The reasons SJWs infect organizations are (a) that we don’t separate via-positiva devotional organizations, from via-negativa enforcement organizations, (b) we don’t ALWAYS structure either form of organization as empirical technocracy – all successful bureaucracies are indepdendent and are independent because they’re purely empirical and technocratic. The moment they become sentimental or redistributive they fail.
“HOW CAN A PERSON BECOME A GREAT FICTIONAL WRITER IN JUST A SHORT TIME?”
You can’t. Writing is a craft. Craft is process of developing skill through trial and error. You can read say, Vonnegut on writing, Campbell on the monomyth, the basics of plot types, archetypes, points of view, how to research on locations, observe and write dialog by people from different social strata, and writing backgrounds for your characters. You can read (real) poetry (particularly shakespeare) to learn the art of sentence building. But the start-middle-end of composing sentences, paragraphs, scenes, chapters, and stories and weaving them together while maintaining the reader’s interest in what is yet to be revealed by you is just something you have to practice. (Good writers tend to be quite smart, have worldly experience, and have something interesting to say that’s novel at least in some context unfamiliar to the reader.) I can write an argument like no other. An exceptional essay. An adequate screenplay. A less than adequate story. And a weak novel – but it is a matter of interests. To write a novel, or a story you need to have something to say that’s vaguely interesting, adequate interest in the subject, and adequate skill in the craft, and more than adequate art in retaining the reader’s attention.
—“Do you think there should be special benefits and statuses to those who actually boog? When I showed up to the Richmond rally I had no idea it was supposed to be peaceful. What stopped me was the radio news saying that ,the rally was supposed peaceful and that was the intention ,to show that a demonstration with weapons could happen without violence, blah blah blah peaceful discussion. I believe that at this point with the left doubling down with its oppressive measures, the objective now should be to instigate and reward action or am I tripping.”—Tyler Granberry
I have addressed this issue thoroughly and you will be blown away by it – and yes it is one of the reasons I say ‘produce the incentives and people will follow them”.
—“Abrahamic absolutism and rejection of Greco-Roman religious syncretism are the largest stumbling block to a resurgent European or American “right-wing” movement.”—Rocco Ryan
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/83940730_561248917805336_8704295496484651008_o_561248907805337.jpg ORIGINS OF HOMOSEXUALITY
(for some reason jayman is countersignaling and I haven’t figured out why yet)
Again: This is because as far as I know, homosexuality is an in utero developmental failure that was insufficient to produce either male brain or miscarriage.The two most common theories attribute this to immune system responses to internal (genetic) or external (viral) stimulus.
—“No that’s not what it is, nor does that make any sense whatsoever. That said male and female same sex attraction likely do have different etiology”—JayMan @JayMan471
It makes perfect sense. AFAIK immuno response, possibly to T. That doesn’t mean it’s true. If you have a better body of science to work from then I’d love to see it. But this is a subject I’ve followed for three decades, and the two theories are still out there working.
—“[See] Greg Cochran’s “Gay Germ” Hypothesis – An Exercise in the Power of Germs”—JayMan
@JayMan471
Agreed. That doesn’t nullify the (a) runs in families (b) second son, (c) testosterone and immune system theories. As for the viral is merely that I can’t falsify the hypothesis, so I’m not willing to take it off the shelf.
And BTW: Nothing in that set of articles or any other, undermines the hypothesis that (like cervical cancer by viral transmission) that there isn’t some other immune trigger either heritable or environmental that produces the defect in development.
BTW 2: So far in the two or three times you’ve disagreed with me it’s because you are rushing to judgement. I realize that the world is full of idiots you must defend your time and space against. But I’m not one of them. -hugs
This paper is accessible, from 2016, and summarizes the findings from across the decades. It’s rather obvious that “The fraternal-birth-order effect” is currently the most convincing cause, and its heritability, a most convincing vulnerability.ORIGINS OF HOMOSEXUALITY
(for some reason jayman is countersignaling and I haven’t figured out why yet)
Again: This is because as far as I know, homosexuality is an in utero developmental failure that was insufficient to produce either male brain or miscarriage.The two most common theories attribute this to immune system responses to internal (genetic) or external (viral) stimulus.
—“No that’s not what it is, nor does that make any sense whatsoever. That said male and female same sex attraction likely do have different etiology”—JayMan @JayMan471
It makes perfect sense. AFAIK immuno response, possibly to T. That doesn’t mean it’s true. If you have a better body of science to work from then I’d love to see it. But this is a subject I’ve followed for three decades, and the two theories are still out there working.
—“[See] Greg Cochran’s “Gay Germ” Hypothesis – An Exercise in the Power of Germs”—JayMan
@JayMan471
Agreed. That doesn’t nullify the (a) runs in families (b) second son, (c) testosterone and immune system theories. As for the viral is merely that I can’t falsify the hypothesis, so I’m not willing to take it off the shelf.
And BTW: Nothing in that set of articles or any other, undermines the hypothesis that (like cervical cancer by viral transmission) that there isn’t some other immune trigger either heritable or environmental that produces the defect in development.
BTW 2: So far in the two or three times you’ve disagreed with me it’s because you are rushing to judgement. I realize that the world is full of idiots you must defend your time and space against. But I’m not one of them. -hugs
This paper is accessible, from 2016, and summarizes the findings from across the decades. It’s rather obvious that “The fraternal-birth-order effect” is currently the most convincing cause, and its heritability, a most convincing vulnerability.
—“An institution’s ability to perform its primary function is inversely proportionate with the level it’s infested with social justice.”—James Louis LaSalle
Trump voters have taken over the Republican Party and made it a party of economic nationalism. There’s no reason why we can’t provide the intellectual firepower to help this already successful political movement expand its power and reach and correct its blindspots as we push the Overton window wide open 🙂