Are you back yet?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 16:00:00 UTC
Are you back yet?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 16:00:00 UTC
Perhaps my method of teaching is just very different from yours.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 13:54:00 UTC
“You’re a daisy if you do….”
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 12:58:00 UTC
YOU SHOULD REMAKE YOURSELF INTENTIONALLY AS OFTEN AS YOU CAN.
I remade myself in:
82 (entering work force – more biz less artist/philosopher)
89 (for health, tried to down-gear to technology)
95 (decided down-gear wasn’t working – back to entrepreneurship)
01 (splitting career and philosophy / gear-up / 02 cancer )
06 (first draft of what is today propertarianism… changed my perspective)
09 – 12 (raise philosophy priority over career / down-gear / 09 cancer )
12 – 16 (Ukraine, Bohemian, Philosophy + Biz Mix. Limited personal life. Achieved goal of testimonialism, propertarianism, market government, wilsonian synthesis, and people in the movements are at least aware of me.)
16… Product will get out the door. Book ready to finish first draft. Taken me most of the year to re-gear myself for biz growth again.
Future? No idea yet. But it’s better to burn out than to rust. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 12:56:00 UTC
women are awesome.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 12:34:00 UTC
Keyensian is Mainstream. It is better to see mainstream as attempting to moderate all three forms of inquiry: rule of law for the central bank(monetary policy). Keynesian Discretion for the policy makers (fiscal policy). Keyensian sociology for the population (maximize consumption and tax revenues to maximize redistribution).
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 12:11:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/What-is-libertarian-communism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=086db11fQUORA NONSENSE: “WHAT IS LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM?”
Like “meritocratic communism” it is either an impossibility, **o****r**** a lie**.
Most likely **a lie** to cover an impossibility. Most such lies are created in order to perpetuate fraud by political means by making false moral appeals in an effort to avoid exchanging behavioral limitations for material rewards.
**Libertarianism:** universal individual ownership of property, and voluntarily constructed commons.
**Socialism:** Universal state ownership of property, and the involuntarily constructed commons, where bureaucratic or authoritarian leaders determine the assignments of work and the distribution of proceeds from the work – (which usually don’t end up existing) Socialism is a failed experiment.
**Mixed economy:** Involuntary organization of the production of commons using representatives who appropriate the proceeds of production. Plus the voluntary organization of production of goods and services which generates the proceeds that are later redistributed as commons. This is in practice the western model since voters demonstrably do not vote for policy but ideology.
**Direct Economic/market Democracy: ** The voluntary organization of the production of commons by voting for desired commons with the contributions that one has produced. Combined with the voluntary organization of production of goods and services which generates the proceeds some portion of which are used to produce commons. In this model competitive commons are possible, and no monopoly commons are necessary. But competitive commons are class-weighted. This is an unlikely experiment except in small, very wealthy communities.
**Direct Redistributive/Shareholder Democracy:** The voluntary organization of the production of commons by voting a SHARE of the proceeds from a mixed economy. Combined with the voluntary organization of production of goods and services, which generates the proceeds some portino of which are used to produce commons. This means meritocratic contribution to commons but egalitarian decision of commons. In this model competitive commons are possible, and no monopoly commons are necessary. This is a likely next generation of Government since it eliminates the unnecessary conflcit of monopoly commons and eliminates the existence of politicians who engage in corruption.
We must organize cooperation (morality)
We must organize reproduction (family)
We must organize production (market)
We must organize commons (government)
We must organize a monopoly with which to hold our territory (military)
If you aren’t using these terms then you’re probably engaged in error or lie.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 12:03:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/What-do-white-people-need-to-understand-about-racism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv&share=978392a0WHAT DO WHITE PEOPLE NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT RACISM?
That it’s natural. That all human groups act in the interests of their kin. That people vote racially. They work in racial groups. They live in racial groups. They mate and marry in racial groups. They speak in racial groups.
All racial groups convey status because some groups are more desirable than others. That all those capable of escaping the lower classes of their racial groups rationally want to join in white culture so that they can have a better life, and that as such they want to limit racial discrimination. And that white middle and lower classes want to preserve their privileges by preserving the status of their elites from competition.
That race, religion, culture, tribe, gender are a part of life because they are meaningful differences because people act to their advantage at all times, and race, religion, culture, tribe and gender convey different advantages.
It is in the market for good and services that we are all equal. We all benefit from our participation in the market.
In the commons we are not equal in our needs. Each group needs different commons to assist them in their evolution.
In all walks of life we are not equal in our value to one another. It is our elites for whom groups are not an advantage.
That the problem we call racism arises from monopoly democracy which forces equal terms upon all people instead of the terms that each needs to achieve its best advantage. It is the government and democracy that create evil out of race, creed, and class.
NO MORE LIES.
The century of pseudoscience and lying is over.
Kant, Boaz, Freud, Marx, Cantor, Mises, Frankfurt School, Rothbard, and the Postmoderns are just liars and pseudoscientists creating mythology of secular christianity that is the literary equivalent of science fiction and fantasy that provide the myth of pagan aristocracy.
It’s not complicated. Silly people in the ancient world believed in holy books. Silly people in the modern world believe in pseudoscientific books. But they’re both nonsense. Both lies.
The difference is that pagans and aristocracy know that science fiction and fantasy are just literature. The secular christians thought that mysticism was real. They think pseudoscience is real. They love propaganda. They love political correctness. They police speech that exposes their lies.
The fact that women are and the underclasses are vectors for mysticism and pseudoscience, and men and the middle classes are vectors for commerce, technology, and warfare shouldn’t be surprising.
Women and slaves spread the lies of mysticism in the ancient world. Women and the ‘slaves’ or underclasses spread the lies of pseudoscience in the modern world.
There is nothing even the least bit difficult to understand.
Wishful thinking is fertile ground for lies.
Lies are lies no matter how well you wrap them in story.
Stories are the perfect method for telling lies.
Why? Women invented gossip: stories. Men invented history.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 11:44:00 UTC
( Some guy here. Name sounds like “Pedo”. I am trying really hard not to laugh when they say his name. I don’t see a small bear anywhere. )
BTW: did you know pedo’s test for IQ one standard deviation below their peers?
IN UTERO BRAIN DAMAGE.
Blame mommy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 11:22:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/Is-socialism-dangerous/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv&share=18cd6a81SOCIALISM VS SCIENCE FICTION
Socialism and Communism are best though of as a pseudoscientific literary movement for christian lower classes, where science fiction and fantasy are best though of as a pseudoscientific literary movement for pagan and aristocratic classes.
Science relies upon rule of law, banking, credit and finance, and macro economics.
It’s the losers who dream.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 11:07:00 UTC