Source: Facebook

  • “Bad Boys, Bad Boys, / whatcha gonna do? / whatcha gonna do with a 70 IQ?”— I

    —“Bad Boys, Bad Boys, / whatcha gonna do? / whatcha gonna do with a 70 IQ?”—

    I avoid posting humor but this just made my day.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 09:32:00 UTC

  • MUST READ My central objective in using Jayman’s work is to demonstrate that the

    http://www.unz.com/jman/the-donald-trump-phenomenon-part-1-the-american-nations/A MUST READ

    My central objective in using Jayman’s work is to demonstrate that the data reflects the very obvious conclusion that people vote genetics FIRST and all other properties, even economics, second. Period. MAN IS A MORAL CREATURE FIRST .


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 09:30:00 UTC

  • THE CURE FOR SUGGESTION AND DECEIT. Rationalism was invented to attempt to recon

    THE CURE FOR SUGGESTION AND DECEIT.

    Rationalism was invented to attempt to reconstruct christianity without mysticism. I understand the great deceits. It’s but one of them.

    Rationalism’s Obscurantism and Scriptural Mysticism are similar techniques. The Contemporary version uses propaganda and repetition. But the technique is reducible to suggestion by loading framing and overloading in all three. Suggestion works. The science says that we can’t even defend ourselves from it even if we work hard at it.

    This is why we invented analytic philosophy and operational definitions in science. And why I have completed that project with testimonialism and propertarianism.

    To make suggestion impossible.

    At least to make it impossible in matters of finance, politics and law where it can be so readily used for ill.

    Suggestion is necessary or teaching each other by analogy would be impossible.

    Suggestion is necessary or supposition of intent would be impossible.

    Supposition of intent is necessary or cooperation is impossible.

    Cooperation is necessary or a division of labor and exchange is impossible.

    But in all human cooperation and all transfer there is a difference between suggestion of meaning, and the test of truth.

    We have been, as normal humans, attempting to define a single test of truth for millennia. But we have failed.

    Because epistemology requires the transfer of meaning by suggestion, and the test of truth by criticism.

    As such the single most important solution to communication is to limit the divergence between the means of communicating meaning, and the means of criticizing meaning.

    This is what I believe we, I, have accomplished: to speak in a manner that the least difference between meaning and truth exists.

    This is testimonialism and propertarianism.

    The scientific method is a process of creativity followed by criticism. invention followed by testing. Imagination followed by survival from scrutiny.

    The easiest way to limit suggestion is to refer to existential operations using a continuous point of view.

    Operationalism.

    With the tests of operationalism, we slowly train ourselves to speak the truth, just as we have slowly trained ourselves to speak in the language of science instead of the language of mystical analogy.

    And the benefits of this truthfulness will be as great as the benefits of science.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 08:11:00 UTC

  • DEAR PATRIARCHY I hope it’s OK to ask to work through this with you. We have bee

    DEAR PATRIARCHY

    I hope it’s OK to ask to work through this with you.

    We have been conquered by lies (pseudoscience mostly) distributed to our women and underclasses just as the greeks and roman were conquered by lies (christian authoritarian mysticism) distributed to our women and underclasses. We have lost control of our media, academy, and school due to the perverse incentive of hyper-consumption.

    The best political religion I know of is Roman law. The best common religion is nature and hero worship. The best personal religion is stoicism. And our competitive advantage in the ancient and modern worlds has been truth, trust, commons, technology and war. While in the middle period we were terribly weakened by Christianity. So weak that without the conquest of the viking pagans we would not have survived the ongoing muslim conquest.

    I understand the importance of pulpit and doctrine. But I can find nothing of value in Christianity other than its continuation of natural law, and its institutional emphasis on the family as the unit of production, reproduction, and government.

    Yes, the church introduced (for selfish purposes): The forcible prohibition on inbreeding. The forcible extension of property (legal) rights to women. The persuasive educational introduction of chivalry as a means of absorbing males into the commons. B

    But the creation of northern Europe was the result of manorialism -small business that limited the reproduction of the lower classes and redistributed wealth and reproduction to the middle and upper classes. Combined with the aggressive use of hanging to gradually domesticate the recalcitrant lower classes. The wars and plagues, winters and famines that kept their numbers under control. The rise of the Hansa society and it’s extension of middle class wealth. Our rediscovery of greek and roman thought that brought us advanced science and technology. And the printing press that gave us an advantage over the rest of the world in using this knowledge.

    If anything those countries last to be converted survived far better than those countries first to be converted to christianity. The earlier that they were converted the worse they are today.

    The church like the present state claimed responsibility for virtues while distributing harms. But there is little evidence that the church contributed rather than held back our civilization.

    Today’s pulpit is academy and press. This is a profoundly destructive combination since they distribute hyperconsumption largely to women and the underclasses instead of suppressing the underclasses. In effect, we are **re-wilding** the world, and reversing thousands of years of our ancestor’s domestication of man.

    So when we say ‘return to tradition’, I see the importance of a return to the suppression of the underclasses, a continuation of domestication of the world, a return to the family rather than the individual as the central unit of production and reproduction. An end to the downward redistribution of productivity. An ongoing suppression of impulsivity in the commons. We must render the commons sacred once again and therefore prohibit it from consumption by the hordes.

    The church provided the underclass population with love, care, and insurance. And a modicum of useful information. It was always a tool of the aristocracy in the north. But where the church gained power in the south, the catholic countries, all was worse, and remains so.

    Even venice was just an outpost for the byzantines, and provided their navy. Christianity was just a way of controlling the underclasses. It was decoration not substance.

    The most important institution that developed in Europe was the finance system of the templars, yet the church killed them off in order to relieve its debt. The revolutions against the monarchy were more so against the church ownership of land, and its parasitism than it was against the emergent private state.

    What upset the order was the rifle as much as the industrial revolution. What destroyed our order was grant of equal status to women in the government. It took women 100 years to make use of the work of jewish thinkers once again to destroy our order once again, and bring about another ‘christian’ dark age. Yet this was the result of christian incentives not aristocratic or paternal incentives.

    All religions bind. The value in binding is universal. That is separate from the content and result of teachings. The good in christianity comes from the ritual and the shared teaching that binds us together as a society under an authoritarian, domesticating, paternal order of the family, rather than an egalitarian, dysgenic, feminine order of hyper consumption of all that we have accumulated over the centuries since our ancestors first combined horse, wheel, and bronze into chariot and created the Aristocratic, Paternal Order and began domesticating man.

    So why must we restore that which by the evidence, if not by our Intuition, is part and parcel of our conquest?

    Why not use the church, and alter the experience to teach that which must be learned, to continue our traditional domestication of man? Why not return to the unstated religion of raising man to the transcendent gods we imagine in our myths and legends?

    Why reintroduce the babylonian mysticism that has been so detrimental and that we have worked so hard to escape?

    The germans have at least twice tried to overcome christianity and failed. And it is our anglo CHRISTIANITY that caused them to fail.

    We have been wrong in the english speaking world many times.

    And each time we have been wrong it has been our christianity driving us. And each time we have hurt western civilization it has been in an attempt to constrain our reemergent indo-european pagan intuitions.

    Christianity and Judaism are the reasons we suffer not our salvation. There has been one secret to the success of the west in the ancient and modern worlds, and that is truth, reason, science, a love of nature, and our desire to transcend into the gods we worship.

    We require pulpit, church and canon. But not the destructive one of the byzantines, babylonians, Egyptians and Jews. We have our own gods, heroes, history, and our accomplishments with our own outshine those of all others combined.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute,

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 07:52:00 UTC

  • SICK AGAIN? So monday I travel to Kiev and pick something up. and it takes me un

    SICK AGAIN?

    So monday I travel to Kiev and pick something up. and it takes me until thursday to kick it. I return to Kiev on Friday, work with my partner kirill all day (who has a very unpleasant illness or other) and he makes me ill and I wake up this morning nearly dead. I am just not going to go back to living in a bubble. lol

    Kirill Latysh You literally make me sick. lol 🙂 Damn. I suspect I will lose all productivity this week. sigh…


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 02:48:00 UTC

  • Dacian Draco (@dacian_draco): There Is No Capitalist or Socialist Economic Ratio

    http://twitter.com/dacian_draco/status/708319912243154945/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=708438637424340993Retweeted Dacian Draco (@dacian_draco):

    There Is No Capitalist or Socialist Economic Rationale 4 Mass Immigration (Pls follow Dr. Duchesne @eurocanadians) https://t.co/Yfd9bhv2ms


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-11 18:45:00 UTC

  • Dacian Draco (@dacian_draco): @curtdoolittle on The Daily Shoah #75

    http://twitter.com/dacian_draco/status/708416704838307840/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=708436878794608641Retweeted Dacian Draco (@dacian_draco):

    @curtdoolittle on The Daily Shoah #75: https://t.co/poqidoHRF6


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-11 18:38:00 UTC

  • Evil: costs imposed on others for the purpose of causing suffering and loss rath

    Evil: costs imposed on others for the purpose of causing suffering and loss rather than for purposes of personal gain.

    There is evil in this world.

    George Soros.

    Serial Killers.

    Barak Obama.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-11 11:02:00 UTC

  • DEFINITIONS OF MORAL, ETHICAL, CRIMINAL Moral: costs imposed by externality. Eth

    DEFINITIONS OF MORAL, ETHICAL, CRIMINAL

    Moral: costs imposed by externality.

    Ethical: costs imposed interpersonally.

    Criminal: costs imposed physically

    Evil: costs imposed for the purpose of imposing costs and causing suffering rather than for personal gain.

    Objective morality: necessary/natural law. (think physical law, and natural law.)

    Normative morality : evolved morality – includes normative contractual provisions. If a moral norm requires the bearing of a cost, and one violates that norm, one imposes a cost upon those who bear the cost. (think contract law)

    Traditional Moral Commands: Religious contract traditions that may or may not be in fact moral. Since a religion requires a contract of one sort or another that causes mass behavior that is usually costly to members, it is a violation of that normative contract that imposes costs upon others to fail to observe it. (think legislation)

    Declining Traditional, Religious, and normative moral rules: changing circumstance has eliminate the value of the prior order’s demand for to forgo an opportunity or bear a cost. Some continue to pay and others do not, but objectively the value of the behavior has declined. (think outdated legislation)

    Abnormal Moral Rules: signal traditions that are objectively immoral but have not been eradicated through competition. (Think ancient traditions that actually cause harm.)

    This is pretty much how it works world ’round.

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-11 10:54:00 UTC

  • Universalism is unnecessary. A minority of us can police each domain. Eliminate

    Universalism is unnecessary.

    A minority of us can police each domain.

    Eliminate the bad and only the good remains.

    the problem becomes one of the weak who lack openness to experience.

    Who fall into the trap of familiarity.

    Who cannot distinguish the familiar good from the novel good.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 23:36:00 UTC