Source: Facebook

  • Vivek Upadhyay Is it cool to get you involved with podcasts etc?

    Vivek Upadhyay Is it cool to get you involved with podcasts etc?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 14:02:00 UTC

  • I SAID THIS IN 1987, PROFESSORS ARGUED WITH ME. I’m like, “look, a grenade weigh

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-23/the-pentagon-takes-aim-at-bomb-carrying-consumer-dronesWHEN I SAID THIS IN 1987, PROFESSORS ARGUED WITH ME.

    I’m like, “look, a grenade weighs 14oz, and a block of C4 weights a bit more. If the machine is basically built to turn into shrapnel,especially if at close (50yd) range they have a solid rocket booster (+3oz), then, I mean, they have a terminal (killing) radius of about 15 feet or so, and they cost nothing, and a swarm of them is terrifying. Most amateur quad drones today lift twice that in payload.

    Now you’ve probably seen the little bot that ‘hops’. Same thing. Biggest complaint I read (and hear) from field people is that all bots are too loud still. Light, quiet and made for shrapnel. We make these things out of plastic to make them cheap, but some alloys are almost better.

    Sure suppressing fire, night operations, etc, men are better. But I mean crappy night vision on one of these things and you’re sitting half a mile away playing video games: lining up drones: boom a blocked window, boom inside the room, boom in the hallway, boom in the next room. I mean, guys come running out and you chase and boom.

    I like the little hopping bots, assuming that even if you shoot them they go off, so you’re actually afraid to destroy them anywhere near to you.

    I was so passionate about making smart tanks until I realized that I was looking at the wrong scale. What we want is zika-mosquitos, lots of explosive grasshoppers and butterflies, rats (Hoppers), and birds (drones).

    I can fantasize can’t I?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 14:00:00 UTC

  • (as far as I know there is nothing unchristian about my arguments, and my critic

    (as far as I know there is nothing unchristian about my arguments, and my criticism of Christianity is limited to the use of falsehoods, and demand for submission. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:27:00 UTC

  • THE SPECTRUM OF SIGNALS OF BELIEF CLAIMS. We’ve been discussing this in my corne

    THE SPECTRUM OF SIGNALS OF BELIEF CLAIMS.

    We’ve been discussing this in my corner of the universe, and I tend to work with the following terminological sequence:

    Faith = recognition that you’re position is indefensible, but you report that you hold some position.

    Belief = a ‘signal’ in the report that you might decide in favor of the position were it of no cost to you, but that you aren’t accountable for the truth or falsehood of it.

    Know = that you are not signaling, but with present knowledge, will defend your claim that you will decide in favor of the position, even if it costs you minor reputation for defending it.

    Promise = that you are willing to commit status and reputation to defend the assertion that you will choose in favor of the position.

    Warranty = that you are willing to commit materially to defend the assertion that you will choose in favor of the position.

    Demonstrate = that you have chosen in favor of the position.

    We have a lot of evidence that says this hierarchy of costs reflects the ‘put’ that an individual is making on the proposition at hand.

    TYING TO EARLIER POST ON THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY as reducible to word games that attempt to escape accountability.

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154464857972264

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:26:00 UTC

  • OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM’S MAIN THEMES Quick Note Turned into a Post. If you

    OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM’S MAIN THEMES

    Quick Note Turned into a Post.

    If you watch (1) the intertemporal division of perception, (2) the intercultural division of perception (circumpolar people), and (3) listen to this podcast (civilizational strategies);

    And if you catch that consistently across the personal, interpersonal, national, and civilizational strategies, that I CONSISTENTLY try to draw your attention to the three possible means of governance (coercion): religion/gossp/ostracization, trade/remuneration, and law/order/violence, you will begin to see the pattern that I work with that is VERY DIFFERENT from the idealism of ‘equality’ or even near equality.

    And if you then grasp that all human intuition, mind, emotion, reason, exists for the simple purpose of acquisition. And our intuitions vary only be reproductive strategy(gender) and our desirability(class). And that our emotional reward system is nothing more than evidence of changes in the state of property.

    And that we act to acquire property in toto.

    And that we negotiate for acquiring what we desire to fulfill our strategy.

    And that we signal by a thousand means in order to improve our negotiating position.

    And if you are enough of a philosopher to grasp that I divide categories of argument into the equivalent of increasingly articulate mathematical disciplines. (see my hierarchies of argument) – and we use them to honestly, dishonestly, wishfully, foolishly, and rarely truthfully, use them to negotiate with one another.

    And if you then you bring in the various dimensions by which I ask we test propositions (testimonialism’s six dimensional tests of due diligence necessary for warranty of propositions),

    And that the only way we make use of information across all our perceptions, is when we cooperate (Trade) voluntarily.

    And then that we can ‘calculate’ together fastest, most competitively, if we make use of (1)natural, judge-discovered, common law, jury, (2) a market for reproduction (marriage and family), (3) a market for the production of good and services in support of the market for reproduction, (4) and a market for the production of commons.

    And that we have domesticated mankind through incremental suppression of parasitism thereby enforcing production. And that we have only now to expand our suppression of parasitism to counter the development of media, so that we prevent propaganda and deceit in every walk of life.

    Then you have social science as I describe it in Propertarianism. (Natural Law), and the solutions to the majority of current problems.

    Stop lying, stop parasitism, and stop involuntary association, and that’s what it takes.

    My next series of thought will be criticisms of the attempt to preserve the monopoly of territory on the continent by the federal government.

    And I will continue to work on religion while I do that.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:12:00 UTC

  • We are all unequal but all compatible if we trade with each other

    We are all unequal but all compatible if we trade with each other.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 11:02:00 UTC

  • Members of good families want nationalism, members of bad families universalism

    Members of good families want nationalism, members of bad families universalism – in other words, they want a better family than made them.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 07:14:00 UTC

  • Good families want nationalism, and bad families want universalism

    Good families want nationalism, and bad families want universalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 05:00:00 UTC

  • Decidability means you are either a member of a family, tribe, and nation, or a

    Decidability means you are either a member of a family, tribe, and nation, or a government, corporation, employee, and serf. Why?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 04:59:00 UTC

  • OUCH —“You said a great sentence- The ugly truth is that west domesticated man

    OUCH

    —“You said a great sentence- The ugly truth is that west domesticated man.- But you forgot to say even uglier truth, – But failed in domestication of women, they were shielded throw that process by the god of golden pussy,natural submissiveness and biological superiority , and we are looking at consequence of that in todays modern world. Just as you said- incentives, incentives and sex is a powerful one. Who wants instant gratification, consumption on all sides ,security on every level of their life, hates liberty and truth and agency, it is the women, and their collective and solipsistic introjection mushroom of underground lies, deceit and mysticism around their biological imperative.”— ML


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 04:42:00 UTC