Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE REVOLUTION IS HERE Metaphysics of Correspondence with Action – Realism, Natu

    THE REVOLUTION IS HERE

    Metaphysics of Correspondence with Action – Realism, Naturalism, Complete Scientific Realism (Testimonial Realism), Defeating the Red Queen.

    Testimonial Truth – Complete Warranty of Due Diligence

    Propertarianism – Ethics of Property in Toto: non-imposition of costs.

    Nomocracy – Rule of Law, Universal Standing, Universal Application

    Market Government – Post Monopoly Production of Commons, Market for Production, Market for Reproduction,

    Transcendent Aesthetics – Bounty: the True, the Excellent, The Beautiful, The Transcendent

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-21 02:31:00 UTC

  • IF ANY OF YOU ARE STILL DECEIVED, WE CAN CURE YOU (marxism, feminism, democratic

    IF ANY OF YOU ARE STILL DECEIVED, WE CAN CURE YOU

    (marxism, feminism, democratic secular humanism, mainstream democrat, republican, libertarian, anarcho capitalism, neo-reactionary)

    —“There is only one source of liberty: the organized application of violence to suppress parasitism by all means in every area of life.” Here we have the means (violence) to an end (liberty).How is this not edgy consequentialism again. Fucking animals can consequentialism bro. But thanks for your concern. Holy shit utilitarianism too! It’s literally a shit smorgasbord of consequentialism! Yeah I’m into deontological things like ethics and shit”— Greg Gilson (a victim of cosmopolitan deception, and current Useful Idiot)

    Neither you nor the author of the OP seem to grasp the difference between BELIEF and the ABSENCE of demonstrated preference, and INCENTIVES and the PRESENCE of demonstrated preference. In other words, the difference between an existentially impossible model and an existentially possible one.

    Nor do you realize the difference between internally consistent but informationally incomplete, and externally non-correspondent argument, with internally consistent, informationally complete, and demonstrably correspondent argument.

    Nor do you realize that selfish(isolationist), imitative(environmental), virtue(hero), deontological(rule), and teleological (outcome), ethics constitute a spectrum of problems from total ignorance to total knowledge – and that one only chooses a lower demand for knowledge when he lacks the information to use the ethical standard that requires greater knowledge. Unless of course, he is engaged in deception wherein the use of greater knowledge and a corresponding methodology of ethics that makes use of greater knowledge, would falsify his arguments.

    Nor do you seem to realize that your form argument is constructed by the same form of deceit as marxism: wishful thinking, overloading and suggestion, and appeal to cognitive bias that grants altruistic trust to appeals to your reproductive strategy.

    Now, while it is apparent to those of us with far greater knowledge and skill, that you are the victim of various forms of overloading and suggestion that appeals to your (lackluster) reproductive strategy and limited knowledge and ability, and therefore a “useful idiot” for advocacy on behalf of the left-marxist-center-libertine-right-neocon second great rebellion against meritocratic aristocracy and western liberty, it is not apparent to you for the same reasons you are open to such relatively easy suggestion.

    But once you are made aware that you’ve been duped, the fact that you can construct an argument using philosophical terms the consequence of which you demonstrably do not grasp, there is hope that you might learn, and transcend the Second Great Deceit of Pseudoscience and Pseudorationalism, and evolve beyond Useful Idiot, and learn the method of pursuing an existentially possible form of liberty.

    If any of you are still victims of cosmopolitan pseudo-mystical, pseudo-rational, or pseudo-scientific deception, we can cure you.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    (note to readers: you might literally have to study this argument, or ask a few questions, but this is how you put an end to the Kantian fallacies that were adopted by the cosmopolitans and used to create the deep overloading fallacies in marxism, libertinism, and neo-conservativsm that made deceit by suggestion and appeal to reproductive cognitive bias possible. But remind people: if any of you are still fooled by the cosmopolitan fallacies – at any point on the ideological spectrum – there is hope: we can cure you.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-21 00:04:00 UTC

  • ADHERENCE TO FALSIFIED THEORIES ISN”T DEMONSTRATING INTELLIGENCE – JUST LOSS AVO

    ADHERENCE TO FALSIFIED THEORIES ISN”T DEMONSTRATING INTELLIGENCE – JUST LOSS AVOIDANCE GIVEN ONE’S OVERINVESTMENT IN MALINVESTMENT

    Sure I spent a lot of times at LvMI. But you know, once you know your theory is bullshit it’s time to seek another.

    There is only one source of liberty: the organized application of violence to suppress parasitism by all means in every area of life.

    The organization of acquisition, inventory, transformation, and consumption, the organization of reproduction, the organization of production, distribution and trade, the organization of commons production and the organization of territorial limits.

    It is by the suppression of parasitism that we create the Liberty we seek.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-20 14:58:00 UTC

  • All of us are imperfect. We all demonstrate a mean-time-between-stupid. But some

    All of us are imperfect. We all demonstrate a mean-time-between-stupid. But some liberty-advocates work opposite ends of the scale. #tlot

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-20 14:57:00 UTC

  • Tom Woods just keeps getting better every year

    Tom Woods just keeps getting better every year.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-20 14:54:00 UTC

  • (No, it’s because I don’t believe I will live long enough to collect much social

    (No, it’s because I don’t believe I will live long enough to collect much social security. It’s better to burn out than to rust anyway. 🙂 )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-20 13:57:00 UTC

  • SILICON VALLEY IS FIGHTING A LOSING BATTLE Why? because economic regionalization

    SILICON VALLEY IS FIGHTING A LOSING BATTLE

    Why? because economic regionalization is going to win (it has to). Because the USA is losing its dollar advantage (it has to). Because populism (self-defense) is the natural reaction to both (people have to).

    And all the valley leadership are doing is branding themselves as a political Hollywood v2, which can be regulated and taxed into submission.

    Ask Gates what happens when your government turns against you.

    The USA makes the EU look like mother Theresa when they go after you. Because they aren’t necessarily trying to win a case. They are trying to force you to submit through distracting and sewing uncertainty in your management team, the financial market, your shareholders, your employees, and forcing you to bear enormous opportunity, financial, and brand-sentiment costs.

    Ergo, Thiel is correct.

    Some of us understand how easy it would be for example to make the Hollywood lottery effect even more impossible than it is already. The same is for the tech giants of the day.

    The wild west of the internet is on its way to domestication. The dollar is on its way to domestication. Immigration is on its way to domestication. Overseas revenues are on their way to domestication. and the fact that tech is a distracting bright spot of profitability in an economy with few of them is a privilege that the valley takes for granted.

    Time to get on the bus.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-20 13:50:00 UTC

  • “The trend of centralization of the global economy will remain in the past. It w

    —“The trend of centralization of the global economy will remain in the past. It will be replaced by regionalization. In today’s economic instability, only systems with 0.5 to 1 billion people can be effective,”—

    —“A norm is an economic system with 0.5 to 1 billion people. This means that the world economy should fall into 5-6 relatively independent units as a result of the crisis.”—

    —” today there are two basic scenarios, based on an economic

    model. The first scenario – the salvation of the transnational price of the financial system of the US economy falls. The second scenario – the salvation of the US economy at the expense of the destruction of the global financial system. Since the Republican Party stands

    for the second scenario, for it has voted the majority of voters in 2014. The same trend we are seeing now. The Democratic Party supports the first scenario. However, the split between these scenarios is not between parties, but across them: for example, Republican George W. Bush is committed to the first scenario, a Democrat Bernie Sanders – second. But now, in the midst of the election race, it is obvious that Donald Trump represents the interests of isolationists and Hillary Clinton – globalists. That is, they are two wings of the split

    of the American elite. That is why all attempts to assess their chances of election of the President, based on the old system, where important vote count individual representatives of American society, will not work.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-20 13:20:00 UTC

  • (Got a reminder from Cesar Tortelino and thought I’d share some choice quotes fr

    (Got a reminder from Cesar Tortelino and thought I’d share some choice quotes from everyone’s favorite Russian Economist)

    —“the world economy has developed in the framework of expanding markets over the last 400 years. As a result, today it is in a very unstable state, since household spending is several times higher than income: by $3.3 trillion in the US and $2.5 trillion in the EU. The purchasing power of the average salary in the U.S. is at the level of 1958, all the rest – is induced demand due to the growth of private and public debt”—Khazin.

    (I have said this differently: that the standard of living of the average american can decline by 40% if america loses control of the petro-dollar.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-20 13:00:00 UTC

  • FASCISM IN THE GREAT GAME OF ROCK PAPER SCISSORS: –Liberty/Market, Fascism/Mar,

    FASCISM IN THE GREAT GAME OF ROCK PAPER SCISSORS:

    –Liberty/Market, Fascism/Mar, Law/Culture–

    The Communist threat was enormous.

    Given the asymmetric value of oppy.costs, NOT ACTING in era of change is expensive.

    So taking early initiative or waiting is a question of forecast costs.

    And fascism was an answer to acting early.

    A condition of liberty is the consequence of the nearly universal suppression of parasitism.

    But just as soldiers compete, norms compete, and markets compete: *Rock-Paper-Scissors applies*.

    One cannot fight soldiers with markets:Rock-Paper-Scissors. There is no steady state in econ or out.

    There is no permanent condition of liberty possible any more than is a permanent condition of war.

    Rock paper scissors: Liberty/Market, Fascism/War, Law/Culture.

    Simple people use simple models. But while simple people use simple models it is up to us to explain the much more complicated world.

    And that most complicated world consists not of steady states,but of supply,demand,rents,and shocks.

    Facism is not a model, it is a tool with which we seek the optimum state of liberty, law, peace.

    Monopoly institutions are not a steady state but a means of paying for the suppression of local rent.

    Rule of law is not a steady state but a tool for the suppression of innovations in parasitism.

    That we have yet failed to create an institution for suppressing centralized rents is just a failure.

    Anarchism cannot do this, so the alternative is market production of commons.

    Because commons are necessary even for the production of property rights, rule of law and territory.

    And surprisingly, it turns out that commons free of privatization, are devastatingly competitive.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-20 09:44:00 UTC