HBD. Hugs from far away. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-20 12:39:00 UTC
HBD. Hugs from far away. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-20 12:39:00 UTC
HBD man!!!! Love you brother. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-20 12:39:00 UTC
—“Where did you learn that the roots of science are in martial epistemology? Who on your reading list?”—
Well, it’s not a novel idea. I just frame it more precisely.
I think I intuitively understood it just because of all the history I’ve read. But it was the sequence Marija Gimbutas > J. P. Mallory > Karen Armstrong that provided such consistency that I was able to make use of it.
IMHO Karen Amstrong does the best job of the worldwide analysis of the age of transformation, and the foundations of our differences as the martial structure of that time.
That said, Taleb also covers it in the Black Swan when he says that military people are the least ideological because they have the most skin in the game.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-20 12:39:00 UTC
Um. Dear muslims. You kill westerners, well, we’re just assuming you’re undomesticated animals but that we will keep trying.
But when you assassinate Russians you’re dealing with people that stole an empire from the mongols. They’re waaaay scarier than muslims.
You have no idea what you clowns just did.
Russians are not ‘hopeful’ like the west.
They understand you.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 21:42:00 UTC
THE CULT THAT FOLLOWS POPPER….
Are the critical rationalists still a group here on fb?
—“Indeed: https://www.facebook.com/groups/criticalrationalism/ “—
Ah… I’m blocked. That’s why I can’t find it. 🙂 ….
I completed the critical rationalist project. And I’m blocked from the group. Why is that so humorous? lol
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 13:36:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 13:31:00 UTC
are the critical rationalists still a group here on fb?
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 13:27:00 UTC
RESPONSE TO STEVE’S “BIG TEN”
(While I can agree that most of steve’s responses are true with my undrestanding, I cannot say that they would be interpreted correctly by those without such understanding.
Most of my responses illustrate the far greater precision of Testimonial Truth over the current vernacular. Some of my statements include some insight into why Steve’s observations are true.)
1. We’re in the middle of a dark age.
(CURT: yes. Where Poincare labeled current thinking ‘mere philosophy not mathematics’, and Hayek said ‘new era of mysticism’, I call it ‘the pseudoscientific era’ or ‘the second chirstianization of the west – this time through material false promises whereas in the ancient era, through supernatural false promises of life after death. But yes, we are in either the beginning or early middle of a dark age.)
2. Intelligence is about thought processes, not IQ.
(CURT: Either no or unclear. IQ is a physical property of brains, and demonstrated intelligence includes more than IQ. If that’s the meaning the author intends it should be stated as such. demonstrated intelligence requires short term memory, general knowledge, and the absence of ignorance-creating errors, biases, and deceits. )
3. Extroversion and critical thinking are often inversely
related.
(CURT: Depends upon your definition of extroversion. If it means you obtain information from others vs test it yourself then, yes. If you mean whether we ‘recharge’ by social interaction or ‘quiet time’ that doesn’t appear to be true. Socrates was a gadfly. I work in cafe’s. )
4. The Copenhagen interpretation is the second-worst
idea in the modern era.
(CURT: Yeah, well that’s for damned sure.)
5. Cantor’s “diagonal proof” is an embarrassment to
human reason and will be used as a demonstration of
the irrationalism of the 20th century.
(CURT: Um, it is possible to restate his use of mathematical platonism in operational – and therefore mathematical – terms, by simply talking about generating sets of numbers operationally. But as stated, yes, it’s mystic not math.)
6. The theory of evolution has holes in it.
(CURT: I don’t know what that means, but I think it doesn’t. I think our understanding of genetics has holes in it. The theory of evolution is pretty simple. )
7. Rationalist theories of economics are correct, but
they’ve been greatly damaged by Hoppe.
(CURT: this is incorrect. there is but one epistemological method available to man, and one of the tests of internal consistency consists in the possibility of operational construction by subjective testing. This means rationalist theories of economics are false, and hoppe’s justifications are false. But it also means his deductions from private property as a means of decidability are correct.)
8. Governments are unnecessary.
(CURT: False. Monopoly governments are unnecessary. if we have a nomocracy (rule of law) and we create markets under rule of law for the construction of commons, then in fact we have removed DISCRETION from rule, but we still are ruled – by natural law.)
9. Confusion is the source of nearly all mankind’s
problems.
(CURT: this is… not helpful. I would say that in a period or rapid change, we lack the technologies of commensurability to resolve our differences. In fact, I think ‘science’ or what we call Aristotelianism is working its way across humanity quite nicely at this point.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 13:24:00 UTC
NO ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYONE, NOR SCIENTIFIC THOUGHT FOR EVERYONE.
I think we need to give up on the hope that all people can be taught to think as we call ‘scientifically’ for the simple reason that as we dip below 105, the challenge becomes insurmountable.
If we had the IQ of every person quoted or tested I think we would tend to have a much clearer view of ‘what people think’.
We definitely have a spectrum that starts with neuroticism, progresses through paranoia, graduates to conspiracy theory, and matures in to schizophrenia – and its not an insignificant portion of the population.
We definitely have a spectrum that starts with sensitive, progresses through solipsism, and matures into solipsistic paranoia.
We definitely have a spectrum from needy, to extroversion, to balance, to introversion, to disconnected/withdrawn.
These three traits TEND to run in families and are only mediated by familial cohesion (indoctrination).
When I see quotes like this article, what I see is the “I am average” fallacy. If we had IQ markers along with our opinions then it would be a lot harder for pseudo-academics, and pseudo-intellectuals, to use SUGGESTION to deceive us by appealing to “i am average” or ‘most people are like me’.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 12:20:00 UTC
PREDICTION VS EXPLANATION
I classify falsifiability under ‘scope consistency’: limits, parsimony, and falsifiability. Technically they are all properties of scope. But to test scope we must test all dimensions of scope.
Also, like internal consistency, i use external correspondence rather than ‘predictability’ since ‘prediction’ generally invites the ludic fallacy (probability). We cannot predict much in the economy, because any observation and measurement we make effects it. the physical sciences progress quckly because they are the most simple, becuase they are the least variant. social sciences advance more slowly because we adapt where the physical world can’t.
So science requires that we ‘match the data’ recorded in retrospect, not that we predict. Instead, prediction is a reductio test of simple systems. Ergo, the explanation horizon depends reflects the rate of adaptation. so we must choose more prediction in some cases (physical science) and more explanatory power in other cases (social science) simply because the horizons vary so much between reaction (the physical world) and action (the social world).
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 11:24:00 UTC