( I hope this doesn’t mean anything. But I usually don’t ‘see’ typos. But over the past few weeks I’m not seeing the extra words that shouldn’t be there. )
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 05:48:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
The only way to win is not to play the game. The only way to rule justly is to e
The only way to win is not to play the game. The only way to rule justly is to eliminate discretionary rule: Rule of Law: Nomocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 05:47:00 UTC
-
will be as revolutionary for mankind as empiricism – and likely more so
https://t.co/08d0ytWGhZTestimionialism will be as revolutionary for mankind as empiricism – and likely more so.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 05:46:00 UTC
-
The only way to win is not to play the game. The only way to rule justly is to e
The only way to win is not to play the game. The only way to rule justly is to eliminate the discretionary rule: Rule of Law: Nomocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 05:45:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 05:32:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 05:08:00 UTC
-
(I bet The Law of Nature is more popular in China than the west. They don’t live
(I bet The Law of Nature is more popular in China than the west. They don’t live in denial. They just lie a lot to make reality tolerable.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 04:24:00 UTC
-
(trying to turn josh’s comment into a description. might take me a bunch of trie
(trying to turn josh’s comment into a description. might take me a bunch of tries)
All Doolittle’s work is reducible to Testimonialism – and Testimonialism is only concerned with intersubjectivity[*1] as the necessary domain of cooperation, law, and political action.
His system isn’t really saying anything we didn’t already know science to be. Other than perhaps, that cooperation written as empirically discovered law can evolve as does knowledge in any other empirical science.
Sociality [*2] inherently needed intersubjective consensus to be possible to be a viable evolutionary strategy, and that’s all we’re really doing with law and society: cooperating on evolutionary strategies.
What you or I may think and write about that tries to move past this simple “roboticism” (uninspiring logic) isn’t really for the domain of law. And in a way, it had to be that way to be individually meaningful.
—
[*1] – In its weakest sense, intersubjectivity refers to agreement.
[*2] – Sociality is the degree to which individuals in an animal population tend to associate in social groups and form cooperative societies. Sociality is a survival response to evolutionary pressures.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 02:58:00 UTC
-
Class Structure as Necessary Hierarchy in Limits. Militia (every able bodied man
Class Structure as Necessary Hierarchy in Limits.
Militia (every able bodied man sworn to defend sovereignty of all.
Aristocracy (martial/judicial – limits ) (organization of cooperation)
Priestly (public intellectual – advocacy) (organization of ambitions)
Burgher (organization of production distribution and trade)
Family (organization of production of generations)
Labor (production of goods and services) (organization of physical reality)
Dependent (Young, Infirmed, and Old)
Underclass (those who cannot contribute but just cost)
Criminal-class (career predators and parasites)
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-19 02:33:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-18 09:47:00 UTC