—“Justice is a process for reverting violations of reciprocity.”— Martin Štěpán
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 19:54:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
( Doing stupid-sh__t used to be the providence of young men demonstrating risk t
( Doing stupid-sh__t used to be the providence of young men demonstrating risk tolerance. Of all the things young women could pick up on, that’s the one they do… omg. )
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 18:39:00 UTC
-
“THE ABSENCE OF IMPEDIMENTS TO THE DEMONSTRATION OF MERIT” —“Equality of Oppor
“THE ABSENCE OF IMPEDIMENTS TO THE DEMONSTRATION OF MERIT”
—“Equality of Opportunity is only theoretically possible in a totalitarian state and even then it is impossible because those with the power to enforce equality of opportunity would be vastly more powerful than the ordinary citizen and would use that power to further entrench themselves and their class in the power hierarchy. … It’s just a dumb idea. “—Scott De Warren
I think the term means “The Absence of Impediments to The Demonstration of Merit”. The left abused it. The right doesn’t.
Western civilization has always provided a path for merit and punishment for the opposite.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 18:32:00 UTC
-
“Samuel Huntington told the truth.”—Scott De Warren
—“Samuel Huntington told the truth.”—Scott De Warren
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 18:17:00 UTC
-
I wrote a couple of important posts on economics today. Now I’m gong to write on
I wrote a couple of important posts on economics today. Now I’m gong to write one on lingerie models and tattoos and measure the difference in likes. lol
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 18:14:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/82068367_183249079739920_35380098730
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/82068367_183249079739920_3538009873067278336_n_183249076406587.jpg IS INTELLECTUAL HONESTY IN CONFLICT WITH POLITICAL SCIENCE? ;)IS INTELLECTUAL HONESTY IN CONFLICT WITH POLITICAL SCIENCE? 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 18:02:00 UTC
-
SOVEREIGNTY OF STATES —“Most foundational early modern scholars of internation
SOVEREIGNTY OF STATES
—“Most foundational early modern scholars of international law (Grotius etc.) argued that international law and international treaties cannot supercede national sovereignty. The Treaty of Westphalia upholds this view. Sovereign states can enter into and break international treaties at will. There is nothing ‘above’ a sovereign’s authority in the international system under natural law.”—Scott De Warren
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 17:57:00 UTC
-
“Jack Sandusky What’s your take on what just happened at the Kremlin?”— Putin
—“Jack Sandusky What’s your take on what just happened at the Kremlin?”—
Putin is (as we should also) removing a clause from the constitution that puts international law above the russian constitution.
We have the same vulnerability in our constitution in that it is possible for a treaty to override our constitution.
This is yet another hole in the constitution that the P-constitution repairs.
(a) there is no violation of natural law no matter what.
(b) there is no means of violating the constitution no matter what.
(c) there is no law higher than the natural law, and no other law higher than the constitution than the natural law.
(d) the constitution includes the law of the european peoples.
So we have physical reality > the natural law > law of european peoples (our group strategy) and > constitution that implements that strategy in the natural law, using strict construction.
Like I said, I think shit thru.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 17:01:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/82222344_555593728370855_15552818835
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/82222344_555593728370855_1555281883506409472_n_555593725037522.jpg Humor.Humor.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 16:55:00 UTC
-
What would happen if we sold shares in the State rather than bonds?
What would happen if we sold shares in the State rather than bonds?
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 16:05:00 UTC