Source: Facebook

  • DO INDIVIDUALS IN ARISTOCRATIC FAMILIES EARN THEIR STATUS? So are you saying tha

    DO INDIVIDUALS IN ARISTOCRATIC FAMILIES EARN THEIR STATUS?

    So are you saying that generation after generation of underclass membership is unearned? Generation after generation of working class membership is unearned? Generation after generation of middle-class membership is unearned? Generation after generation of upper class is unearned? Generation after generation of Aristocracy is unearned?

    The ever-present grinding of (a) genetic regression to the mean, (b) economic competition (c) political competition , (d) military competition makes preservation of assets almost impossible.

    Are you rationalizing or are you judging on the evidence. Becuase the evidence is that (a) classes are genetic in origin, (b) there is significant rotation between neighboring classes, (c) that the middle class contains most of the genetic virtue of the population, with aristocracy working aggressively through reproductive selection to preserve genetic, material, territorial, social, and political capital.

    So if you have any example of any extant aristocracy that is not holding its own through merit then that would be a further empirical test. But your opinion otherwise is merely justification.

    FAMILIES CREATE ARISTOCRATIC FAMILIES OVER GENERATIONS.

    few wealthy families survive. few businesses survive, few civic organizations, and even few nations survive multiple generations of competition. Those families, businesses, civic organizations and nations that survive more than three generations do so because of their ability to compete.

    In other words, a natural aristocracy (emphasis on natural), is evidence of excellence, unless you can find (Rothschilds) an immoral means of achieving it.

    NO SPECIAL PLEADING

    and one example does not invalidate a distribution, just as one example does not validate a distribution. Outliers do not determine general rules. If we look at the history of aristocracy it is the most successful political order in human history, and democracy is merely a method of distributing the spoils of technological or military windfalls (athenian silver mine comes to mind.)

    WHY?

    Because once you are self sustaining the only signals you can produce of value are those that improve the commons (arts). The germans created the high point in europe for the simple reason that many princedom’s competed for signals and in doing so financed the arts and sciences.

    FALLACY OF THE BRITISH ARGUMENT AGAINST ARISTOCRACY

    The fallacy of your argument is in attributing merit to the individual rather than the family and rather to the lineage. Aristocracy is a product of lineage. Individualism is merely an excuse for failing to produce a lineage capable of accumulating genetic, material, territorial, social and political capital. In other words, your argument is a (common British) excuse by failed peoples to attribute merit to individuals rather than to organizations, and to families. In other words, it’s the most common repetition of the most common British moral fraud: lowlife false virtue signaling.

    INCENTIVES: ARISTOCRACY DEMONSTRATES LONGER TIME PREFERENCE AND THE ACCUMULATION OF COMMONS.

    Whereas democracy demonstrates the tragedy of the commons writ large.

    Curt Doolittle,

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-16 09:33:00 UTC

  • “Nature makes the rules. Cultural Marxists break them. Which is why they will fa

    —“Nature makes the rules. Cultural Marxists break them. Which is why they will fail in the end.”—Claire Rae Randall

    Yes. And we will pay the cost of their failure. So, we cannot tolerate them any longer.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-16 09:17:00 UTC

  • CHOOSE: LARGE CASTE, SMALL NATION As South America, Islamic Civilization, Indian

    CHOOSE: LARGE CASTE, SMALL NATION

    As South America, Islamic Civilization, Indian Civilization, and the Roman Empire demonstrated, there is no ‘uniformity’ or equality possible thru inbreeding. We either divide into nation-states or we divide into castes.

    So we can only choose the to distribute hierarchies and underclasses across many small states with possible rotations, or concentrate them in an inescapable caste-trap in large states.

    This is effectively law of nature that humans would have to act against their personal and reproductive interests to change.

    For the simple reasons that (a) some races have been more successful at morphological evolution through paedomorphic mating, (b) we are unequally desirable as mates, friends, partners, allies, and leaders, because of degrees of paedomorphic evolution and eugenic culling of the underclasses, and (c) we demonstrate both kin selection(more male) and hypergamy(more female) mating preferences.

    So we can choose castes or nations. And the evidence is in: Many small nations are superior at producing relative equality.

    That this is both obvious and logical is in itself a criticism of our tendency to seek safety in numbers even when it is against our interests, and to imagine commonality of thought and interest where it does not and cannot exist.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-16 08:34:00 UTC

  • RORTY is just a skeptic. He has no philosophy. He gives us none. His work is sim

    RORTY is just a skeptic. He has no philosophy. He gives us none. His work is simply excuse making (not even justification) of power seeking of the left.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-16 05:14:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://yournationnews.com/clint-eastwood-says-trump-isnt-racist-hes-just-saying-whats-on-everyones-mind/


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-15 18:14:00 UTC

  • DECIDABILITY PROVIDES POWER The never-ending problem of sentience, is choice. Kn

    DECIDABILITY PROVIDES POWER

    The never-ending problem of sentience, is choice.

    Knowledge provides decidability.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-15 18:04:00 UTC

  • STRATEGIES NOT STEADY STATES Communism …. (lower class – short term – consumpt

    STRATEGIES NOT STEADY STATES

    Communism

    …. (lower class – short term – consumption – r-selection )

    …. (mandatory consumption)

    …. (reproductive offense – distribution of assets )

    …. (strength in numbers)

    Market Government

    …. (middle class – medium term – production)

    …. (mandatory exchange)

    …. (productive offense – market exchange of assets)

    …. (strength in adaptation/evolution)

    Fascism

    …. (upper class – long term – preservation – K-selection)

    …. (mandatory production/contribution)

    …. (organizational offense – concentration of assets)

    …. (strength in ability[resources])

    Innovative < —————- > Defensive

    …. …. …. Communism (universalism) (impossible)

    …. …. Socialism (competitively impossible)

    …. Social Democracy (possible as long as competitive)

    Market Government (Trade) …. Anarchism (impossible)

    ….Classical-Liberalism, (competitively possible)

    …. ….Christian Monarchism (competitively possible)

    …. …. ….Fascism (particularism)

    We alter between these strategies as our prosperity allows.

    —Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-15 16:03:00 UTC

  • NOTES FROM THIS MORNING’S REVIEW OF CURRENT STATE 5-Literature 4-Religion 3-Phil

    NOTES FROM THIS MORNING’S REVIEW OF CURRENT STATE

    5-Literature

    4-Religion

    3-Philosophy (Moral Entrepreneurs)

    2-Intellectual History

    1-History

    0-Law

    1-Science

    —Curt

    Tautology(necessary),

    Proof(possible),

    Rational(potential),

    Literature(meaningful) —Curt

    We are all relying upon narratives that provide decidability for the purpose of pursuing allies in the achievement of a condition, not truth. We only rely upon a truthful narrative when it assists us attracting allies in the achievement of a condition. –Curt

    Shinto when we’re born,

    Confucian when we’re adolescent,

    Christian when we’re married,

    Buddhist when we die. — Japanese Saying

    Rationality – in that one consents to be persuaded – is a social virtue not a human faculty. Reason is a human faculty. Rationality is a moral virtue – a property of cooperation. — Rorty restated by Doolittle

    “It’s not a surprise that religion, democracy, and science, are in conflict: power.”–Rorty

    “Another sense of philosophy describes how various ideas fit together.” — Rorty. Well, I would say that philosophy consists of logic (necessity), criticism (science), integration(rationality), advocacy(moral literature), and imagining (fantasy literature). And that religion conflates advocacy, imagining, and Law (force). –Curt

    “if we take care of education and democratic freedom then truth will take care of itself”–Dewey. Well, it turns out that Dewey/Rorty are wrong. Just the opposite. – Curt

    Judaism is, like American pragmatism, a feminine philosophy, in that consequences to the commons are irrelevant. All that matters is the consequences to those collectively extant in the moment. — Curt

    Rorty makes the progressive error of the steady-state. We always fight the red queen. We have lost that under the temporary prosperity of industrialism. But the red queen has shifted just as crime has shifted. We compete against economies and resources and institutions, not against farming and territory and demographics. — Curt

    What objectively right vs objectively better = Survival of your gene pool. It is objectively right, and objectively better. — Curt

    Innovative < —————- > Defensive

    …. …. …. Communism (universalism) (impossible)

    …. …. Socialism (competitively impossible)

    …. Social Democracy (possible as long as competitive)

    Market Government (Trade) …. Anarchism (impossible)

    ….Classical-Liberalism, (

    …. ….Christian Monarchism

    …. …. ….Fascism (particularism)

    Communism

    …. (lower class – short term – consumption – r-selection )

    …. (mandatory consumption)

    …. (reproductive offense – distribution of assets )

    Market Government

    …. (middle class – medium term – production)

    …. (mandatory exchagne)

    …. (productive offense – market eschange of assets)

    Fascism

    …. (upper class – long term – preservation – K-selection)

    …. (mandatory production/contribution)

    …. (organizational offense – concentration of assets)

    We alter between these strategies as our prosperity allows.

    —Curt

    The west is deconflationary. we do not confuse methods of arguments, disciplines that make use of them, institutions that provide and manage them. We maintain a competition, and circumvent a monopoly.

    LIMITS: Law, legal jurisdiction – secular jurisdiction – a discovered science of dispute resolution.

    UTILITY: Trade – practical jurisdiction – a learned craft of pragmatism.

    IDEALS: Matters spiritual – are literary – and an imagined art of aspiration.

    Islam and Judaism are ‘simpler’ methods than western. simpler than Chinese. And suitable for a people less intelligent

    —Curt

    –“The collapse of the ottoman empire (Turks) allows the primitives (Salafis) to determine the authoritarian voice of Islam. Had the Turkish sultan maintained control of Islam, then it is possible that Islam would have reformed and the primitivism might have been suppressed as it was in other civilizations.”— Roger Scruton.

    “There is nothing that a democratic polity is accountable to but itself.”—Rorty But this is false. This says that the majority underclass under majoritarian monopoly rule is unaccountable to the consequences they force upon the middle and upper classes, and the genetic, territorial, normative, institutional, informational, and monumental capital of the civilization.—Curt Doolittle

    —“Truth isn’t correspondence with reality. Truth is just whatever it takes for people to obtain what they want.”–Rorty He is saying nothing matters. My question is why others have any reason or justification for not committing violence against those that oppose our preferences and interests. –Curt

    —“Conservatives are people who are aware of the fact that they’ve inherited something good, and want to conserve what is good. It’s much easier to destroy things than create them. It’s much easier to criticize existing things that are imperfect, than to construct things are better.”—Roger Scruton


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-15 15:37:00 UTC

  • URL for is working again, and the transfer to WordPress Completed. #tlot #tcot #

    https://t.co/FnrxVcL8dPThe URL for https://t.co/FnrxVcL8dP is working again, and the transfer to WordPress Completed. #tlot #tcot #nrx #altright #newright


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-15 15:34:00 UTC