Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Great interview with TRS tonight. Talked revolution, racism, and women. Always f

    Great interview with TRS tonight. Talked revolution, racism, and women.

    Always fun to have unfiltered man talk. It was hard for me at first. But I get in the groove.

    Great guys. Great time.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-06 15:52:00 UTC

  • We gave our own women a choice. We have the rest of the world a choice. They cho

    We gave our own women a choice.

    We have the rest of the world a choice.

    They chose poorly.

    The experiment failed.

    We can morally abandon hope.

    We can return to evidence.

    We can exchange but not convert.

    We can cooperate but not advance.

    We can use high trust internally but pragmatism with others.

    We can act morally but not optimistically.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-06 15:28:00 UTC

  • Do you read Scott Adams’ blog? He does some good work, and then he says things l

    Do you read Scott Adams’ blog? He does some good work, and then he says things like this which seems like something you’d say:

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-06 07:30:00 UTC

  • 4) Belief is required of followers. 3) Plans required of organizers. 2) Strategy

    4) Belief is required of followers.

    3) Plans required of organizers.

    2) Strategy required of leaders.

    1) Ideas required of Philosophers, Prophets and Kings.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-06 05:14:00 UTC

  • Dear Leftists. You are not safe. You never were. You never can be. That is your

    Dear Leftists. You are not safe. You never were. You never can be. That is your greatest folly. We have been patient. But we will come for you. And when we come for you, we will have no mercy.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 13:14:00 UTC

  • Either he wins and there are a few years of reprieve. Or we revolt and change it

    Either he wins and there are a few years of reprieve. Or we revolt and change it now. I mean. It’s that simple yes?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 13:14:00 UTC

  • Someone I respect, and who has a good mind, has been working through my recommen

    Someone I respect, and who has a good mind, has been working through my recommended reading list. And it’s interesting to see what happens everyone who does either taps out from the strain, or transitions with the experience. I love humans.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 13:12:00 UTC

  • Sometimes we must make hard choices. Because there are no easy choices left to m

    Sometimes we must make hard choices. Because there are no easy choices left to make. When we do, that which we valued above all the day before, we may not value the day after. I am as much a fool as any other fellow. My folly is in things that others find trivial. Just as others folly is in things I find trivial. But I am as guilty of folly as the next man.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 13:10:00 UTC

  • DEFINING REVOLUTION —“A revolution is a rapid, fundamental, and violent domest

    DEFINING REVOLUTION

    —“A revolution is a rapid, fundamental, and violent domestic change in the dominant values and myths of a society, in its political institutions, social structure, leadership. and government activity and policies. Revolutions are thus to be distinguished from insurrections, rebellions, revolts, coups, and wars of independence. A coup d’etat in itself changes only leadership and perhaps policies; a rebellion of insurrection may change policies, leadership, and political institutions, but no social structure and values; a war of independence is a struggle of one community against rule by an alien community and does not necessarily involve changes in the social structure of either community. What is here called simply “revolution” is what others have called great revolutions, grand revolutions, or social revolutions. Notable examples are the French, Chinese, Mexican, Russian, and Cuban revolutions.”— Samuel Huntington

    By Huntington’s criteria, is it revolution I (we) pursue? I did not think so. But at this point I do. For the restoration of truth telling, the suppression of political parasitism, the conversion of information to a commons, the imposition of strict construction, and the imposition of market government, and the eliminationgn of politicians, all are fundamental changes in the postwar feminist/socialist epoch. Even if they are restorations of the anglo saxon order.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 13:08:00 UTC

  • PAIR BONDING VS LOYALTY ( HBD_Chick and Rachael Colleen ) What is the relationsh

    PAIR BONDING VS LOYALTY

    ( HBD_Chick and Rachael Colleen )

    What is the relationship between pair bonding and loyalty?

    We know all groups demonstrate loyalty. It varies only in the nearness of relations, from offspring, to kin, to those we cooperate with, to abstract moral commitment. In other words, we demonstrate kin selection and cooperation selection, and potential cooperation selection, and all else is open to competition, parasitism or predation.

    In other words, is clannishness / pair bonding a discreet behavior in itself, or is it another defense of ‘property’ that we call ‘loyalty’. Are we just protecting investments?

    Is it the case that the more different we are the more valuable is pair bonding? The more similar we are (the more dim we are) the less value is pair bonding? I mean, we know people are attracted to similar value judgements.

    Is there a relationship between iq and pair bonding?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 05:16:00 UTC