Source: Facebook

  • “I feel like I need to pop an addy to read any of Curt’s posts.”—Bashar Al Ste

    –“I feel like I need to pop an addy to read any of Curt’s posts.”—Bashar Al Stedman


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-20 18:37:00 UTC

  • IS A RIGHT? (repost) Dec 20, 2019, 6:32 PM

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/13/what-is-a-right-2/WHAT IS A RIGHT?

    (repost)

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/13/what-is-a-right-2/Updated Dec 20, 2019, 6:32 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-20 18:32:00 UTC

  • Dec 20, 2019, 6:31 PM

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-k-parliament-backs-brexit-deal-decisive-step-toward-leaving-n1105601FINALLY!!!Updated Dec 20, 2019, 6:31 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-20 18:31:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline

    Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-20 12:49:00 UTC

  • I don’t know what ‘liberalism’ means any longer. It used to mean constraining go

    I don’t know what ‘liberalism’ means any longer. It used to mean constraining government. But it meant that under parliamentary control. I think the western experiment in ‘aristocracy of everyone’ by continuous expansion of the franchise in order to justify taking political power(organization of the production of private and common) from the monarchy and the church, and to justify the expansion of taxation for the purposes of redistribution – is a clear failure.

    I don’t think you can get away from 1) rule of law and markets for adaptive velocity 2) state-private investment in increasingly complex and expensive investment in competitive innovation, 3) the need for ‘decider of last resort’, whether despot, monarchy, 4) money isn’t real any longer, so it’s just a tool of positive incentive (coercion?) and we will (shortly) see the end of the private global capitalists, and the universal adoption of the chinese method of state money and interest management.

    The liberal order was made possible by the European Colonial Expansion, and the relative weakness of (small) european governments compared to the strength of the emerging middle class, and the vast pool of middle class genetic reserves built up in europe over more than a thousand years. We have been in the post modern order since marx, freud, boas, cantor, adorno, friedan, rothbard/rand, trotsky/neocons sequentially tried to undermine men (marxism), culture (frankfurt), truth (derrida), women (feminism), and the western identity.

    We have been in the post liberal order since the bolsheviks started the revolt against it, and now the muslims are revolting against it – last century the jewish revolt, an this century the muslim revolt. The chinese and russians and now indians have been through their experiment and are returning to world norms. The west is more malinvested in the falsehood because of the jewish postwar influence in the academy to suppress all eugenics (study of human behavior)was successful at displacing the germanic martial aristocratic tradition, by rallying women and minorities using media, academy, democracy, immigration to destroy western civilization with false promise of freedom from darwinian necessity that made western excellences possible.

    Our constitution (Rule of Law of sovereignty and reciprocity ) is not rigid enough (like a scriptural document) to limit our conquest by democratic and propaganda means. ANd we did not understand our traditions we only practiced them. So we were easily sold false promise by sophism, pseudoscience in the modern world like our women and lower classes were sold false promise by sophism and supernaturalism in the ancient world – and this ‘second great failure’ is the end of the possibility of democratic majoritarianism – unless we can prohibit false promise of freedom from natural law from the informational commons. As far as I know there is no optimum social political and economic order, only a sliding scale of what is possible given a genetic distribution and the relative state of development. If it is possible to develop many small monarchies under the same rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity that is the optimum social and political order, as long as the ‘bottom’ is prohibited from reproduction as it was in the ancient world by nature, the middle world by manorialism, ad the present and future world by eugenic policy. Every other order declines in competitive utility from there.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 19:30:00 UTC

  • Emotions are measures of changes in state of property. by Martin Štěpán ( Brando

    Emotions are measures of changes in state of property.

    by Martin Štěpán ( Brandon Hayes)

    Emotions are measures of changes in state of property. When they tell you hate or any other emotion is a crime, they’re trying to convince you your measurements are erroneous and to get you to stop measuring so that they can change the state of your property without obstacle.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 19:25:00 UTC

  • DOES METAPHYSICS EXIST? DEPENDS ON THE DEFINITION. The question is only whether

    DOES METAPHYSICS EXIST? DEPENDS ON THE DEFINITION.

    The question is only whether metaphysics = paradigm. As far as I know it does (must). So to say there is no such thing as metaphysics, is only to say that there is no such thing as relativism. In other words, there is either a most parsimonious paradigm for the description of reality or their isn’t.

    As far as I know there is always and everywhere one most parsimonious and most complete paradigm, and that discipline we call science slowly converges upon it. And that this most parsimonious paradigm always and everywhere will provide decidability between less coherent (complete and consistent) paradigms.

    And the current limitation on progress in physical science is our present failure (or challenge of) creating a language (mathematics or logic of) of geometric rather than point (positional) relations.

    The more obvious demands of protein modeling appear to be working toward a solution to that problem more so than physicists.

    As far as I know social science (cooperation, law, politics) is solved because it’s at human scale. As far as I know economics remains unsolved and is a harder problem than the transition from positional (curves) to geometric (shapes), if for no other reason than we simply can’t create consistent categories so are stuck with bayesian categorization, prediction, falsification, and adaptation, with symmetries (which are showing up in certain economic patterns) providing the intermediary measures that the original data itself cannot.

    So, I don’t see the meaning of a discipline of metaphysics other than the rather obvious demarcation between deflationary (logical, operational, empirical, science) and fictional (allegorical) grammars (vocabularies). And it certainly appears to do nothing more than that.

    The underlying conflict being that the most parsimonious language launders information present in experience. And as we have seen the empathic vs analytic difference in demand for priority on one hand, and a desire for psychological sedation (suppression, mindfulness,) on the other.

    And from my tests over the past two years in particular that (masculine vs feminine cognition ) appears to be impossible to resolve. Which as far as I know is the source of the conflict of the present age, and what’s driving the incentive to separate (or dominate).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 19:03:00 UTC

  • “One of the more striking recent developments in economics has been economists’

    —“One of the more striking recent developments in economics has been economists’ growing acceptance of the idea that globalization has held down pay for a large swath of workers.”

    Automation: “Workers whose labor can be replaced by computers, be they in factories or stores, have paid a particularly steep price.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 17:08:00 UTC

  • A SHORT TIMELINE OF PURCHASING POWER (from visual capitalist) 1900s After the Pa

    A SHORT TIMELINE OF PURCHASING POWER

    (from visual capitalist)

    1900s

    After the Panic of 1907, the National Monetary Commission is established to propose legislation to regulate banking.

    U.S. Money Supply: $7 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: A pair of patent leather shoes.

    1910s

    The Federal Reserve Act is signed in 1913 by President Woodrow Wilson.

    U.S. Money Supply: $13 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: A woman’s house dress.

    1920s

    U.S. dollar bills were reduced in size by 25%, and standardized in terms of design.

    The Fed starts using open market operations as a tool for monetary policy.

    U.S. Money Supply: $35 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: Five pounds of sugar.

    1930s

    To deal with deflation during the Great Depression, the United States suspends the gold standard. President Franklin D. Roosevelt signs Executive Order 6102, which criminalizes the possession of gold.

    By no longer allowing gold to be legally redeemed, this removes a major constraint on the Fed, which can now control the money supply.

    U.S. Money Supply: $46 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: 16 cans of Campbell’s Soup

    1940s

    The massive deficits of World War II are almost financed entirely by the creation of new money by the Federal Reserve.

    Interest rates are pegged low at the request of the Treasury.

    Under Bretton-Woods, the “gold-exchange standard” is adopted.

    U.S. Money Supply: $55 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: 20 bottles of Coca-Cola

    1950s

    The Korean War starts in 1950, and inflation is at an annualized rate of 21%.

    The Fed can no longer manage such low interest rates, and tells the Treasury that it can “no longer maintain the existing situation”.

    U.S. Money Supply: $151 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One Mr. Potato Head

    1960s

    An agreement, called the Treasury-Federal Reserve Accord, is reached to establish the central bank’s independence.

    By this time, U.S. dollars in circulation around the world exceeded U.S. gold reserves. Unless the situation was rectified, the country would be vulnerable to the currency equivalent of a “bank run”.

    U.S. Money Supply: $211 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: Two movie tickets.

    1970s

    In 1971, President Richard Nixon ends direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold.

    The period following the Nixon Shock is uncertain. The federal deficit doubles, stagflation hits, and the oil price skyrockets – all during the Vietnam War.

    Over the decade, the dollar loses 1/3 of its value.

    U.S. Money Supply: $401 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: Three Morton TV dinners.

    1980s

    The stock market crashes in 1987 on Black Monday.

    The Federal Reserve, under newly-appointed Alan Greenspan, issues the following statement:

    “The Federal Reserve, consistent with its responsibilities as the nation’s central bank, affirmed today its readiness to serve as a source of liquidity to support the economic and financial system.”

    The Dow would recover by 1989, with no prolonged recession occurring.

    U.S. Money Supply: $1,560 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One bottle of Heinz Ketchup.

    1990s

    This decade is generally considered to be a time of declining inflation and the longest peacetime economic expansion in U.S. history.

    During this decade, many improvements are made to U.S. paper currency to prevent counterfeiting. Microprinting, security thread, and other features are used.

    U.S. Money Supply: $3,277 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One gallon of milk.

    2000s

    After the Dotcom crash, the Fed drops interest rates to near all-time lows.

    In 2008, the Financial Crisis hits and the Fed begins “quantitative easing”. Later, this would be known as QE1.

    U.S. Money Supply: $4,917 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One Wendy’s hamburger.

    2010-

    After QE1, the Fed holds $2.1 trillion of bank debt, mortgage-backed securities, and Treasury notes. Shortly after, QE2 starts.

    In 2012, it’s time for QE3.

    Purchases were halted in October 2014 after accumulating $4.5 trillion in assets.

    U.S. Money Supply: $13,291 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One song from iTunes.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 16:56:00 UTC

  • FOLLOW THE MONEY: MOST PROFITABLE SECTORS Health the most profitable sector with

    FOLLOW THE MONEY: MOST PROFITABLE SECTORS

    Health the most profitable sector with a 21.6 percent net profit margin. Technology services 17.2 percent net margin were second, narrowly edging past finance 17.1 percent. Electronic technology and consumer nondurables round out the top five.

    Finance and insurance represent 7.4 percent (or $1.5 trillion) of U.S. gross domestic product or 266B.

    Health 3,823, (or 3.8T) 21.6% profit is 826B.

    Tech looks impressive but it doesn’t employ many people. Sort of like electricity., Small market HUGE impact.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 16:02:00 UTC