Source: Facebook

  • Eat the weak. They waste the world’s resources and they inhibit our transcendenc

    Eat the weak. They waste the world’s resources and they inhibit our transcendence into the gods we seek.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:54:00 UTC

  • I mean, look. I could write a bot for ‘arguing’ like these people. Bots only mim

    I mean, look. I could write a bot for ‘arguing’ like these people. Bots only mimic sentience. These people only mimic sentience. They’re just gene machines: ‘lie, gossip, rally, shame, and form enough of an irritant that I can get what I want through cost imposition rather than productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges. I mean, if I can get away with parasitism I not only gain, but I damage my enemy.

    That is (((their))) group evolutionary strategy. It is the evolutionary strategy of our lower class women. Which is why they use it and we so often fall for it.

    They are just parasitic machines. not humans. not really even animals. Just parasitic machines that mimic us.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:51:00 UTC

  • I don’t expect anything intelligent, honest, ethical or moral from someone who t

    I don’t expect anything intelligent, honest, ethical or moral from someone who thinks, looks and acts like a goat-f_cker. I am just using him as a chimp in a circus. The dog cannot refrain from licking his ass. (((Gossips))) can’t help it any more than a woman can bear embarrassment. So they double down over and over again. it’s an animal reaction. You just have to marvel at the consistency of their impulses. And how easy it is to trick them into verbal ass-licking in public.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:46:00 UTC

  • The best way of teaching followers to conduct arguments is to find a useful idio

    The best way of teaching followers to conduct arguments is to find a useful idiot to argue with, and show how to defeat them.

    Because it is the audience who judges defeat in debate, no matter how much groveling and pretense the defeated display.

    It’s more evidence that all members of the (((tribe of pathological liars))) are female: they use feminine arguments: “my approval is desirable, yet I have no argument other than the denial of my approval”.

    Yet, like women, whose freedom is given by the virtue of our kindness, but who can easily be enslaved, they merely demonstrate abuse of our kindness, begging to be beaten, and if beating fail enslaved, and if enslaving fail, killed.

    Violence is our greatest asset.

    With that asset we can create cooperation or predation.

    We create cooperation not by demanding it.

    But by prohibiting everything but it.

    Violence against predation, parasitism, fraud, and deceit is the highest profession of all.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:41:00 UTC

  • The first question of ethics (cooperation) is ‘why do I not kill you and take yo

    The first question of ethics (cooperation) is ‘why do I not kill you and take your things?’

    The first question of debate is also ‘why do I not kill you and take your things’?

    The answer to both questions is, “Because cooperation is disproportionately rewarding for both parties – at least over the medium and long term.”

    But if we we lie, if we cast insults, then we are de-facto, not cooperating, to produce disproportionately rewarding ends. So ethics ends.

    And if we tolerate the existence of people who engage in lie, insult, and fraud, then we are not cooperating with those with whom we cooperate. So Morality Ends.

    So, unbound by cooperation, unbound by ethics, and unbound by morality, we return to violence as of greater benefit than suffering lie and insult and non-cooperation.

    So it is only moral that I kill you and take your things.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:31:00 UTC

  • LOWER ORDER / HIGHER ORDER In my work I use the incremental, evolutionary, suppr

    LOWER ORDER / HIGHER ORDER

    In my work I use the incremental, evolutionary, suppression of parasitism in all its forms via natural judge discovered common law, as a means of causing the gradual increase in trust, and the gradual increase in the production of goods, at gradually increasing rates. (you can see this in Fukuyama’s work as well, although as an asian he prefers the monopoly bureaucracy instead of the western model of a market of sovereigns under the common law of sovereigns.)

    So I refer to higher orders as those with higher trust (lower corruption) and the corresponding institutions.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:22:00 UTC

  • “ARGUMENT AD NON-HUMANUM” (argument structure that you might want to use against

    “ARGUMENT AD NON-HUMANUM”

    (argument structure that you might want to use against the gossip/rally/shame crowd) (lols)

    ***I know a member and the effeminate tactics of the (((tribe))) of ‘fraud, lie, gossip, rally, and shame’ when I see one. But as a dog cannot refrain from licking its ass, a monkey cannot refrain from jerking its dick, a woman cannot refrain from solipsism, a member of the (((tribe))) of ‘lie, gossip, rally, and shame’ cannot refrain from the intellectual equivalent of urinating on hydrants and throwing inarticulate verbal feces – at least without significant socialization with ‘betters’. Thankfully a not insignificant number of women and members of the (((tribe))) – with effort – can be trained. Just as a not insignificant number of the underclasses can be trained. ***

    (ps: if only I could train my tribe out of the death spiral of virtue signaling, and conspicuous consumption, and the excuse making of misrepresenting convenience with conviction.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:21:00 UTC

  • ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE ACADEMIC DISCIPLINES I take economists seriously

    ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE ACADEMIC DISCIPLINES

    I take economists seriously in their criticism of social science. I take physicists seriously in their criticism of economics. I take philosophers seriously in their criticism of physics. I take historians seriously in their criticism of philosophy. I take the common law seriously in its criticism of the history of man. For man, in every discipline, the mirror always lies.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Sovereign Men

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 07:58:00 UTC

  • Ben Glass (a) a superior culture and civilization do not imply a superior geneti

    Ben Glass

    (a) a superior culture and civilization do not imply a superior genetic distribution. (e) your (((shaming))) is not an argument.

    Cowards fail to make arguments. I am neither a coward, a name caller, a practitioner of rallying and shaming, a practitioner of pilpul, or one of pseudoscience propaganda and deceit. And I will stand my by words with violence.

    You on the other hand have demonstrated nothing other than the ignorance, and petulance of a ten year old school girl, that lives under the illusion that her approval is desired, and the conviction that she will not have the daylights slappped out of her for her insults.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-26 20:00:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-26 19:55:00 UTC