Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • ANSWER A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CHURCH OF TOMORROW? If you went to the same chu

    ANSWER A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CHURCH OF TOMORROW?

    If you went to the same church, and had similar rituals, but they drew from all of our history, not just Biblical, and tried to apply the lessons of history to (apolitical) current life and family affairs would that make you more interested in it?

    If you went to the same church and the people who performed the rituals were married, and had the best educations possible from the best universities possible, in both the sciences and the arts, would that make you more likely to go?

    If you went to the same church and every week you had a guest speaker on a ‘meaningful’ subject. would that make you more likely to go?

    If you went to the same church, and they offered education by professionals with lifetime experience in ‘real life, household management, craftsmanship, business, industry, finance, and science, would that make you more interested?

    If you want to that same church and they provided credit union and banking, legal, tax, services – not by employees but by devotees – what would you think of it?

    If you went to that same church and they organized emergency and disaster services, what would you think of it?

    What does this sequence of ideas make you think and feel?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 13:18:00 UTC

  • MINDFULNESS IN DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS shinto achieves mindfulness throug

    MINDFULNESS IN DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS

    shinto achieves mindfulness through precise repetition of ritual in a respectful manner.

    stoicism achieves mindfulness through small daily task completion in a virtuous manner.

    buddhism achieves mindfulness through meditation and escape from reality.

    Islam achieves mindfulness by many memorizations and ritual prayers during every single day.

    christianity achieves mindfulness by personal and collective prayer (and song).

    Order those by the least false to most false.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 12:25:00 UTC

  • THINK OF THE CHURCH AS THE MONSANTO OF FARM LABOR AND THAT’S THE BEST ANALOGY

    THINK OF THE CHURCH AS THE MONSANTO OF FARM LABOR AND THAT’S THE BEST ANALOGY

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 12:19:00 UTC

  • LAWS OF NATURE, NATURAL LAW, AND LAWS OF INFORMATION 1) Laws of nature (physical

    LAWS OF NATURE, NATURAL LAW, AND LAWS OF INFORMATION

    1) Laws of nature (physical laws) and

    2) Natural laws (laws of cooperation), and

    3) Truth (laws of information)

    consist of a spectrum dependent upon each other.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 11:09:00 UTC

  • FYI: ORIGINS OF “CROM” Crom Cruach (“Crom”) Irish Paganism. “Head of all the god

    FYI: ORIGINS OF “CROM”

    Crom Cruach (“Crom”)

    Irish Paganism.

    “Head of all the gods”

    Gold figure surrounded by twelve others (fertility / sun god).

    Human sacrifice in exchange for promise of fertility (probably crops).

    Myth has it that his worship was ended by st patrick who smashed his ceremonial ‘altar’ (or whatever).

    (I have not researched this deeply, but there is some historical justification for the origins of this ‘god’ as a ‘hero’ from the past.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 10:31:00 UTC

  • As far as i know, gods, like the rest of the universe, consist entirely of infor

    As far as i know, gods, like the rest of the universe, consist entirely of information. They hold, and transfer information. And by information, we mean, influences upon individual decidability. The question is, what is the quality of the information that they transfer? And how do we measure the consequences of the information that they transfer? These various gods exist, since humans act as though they exist, even if they only exist, like all of the universe, as information. And some of these gods are ideal, some helpful, some unhelpful, and some nothing more than the embodiment of evil. The way we know, is the truth or falsehood of their information, the productivity or parasitism of their people, and the genetic, economic, informational, and aesthetic achievement of their people. Gods are measurable and decidable. We can JUDGE THE GODS WORTHY OR NOT.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 10:23:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGINAL WASN”T QUITE RIGHT Sovereignty, Truth, Excellence, and Beauty. The

    THE ORIGINAL WASN”T QUITE RIGHT

    Sovereignty, Truth, Excellence, and Beauty.

    The original truth, goodness, and beauty betrayed an unfortunate lack of understanding.

    ……S

    E….+…..B

    ……T

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 08:10:00 UTC

  • MY GOD IS THE GOD OF MY ANCESTORS My god is very simple. He wants the truth. Bec

    MY GOD IS THE GOD OF MY ANCESTORS

    My god is very simple. He wants the truth. Because truth gives us power over nature, to bend it to our will. And the power of truth over nature is the source of the ascent of our people by transcendence from beast, to man, to human – and eventually, if successful, to gods. Just as our Aryan(european) ancestors, the aristocratic egalitarians, opened the brotherhood of sovereign men to any who can transcend from beast, to man, to human, by his warrant of sovereignty to other men, my god seeks to create a brotherhood of gods by seeking transcendent humans to join him, and to increase his numbers, by those equally able to wield truth and sovereignty successfully. My god does not seek subjects. He seeks peers: the brotherhood of sovereign men.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 07:56:00 UTC

  • Q&A: –“Curt, is decentralisation a misnomer?”— GREAT QUESTION: Yes. Decentral

    Q&A: –“Curt, is decentralisation a misnomer?”—

    GREAT QUESTION:

    Yes. Decentralization merely refers to redistribution of labor to additional locations without necessarily affecting the methods of decidability and degree of homogeneity. Whereas devolution, disempowerment, and secession are accurate terms since we restore the market and our ability to use it to calculate.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 07:51:00 UTC

  • WE WILL END HISTORY HOW WE STARTED IT: WITH VIOLENCE. (by James Augustus Berens)

    WE WILL END HISTORY HOW WE STARTED IT: WITH VIOLENCE.

    (by James Augustus Berens)

    We Will Bring About The End Of History.

    Not through submission but through sovereignty.

    Not through permission but through demand.

    Not through falsehoods but through truth.

    Not through discretionary rule but through rule of natural law.

    Not through majority monopoly ascent but through minority market consent and dissent.

    Not through supernatural monotheism but through historical polytheism

    Not through indulging the meek, feeble minded and vulgar but through the promotion of the strong, wise and beautiful.

    The Hebrews had it backward: man has not fallen from God’s grace; he has transcended the primitive through domestication of his underclasses and his alpha males.

    Man wasn’t cast from the Garden for eating from the tree of knowledge; we built the garden through the inter-generational accumulation of informational capital.

    We had the prefect government, but we failed to anticipate and protect ourselves from the industrialization of misinformation, deceit and pseudoscience.

    History ends with the completion of the western project: The Truthful Society.

    We must demand truth by leaving our enemies no alternative but to compete in the market for association, cooperation, production, information, reproduction, commons, dispute resolution, and rule.

    The alternative is to fall into another dark age from which we may never recover: to submit once again to the dark forces of mysticism, ignorance, deceit, and dysgenia.

    –James Augustus Berens

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-23 07:46:00 UTC