Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • OK, CALI. LETS CLARIFY – NOT GONNA HAPPEN. 1) Cut the water. 2) Close the federa

    OK, CALI. LETS CLARIFY – NOT GONNA HAPPEN.

    1) Cut the water.

    2) Close the federal reserve branches in SF and LA and transfer them to Utah’s branch.

    3) Close the land exits from California to the USA.

    4) Close the ports – air and sea.

    Watch a reclaimed desert, convert back to desert.

    SO:

    1) please seceded, we want you to. you’re a cancer for this country.

    2) take your portion of the national debt that you were so heavily responsible for creating.

    3) create a new currency and issue it in the hopes that someone in the world will take it.

    4) build dozens of desalination plants with the money you won’t have.

    5) lose all the revenue that is created by CA’s function as a port of entry.

    6) lose all trade revenue with the rest of the country.

    7) beg to be part of china since they’re the only people who can finance your survival.

    8) learn chinese, and how to live under authoritarian rule.

    9) note that the rest of us will lock the doors, throw away the key, and leave you to die.

    You know. You can go nicely, or you can go ‘dead’.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 18:33:00 UTC

  • CONSTANT RELATIONS: CLASS VS CATEGORY —“One is the notion of category that add

    CONSTANT RELATIONS: CLASS VS CATEGORY

    —“One is the notion of category that addresses the building blocks of thought – which are the categories that are necessary for thinking, knowing, deciding, etc.”—

    I don’t know what building blocks of thought are.

    But as far as I know the process of precognitive, as well as cognitive categorization refers to identifying a set of constant relations. And as far as I know that’s all that can be said about them. This is the function of our physical layers of neurons: reducing sets of constant relations to increasing generalizations that increase the potential for associations, culminating the potential for intertemporal associations.

    Again. As far as i know, this is all that can be or need be said. we do not need the word ‘category’, which in original translation means something on the order of ‘accusation’ or ‘assertion’, or ‘name’:

    category (n.)

    1580s, from Middle French catégorie, from Late Latin categoria, from Greek kategoria “accusation, prediction, category,” verbal noun from kategorein “to speak against; to accuse, assert, predicate,” from kata “down to” (or perhaps “against;” see cata-) + agoreuein “to harangue, to declaim (in the assembly),” from agora “public assembly” (see agora).

    Original sense of “accuse” weakened to “assert, name” by the time Aristotle applied kategoria to his 10 classes of things that can be named.

    —“category should be used by no-one who is not prepared to state (1) that he does not mean class, & (2) that he knows the difference between the two”—- [Fowler]

    So I should probably be more cautious when I use the term, since class(invariant) is at least descriptive, and the relationship between class(invariant) and category (utilitarian or ‘discretionary’? ) is easier to understand, even if ‘set of constant relations’ is existential. So we can express constant relations as either a Class or a Category. I tend to think (and I should probably work on clarifying this a bit), but I use class for existential categories (science), and category for utilitarian (imagining, reasoning).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 18:24:00 UTC

  • CALIFORNIA. uh huh. Not gonna make the payments to the feds? how about we close

    CALIFORNIA.

    uh huh. Not gonna make the payments to the feds?

    how about we close the fed branch in SF and it’s sub-branch in LA, and move the clearing to the Utah Branch?

    How long will California exist? Days? Two weeks?

    We WANT you to secede.

    But you gotta secede if you want out.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 17:45:00 UTC

  • PHILOSOPHERS NOW DEMOTED TO THE SAME RANKS AS THEOLOGIANS. Philosophers criticiz

    PHILOSOPHERS NOW DEMOTED TO THE SAME RANKS AS THEOLOGIANS.

    Philosophers criticize Theologians for archaic reasoning, and scientists criticize philosophers for archaic reasoning, and now Testimonialists get to criticize even scientists for archaic reasoning; criticize philosophers aggressively, and criticize theologians dismissively to the point of prosecutorally.

    I know, I know, I know….. Most people are over-invested in nonsense-philosophy as tools of categorization the same way that most people are over invested in theology, and the way that most people are subconsciously incapable of reversing their over-investment in justificationism, and consciously incapable of reversing their desire for monopoly decidability in justificationism.

    That point of demarcation( the error of monopoly, justificationary, decidability) may in fact function as the point of demarcation between post-human and human, the way agency functions as the point of self determination between human and domesticated animal. The way that observation of property in toto functions as the point of demarcation between domesticated animal and beast.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 17:23:00 UTC

  • TRUTH IS A MERCILESS GOD If your comforting lies are so precious that you will n

    TRUTH IS A MERCILESS GOD

    If your comforting lies are so precious that you will not burn them along with the comforting lies of the left, then you are not one of us, but one of them – no matter what comforting lies you tell yourself.

    Truth is a merciless god.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 15:48:00 UTC

  • ALL WARS, MARTIAL, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND CULTURAL ARE COSTLY. AND YOU WILL NO

    ALL WARS, MARTIAL, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND CULTURAL ARE COSTLY. AND YOU WILL NOT GET OFF CHEAPLY.

    Lets be clear. Your little comforting lies need to die too.

    The left won the culture war by telling desirable half truths, after failing at the revolutionary, economic, political, and military wars against Aryanism (domestication of man).

    Thankfully we now have testimonialism.

    The left won in the ancient world by vast immigration from the east, and the imposition of eastern half truths and outright lies, followed by rapid conquest of the mediterranean.

    Thankfully we invented empiricism in the modern world – after humanity’s longest dark age.

    The left won in the prehistoric world by the imposition of half truths and outright lies to mobilize the underclasses against Aryanism. Producing humanity’s first visible dark age.

    Thankfully we invented reason in the ancient world, after our second longest dark age.

    The left won the eastern world by the invention of half truths and outright lies: the supernaturalism that we call ‘organized religion’. They did it in response to THE WEST.

    We had created that industry we call Aryanism: the combination of bronze, horse, wheel, contractualism, sovereignty, and heroism: the use of superior technology to allow elites to domesticate and transcend man from beast to human by the incremental suppression of his innate parasitism.

    THAT MEANS YOU TOO.

    We did not understand our own ‘technology’: Aryanism. But now that we do, we can use it to destroy the ‘left’ (the middle-east, the middle world, the people who lie), and destroy them forever, and end the cycle of our innovation of truth and transcendence, and their innovation of deceit and devolution.

    The consequence of the restoration of the west, and the incremental improvement in our technology of domestication, will restore our civilization, but it will also destroy the lies and half truths imported from the east, that our people use as a ‘crutch’ with which to sate their weaknesses with dreams, delusions, fantasies, and escapism.

    There is only one truth, one perfection, one heroism, one aristocracy, and that is the defeat of falsehood, half truths, parasitism, and infection of the mind of man with the entire portfolio of lies.

    And if this is not good enough for you then you are not worthy of transcendence. You may not be as weak as those who are evil, but you are not as strong as the gods we seek.

    There is no room for the weak among the gods.

    And if you must lie, and seek comforts, rather than act, and enact changes, then you are merely weak. Not weak enough to harm perhaps. but not strong enough to transcend.

    So the price of victory of the middle east (the left) is one that all who cannot face truth without fear, but with pleasure, with inspiration, and with conviction, and with action.

    There are many myths to choose from. But they are not truths. They are simply highly condensed means of making decisions that consistently advance our achievement of perfection in a universe of chaotic information among people who are evil, weak, infected, or unable to choose.

    Eat the weak.

    Conquer.

    Rule.

    Transcend.

    And become the gods we seek.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Law of Nature and of Man

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 15:43:00 UTC

  • THE CURRENT ERA HAS CONQUERED THE LEFT WITH IN ECONOMICS AND POLITICS WITH FINAN

    THE CURRENT ERA HAS CONQUERED THE LEFT WITH IN ECONOMICS AND POLITICS WITH FINANCIALIZATION BUT THEY HAVE WON WITH CULTURE AND REPRODUCTION.

    The financialization of the west, first to finance the early 20th century immigrants to the USA, second in the postwar era to rebuild Europe, then third in the seventies and eighties (the petrodollar) was used to fight the cold war (world communism), and fourth to stimulate the economy when the financial system collapsed, has gotten entirely out of hand, and let western governments commit suicide to the point where immigration and extermination of the nations (people) is the only economic lever at their disposal. This whole bit of nonsense is made possible by the collaboration between the left-wing university, the left wing press, the incentives of ‘big’ finance and business, and the oversized state.

    Only very ignorant, immature, and inexperienced people interpret the world in simple terms. everyone in history, for all of history, operates on economic incentives.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 15:22:00 UTC

  • INTENTIONS ARE IRRELEVANT. VIA POSITIVA (STORIES) HELP ORGANIZE BUT VIA NEGATIVA

    INTENTIONS ARE IRRELEVANT. VIA POSITIVA (STORIES) HELP ORGANIZE BUT VIA NEGATIVA (LAW) DECIDES OUTCOMES.

    The purpose of Natural Law is to prevent harm, resolve disputes, and force restitution. If no dispute, no harm, no externality exists then this is not a matter for law. law evolves via negativa. by discovering methods of conflict because of parasitism and preventing them by recording them as a warning that one will be forced to pay restitution, and as a help to those who want to know how to avoid conflict. It is a purely empirical process.

    If one seeks to build consensus that is not the function of the law (via negativa). Yet if one seeks to build consensus by MEANS THAT CANNOT BE WARRANTED, and means that cannot be testified to, then one has failed to perform due diligence against harm, and one can be brought up for restitution.

    Intentions are irrelevant.

    The ease of transfer is irrelevant.

    The ‘good’ of the outcome is irrelevant.

    Those are statemetns of positiva (intention and excuse making)

    However, when we come into dispute, disputes are decidable. All differences in property in toto are decidable.

    If one does not impose a cost against property in toto then the matter is undecidable, precisely because it is immaterial. What you do in your own head that does not manifest itself as an imposition of costs upon the costs paid by others is irrelevant. (and reciprocity applies to others).

    If you want a positive political philosophy (methods of cooperating in the production of commons) then we have a spectrum of options from near dictatorship to near anarchy to choose from. I don’t need to list them. We know them.

    If you want a positive personal philosophy (generative options) we have at least these methods to choose from: , dreaming/free-association, the occult/new-age, superstition, myth, literature, Tradition/habit, rules of thumb/imitation, general rules of arbitrary precision (truth/science/history).

    if you want an mental discipline mindfulness discipline we can achieve this through drugs/dreaming, suppression/meditation, internal-(recursive)-conversation/prayer, disciplined and restive ritual, contemplative writing, disciplined action-planning(stoicism), physical exercise/hiking-running-walking.

    But if you want to DECIDE between competing wants, or decide between matters of conflict, there is only one possible method of decidability.

    Now I might prefer a highly redistributed homogenous polity under strict rule of natural law, requiring all of that redistribution to be truthfully stated in the law, transparently performed and objectively measured. And I might prefer that order simply because I am highly independent by virtue of my talents and skills, and people seem to find me useful. But I can see others who are not so independent, not possessed of talents and skills, and not found useful, preferring a different order – although it is hard to understand a better order for getting it to them morally.

    Now, others might prefer a different order for immoral reasons. Those reasons might be obvious (inabilty to compete in a market). Or they might be less obvious: inability to organize toward a productive end truthfllly. or they might be insidious: attempting to disorganize or organize toward a harmful end.

    But all of these cases are decidable.

    But in order for a case to be decidable, someone’s interests (property in toto) must have been subject to harm because of it.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 13:04:00 UTC

  • “Testimonialism is not about identifying truth but about reporting truthfully.”-

    —“Testimonialism is not about identifying truth but about reporting truthfully.”— Bill Joslin

    Survival in the market of criticism (tests) is all we can know.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 12:39:00 UTC

  • Q&A: ABORTION —“May I ask what your views on abortion are?”— I have to answe

    Q&A: ABORTION

    —“May I ask what your views on abortion are?”—

    I have to answer this question by starting with the basis of decidability.

    0) My view is that moral decidability is provided by continuing domestication for the purpose of transcendence by the prohibition on parasitism alone. Or rather productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer alone. And as such perfectly cooperated man results in transcendent man.

    1) my view is that the effort to fully employ our women, so that we could increase taxation, so that we could enter the work force late, and retire early, has been self-genocidal. This is merely intergenerational parasitism. We are killing future generations by our conspicuous consumption of tax revenues.

    2) my view is that the cost of raising children meritocratically is only calculable in a two+ person household. (the economics of this should be obvious).

    3) my view on infanticide is that we have been doing it since the dawn of time – by the cruel means of exposure. And that abortion merely preserves this eternal trend. And moreover, I am not sure we shouldn’t do much more infanticide. I am certain that any defect that externalizes costs onto others is bad, and that we tolerate the nonsense of hormonal mothers in more than just births but in failing to sterilize the incompetent, and to hang the (predatory) criminal population.

    4) my view on killing is the same.

    5) my view on conquest is the same.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-28 12:34:00 UTC