreasingly available.

    Not trying to rain on your parade, but the reverse side of the coin is just as frightening as the obverse is inspiring.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 12:23:00 UTC

  • What don’t I understand? Other than games – including the piloting of machines –

    What don’t I understand?

    Other than games – including the piloting of machines – what good are vr headsets?

    I see the value of overlays. I can see getting so used to magicleap that I can’t travel without it.

    I can’t see the value in immersion other than for games

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 10:36:00 UTC

  • OBJECTIVE GOOD VS SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCE (the thrust of this argument is a confla

    OBJECTIVE GOOD VS SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCE

    (the thrust of this argument is a conflation of good and preference, and my opponent’s presumption that because of that conflation there are no ‘goods’. This may be a bit hard to parse, but there are objective goods.)

    I think it is that I simply failed to provide sufficient touch stones so that you would draw the conclusions on your own.

    In other words the argument I make is a necessary one. And that is why it’s an is.

    That might take a bit but we will get there.

    —” I would add my surprise to see you mention at the end that this is all about how things are and not should be.”— Mark

    I Think you’re referring to this statement:

    —“(g) as far as I know I am explaining what men do (is), not what they should do (should).”—

    Which in the context I mean that men do what they must do. what they must do is what they in fact do (“is”). And what they should do is what they must do, and do (“should”). In other words, there is no difference between must, can, is and should. Or better stated, “Man justifies his group evolutionary strategy, whatever it is – he survives.”

    —“I see you started out apparently very much talking about good/bad in a thread on political views necessarily based on moral views. So…?”—

    So instead I am stating that moral principles necessary for in-group cooperation and are universal necessities (subject to limits), and that despite local variation in the portfolio of norms necessary for the purposes of competition, production, free rider prevention, and rent seeking, that must, can, is, and should are identical propositions.

    The only question is cooperation between groups with different portfolios that are incompatible. In compatibility is universally decidable by property rights independent of local variation in the portfolio. And this also is what we see men do in reality.

    So objective morality – rules necessary for rational beneficial voluntary cooperation – is universal.

    –“good”— Mark

    Now what is the difference between “preference” and “good”? Well I can prefer something I can experience myself. We can say that fulfilling a preference feels good. We can also say that something is good even if it isn’t immediately preferable.

    So to avoid confusion, lets say that **a preference is an experiential good, and a good is either an non-experiential intertemporal personal benefit, or objectively decidable interpersonal benefit.**

    –“starting point”— Mark

    So, i start with the first question of “why don’t I kill you and take your stuff”. The first question of ethics.

    The answer is then one of short and long run costs versus benefits. As long as one’s opponents promise greater cost than reward, we choose cooperation or boycott – if we can choose boycott.

    From there, to the disproportionate rewards of cooperation assuming predation is costly. Or as biological evolution has informed us: we possess the intuitive ability to both imitate, and beyond imitate to empathize, and beyond empathize to cooperate, and beyond cooperation to anticipate demand for cooperation. We evolved it because cooperation is disproportionately rewarding. But when we cooperate we must prevent free riders from undermining the incentive to cooperate – hence the human intuition to punish free riders (cheaters) even at high personal cost.

    If a group decides that survival is not ‘good’ (bearing a cost of an intertemporal and directly imperceptible forecast subject to risk) and does not survive then it is not ‘good’ for others to imitate it if they wish to survive. Hence over time, good is defined as what others can imitate in order to survive. So, good is an evolutionary imperative, not a preference. A preference may feel good by analogy but it is not an abstract ‘good’ – a value judgement.

    ie: subjective preferences and objective goods are different things. And those goods that are in fact ‘good’ are objectively ascertainable over time independent of subjective preference.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 10:10:00 UTC

  • “Kerry reminds agreement crafted to avoid Congress…”— Now, (a) why is any ci

    —“Kerry reminds agreement crafted to avoid Congress…”—

    Now, (a) why is any circumvention of the division of powers tolerable?

    And, (b) why doesn’t doing such a thing end one in prison, including every individual involved in crafting it?

    WE NEED SOME BURNING CROSSES

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 08:43:00 UTC

  • REDUCING H.B.D. TO RULE OF LAW I think the tide has changed and that HBD has won

    REDUCING H.B.D. TO RULE OF LAW

    I think the tide has changed and that HBD has won out over “The Great Boazian Lie”.

    My position on HBD is:

    1) the majority of differences between the great tribes (races) is in the rates of reproduction of the lower classes. Or conversely, the rates of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses and the concentration of reproduction in the middle and upper classes.

    2) that sexual maturity regulates aggression and impulse and time preference.(humans are no different from foxes or any other creature). Hence the increasing aggression (and penis size) from east asian, northern whites(Ukrainian), southern(Iranian) whites, arabs, and africans.

    3) cranial size effects intelligence disproportionately since intelligence is largely a function of memory.

    4) there appears to be a difference in the evolution of different brain agents (language in particular) and in cooperation (frontal lobe) that is expressed in the races, and verbal self expression both limits frustration and increases cooperation.

    5) raw athletic ability decreases with decreases in sexual maturity.

    THEREFORE

    The problem for any society to solve is largely one of reducing the relative size of the individuals below what we consider 106IQ today, and a target for any polity should be a distribution no less that 115, and preferably 125 if we wish to see ‘Star Trek’ – whereas the current downward trend is producing a devolution to a future of ‘Favelas’.

    WORSE

    It is possible that we have passed peak human, since it is very difficult to cleans defective genes from a polity, and intelligence is comprised of a complex set of genetic biases.

    EXAMPLES

    China surpasses india both because of superior suppression of the underclasses, and superior ability of the red army to force literacy.

    The west succeeded because of (a) Aristocratic egalitarianism (b) martial truth (d) dramatic culling of the lower classes both by starvation, access to land, and aggressive hanging.

    You do not so much improve your population as limit the harm done to it by the lower classes.

    This is a consistent theme that I’ve discovered in most of my work: we do not know the truth but we know falsehood. WE do not know goods but we know bads. We cannot breed better men, we can only stop bad men from breeding more.

    The EUGENICS program was perhaps the most important objective of western man, and the failure of it due to women and pseudosciences was the second catastrophe.

    1) The Enlightenment fallacy of oppressed man vs eugenic civilization.

    2) The Enlightenment undermining of monarchy, aristocracy, instead of addition of new houses for newly participatory classes.

    3) The enfranchisement of women and women’s advocacy of enfranchising slaves as a means of gaining their own enfranchisement.

    4) The Jewish Cosmopolitan Pseudoscientific movement as an attempt to create a second Religion for women and slaves (underclasses): Boaz(sociology), Marx(economics), Freud (psychology), Frankfurt School (politics).

    5) The Anglo attack on german civilization in the first war. The anglo attack on german civilization in the second war, and failure of Germany to restore european civilization to aristocratic, aesthetic, and egalitarian origins.

    6) The adoption of the Pseudoscientific Religion by the Academy, State, Media complex and its appeal to women in academy: as revenue, state voting as power, and consumer consumption of goods as revenue. (a degree in other than STEM fields appears to be nothing more than a modern sale of Indulgences to build universities instead of churches.)

    7) The 1965/66 Immigration law by which the Women, Blacks, Jews, the Pseudoscientific Religion of the Academy, State, Media complex sought to achieve through depopulation (destruction of the family) and immigration (invasion) what they could not achieve by propaganda.

    8) The failure of the masculine, familial, conservative, libertarian, and scientific thought leadership to produce a body of thought to counter the second use of women as a means of distributing the Pseudoscientific Revolution’s attempt at the Second Great Lie (pseudoscience) second only to the First Great Lie (monotheism). (Which Propertarianism and Testimonialism, Genetic and Cognitive science, plus a century of recorded damage to civilization help to overturn.)

    9) the great wealth to be made from the conquest and sale of the North American (US/Canadian), and Australian continents, has been interpreted as a property of American Democracy rather than american democracy is a temporary luxury made possible by the rather ridiculous wealth from the 300 year long sale of the Continent to immigrants. And while we were limited to immigration of middle class gene pools without access to land from above the Hanjal line, we now are engaged in a pollution of all forms of capital. (the same applies to Russia by the way.)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 06:03:00 UTC