Source: Facebook

  • THE GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS Europeans Develop Competition-law, Reason, Realism

    THE GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS

    Europeans Develop Competition-law, Reason, Realism, Naturalism, Empiricism, Technology-Science, Geometry.

    CALCULATION

    Chinese Develop Bureaucracy-rule, Reason-lite-Wisdom Literature, Realism, Naturalism, Technology but not science, and Arithmetic. They settle on Reason and Bureaucracy.

    REASON

    Indians Develop Class Roles, Political Reason, Supernaturalism, Mythicism, Pragmatism, limited technology, arithmetic and positional names. That this is the remnant of a military order is lost in time. The indians settle on “the Way” – wisdom literature.

    REASONABLENESS

    Iranians-Persians Develop the optimum human, Hierarchy instead of Castes and Roles. But are seduced by babylon and their own aryan religion. The are ruined by the muslims and despite, like the Germans, rising out of it, descend once again and they can’t get out of it now (similar to how the west is being brought down again by Judaism and islam).

    IDEALS

    The Egyptians Run with Animism and Archtetypes and Myth and it’s beautiful. They try a single dominant god but the priests wisely reverse it.

    MYTHS

    The Jews Invent the abrahamic method of deceit by combining

    DICTATORSHIP LAW OF PARASITISM

    The Arabs

    DICTATORSHIP WISDOM LIT OF PREDATION


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 16:52:00 UTC

  • ECONOMICS IS JUST AN EXTENSION OF PHYSICS We can quantify all sorts of metrics o

    ECONOMICS IS JUST AN EXTENSION OF PHYSICS

    We can quantify all sorts of metrics of human behavior, but you’re confusing mathematics with physics, the same way most people confuse averages with instances or distributions. In other words, mathematics describes averages of points in time, it doesn’t not describe operations.Mathematics consist of operations that describe states and changes in states and averages. But not the underlying operations. Physics studies both the quantitative and the operational. Mathematics just the quantitative (positional). So while mathematics describes ‘sums’ operations describe changes in state.

    Here:

    At every “level’ of reality we discover an underlying limited number of operations (Grammar) producing some set of symmetries (outcomes, equilibria), and above that a new limited number of operations (Grammar, outcomes, equilibria)) that produce another set of symmetries, and above that and so on.

    So, we don’t yet know what causes the quantum level

    We have a fairly good idea what causes the subatomic level.

    we have a very good idea what causes the atomic level.

    We have such a good understanding of chemistry that it’s boring.

    We are getting a fair understanding of biochemistry (and that it’s mechanical).

    We are getting a beginning understanding of proteins (and that it’s mechanical(operational) )

    We are getting a beginning understanding of genetic reproduction (and that it’s mechanical- operational) .

    We are getting a fairly good understanding of cells.

    We have a more than fairly good understanding of multi-cellular (complex) organisms.

    I’ll stop there since I think you can see the pattern of some set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, followed by another set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, and that this process continues indefinitely, all the way to what we call consciousness.

    Now life buys us conservation of energy (defeat of entropy), but it’s still bound by the laws of physics (the underlying grammars).

    Memory buys us prediction. And prediction provides our ability to perform operations (actions) that improve our defeat of entropy.

    Increase in neural( brain) volume provides Competition between predictions, which provides us choices of options for defeating entropy.

    Increase in Brain volume provides iterations on predictions for increasing choices of defeating entropy the sequence of actions (or inactions for that matter).

    Increase in brain volume provides prediction of others predictions and predicting opportunities for cooperation that further improve our ability to capture and use energy by defeating entropy.

    Human ability to capture energy is limited by the grammar of human action (possible actions and sequences of actions and parallel combinations of other’s actions).

    So the grammar of human action consists in the physical, emotional-intuitionistic, and cognitive operations.

    Those operations are bounded by physical limitations of the grammars upon which they are constructed.

    Both Physics and Economics are bound by the same underlying grammars (laws) but because humans have memories, prediction, sentience, and consciousness, reason, calculation, symbolism, and computation, we can use debts and credits with each other to temporarily lend to each other, in presumption of future returns on that investment or debt.

    We don’t violate that physical law. Because humans observe reciprocity (equilibrium) just as the physical world obeys equilibrium (entropy). If we didn’t we wouldn’t be here.

    And so some people specialize in capitalization (productivity) and some people specialize in consumption, and others in parasitism or predation.

    But in the end, over time, we are limited by the physical laws of the universe. We can create productivity (as does life), or we can parasite upon other lives (as do bacteria and viruses).

    We cannot run the clock on parasitism (Socialism or gypsies) or conquest (islamism) forever because we will run out of hosts to prey upon.

    So economics is just physics with debits and credits (ability t steal, to borrow, to exchange,to produce, or to save) made possible by consciousness, by test of reciprocity (account balances), within the limit of proportionality (exit).

    TRIANGLE:

    What limits to human operations?

    ………………What Limits?……………….

    ………………………|…………………………

    …………….Human Actions……………..

    ……………..Consciousness…………….

    …………………Sentience………………..

    …………………….Life………………………

    …………………./………\……………………

    ……….subatomic..macro-atomic…..

    ………………./…………..\…………………

    ……….?Limits………….Limits?…………

    Human limits are reciprocity (positive) with the limits of proportionality (negaitve).

    The subatomic level appears to run out of energy by maximum dissipation.

    The macro atomic level appears to run out of ability to compress energy.

    Sorry but it’s just Physics with the ability to use each other for debt and credit that we call ‘cooperation”.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 15:53:00 UTC

  • ON THE LIMITS OF MATHEMATICS Mathematics is the measurement of averages with lim

    ON THE LIMITS OF MATHEMATICS

    Mathematics is the measurement of averages with limited variance in category, and economics is the measurement of averages in wide variance in category.

    The universe changes state by operations.

    We use mathematics to describe point changes.

    Calculus breaks down at the subatomic level.

    Calculus breaks down at the economic level.

    The problem is we don’t have a calculus of geometries (yet) and we may not have one until we solve either the subatomic problem, or the protein folding problem or the economic problem. I’m betting on the second mostly because both math and physics are lost in nonsense land.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 15:52:00 UTC

  • (In my university, because I majored in Fine Art, you could take creative writin

    (In my university, because I majored in Fine Art, you could take creative writing for credit every semester. I did. But, i’m too disagreeable and appreciative of the finer things to write works of fiction in poverty for two to four years at a time just so I can play lottery games with publishers. I won a scholarship voted by the professors two years in a row for the most likely to become a practicing artist. But I’m unsuited for poverty. I prefer technology, business, law, philosophy, politics and war. Literature is just writing philosophy but in slow motion for peanuts. )


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 15:52:00 UTC

  • Thoughts… Subconscious has been troubled by (or working on) something that is

    Thoughts…

    Subconscious has been troubled by (or working on) something that is beginning to take shape, and I can’t quite put my finger on it yet, but it’s coming out as very clear distinction between the feminine semitic and compromise hindu, and masculine european-sinic, but it’s deeper than that.

    It’s that the female-semitic method of argument (baiting into hazard is literally the antithesis of evolution. It’s the greatest threat to humanity – greater than plagues. Because its a plague of the mind.

    The discussions today on operations. It’s another example of whomever made the comment last summer, that the Grammars are as important as testimonialism and acquistionism+propertarianism.

    I keep seeing more and more opportunity behind the grammars and this whole need for a new mathematics and the grammars is running around my head and there is something there on the fringes of auto association – a pattern of something – that I think would dwarf the previous insights.

    So there is this strange constellation forming between the semitic-european falseood-truth problem, the next-math problem, and … damn.

    Constitution -> Course -> Big Book -> Religion – and in the background I”m going to have to work on this problem and see where wolfram hit a dead end.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 15:51:00 UTC

  • The Natural Law: (+) .Evolution: Evidence of Competition (-) .. History: Evidenc

    The Natural Law: (+)

    .Evolution: Evidence of Competition (-)

    .. History: Evidence of Consequences (+)

    … War: Evidence of Extra Political Conflict (-)

    …. Politics: Evidence of Political Conflict (+)

    ….. Law : Evidence of Conflict (-)

    …… Economics: Evidence of Cooperation (+)

    ……. Operations (Grammars) (+)

    …….. Sciences : Method of Due Diligence (-)

    ……… Math (measurement): (+)

    ………. Logic: (consistency): (-)

    ……….. Reason: Permutation (+)

    ………… Logical Facility (“difference engine”) (+/-)

    …………. Model, Events, Locations, Places, Objects, Entities (+)

    ………….. Sequences of Constant Relations (prediction) (+)

    …………… Human Sense Perceptions at Human Scale (+)

    ……………. Changes in State in the Universe At Human Scale (+)

    (+) = Via Positiva

    (-) = Via Negativa


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 15:51:00 UTC

  • The Natural Law: (+) .Evolution: Evidence of Competition (-) .. History: Evidenc

    The Natural Law: (+)

    .Evolution: Evidence of Competition (-)

    .. History: Evidence of Consequences (+)

    … War: Evidence of Extra Political Conflict (-)

    …. Politics: Evidence of Political Conflict (+)

    ….. Law : Evidence of Conflict (-)

    …… Economics: Evidence of Cooperation (+)

    ……. Operations (Grammars) (+)

    …….. Sciences : Method of Due Diligence (-)

    ……… Math (measurement): (+)

    ………. Logic: (consistency): (-)

    ……….. Reason: Permutation (+)

    ………… Logical Facility (“difference engine”) (+/-)

    …………. Model, Events, Locations, Places, Objects, Entities (+)

    ………….. Sequences of Constant Relations (prediction) (+)

    …………… Human Sense Perceptions at Human Scale (+)

    ……………. Changes in State in the Universe At Human Scale (+)

    (+) = Via Positiva

    (-) = Via Negativa


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 15:29:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES IN STANDARDS by Vengefül Bobmoran High trust people require not only

    DIFFERENCES IN STANDARDS

    by Vengefül Bobmoran

    High trust people require not only the absence of conflict of interest, but also the absence of *appearance* of conflict of interest, as the appearance itself is enough to erode trust and imposes a huge cost on everyone.

    The left applies the bare minimum ghetto ethic (no provable conflict of interest – cheap, easy deniability and pilpul) to its own, but will gladly apply our standards (no appearance of conflict of interest – expensive compliance) to us.

    They don’t even care about maintaining trust; they just intuit the huge costs of adherence to our standards and attack us with it, in the same way that they use the judicial process itself, rather than the judgement, as a weapon. This also explains how they can suddenly be more Catholic than the Pope when criticizing us: it’s all about maximizing the costs (damages) they can impose.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 14:53:00 UTC

  • We can, and do, falsify all human action in court. The question was, could we fa

    We can, and do, falsify all human action in court. The question was, could we falsify all human speech in court.

    The answer is yes.

    The usual problem is that someone wants an ideology(political) philosophy (secular theological), or theology (supernatural theological) solution – which is impossible. Because Science (truthful testimony) is falsificationary.

    As far as I know, P is complete. And there are no false or ir-reciprocal statements that can survive its falsification.

    That fact that people can’t get their noggins around the fact that all science (testimony) like markets (competition) is falsificationary is a common problem. But it stems from a failure to understand that science is falsificationary, then demanding P, like philosophy, ideology, or religion be justificationary. It’s not. So they criticize P for not being a science on the one hand by false presumption science is justificationary, and then complain P isn’t justificationary. Kind of silly really, but you can see where they get it from.

    Most people are stuck in the error of “Mathiness” because they don’t grasp the constitution of, or limits of, mathematics. Math breaks down in all three directions: the very small, the very large, and the very-human (cognitive): economics.

    If you need a positive theology, philosophy, ideology, sophism, or pseudoscience, then I understand the via-positiva is necessary for simple minds.

    But grownups are not afraid of via-negativa (skepticism), because we know all non trivial non tautological propositions are contingent, because we may always or nearly always, discover some novel parsimony that allows us to reorganize our paradigms for greater consistency, correspondence, coherence, completeness and parsimony than before.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 14:48:00 UTC

  • THE CULT OF COMPETENCE by Luke Weinhagen —“… the freedom we have enjoyed in

    THE CULT OF COMPETENCE

    by Luke Weinhagen

    —“… the freedom we have enjoyed in America is not the fruit of fortuitous accident, of great natural resources, or of mere isolation from the tangled skein of European politics. It is the direct result of purposeful thinking and hard work. It is the child of the cult of competency—intellectual competency, physical competency, moral competency…”—

    Source ( http://ergo-sum.net/literature/CultOfCompetency.pdf)

    The address the above excerpt is pulled from has become something of an inspiration for me in defining and pursuit of a cult of competence.

    The problems we are working to provide solutions for now have been plaguing man for at least as long as we’ve been writing it story down.

    The cult of competence has always been there in some form wherever dangerous free individuals pursue fruitful and virtuous interaction with other dangerous free individuals.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 14:40:00 UTC