http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/690836431040843776/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=690836431040843776#Conservative #AltRight #NRx #libertarian https://t.co/qNABSd4TMg
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 05:00:00 UTC
http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/690836362602373120/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=690836362602373120#Conservative #AltRight #NRx #libertarian https://t.co/jPP0SvtSQO
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 05:00:00 UTC
http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/690836275402821632/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=690836275402821632#Conservative #AltRight #NRx #libertarian https://t.co/vLX8GTeGz9
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 04:59:00 UTC
http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/690836074285891584/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=690836074285891584#Conservative #AltRight #NRx #libertarian https://t.co/yoOdsq4HWu
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 04:58:00 UTC
THEY ARE TRYING TO CREATE A SET (State without causality) OUT OF AN EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM. A LAW OF SETS RATHER THAN AN EVER-EXPANDING MODEL.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 04:25:00 UTC
KRIPKE like all cosmopolitans (enlightenment jews) Including Wittgenstein (and we see that eventually Russel figures it out that its a dead end), is not trying to create science (describe reality) like a Teuton/Aryan/European. THEY ARE TRYING TO CREATE A BOOK OF LAW. A verbalism.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 04:24:00 UTC
SAUL KRIPKE MAKES THE SAME COSMOPOLITAN ERROR AS WITTGENSTEIN.
(for critical rationalists, critical realists, philosophers of science, and professional or semi-professional philosophers this is important)
I knew I would figure it out. Sounds, Meaning, Law, “Platonism”. And he is not a naturalist or materialist. (Although these terms in themselves are operationally insufficient.)
DOOLITTLE (TESTIMONIALISM)
A deterministic universe > changes in state > operations > experiences > descriptive names of (a)subjective experiences **or** <b>objective experiences **or** (c)operations(repeatable) > common names(justificationary/meaning) > necessary names(critical/truth).
This follows the standard epistemological sequence: free-association > hypothesis(justificationary) > theory(critical) > Law.
The Problem of Ideal Types rather than Supply Demand Curves is everywhere in western thought.
And it has four origins:
1) Natural human tendency for simplicity in comparisons. (discounting)
2) Monotheistic universalism seeking of ideals (moral laws)
3) Moral rationalism seeking of ideals (moral-legal laws)
4) Mathematics (particularly geometry).
5) Ideal Types, General Rules, Theories : without limits and full accounting.
The universe equilibrates. There are no unlimited non tautological (non trivial) theories. (natural phenomenon are analogous to distributions with strange tails). And human behavior and cognition function by supply and demand curves – NOT distributions, and NOT ideal types.
Weber was SO CLOSE.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 04:22:00 UTC
Before and during college I used to love working Saturdays in retail, and have Sunday and Monday off.
On Saturday I would only have to think about customers – not corporate stuff. Customers are not in ‘work mode’ when they talk to you. There is less general ‘noise’ from the street traffic and bustle.
I worked in commercial art and printing supplies. So it’s not like I was selling clothes or pizza. People were either hobbyists or professional artists or designers, or architects or engineers, or students. So I was dealing with an interesting class of people. And at that time, it was a manual rather than software craft. It took quite a bit of work to do the most basic thing.
People are much less well behaved in public today. We have far more underclass participating in retail. So it’s not the same experience. Amercians are more selfish and feel more privileged, so it is a less pleasant one.
I am not one of those people who gets tired of customers. I like solving their problems. I have never had a problem firing bad customers – even in my teens. “I want to help you. It makes me happy to help you. But I can’t help you if you are unkind to me.” This has always worked in every industry. I don’t talk about duty or respect. I talk about care and kindness.
( And if you have ever been opposite me in hostile negotiations you know that I am not pleased by them but I have a ‘talent’ for them. I hold the moral high ground. And win or lose that is the right action for me. )
I have always found greater comfort in the presence of calm crowds, whether in the campus union reading, or in the shopping mall, or in the open desk area working, or in the coffee shop designing software or writing.
Cause I love my fellow humans.
Every lunatic one of them.
(Even those that need paternalism so that they don’t hurt mankind).
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 03:56:00 UTC
DEBT(RESTITUTION:JUSTICE) VS PARASITISM(INJUSTICE)
(important post)
PARASITISM (EXTRACTION: INJUSTICE : WAR)
Political Parasitism : Forcible Redistribution to non-kin (war).
Political Harm: Forcible Maintenance of Suicidal Commons (war).
Political Debt : Child support, Alimony, Common Property (war).
Usury Debt: Predatory Financing Debt (asymmetric knowledge, unproductive, warrantied (no skin in the game), involuntary, causing externalities) (war)
—VS—
DEBT (RESTITUTION: JUSTICE: COOPERATION)
Debt: Forcible Transfer of Restitution for Non Predatory Debt (fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary, free of externality.)
Restitution Debt: Forcible transfer of restitution.
Punishment Debt: Imposition of costs for betrayal.
The only ‘debt’ is restitution.
Interest must be earned (productive).
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 03:24:00 UTC
(I love to make people laugh. Or smile. Or just feel that the world is sometimes a good place because some of us care about *everyone* in the commons.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 03:15:00 UTC