Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • MY POSITION ON THE JEWISH QUESTION (revised and updated) ( Hint: My position is

    MY POSITION ON THE JEWISH QUESTION

    (revised and updated)

    ( Hint: My position is the same toward every out group. )

    I WILL BRUTALLY MANAGE THIS THREAD AGAINST STUPIDITY

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-03 10:12:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY VERSUS SERVILITY One can hire an administrator of contracts. If that

    SOVEREIGNTY VERSUS SERVILITY

    One can hire an administrator of contracts. If that’s what you mean by ‘governor’ then that kind of “government” is something I am comfortable with.

    But I won’t give up my Sovereignty (My “rights as an anglo saxon”) in the choice of contracts I will prefer to pay for; which choices of contracts I prefer not to pay for; and which choice of contracts I will not tolerate.

    This is the difference between Sovereigns investing in Commons (Anglo Saxons) by vote and hiring project managers, and Subjects choosing their rulers by vote, who will then choose the commons they produce for those who chose them.

    We have had our rights for thousands of years.

    It took those thousands of years to preserve them.

    It took those thousands of years to capture them in draft form the US Constitution.

    And today we can capture them perfectly in a new one.

    So will you choose the Sovereignty of the Warrior, or the Servility of a Subject?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-03 08:10:00 UTC

  • ( my mother, a solid catholic conservative democrat, watching the news, spontane

    ( my mother, a solid catholic conservative democrat, watching the news, spontaneously says “We have four countries: the northeast, the south, the farmland in the middle, and the west coast. And we all have different values. And … I don’t wanna live through … I dont want to live through what’s coming.” )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-03 07:50:00 UTC

  • “..the flag can’t fight. I can. If you won’t kneel to a flag, I’ll make you knee

    —“..the flag can’t fight. I can. If you won’t kneel to a flag, I’ll make you kneel to me.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-02 19:32:00 UTC

  • WESTERN CIV ON SKIN IN THE GAME Your narrative is exceptional – as wisdom. But w

    WESTERN CIV ON SKIN IN THE GAME

    Your narrative is exceptional – as wisdom. But wisdom cannot be converted into law unless in a formal, deflationary argument.

    The west differs from the east. We never conflated law with other fields. And the skin of the loan IN put = the warranty OUT put.

    High trust civilization (the west) could use warranty rather than skin. So what happened that the west stopped demanding warranty?

    Without low trust SKIN IN -or- high trust WARRANTY OUT, western civ kept high trust population but low trust economics and policy.

    Now, if the west relied upon high trust warranty, how could we rely once again on high trust, or must we move to low trust Skin?

    When you discuss cultural deltas I hear (a) levantine low trust with (b) mathematical and literary platonism. Not Natural Law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-02 16:47:00 UTC

  • didn’t think our accelerating civil war was all that quiet…. 😉

    https://t.co/MiXVpAFXEKI didn’t think our accelerating civil war was all that quiet…. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-02 14:13:00 UTC

  • I’ve been back in the USA since just before the election – and angry the entire

    I’ve been back in the USA since just before the election – and angry the entire time. I Hate The State

    #Conservative #Libertarian #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-02 10:52:00 UTC

  • YOUR POVERTY AND YOUR LACK OF AGENCY You’re poor because you lack Agency sure. B

    YOUR POVERTY AND YOUR LACK OF AGENCY

    You’re poor because you lack Agency sure. But you know, even if we remove obstructive institutions, and even if we create institutions to invest in overcoming your initial circumstance, we are still stuck with the fact that we cannot change YOU, and that YOU can lack Agency for your own informational, intellectual, emotional, or physical reasons. We know for certain that you cannot tell if you are able or not. We don’t like to choose whether you are able or not – we can err. All we can do is invest in eliminating impediments so that you can DEMONSTRATE whether you possess agency and ability – or not.

    Anyone who tells you more money will matter is simply lying to you. You’re poor because you lack Agency, because you or your parents or your ancestors have lacked intellectual, emotional, or physical ABILITY as well as informational (ignorance) or institutional impediment.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-02 10:23:00 UTC

  • Well, conservatives have failed because they cannot, under democracy, admit thei

    Well, conservatives have failed because they cannot, under democracy, admit their strategy: domestication. Or rather “Eugenics” in pursuit of fellow Sovereigns.

    That’s what you get with Propertarianism’s Natural Law: we just state western civilization truthfully.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-02 10:09:00 UTC

  • NATURAL LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE RESTORATION NATURAL LAW Testimonialism: Episte

    NATURAL LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE RESTORATION

    NATURAL LAW

    Testimonialism: Epistemology and Truth (Testimony), and Propertarianism: Ethics and Natural Law (Cooperation), and Natural Common Law (a grammar), provide the means of producing contracts (Constitutions), that are ‘scientific’ – which in testimonialism means ‘truthful’, and not open to creative interpretation by the judiciary. This ‘precision’ was necessary in order to increase the demand for warranty of due diligence against fraud from covering products and services, to covering information (speech).

    SOVEREIGNTY (WESTERN CIVILIZATION)

    Sovereignty (‘liberty in fact not by permission’), Market Civilization (association, cooperation, production, reproduction, production of commons, production of polities, production of group evolutionary strategy), and Western Group Evolutionary Strategy (Transcendence / Domestication), Provide an analytic explanation of the reasons for western rapid evolution in the bronze, iron, and steel ages.

    THE RESTORATION

    1 – How we were met by supernatural mysticism, monotheistic religion, and pseudoscientific/pseudorational ‘religion’ by the people to the east, in each era. And how the current pseudoscientific came about.

    2- How we can use Natural Law to restore western civilization, by reforming or rewriting our constitution and that of others.

    3 – Including various institutional methods of producing commons truthfully.

    4 – Including the necessity, under Sovereignty, of markets for the production of commons.

    5 – Including the necessity of various policies under the group strategy of Transcendence

    So, given that we can use propertarianism and testimonialism to produce ANY government truthfully, what I THINK you are asking, is that if we chose to pursue Sovereignty and Transcendence to restore western civilization under strictly constructed natural law, what would be the optimum(?) end state?

    We can choose from any number of options, but the lowest risk is to selectively revoke, restore and amend the constitution and with it the judiciary, restore the monarchy and militia, reduce any ‘federal’ government to a corporeal insurer of last resort, with courts limited to dispute resolution on narrow forms of commercial non normative property; with a market for commons consisting of multiple “houses” representing various classes, (Territorial, Commercial, Familial, and Dependent) which vote by apportionment (put money to what they want), and any contract not opposed by the other houses on legal basis survives. In other words “a market” using some of the proceeds of “the markets” for the production of commons, that improve the returns in the market.

    My ‘belief’ (forecast) is that the proceeds of suppressing falsehood (by testimonialism) will be greater than the proceeds of suppressing mysticism (by empiricism).

    The converse question is that if you cannot provide warranty of due diligence of your words, then why should others tolerate them any more than whether they tolerate a lack of due diligence of your actions (services), or productions (goods)?f

    Every liar no matter how well intentioned finds an excuse to defend his lies. But why is it that we must tolerate lies?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-02 09:42:00 UTC