Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • WHY ARE CEO’S AND CFO’s MORE ACCOUNTABLE THAN POLITICIANS FOR THEIR SPEECH?

    WHY ARE CEO’S AND CFO’s MORE ACCOUNTABLE THAN POLITICIANS FOR THEIR SPEECH?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 08:20:00 UTC

  • Distribute liquidity to advance the economy directly to citizens by equidistribu

    Distribute liquidity to advance the economy directly to citizens by equidistribution without exception. This will by pass the financial system and create dependence upon citizens rather than the state, and deprive them of most if not all interest fees.

    Eliminate interest collection on consumer borrowing by direct debit from the treasury by rule (formula) that is without exception. Bypassing consumer credit, and bypassing consumer interest.

    Revise freedom of speech to freedom of truthful speech. Meaning that one must warranty that which is placed in the commons, and that we can demand restitution for that false speech inserted into the commons.

    Restore Libel, Slander for court and Insult, Ridicule, and lie as criteria for judicially sanctioned duels. Denial of a duel when challenged for ridicule, insult, and lie (falsehoods) means you will either perform restitution(apology) or you can be simply killed.

    I am not so concerned about politicians once this occurs since we can kill them and their advocates with ease.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 08:19:00 UTC

  • In political discourse, the statements “Men do…y”, vs “Women do…x” state tha

    In political discourse, the statements “Men do…y”, vs “Women do…x” state that the cumulative result of each distribution is to produce a political effect either x or y”

    It is telling that men will comfortably take an autistic (individual) view of these expressions while women will take a solipsistic (collective) view of these expressions, thereby proving the very point such expressions attempt to illustrate.

    COMPROMISE = TRADE

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 08:13:00 UTC

  • “We” = “The West”. Don’t be daft. 😉

    “We” = “The West”. Don’t be daft. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 08:04:00 UTC

  • WE ALL FAILED Anglo, American, French, German, Jewish We all tried to position o

    WE ALL FAILED

    Anglo, American, French, German, Jewish

    We all tried to position our group evolutionary strategy, as a universal moral code, each of us using our internal method of social argument: empirical, legal, moral, rational, pseudoscientific.

    WE ALL FAILED

    Truth is enough,

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 07:29:00 UTC

  • RESTITUTION? –“Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.”– (“Kill them al

    RESTITUTION? –“Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.”– (“Kill them all. Let god sort them out.”) #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 07:10:00 UTC

  • The point at which commons FEES transform into TAXES is the point at which a pol

    The point at which commons FEES transform into TAXES is the point at which a politician can employ DISCRETION in their use. #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 07:08:00 UTC

  • DEMARCATION: FEES VS TAXES The point at which common fees transform into taxes i

    DEMARCATION: FEES VS TAXES

    The point at which common fees transform into taxes is the point at which a politician can employ discretion in their use.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 05:09:00 UTC

  • We ran a test. We gave women a chance. They failed the test. We have done histor

    We ran a test. We gave women a chance. They failed the test. We have done history a great service. Never again need any civilization fall because of its women.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 04:59:00 UTC

  • WE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO IGNORANCE AND MYSTICISM IN THE COMMONS Why do we have

    WE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO IGNORANCE AND MYSTICISM IN THE COMMONS

    Why do we have the right to ignorance and mysticism (in the commons)?

    –“…the question is unanswerable…”–

    Quite the opposite. The question is answerable either way.

    That one cannot have a right to impose costs upon others.

    You can hold any falsehood you want, any immorality you want, as long as its in your head. But once you bring it into the commons then you are forcing a cost upon others.

    So,

    why does one have the right o act mystically?

    why does one have the right to act ignorantly?

    why does one have the right to act immorally?

    why does one have the right to act unethically?

    why does one have the right to act criminally?

    why does one have the right to act malignantly? (evil)

    You see, when you place ideas on a spectrum of similar ideas it becomes clearer that ignorance, and mysticism are merely increasingly indirect means of exporting costs upon others: another form of crime.

    In the past we have been tolerant of every form of malignant, criminal, unethical, immoral, ignorant, and mystical behaviors.

    But we have incrementally suppressed each form of crime over the generations and it is this suppression of crimes of imposition that have created our ‘domestication of man’. Our prosperity is the result of eliminating criminality as much as eliminating error.

    So again, why does one have the right to ignorance and mysticism any more than the right to immoral, unethical, criminal, and malignant behavior?

    One only possesses that right if others reciprocally grant it.

    That is the origin of all rights: reciprocal insurance.

    Why do we suppress imposition of costs? to force people into beneficial behavior rather than parasitic behavior. And ignorance and mysticism are a cost, and truth and spiritualism are not.

    There is nothing unscientific about spirituality any more than there is anything unscientific about the experience of seeing color in visible light.

    Mysticism is a drug. Ignorance is a form of free riding.

    Drugs are fine in your home. Ignorance is fine in your home.

    Don’t do drugs in public. Don’t speak ignorance in public.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 04:28:00 UTC