Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • I have seen craftsman all over this world. When it comes to stone, tile, mosaic,

    I have seen craftsman all over this world. When it comes to stone, tile, mosaic, brick, or cobbles, hire Italians.

    Watching Ukrainians is literally painful.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-23 07:24:00 UTC

  • ). Hbd man

    :). Hbd man

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-23 06:46:00 UTC

  • Happy birthday. 😉

    Happy birthday. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-23 06:46:00 UTC

  • #libertarian #NRx #_altRight_

    https://t.co/PAZjnf8vRE#Conservative #libertarian #NRx #_altRight_

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-22 09:26:00 UTC

  • #Libertarian #NRx #_AltRight_

    https://t.co/vr0eJ4r6j6#Conservative #Libertarian #NRx #_AltRight_

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-22 09:26:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.quora.com/How-can-human-rights-be-taken-away/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=d9933c3b

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-22 07:46:00 UTC

  • WE DON”T TRUST CANADA AND AUSTRALIA. THEY BEHAVE LIKE TRUST FUND BABIES. WHY SHO

    https://www.quora.com/Does-the-United-States-trust-Australia/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=57d64a4eNO, WE DON”T TRUST CANADA AND AUSTRALIA. THEY BEHAVE LIKE TRUST FUND BABIES. WHY SHOULD WE?

    Australia and Canada both suffer from extraordinary privileges that they attribute to their own actions or own beliefs rather than the windfall produced by their ancestor’s conquest of primitive lands, using science, guns, germs, steel, accounting, and rule of law.

    None of us take Australia or Canada any more seriously than we take the girl whose father pays for everything seriously. It’s nice that she gets to live that way but it has nothing to do with her or her judgements and everything to do with the aggressive use of dominance in business, industry, war and politics by her father and his father, and his before him.

    It’s actually painful to listen to Australians, Canadians, and american Urbanites, (As well as many urban brits). All trust fund babies trying to signal their high mindedness because they have no achievements to point to of their own.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-22 07:43:00 UTC

  • ONLY CAN WE HAVE A PERFECT GOVERNMENT – WE HAD IT. We had the perfect government

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-a-perfect-government-and-make-everyone-happy/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=75598c1cNOT ONLY CAN WE HAVE A PERFECT GOVERNMENT – WE HAD IT.

    We had the perfect government: Monarchy, Multi-House Parliaments with one house per class, and the Common Law under Rule of law, under Nationalism (tribalism).

    The Monarch had only power of veto. The houses functioned as a market for trading commons between the different socio-economic classes. And an homogenous polity can act redistributively because everyone is a near relation (kin) and not a competitor.

    This is why the Nordic countries are as they are: small homogenous protestant nations that have practiced eugenic reproduction for more than a thousand years, and perhaps as long as 3500 years. They bypassed the empire phase during colonialism and so they did not develop state corporatism, and therefore the ability to commercially and militarily profit from heterogeneous polities.

    Nordic countries then produce the ideal because they are small homogenous eugenic nation states with common interests, little diversity, and lack the population, territorial, economic, and military scale needed to engage in conquest by immigration, territorial expansion, economic conquest, or military conquest.

    The dirty secret of the Human Genome project is that our tribes and races are vastly unequal, largely because some of our tribes and races have been better at suppressing the rates of reproduction of the lower classes (eugenics). And the reason is that the northern climates do not allow marginal individuals to survive under agrarianism. And that most northern peoples aggressively used hanging, delayed marriage and childbirth, regulated access to farmland to people of good character, and effectively engaged in active upward redistribution of reproduction.

    If you want a Denmark you need to fill it with Danes. The northeast of Europe developed “Bipartite Manorialism” earliest, and the church’s ban on cousin marriage the earliest, and that is one of the significant reasons for northern europe’s advantage.

    Why? Because while you need to reach the Pareto optimum of both 80% of resources in the control of your top 20%, AND your top 20% must have IQ’s above 106, this cannot be done by improving the intelligence of your best, but by by reducing the numbers of your worst, until your best are the top 20% of your population.

    This is counter-intuitive. But the point being that your lower classes are a tragic burden on your people.

    This is the dirty secret of the west’s success: we hung 1% of the population every year. Over twenty years, this has a profound effect. Over five hundred years it will raise a people out of ignorance and poverty.

    How can we do the same without hanging our troublemakers? We can do it by preventing their births.

    Otherwise there is no way to get to Denmark. And instead, under normative dysgenia we will decline just as the entire Arab world has declined under islam: through dysgenic reproduction, that depresses the reproduction of our best, and increases the reproduction of our worst.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Science and Uncomfortable Truth

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-22 07:32:00 UTC

  • PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS Sinic (Eastern) : Basis of Sinic philosophy is Sun Tzu: Dece

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-key-differences-in-business-culture-between-Western-and-Eastern/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=fa2e63d0EASTERN PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS

    Sinic (Eastern) :

    Basis of Sinic philosophy is Sun Tzu: Deception and delay until opportunity to defeat. We are strongest when we have total control, and cannot be victimized by the other, and no longer need to compromise.

    Falsehood is expected.

    Preserve Face, avoiding offense.

    Information Hiding, is expected.

    Self benefit rather than symmetric benefit is not only expected but desirable.

    Decisions are made outside the room by those in authority.

    Agreements are temporarily useful for the moment, but open to revision and circumstance at all times.

    Differences are to be hidden until they can be used to produce asymmetric benefits.

    Disagreements are to be used as opportunities for asymmetric benefits.

    Corruption is expected and even ‘understood’.

    Asymmetric benefit is expected and ‘understood’

    Non Performance is expected, and ‘understood’.

    Changing the terms of the agreement is expected and ‘understood’.

    WESTERN PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS

    Germanic (Western):

    Basis of western philosophy is Aristotle: Truth, transparency, and cooperation leading to mutual benefit – we are strongest when we cooperate together, and we preserve our cooperation through constant compromise.

    Truth, even if unpleasant.

    Directness, even if offensive.

    Information transparency, even if disadvantageous.

    Objective is mutual benefit – and non parasitism, developing long term trust.

    Decisions are made in the room between the negotiators.

    Agreements are binding contracts not subject to revision or circumstance, even if risky.

    Resolve differences quickly, and move on.

    Disagreements must result in mutually beneficial compromise.

    Corruption is inexcusable.

    Asymmetric benefit is inexcusable.

    Non performance is inexcusable.

    Changing the terms of the agreement is inexcusable.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-22 07:12:00 UTC

  • A YEAR OF LIVING DANGEROUSLY (further rumination on populism) Well, over the pas

    A YEAR OF LIVING DANGEROUSLY

    (further rumination on populism)

    Well, over the past 12-14 months I have danced with populism a bit. And I understand the game of feeding the fires of fashionable passions. I have met a lot of people. I have met people who are more likely to carry out a revolution. And during this time we have seen the rise of the trump/sanders movement. And that movement has changed our political discourse as much or more so than any intellectual movement can.

    Now, I don’t believe the presidential elections will change much – other than to establish a discourse. But the hope that dramatic change will come about is enough to transfer the interest of all activists from permanent change by revolution to temporary improvement by democratic action – at least for a time.

    That’s a way of saying that I need to keep at my work because populism has returned to strategy under democracy rather than strategy toward a revolution – and its a revolution we will require to change the state of affairs.

    My experiment with populism was fun, and socially rewarding, but ultimately a failed experiment. Why? for no other reason than it decreased the time I spent on serious work, distracted me from thinking about the more serious issues. It associated my work at least a small part with negativity. And it has caused me personal frustration.

    That is because my solution to the problem of social order is a nationalist one, and a universal one. Because it is not a criticism of race, but a criticism of corporatism. Not a criticism of race but a criticism of class. Not a criticism of race but a criticism of multiculturalism. Not a criticism of race, but a criticism of genetic devolution. Not a criticism of race, but an advocacy of preserving the people who, for apparently genetic reasons, are the most creative and innovative people.

    I start with the proposition that innovation and creativity and competition and lack of underclass burden, generate ‘goods’ which assist mankind in transcendence of the animal. And that western science, economics, politics, art, and thought is the byproduct of martial epistemology, among minority voluntary warriors (and not majority mandatory soldiers.)

    And that all peoples can transcend if they adopt the institutions of ‘truth’, while all the time suppressing the reproduction of the lower classes.

    In other words, while I am sure that my own people will succeed by returning to their model. I am also sure that other peoples will succeed by adopting our model. And if they do not adopt our model, then they are adopting ignorance, parasitism, and dysgenia. And as such are our enemies. If a people must persist that is different from whether a people must expand. I advocate persistence of all, but that expansion of people rather than our model, violates our model.

    In this way you may call me a familialist, a tribalist, a nationalist, and a racist in the sense that I advocate for transcendence.

    But I am not interested in mere complaints about others who are at present unable to adopt the technologies of transcendence that we have invented. They do what they are able. We can make them able to do otherwise, and transcend.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-22 04:19:00 UTC