Source: Facebook

  • ANALYSIS OF THE STRATEGIES OF THE UKRAINAN AND RUSSIAN PEOPLES AND A PREDICTION

    ANALYSIS OF THE STRATEGIES OF THE UKRAINAN AND RUSSIAN PEOPLES AND A PREDICTION OF THE FUTURE.

    —Why is urkaine’s independence sacrosanct?—

    1) liberty has a value in itself, and one cannot claim a desire for liberty without reciprocally assiting others. Although the reason for that is longer than I want to get into right now.

    2) there is no reason ever, why a people cannot secede to form a nation by secession from an empire, except occupation.

    2) It is always moral for a higher trust people to govern a lower trust people, but Russians are a lower trust people than Ukrainians.

    4) Poland and Ukraine are genetically related peoples (indistinguishable) and there is no reason that Ukrainians cannot possess the same quality of life as the Poles. Poland has a GDP per capital of 14K and Ukraine, despite similar geography and demographics has one of 4k. Ukrainians could triple their standard of living if they could join either Poland or the EU, which would displace the oligarchs, and with the oligarchs and Russian corruption, post-soviet poverty.

    5) The Russians have murdered far too many people in this country, desecrated graves, destroyed traditions, made people disappear in the night, destroyed a once-healthy high trust European culture, destroyed families, destroyed ethics and morality, destroyed the middle class, occupied, impoverished, and supported a predatory and corrupt regime. They don’t want Russian leadership they want prosperity.

    6) the borderlands sphere, consisting of the north eastern European countries: Boland, Czech republic, Hungary,, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovenia, and at the outside, Romania form a cultural and genetic region.

    The southern eastern European countries of the mountain-sphere: Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania, Kosovo and Macedonia, would be better off forming their own federations. These countries had more ottoman influence and they will always be harder to govern.

    Belarus has decided to remain, like the Kazhaks, in the Russian steppe-sphere. Much like cuba lived off soviet contributions, belarus lives of russian.

    WHY DOES UKRAINE MATTER TO RUSSIA?

    Well, to be a great power requries about .5B people. Russia has 140M. The Kazahks have 17, the Belarus 10, Ukraine about 45, the poles 38, the baltics not enough to matter.

    Russia has poor ports for a world power: the black sea (crimea), kalinningrad (conquered german city of Koenigsburg), and it’s artic locations. So as an ARTIC power it’s got bases, but as a TEMPERATE SHIPPING power it doesn’t.

    Without access to water russia cannot be a great power.

    WHY DOES RUSSIA WANT TO BE A GREAT POWER?

    They want to restore orthodox civilization, and frankly who can blame them. Otherwise they’re a small population with an enormous land mass to defend, and without the people, economy, and infrastructure to defend it.

    Russian mythology and paranoid psychology does not easily accept the status of second-rate nation, subject tot he will of others. Especially when internal control requries such heavy-handedness. Weakness is not tolerable.

    So the die is cast, and unless russia wants to rule the islamic world by remote, using israel, saudi arabia, and turkey, she has no possible method of obtaining territory and economy sufficient for a great power status.

    So she has three choices: join the west (which is what we all want really – them to rescue us from liberalism and us to rescue them from corruption and the absence of rule of law.

    She can try to unite with china, which merely means she will be a client state of 140m managed by the economiy and might of a different race (chinese) who have a very poor record of treatment of satellites.

    Or she can try to progressively obtain control over the middle east. And why is this sensible for russia? Beause almost all the oil in the world is in a big puddle between saudia arabia, and the artic above moscow.

    IN other words, russia can make a play to rule the resourc-cursed destert and steppe peoples. Why? Islamic demographics and religion dooms them to permanent underclass. Russia, israel, and turkey can create a technological and miltiary caste system that basically farms the arabs and iranians as cattle.

    THIS IS HOW GROWNUPS TALK ABOUT WORLD AFFAIRS.

    (and if you can’t talk economics and incentives you need to learn to)

    BACK TO UKRAINE.

    A romantic would say that we preserve Ukraine. A scientist would say that the southeast and access to the black sea are lost because Russians successfully transplanted so many of their people into that region that they have done to Ukraine what Europeans did to the American Indians: destroyed them through invasion and conquest and immigration.

    So the rational solution would be to give russia her warm water ports and return the center and west of Ukraine to poland, making Poland roughly the population of Germany, but with three time’s germany’s 120k square miles, at ~300K square miles of territory, and the best farmland outside of west france. Capable of feeding all of europe forever. Poland and germany alone then would be equal in population to russia, and economically leaving germany+poland/ukraine with ~5T in GDP compared to 2T of russian GDP.

    Russia then is both safe and economically incapable of western expansion.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 11:01:00 UTC

  • (aspie diary) ( Maybe it’s the kind of autism I have, or where it’s localized, b

    (aspie diary)

    ( Maybe it’s the kind of autism I have, or where it’s localized, but I’ve been taking prescriptions for it since ’91 or so, and I’m basically rewired by now to depend upon it. And I don’t understand people’s complaints. I also have to take thyroid hormones because I don’t have a thyroid, and I have to take blood pressure pills, and my backpack looks like a pharmacy because of all the allergy and asthma-related stuff I carry with me. But I don’t consider these medicines any different than making sure I get red meat three times a week, and eat green vegetables, or get off my rear and walk a little bit each day. But modern medicine made a difficult youth and challenging early adulthood into a much more tolerable maturity. I suspect that for most people they want to hold onto an existing mental frame and not let themselves adapt to the new frame. Perhaps it takes a certain character to deal with introspective uncertainty and chaos for long enough to adapt. I remember what it used to be like, and it would focus like hell on one thing or the other, and I just couldn’t switch gears at all without a struggle. I still have ways of talking myself out of autistic state and into engaged-state. I just don’t have to use them unless I am very stressed or very tired. I watch Mr Robot and it’s not strange to me. I don’t have his schizophrenic traits but the behavioral tendency to live entirely in your head is what I had to train myself out of. And it was so hard that in retrospect I cant believe it. But you know why I paid that high cost? Access to females. Women were my incentive to fight the autistic fight. And it largely worked – albeit, there is certain kind of woman that finds me attractive or interesting, and they often share similar quirks. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 10:07:00 UTC

  • KUDOS FOR THE POSTER/INFOGRAPHIC SUGGESTION Whoever told me that I ought to redu

    KUDOS FOR THE POSTER/INFOGRAPHIC SUGGESTION

    Whoever told me that I ought to reduce Propertariansim to posters or infographics, you were insightful. Because that’s the best way to distribute it. Thank you.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 09:51:00 UTC

  • ( a little birdie whispered to me that we may have some podcasts in the future.

    ( a little birdie whispered to me that we may have some podcasts in the future. i don’t want to steal someone else’s thunder, but I thought i might generate a little market interest ahead of time.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 09:50:00 UTC

  • Q&A –What’s the story with nazis funded by Soros in Ukraine?— The story is, t

    Q&A –What’s the story with nazis funded by Soros in Ukraine?—

    The story is, this:

    Which is more believable: that in a Country the size and population of Canada, whose people look across the border enviously at the prosperity of their extended family in Poland – people who speak approximately the same language, possess approximately the same religion and values – would revolt when their president rejected joining the EU because he was bought and paid for, like everyone else in the government, by the Russian government, in hopes of collapsing the military and civil order sufficiently that Russia could claim a humanitarian excuse for repossessing the territory and restoring the Russian empire by the reuniting of Ukraine, belorus, Prussia, and possibly Kazakhstan?

    What’s NOT rational about the red necks in Ukraine like any other country with a surplus of unemployed men, would not gladly take out their frustrations on a government so corrupt that it makes Venezuela look like holy see?

    OK. So apparently people in these circumstances, tasting the chance that they might exit unnecessary poverty and corruption are going to be swayed by Soros’s money? The USA was flying almost 10M in cash a week into Ukraine to give to people. But no one in a million years thought the president would flee, because no one in a million years thought that the people would fight that hard.

    Soros funds a lot of things.

    BTW: I know these guys that are supposedly ‘nazis’ and if you call them right wing nationalists that’s true. They want to crush corruption of the bolsheviks in Russia the same way the germans wanted to crush the bolshevik movement in Europe. There isn’t anything bad about crushing bolshevism, communism, Russian expansion at all. The only thing we can really (over centuries) criticize the nazis about is overconfidence and running out of money to use resettlement camps as labor and finally starvation camps. Fascism is a rational response to communism. It worked. National socialism was a rational response to communism and bolshevism and Trotskyism.

    Soros should be in prison like Putin put the oligarchs in prison. I have no idea why we don’t just seize everything he owns and prosecute everyone who works for him. The hard right in ukraine is just a patriotic nationalist movement.

    We should not confuse putin’s legitimate constraint of american power, with putin’s illegitimate attempt to restore the russian empire and the corruption endemic to the russian sphere of influence.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 08:11:00 UTC

  • Retweeted Brett Stevens (@amerika_blog): .@ThaRightStuff My tribe is Western Eur

    Retweeted Brett Stevens (@amerika_blog):

    .@ThaRightStuff My tribe is Western Europeans. I wish every other tribe goodwill in their own nations. #tcot #altright #nrx


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 07:49:00 UTC

  • Retweeted Brett Stevens (@amerika_blog): You’re not right-wing until you want ar

    Retweeted Brett Stevens (@amerika_blog):

    You’re not right-wing until you want aristocracy, nationalism, free markets and transcendental guidance. #tcot #nrx #altright


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 07:49:00 UTC

  • CAN WE FIND CLASS MOVEMENTS IN CONSERVATISM, LIBERTARIANISM, AND PROGRESSIVISM?

    CAN WE FIND CLASS MOVEMENTS IN CONSERVATISM, LIBERTARIANISM, AND PROGRESSIVISM?

    (Short answer: yes)

    CURT:

    —I tend to refer to the various conservatisms as class-movements within the aristocratic egalitarian system of cooperation, with the national socialists and 88’ers and such as the upper proletariat and lower working class(soldiery, labor, and demand), the traditionalists as the upper working class(nco’s, information and advocacy), the legalists as the middle class(officers, organization and choice), and the martial and judicial castes as the upper class (Monarchy, generals, force and limits).- Curt Doolittle

    IVAN:

    —“Are there similar class-movements among progressives and libertarians? And, could it be stated that class-movements among all three groups are consequence of division of moral intuitions on one hand, and perception, cognition, labour and advocacy on the other?

    I guess, among libertarians, there would be: libertines (lower), an-caps(middle) and international traders (high). And among progressives there would be members of syndicate (lower), social justice warriors (middle) and globalist (high).”— Ivan Ilakovac


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 07:48:00 UTC

  • CURT: DOES CIVILIZATION GIVE US HIGHER PURPOSE? (short answer, no) —does the i

    CURT: DOES CIVILIZATION GIVE US HIGHER PURPOSE?

    (short answer, no)

    —does the introduction of civilization produce another algorithm, one in which the goal is to satisfy human desires and intentions more than a biological imperative?—

    It sure looks as though at some point we stop reproducing more out of security and simply consume more out of luxury.

    I think the domestication of man produces far more productive results, and that we have an endless appetite for consumption.

    I don’t see anything other than that. If any human behavior can be expressed as an attempt at acquisition, consumption, and persistence, then that behavior provides us with decidable causality. And we need not try to invent falsehoods to comfort ourselves that anything else is going on here.

    We enjoy each other because operation at low cost and entertainment at low cost are good algorithms. Enjoyment is the body’s reward for saving, obtaining, consuming, or inventorying calories.

    Our emotions are all reducible to changes in property. All of them.

    It’s …. kind of painful to understand it.

    But we do get to enjoy the ride our genes take us on. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 07:42:00 UTC

  • POLITICAL PREFERENCE IS REDUCIBLE TO GENETIC STRATEGY —“One might view this as

    POLITICAL PREFERENCE IS REDUCIBLE TO GENETIC STRATEGY

    —“One might view this as two competing models of class: the conservative model emphasizes producing an upper half of the pyramid, where the leftist model strives to produce the lower half.”—

    CLASSES

    –The conservative model emphasizes producing an upper half of the pyramid, where the leftist model strives to produce the lower half.—

    Conservative, K-selection, Male/strong, long term, tribe, lower cost of defense.

    Progressive, r-selection, Female/weak, short term, offspring, lower cost of reproduction.

    We differ in perception and function, but are compatible, and through exchanges(negotiations and trades) we ‘discover’ the ‘price’ of persistence (survival). And we rebel at the limits, when exchanges are no longer possible or desirable..

    MEMES

    I see memes as… a failure to produce an equally compelling narrative. But at the bottom of the argumentative spectrum it’s all rallying and shaming anyway. So yes, I see us having adopted the marxists methods, even if I don’t like it.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 07:37:00 UTC