Source: Facebook

  • HOMER IS THE FOUNDER OF THE WEST’S RELIGION My position on homer is that he inve

    HOMER IS THE FOUNDER OF THE WEST’S RELIGION

    My position on homer is that he invented the heroic religion of western civilization by capturing in a narrative the ambitions of the aristocratic peoples. So I see homer, as the original author of the west’s bible, and all the greeks and our scientists, lawyers and philosophers as contributors. Our downfall is that we did not sythesize that corpus before the christians destroyed the civilization, but that now we are in a position to do so.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 13:01:00 UTC

  • THE CURRICULUM “INTEGRA CORPORIS ET SCIENTIA” (or, the complete body of knowledg

    THE CURRICULUM “INTEGRA CORPORIS ET SCIENTIA”

    (or, the complete body of knowledge)

    Action (the human body)

    … Needs (air, water, food, warmth, shelter)

    … Abilities and Limits

    … Fitness

    … Labor

    … Sport

    … Rescue

    … Fighting

    Thought (archaic ‘psychology’)

    … Mind (archaic ‘Psychology’)

    … … Aesthetics

    … … Acquisitionism

    … … Incentives

    … … Error, Bias, Wishful Thinking …

    … Thought (archaic ‘epistemology’)

    … … Free Association (creativity)

    … … Reason (wayfinding)

    … … Criticism (laundering)

    … … Testimony (due diligence)

    Communication (archaic trivium)

    … Reading, Writing

    … … Reading and writing

    … … … Phonetics: Symbol, Sound, Action

    … … Grammar

    … … Logic

    … … Argument

    … … Falsehood, Fraud and Deceit

    … Speaking

    … … Storytelling

    … … Questioning

    … … Rhetoric

    … Information

    … … History

    … … Literature

    … … Visual and Dramatic Art

    Calculation

    … Observation

    … Measurement

    … Mathematics

    … … Numbers – Counting, Positional Naming.

    … … Arithmetic – Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, Division

    … … Mathematics

    … … Algebra 1 – (transformations)

    … … Geometry and Trigonometry – (Space)

    … … Algebra 2 – (geometric transformations)

    … … Pre-Calculus – (limits)

    … … Calculus 1 – (change in processes)

    … … Calculus 2 – ()

    … … Linear Algebra

    … … Applications and models

    … … … Differential Equations

    … … … Modeling

    … … … Applications

    … … Statistics

    … … … Statistics 1 – (distributions)

    … … … Statistics 2 – (models in equilibria)

    … … Pure mathematics.

    … … … Linear Algebra

    … … … Discreet and non-discrete mathematics

    … Instrumentation

    … … [more]

    Transformation

    … Engineering

    … … Physics and entropy

    … … Chemistry and Transformation

    … … Biology and Evolution

    … … Sentience and Decidability

    … Processes, Programming and Modeling

    … … Processes (human processes)

    … … … [work to do here]

    … … Programming [machine processes]

    … … … [work to do here]

    … … Modeling

    … … … [work to do here]

    … Economy

    … … Money and Prices and Time

    … … Interest, Credit, Debt, Accounts

    … … Accounting – Balancing. Rolling up.

    … … Management Accounting (cash)

    … … Micro Economics

    … … Financial Instruments

    … … Financial Accounting

    … … Political (Insured) Accounting

    … … Fiat Accounting (shareholder) Accounting

    … … Macro Economics

    … Information

    … … [how information functions in a polity]

    Cooperation (archaic ‘sociology’)

    … Mankind (behavioral science)

    … Ethics and morality

    … Natural Law

    … … Institutions of Conflict Resolution

    … Families (unit of reproduction)

    … … [more]

    … Organizations (unit of production)

    … … [more – different orgs – how orgs function]

    … Economics

    … … Institutions of money and credit.

    … Politics

    … … Formal Institutions of Commons

    Competition (Group Evolutionary Strategy)

    … Strategies that can be employed

    … … Political, Normative, and property models.

    Conflict (War)

    … War against Things,

    … War against People by Immigration (invasion) by People,

    … War by trade against Production (trade and credit)

    … War by Conversion (Religion) against Norms.

    … War by Information (disinformation) against knowledge.

    … Formal Institutions of offense and defense.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 12:47:00 UTC

  • THE EVOLUTION OF OUR UNDERSTANDING (even if I solve cooperation that does not so

    THE EVOLUTION OF OUR UNDERSTANDING

    (even if I solve cooperation that does not solve sentience)

    0 – 1100 BC – HOMER (WESTERN HEROIC RELIGION)

    1 – 330 BC SOCRATES-PLATO-ARISTOTLE (REASON)

    The universe is simple and regular.

    2 – 1620 BACON (EMPIRICISM)

    2 – 1687 NEWTON ( EQUATIONS – PHYSICAL UNIVERSE).

    Change from Geometry to Equations.

    Behind all of nature was simple laws and ordered.

    Four Pillars of Western Science.

    3 – 1850 – DARWIN (ADAPTATION TO CONTEXT – BIOLOGY)

    The four pillars are false. it is not that regular.

    4 – 1936 TURING (INFORMATION – ALGORITHMS – NON-SMOOTH)

    Most influential paper in mathematics in the past few hundred years

    5 – 1880-1970 FAIL (COOPERATION)

    The operational revolution fails. (What I am trying to do)

    Spencer, Mises, Brouwer, Bridgman, Hayek, Popper.

    I am pretty sure I solved this.

    6 – ???? ??????? (SENTIENCE)

    the measurement of reason (what Taleb is really trying to do)

    (I have no idea what lies beyond sentience – if anything does.)

    IT TOOK US A LONG TIME

    ————————————————

    “Kurgan culture”:

    – Bug-Dniester (6th millennium)

    – Samara (5th millennium)

    – Kvalynsk (5th millennium)

    – Sredny Stog (mid-5th to mid-4th millennia)

    – Dnieper-Donets (5th to 4th millennia)

    – Usatovo culture (late 4th millennium)

    – Maikop-Dereivka (mid-4th to mid-3rd millennia)

    TIMELINE

    4500–4000: Early PIE. Sredny Stog, Dnieper-Donets and Samara cultures, domestication of the horse (Wave 1).

    4000–3500: The Pit Grave culture (a.k.a. Yamna culture), the prototypical kurgan builders, emerges in the steppe, and the Maykop culture in the northern Caucasus. Indo-Hittite models postulate the separation of Proto-Anatolian before this time.

    4000-3500 BC – THE DOMESTICATION OF THE HORSE

    3500 BC – THE IMPORT OF THE WHEEL FROM EUROPE

    3300 BC – EVIDENCE OF CHARIOTS

    3500–3000: Middle PIE. The Pit Grave culture is at its peak, representing the classical reconstructed Proto-Indo-European society with stone idols, predominantly practicing animal husbandry in permanent settlements protected by hillforts, subsisting on agriculture, and fishing along rivers. Contact of the Pit Grave culture with late Neolithic Europe cultures results in the “kurganized” Globular Amphora and Baden cultures (Wave 2). The Maykop culture shows the earliest evidence of the beginning Bronze Age, and Bronze weapons and artifacts are introduced to Pit Grave territory. Probable early Satemization.

    3000–2500: Late PIE. The Pit Grave culture extends over the entire Pontic steppe (Wave 3). The Corded Ware culture extends from the Rhine to the Volga, corresponding to the latest phase of Indo-European unity, the vast “kurganized” area disintegrating into various independent languages and cultures, still in loose contact enabling the spread of technology and early loans between the groups, except for the Anatolian and Tocharian branches, which are already isolated from these processes. The Centum-Satem break is probably complete, but the phonetic trends of Satemization remain active.

    — OUR PEOPLE ARE NOW DIVIDED INTO BRANCHES —

    —“<QUOTE>

    The find probably marks the end of more than 100 years of archaeological debate over whether the great cultural upheaval seen in the Bronze Age (2700 BC. to 500 BC.) was driven by ideas or by immigration.

    “It is completely ground breaking, and the entire history must now be rewritten into a story of mobility and human expansion,” says archaeologist Kristian Kristiansen from Gothenburg University. He led the archaeological part of the study.

    By extracting and identifying genetic material from 101 Bronze Age people excavated in Europe and Asia, the scientists were able to see who Bronze Age people were and how they were related.

    “This is the largest study ever — more than double that of all previous studies combined — and for the first time we can make population studies on fossil genetics,” says Assistant Professor Morten E. Allentoft from the Centre for GeoGenetics.

    The study has just been published in Nature alongside a similar study, led by Professor David Reich from Harvard Medical School, which maps the DNA of 69 Bronze Age people and supports the same conclusions.

    Europeans were created by three migrations

    The last few years were an intense race between Willerslev and Reich to be the first to map and analyse the European’s ancient genetic material.

    They have already shown that modern Europeans share the genetic components of the early hunters but with the arrival of farming culture about 8500 years ago, there was a mixing with new genetic components. This shows up as a genetic difference between southern and northern Europe.

    Neolithic people (4000-1700 BC) resemble us more but there is still something missing, and last year it became clear to scientists that there must have been a third wave of migration.

    This was a migration to northern Europe, which could explain the genetic differences between northern and southern Europeans today.

    “Whether the sample was taken in Germany, Poland, Denmark or Sweden, we see the same component, and we can show that it comes from the Caucasus,” says Allentoft.

    The component matches that of the relatively unknown steppe people, the Yamnaya, who were nomads from thousands of kilometres north of the Caucasus between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea.

    Reichs and Willerslev’s research groups agree that the Yamnaya tribe migrated west into northern Europe around 5,000 years ago.

    Previous archaeological findings have shown that changes occurred in northern Europe around the same time.

    The Yamnaya brought a completely new social structure with them, says Kristiansen.

    “Pastoral people are more collective and live in villages, but with [the Yamnaya] there’s a much more individualistic culture, organised in nuclear families. You can see the change in the funeral rituals they introduce, such as the family burial mounds,” he says.

    The Yamnaya were a nomadic people who brought livestock with them and used horses to pull wagons that carried all their belongings. They burned forests to create grazing land until about 2000 BC when they began to settle down.

    “But we see individual households with family farms and not villages,” says Kristiansen and points to a fundamental change of Europeans both culturally and genetically.

    “They are our main ancestor,” he says.

    Here, the first Yamnaya replaced the existing people, and then around 1,000 years later Yamnaya in Central Asia are abruptly replaced by a warlike people called Sintashta.

    the migration of the Yamnaya culture seems to solve the old conundrum about the origins of Indo-European language.

    “The mystery is solved — the Indo-European language is first spread in Europe and then east to Iran and India,” said Kristiansen.

    The Yamnaya eastern migration also solves the riddle of how the now extinct Indo-European language Tokaisk arose from within China.

    The new study strongly supports the “steppe hypothesis”, which claims that the Indo-European languages spread with these steppe people as late as 3,700 to 2,000 BC.

    Why did the Yamnaya people migrate?

    With large pieces of the puzzle beginning to fall into place, new questions open up — such as what triggered that Yamnaya culture to migrate in the first place.

    Kristiansen explains the current belief is that there was a decrease in farmers about 100 to 200 years before the Yamnaya migrated. One hypothesis is that these communities were hit by illness or crop failure and famine, which provided space for the Yamnaya.

    The new studies set the stage for further work, to map genetic material deeper back in time, as well as our more recent history.

    “We can for example see the formation of the modern Dane is not quite complete 2,000 years ago,” says Willerslev. “It could be really interesting to see what happens later in the Iron Age and Viking times.”<END QUOTE>”—

    My point being that the steppe breeds for aggression and we are failing to understand that it reverses thousands of years of peadomorphic evolution by western man.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 10:41:00 UTC

  • (Like Eli I am increasingly comfortable with market-fascism. In other words, imp

    (Like Eli I am increasingly comfortable with market-fascism. In other words, imposing the eugenic market on others in defense of kith, kin, and self. Tolerance is a failed experiment. We must rule, force rule by our betters, or be ruled and the victim of genocide by our inferiors. In other words, they have aggressed against us, not sought to meet us on aristocratic common ground.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 09:40:00 UTC

  • DEFINITION: CAUSAL DETERMINISM Determinism in Philosophy vs Causal Determinism i

    DEFINITION: CAUSAL DETERMINISM

    Determinism in Philosophy vs Causal Determinism in Science.

    In philosophy, determinism refers to predestination. It’s an extreme pretension. And philosophical determinism does not survive scrutiny because physical determinism does not survive scrutiny.

    So what we have left once we eliminate philosophical determinism, is scientific determinism. Which we often distinguish using the clarification of ‘causal determinism’

    Scientific determinism says that the universe operates by regular rules that we can discover, and that indeterminism arises out of complexity we cannot possess the information to measure, nor is there regularity to the universe in practical (actionable) terms, below and above certain levels.

    For example, we can describe how gasses expand but we cannot determine where any given molecule will end up. A common example in simple physics is filling a barrel with numbered marbles, and tipping it over. Regardless of the initial position of the marbles, and assuming we do not ‘cheat’ by organizing them in some sort of structure, no matter how precisely we repeat the process of pouring the marbles on the floor, we will never predict the resulting position of an individual marble. Yet we will be able to define patterns of behavior. What we will do is determine the *limits* of our ability to describe where a given marble will end up. Hence our ability to create reasonably, but not quite believable, software simulations of such phenomenon.

    It may be possible that we simply lack measurement tools and information stores and machines capable of measuring such things. But as far as we know at present, the universe is only probabilistic at the lowest level, not deterministic.

    So in science, causal determinism refers to regularity within limits. And we use deterministic as a an adjective. Like ‘fast’: something can be slightly or highly deterministic.

    If the universe was not deterministic we could not conduct science.

    But it is, so we can.

    This does not mean that there is no room for free will. And it does not mean that there are precisely determinable formula for everything.

    It means only that we can define general rules to some degree of precision for all phenomenon. In other words “all general rules must specify a limit”.

    For example, it is logical that raising the minimum wage increases unemployment. On the other hand it has proven incredibly difficult to prove one way or another. Same for the neutrality of money. In both these cases we cannot really state anything more precise than that in any meaningful way.

    But it is this concept of limit – and its accompanying requirement for full accounting – that has been missing from our philosophical, scientific, economic, and political discourse.

    Newtonian physics were not false. We use them every day. They are less precise than Einsteinian physics. And undoubtably, when we discover the theory of everything, it will be more precise than Einsteinian physics. Does that mean that Newtonian physics fails at human scale, or that Einsteinian Physics fails at observable-universe scale? No. Not at all.

    It means that to some degree, all science requires that we discover our current limits, and seek solutions to those beyond them, extending the limits of our perception and understanding.

    Does that mean we will not discover some greater but unfortunately unmeasurable regularity to the subatomic universe with the ‘theory of everything’? Perhaps, and perhaps not. I suspect that the problem of measurement will remain with us forever, and that our ability to ACT to change the course of the universe for our benefit will forever be a matter of energy and cost, not one of understanding.

    And as is expected, if we cannot act upon it, then it is not material for human beings. We are bound by the same rules of the universe as is everything else in it.

    Everything costs.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-21 08:08:00 UTC

  • (Sorry. Just accidentally sent a bunch of friend requests that I thought were in

    (Sorry. Just accidentally sent a bunch of friend requests that I thought were incoming. ack.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 21:02:00 UTC

  • EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY The only Anarchy that can exist is a condition of

    EXISTENTIALLY POSSIBLE ANARCHY

    The only Anarchy that can exist is a condition of Sovereignty. Under Sovereignty one can have possessions, but not property. One can have possession but not ownership. But Sovereignty requires relative invulnerability. So to create sovereignty we form alliances with others who desire sovereignty by the exchange of reciprocal insurance. To resolve conflicts between us without violating sovereignty, we can only appeal to the universal decidability of natural law. We accumulate decisions under natural law in the common law. Under reciprocal insurance, natural law, and common law’s norms, we leave behind possessions and create ownership and property. By the combination of sovereignty, exchange of insurance, common law, and the accumulation of decisions, and openness of the contract for reciprocal defense of sovereignty, we create that order we call sovereignty for ourselves. But slaves are more profitable than Enemies. Serfs are more profitable than slaves. citizens are more profitable than serfs. So to increase our defenses, increase our dominion, and increase our wealth, we extend sovereignty, to the citizenry, thus creating a condition of liberty. one possesses sovereignty by ability. one possesses liberty by permission. One possesses freedom out of utility. One possesses subsidy (redistribution) out of charity. There is only one source of sovereignty: the organized application of violence to prevent all alternatives. There is only one source of liberty: the permission of those who fight for sovereignty. There is only one reason that the sovereign grant liberty: profitability. There are only one means of demanding liberty from the sovereign: enfranchisement through reciprocal insurance by violence, or by raising the cost of the absence of liberty through the organized application of violence. Wishful thinking is just lying to yourself and others. That’s the domain of religion. In the domain of truth, there is only one source of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy: the organized application of violence.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 21:01:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://medium.com/@curtdoolittle/what-do-we-mean-by-freedom-2f198a331bfa#.e58vlfdgk

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 18:54:00 UTC

  • (Thanks for inviting me. Although is this a serious group?)

    (Thanks for inviting me. Although is this a serious group?)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 17:27:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “You make a distinction between natural and common law?” NATURAL LAW: coope

    Q&A: “You make a distinction between natural and common law?”

    NATURAL LAW: cooperation via non imposition: the requirement for all actions that affect others, to consist of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to externalities of the same criteria.

    (update)

    NATURAL LAW: cooperation via non imposition: the requirement for all actions that affect others, to consist of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited to externalities that are also productive, fully informed, warrantied, and voluntarily transferred.

    Now technically speaking (and I like to speak technically 😉 ) individuals affected by externalities cannot always be fully informed, and as such cannot consent to voluntary transfer. So we have to count on productive and warrantied, for those that are. In other words, if you make people’s property values increase, they are not going to be unhappy about it. If you make them decrease they are going to be unhappy about it.

    In other words, impose no cost upon others, directly or indirectly that they have not consented to. But by all means distribute gains to others directly or indirectly whether they have consented to it or not. 🙂

    (end update)

    COMMON LAW: those instances in which judges discover a new means of violating natural law, which must then be codified for future reference as a means of deciding against the violator.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-20 14:04:00 UTC