NATIONALISM FOR ALL PEOPLES: WE CAN ALL TRANSCEND IF WE CAN CREATE COMMONS NEEDED FOR OUR FAMILIES, CLANS, TRIBES, AND NATION.
Monopoly government prevents the specialization of the development of commons to serve the needs of the group without creating antagonism by parasitic dependence upon other groups.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-15 09:09:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-15 06:32:00 UTC
—“Whilst I would consider myself a moral objectivist to a large extent, it was Propertarianism that allowed me to expand on that (rational position) as a Natural Law (empirical position); and provided the means to confirm my position that there exists such a thing as moral violence when needed. …. Many Libertarians struggle getting past the NAP because many Libertarians are moral objectivists and thus struggle with the idea of a moral aggression. But it exists and you describe it well. And in hindsight it is demonstrable throughout all history.”—Nick Zito
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-15 06:19:00 UTC
PROPERTARIAN NATURAL LAW: EMPIRICAL NOT RATIONAL
—“I would say that your use of the term Natural Law, as opposed to the former englightment thinkers, is empirical (as opposed to their rational.) They used it to describe a set of innately known or knowable rules of moral behaviour. You are using it to describe a set of discovered rules which are necessary for cooperation.”—-Ivan Ilakovac
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-15 05:50:00 UTC
The cost of the underclass.
https://www.facebook.com/7NewsBrisbane/videos/1420432344636280/
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-15 05:20:00 UTC
Retweeted Realistic_Right (@Realistic_Right):
@curtdoolittle & @jordanbpeterson, 2 of the world’s greatest thinkers, both say the foundation of Western Civ is TRUTHFUL SPEECH.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-14 20:42:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-14 20:39:00 UTC
—“programming is low-level (fault-intolerant, syntactical) intuition is high-level (implicit, contextual non-falsifiable)”– Kashif Vikaas
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-14 20:38:00 UTC
—“Rabbinical Judaism is essentially a religion based on trying to out-lawyer God.”— Felicity J. Chernukhin
Where, at least in my opinion, “God” refers to the god of the jews in relation to the gods of the Iranian-Aryans in the East (Mesopotamia), or the European Aryans in the West (The Agean/Mediterranean).
😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-14 20:27:00 UTC
By Bill Joslin
—“The series of values: Life, Liberty, and Property reflect a series of steady states in time:
1) Life: Myself in the moment (self-ownership)
2) Liberty: My life in the future
3) Property: The results of my life in the past
Using Properarianism’s Sovereignty, Testimonialism, and Propertarianism, we now have an operational triad which less poetically and more existentially accounts for Locke’s Life, Liberty, and Property.
1) Life – Sovereignty (far more robust term, which can be demonstrated versus proclaimed via appeals to morality
2) Liberty – Testimonialism (effective future action in applying our efforts and deciding exchanges toward productive ends)
3) Property – Propertarianism: Property in toto (expanded and demonstrated definition of property)
We’ve improved upon Life, Liberty, and Property”—
Bill – I have an intuition that we could express this in relation to OTHERS (as a law of cooperation) rather than of self (as an appeal for liberty from the state, as Locke was doing)
What do soverignty, testimony, and property cause us to grant for others in exchange for what? Then how do we tie that back to myself, and ourselves, my life and our lives, my property and our property?
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-14 20:24:00 UTC