Source: Facebook

  • WISDOM LITERATURES Aristotle:….Real/Natural:………….Science (Decidability

    WISDOM LITERATURES

    Aristotle:….Real/Natural:………….Science (Decidability) Law

    Plato:………Ideal/Natural:………….Sophistry (Justification) Philo

    Confucian: Real/Myth-Natural:….~Reason(Harmony) Reason

    Hindu:……..Unreal/Supernatural..Wisdom (Harmony) Mytho.

    Persian……Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (?) Mytho/Philo.

    Egyptian….Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (Order) Mytho.

    Semitic:…..Unreal/Supernatural:..Fraud(Authority) Theo.

    We are forever bound by the grammars of our wisdom literatures.

    (Grammar: paradigms, vocabulary, logic, grammar)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 14:13:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/82016878_179885500076278_11543350169

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/82016878_179885500076278_1154335016998666240_n_179885496742945.jpg FYIFYI


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 13:59:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81760855_548902475706647_74289695327

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81760855_548902475706647_7428969532770746368_n_548902472373314.jpg FYI

    Realism > Naturalism > Prediction > Operationalism > Empiricism > Acquisition > Rational Choice > Demonstrated Preference > Reciprocity > Power Distribution of Law > Pareto Distribution of Assets > Nash Distribution of Rewards:

    If it doesn’t pass, it’s false.FYI

    Realism > Naturalism > Prediction > Operationalism > Empiricism > Acquisition > Rational Choice > Demonstrated Preference > Reciprocity > Power Distribution of Law > Pareto Distribution of Assets > Nash Distribution of Rewards:

    If it doesn’t pass, it’s false.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 13:58:00 UTC

  • JUST TRY. Government offices. Waiting Rooms. Corner. Women. Late 40s. Crying. Wa

    JUST TRY.

    Government offices. Waiting Rooms. Corner. Women. Late 40s. Crying. Walk up. Touch shoulder. “You ok dear, can I do something”. Look of astonishment. “No. It’s OK. Toothache”. “Do you want me to go get you some tylenol or something? Or maybe take you to a clinic?” Smiles. “No. I’ll be ok”. “OK” I move on and fill out my paperwork. Tears stop. Body language

    relaxes. You don’t have to lift the entire burden from others. Every little bit helps.

    Just fking try.

    It’s all it takes.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 13:54:00 UTC

  • TRUMP’S SPEECH PATTERN Let me explain Trump for you in simple strategic terms. 1

    TRUMP’S SPEECH PATTERN

    Let me explain Trump for you in simple strategic terms.

    1. Make people solve problems for you.

    2. Propose a controversial solution to a problem

    3. Give away little information.

    4. Collect Maximum Information

    5. Sow chaos to keep the opposition occupied and collect more information

    6. Retaliate against GSRRM(female strategy of undermining by gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, straw manning, and reputation destruction) as a means of avoiding truthful, reciprocal, rational argument by reflecting the same and demonstrating invulnerability to undermining.

    7. Let the solution emerge with other people owning responsibility for the idea and its execution. You trap people who are endemically irresponsible into responsibility and the inability to claim it was the boss’ idea.

    It’s a King of the Hill Game.

    This is how you conduct negotiations from a position of power with hostile, dishonest, or incompetent parties.

    The speech pattern is the consequence of that strategy.

    How do I know?

    I do it. So do many many many men in positions of power.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 11:23:00 UTC

  • SIGH —“you should read….(law)…” Terry O’Brien: 1) Yes of course i’ve read

    SIGH

    —“you should read….(law)…”

    Terry O’Brien:

    1) Yes of course i’ve read those works (see my reading list and our library). Although I tend to prefer Milsom’s treatment of the law.

    2) You’re confusing errors with definitions. that’s ok.

    P logic and law depend on disambiguation by enumeration, operationalization, and serialization, to prevent errors of inference and categorization and this results in everting from clarification to redefinition to neologism.

    We use this technique to create a value neutral universally commensurable language and logic of testimony

    3) Tort means ‘trespass’ and is a violation of demonstrated interest – or what we codify as property. While all peoples vary in the degree of suppression of trespass given their division of labor, level of development, family structure, terms of inheritance, investment in commons, and level of corruption (trust), all people resolve disputes by demonstrated interests at least within the limits of defection.

    4) What is the basis of decidability in Common Law (the abusive term used today that means ‘whatever we can get away with’), Common law (as etymologically evolved) in judge discovered findings of law, Traditional germanic law and its practice, ancient european traditional law, the commonalities of greek and roman law, and what we can linguistically and archeologically determine from proto-germanic west indo european law? (Sovereignty and Reciprocity, testimony and jury.)

    5) Where did (western) evidentiary reason, evidentiary empiricism, and evidentiary science evolve, at what points, by what authors, in what professions?

    So, if we look at vernacular, temporal, periods, ages, or across all of european history since the indo-european expansion, and compare those internal consistencies with other civilizations we winnow down the number of constant relations. This degree of resolution in traditions of decidability, just as the degree of resolution in subatomic, atomic, chemical, biochemical, cellular, expose local and continuous general rules.

    Ergo the common law tradition predates greece and rome. And it is rome and napoleonic france that did it damage, just like it was christian rome, revolutionary france, and postmodern France(with help from the jewish counter-englightenment of marx, boas, freud, cantor, adorno) that undermined that law – causing the continent and the anglosphere to diverge with the anglosphere retaining the via negativa tradition, and the french-continental reverting to via-positiva and causing the failure (impossibility) of the european project.

    The origin of our civilization like all civilizations especially after the Axial Age (restoration after the bronze age collapse), is captured in our group strategy and our law that must survive within it. That law and the ‘metaphysics’ (paradigms of decidability) are the origin of the commonality across time.

    Why did the greeks go through the great change of socrates, plato, Aristotle, and alexander? Why did the greeks romans and the British use a different strategy from the Mesopotamians and the Chinese and the Hindus? Why did greeks work with geometry reason and divination, and why did Mesopotamians work with algebra theology and astrology?

    Whatever group strategy we had, whatever social order that was required of it, and whatever traditions, customs, law and mythos that we had around 900bc at the latests, was continuously reinforced by competition with others. And there are 500 dead gods in the record for those that failed.

    Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Thang, Evidence, Testimony, chieftain > Law, Jury, Senate king > Law, jury, house, senate, emperor

    Because markets are the only means of cooperation and dispute resolution under sovereignty.

    And because only contract is possible for people who required a voluntary entrepreneurial military, using metallurgy, wheel, horse, maneuver, to defeat superior numbers.

    There is a reason for military epistemology, metallurgical epistemology, and our legal epistemology.

    Our origins.

    “What can I testify to under realism, naturalism, and operationalism that is internally consistent, externally correspondent, operationally possible, and narratively coherent?”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 11:07:00 UTC

  • PERCEPTIONS OF POSSIBILITY AND PROBABILITY ARE ALWAYS DETERMINED BY KNOWLEDGE On

    PERCEPTIONS OF POSSIBILITY AND PROBABILITY ARE ALWAYS DETERMINED BY KNOWLEDGE

    One’s perspective on the chances of separation are determined by (a) knowledge of military history, strategy, and end of Westphalian and restoration of traditional conflict (4gw). (b) knowledge of the fragility of the USA, and its cities, how rapidly it will collapse, and how it can be exploited, ( c) knowledge of a compromise solution that will minimize resistance.

    If you have a history of life achievement and know these things, it’s just ‘work’: another project that needs doing. it’s not a problem of knowing what to do.

    This isn’t a time for democratic majoritarianism. it’s a time for a minority to force ultimatums.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 10:23:00 UTC

  • THE END OF DEMOCRACY? We can save democracy in some form if we modify the franch

    THE END OF DEMOCRACY?

    We can save democracy in some form if we modify the franchise and create houses for the classes again, and give women a separate house. But (as Samuel Huntington warned) democracy cannot survive Islam. Between (1) granting women the franchise, (2) postwar jewish marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism-denialism and (3) Islamic religion-of-continuous-war-and-conquest by continuous undermining, without Monarchy as a judge of last resort and without our traditional law of sovereignty in ‘Inviolable Book’ form, and without a Civilization’s State religion we are not able to resist (defeat) the ease at which women’s intuition for undermining, the jewish and muslim strategy of undermining can be combined to destroy the only civilization to drag mankind out of the perpetual dark age of Abrahamic Ignorance and Deceit. Judaism, Islam, and Christianity cost us all the great civilizations of the ancient world: North African, Egyptian, Levantine, Persian, Byzantine, Roman, Greek, The Indus region of India, And was stopped only because it consumes whatever people adopt it, and reduces them to perpetual externalization of inner conflict through blame of others, whereas every other religious system provides mindfulness within the self.

    Western civilization uniquely created continuous innovation and adaptation by the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self all favor others (the polity) in exchange for status, and status produces mindfulness by existential, demonstrated, evidentiary, constructive means.

    Sovereignty requires reciprocity, reciprocity requires the natural law of tort, jury, and court of peers, and cooperation is limited to markets in every domain of life regardless of station. Markets in every domain of life produce the most rapid means of adaptation. Adaptation of the law by continuous competition in court produces the most rapid means of political adaptation. material heroism by the use of technology, contract and maneuver, produce the most rapid means of technological adaptation.

    It is this heroism and sovereignty that came west into europe with the indo-european expansion. It’s that heroism and sovereignty that made Greece and rome.

    It was semitic false promise of a monopoly underclass desirable for women and slaves, and the forcible imposition of superstition, by a priesthood selling lies that replaced a martial aristocracy demonstrating truth, and a failure to constrain roman expansion to the rate at which people could be civilized into a martial and middle class society that created the opportunity for a dark age, and the vast numbers of muslim raiders that destroyed civilizations, arts, knowledge, and trade routes that produced the First Semitic Dark age.

    But it is our failure to learn from that experience and to change from western market tolerance to western monopoly warfare against these enemies that threatens a second semitic dark age.

    The Group’s Strategy was to replace science with pseudoscience(Marx,Freud,Boas), Math with pseudo-mathematics (Cantor, Bohr), reason with sophistry(Derrida), class and gender cooperation with conflict(Adorno, Friedan), Heroism with Victimization(Frankfurt), and Law with Politics. Just as they had replaced the west’s ‘book’ of Homer, Our Aristocratic Hero of Achilles, our Family of the Gods, and our rational law, empiricism, and reason with the semitic ‘books’, the victim-hero of jews and jesus persecution, the family of jewish heroes, the apostles and saints, supernatural law, supernaturalism, and the great semitic deceit using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophistry to avoid argument and truth), critique (disapproval, straw manning, and poisoning the well to avoid argument and truth), hiding under voluntary choice, plausible deniability for the hazard and unfalsifiability of promises to create not innovation and production, evolution and transcendence, but devolution, ignorance, submission, consumption, destruction and and dysgenia. Their group strategy like the female’s is Anti-civilization: Their Pursuit of a Second Dark Age.

    Undermining and conflict generation is the instinctive female strategy and that their (((Elites))) are the antithesis – mirror image – of western civilization’s Creation, Innovation, Cooperation by Markets, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Heroism, Truth.

    There is no difference between jewish invention of false promises in ancient world, christian destruction of the the european ancient world, and islamic destruction of the rest of the civilizations of the ancient world, and the jewish invention of false promises of denial, sophistry, and pseudoscience in Marxism in economics, fruedianism in psychology, boasianism in anthorpology, cantorian-bohr math, freankfurt in cultural marxism, postmodern relativism and denialism, in adademy, undermining rule of law in the courts, and marxist, feminist, postmodern identitarian conflict generation under pretense that markets are not the only possible means of cooperation. They literally have tried to destroy truth, reason, and reason and cooperation by exchange in every possible dimension of human reason, knowledge, and cooperation.

    The hindus produced wisdom literature in myth. Chinese produced wisdom literature and reason. The europeans produced wisdom literature in empiricism. But the semites produced a wisdom literature of lies. Why? Hermes and the cart of lies. Why did Semites invent lying? Likely Because professional (huckster) religion started in Anatolia-Mesopotamia, and it ameliorated the differences between very different tribes at the intersection of trade routes across four continents.

    The cure of course is to produce our own ‘Book’ that canonizes the group strategy of western civilization’s continuous innovation and adaptation – the civilization that dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early, death, and the status of victims of a nature all but deliberately hostile to human life.

    That book would state our history, our strategy, our law, and our method of reasoning in the language of our Natural Religion: Heroism, Excellence, Truth, Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity before Self, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war. And it would, as do all books, set the terms by which none may trespass in thought, display, word, or deed – regardless of rank, nation, race or excuse. Heroism and Man for the Aristocracy, Stoicism and Nature for the able, Christianity for the vulnerable.

    That is the end purpose of the P-law project. And a revolution and restoration and renaissance of our civilization. And an end to semitic dark ages in European alliance with Sinic, Hindu, and African civilizations will bring it about.

    Truth can win if men choose.

    It is just our choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 09:48:00 UTC

  • Climate Change vs Demographic Change – Simple problem, Simple Solution: Stop und

    Climate Change vs Demographic Change – Simple problem, Simple Solution: Stop underclass reproduction. Cause? Women in politics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 08:21:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81924791_179763870088441_39946342045

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81924791_179763870088441_3994634204519333888_o_179763866755108.jpg WHAT IS GSRRM, RRGSM, ETC?

    See our section on Deceits.WHAT IS GSRRM, RRGSM, ETC?

    See our section on Deceits.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 08:17:00 UTC