Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • The battle (Athens-Rome / London-Germany / New-England-Virginia) VS (Jerusalem-B

    The battle (Athens-Rome / London-Germany / New-England-Virginia) VS (Jerusalem-Babylon-Memphis / Ukraine-Frankfurt-Moscow-Paris) tips again.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:52:00 UTC

  • The great lies were invented in the ancient and modern world for the underclasse

    The great lies were invented in the ancient and modern world for the underclasses who were domesticated out of barbarism – not oppressed.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:48:00 UTC

  • Pseudoscience, Marxism, Scientific Socialism, Cultural Marxism, Political Correc

    Pseudoscience, Marxism, Scientific Socialism, Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness: Revolt atainst Aristocracy that domesticated man.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:46:00 UTC

  • In this revolution, our people don’t know the words to use yet. We must give the

    In this revolution, our people don’t know the words to use yet. We must give them the language to restore western aristocratic culture.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:44:00 UTC

  • The revolution against the great lie of cosmopolitan pseudoscience, cultural mar

    The revolution against the great lie of cosmopolitan pseudoscience, cultural marxism, political correctness, and universalism has come.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 06:43:00 UTC

  • Unless one starts with a definition of truth these are fairly meaningless words.

    Unless one starts with a definition of truth these are fairly meaningless words.

    More desperate attempts to apply axiomatic or theoretic rules to loaded, framed, colloquial speech without the awareness that colloquial speech evolved to tolerate laziness, obscure ignorance, convey moral promise, and as such is neither axiomatic or theoretic but merely “meaningful”: conveying associations not necessary relations that are open to deduction.

    Types of Committment ( promise, warranty ):

    Understanding: I can also find a relationship between that description and my experience. ( warranty of sympathy )

    Belief: I intuit so given my experience but I cannot warranty I have tested it. But I warranty that I speak honestly, even if I err.(moral warranty)

    Rational: I can find no contradiction for within my experience, and warranty that I have tried. ( warranty of diligence without cost of testing )

    Empirical: I find it to be correspondent with observations (measurements) that warrant against errors in observation ( warranty of diligence and bearing the cost of testing )

    Scientific: despite my efforts I find it is correspondent and I cannot find a reason that it is false so it remains a truth candidate. ( warranty of diligence and investing in expanding testing )

    Testimonial: I have conducted tests of identity, internal consistency, empirical consistency, existential possibility, objective morality, full accounting, parsimony and limits and as such it is very likely for the question at hand that this statement will survive all scrutiny and only increase in parsimony. ( warranty of total testing )

    The only existentially possible truth is promissory.

    The only existential truth we can warranty is testimonial.

    One does not justify a truth one demonstrates a warranty of the degree of his diligence.

    Thus endeth the lesson. ;).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 04:25:00 UTC

  • So then why must we have uniformity in an economy? Well because we can’t get cus

    So then why must we have uniformity in an economy?

    Well because we can’t get customer service our if monopolies and government service is a monopoly.

    So then how do we preserve competition for service with direction and low risk wages?

    The type of work itself is one reward.

    The payment for it another.

    But the market PRICE of that reward is insufficient to produce common goods we desire while preserving incentives.

    But we cannot fix prices, right?

    More to come …

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 02:48:00 UTC

  • Business isn’t anything like the infantry, other than engineering public works.

    Business isn’t anything like the infantry, other than engineering public works.

    It bears little resemblance to the work of officers only in bureaucracies.

    And it begins to be similar when one compares the work of most work to that if high level officers and politicians.

    Major reasons are:

    1) Emphasis on reward vs risk.

    2) Emphasis on defection ( competition ) vs duty ( loyalty )

    For the lower classes risk mitigation, direction and loyalty provide security. They think in controlling costs.

    For the upper classes reward opportunities, innovation, and defection provide security. They thin in creating opportunities.

    This is fairly obvious.

    What is not obvious is contrasting the difference in bonds which decreases as one increases in rank precisely because it limits opportunity.

    In other words politicians have the inverse incentives of soldiers.

    And business people have the approximate incentives of high ranking officers.

    And labor had the approximate incentives of low level officers.

    And the underclasses have the incentives of soldiers.

    And not surprisingly that’s how demographics tend to work out.

    Incentives.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-15 02:42:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_R1a_Y-DNA.shtml

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-14 14:03:00 UTC

  • What are your thoughts on this?

    What are your thoughts on this?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-14 12:51:00 UTC