The Four Horsemen of Reconstruction: 1-Peterson(Meaning), 2-Haidt (Explanation) 3-Doolittle(Law), 4-Taleb (Measurement)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 10:50:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
HAD PERFECT GOVERNMENT AND WE BLEW IT (for newbies)(worth repeating)
https://propertarianism.com/2016/05/25/perfect-government/WE HAD PERFECT GOVERNMENT AND WE BLEW IT
(for newbies)(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 10:29:00 UTC
-
DEPTH – THE CURE FOR PROPAGANDA (for newbies) (worth repeating)
https://propertarianism.com/2015/01/18/the-cure-for-propaganda-and-western-civilization/IN DEPTH – THE CURE FOR PROPAGANDA
(for newbies) (worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 10:29:00 UTC
-
THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE RECONSTRUCTION 1) Jordan Peterson: Meaning (Opportunity
THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE RECONSTRUCTION
1) Jordan Peterson: Meaning (Opportunity generation)
2) Jonathan Haidt: Causation (Moral division of labor)
3) Curt Doolittle: Decidability (Natural Law)
4) Taleb: Measurement (‘Science’)
FYI: Let’s take notice that I have the lousy job of saying ‘no’ – no one is ever going to like me for that. Haidt has the better job of saying ‘why’. Peterson has the best job of saying ‘how’. And Taleb has the hard job of trying to quantify the information necessary to change categorical state when we lack the data that will be produced by AI’s necessary to develop a testable unit of measure.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 10:17:00 UTC
-
EVOLUTION OF A CONDITION OF LIBERTY (for newbies)(worth repeating)
https://propertarianism.com/2016/10/07/evolution-of-a-condition-of-liberty-the-struggle-from-discretionary-to-non-discretionary-to-market-rule/THE EVOLUTION OF A CONDITION OF LIBERTY
(for newbies)(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 10:14:00 UTC
-
QUESTION OF THE DAY: SELF DEFENSE What are the Definition, Scope, and Limits of
QUESTION OF THE DAY: SELF DEFENSE
What are the Definition, Scope, and Limits of Self Defense Under the Natural Law of Sovereign Men: Perfect Reciprocity?
( I’ve tried a few experiments and the quality of the responses has been far and away above my expectations so for those who feel capable of constructing statements of natural law, this is the next example I’d like to try.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 10:12:00 UTC
-
Úlfheðinn (@DuxHispanii): Accurate
https://twitter.com/DuxHispanii/status/821126685596778500/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=840123662673965057Retweeted Úlfheðinn (@DuxHispanii):
Accurate https://t.co/7EgfQrV6IA
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 03:54:00 UTC
-
Jordan Peterson on {Operationalism} in child raising
Jordan Peterson on {Operationalism} in child raising:
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 17:14:00 UTC
-
( When I eat black jellybeans I imagine them as liberal souls. They taste better
( When I eat black jellybeans I imagine them as liberal souls. They taste better. )
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 16:23:00 UTC
-
Individualism is untestable which is why it’s meaningless. Sovereignty on the ot
Individualism is untestable which is why it’s meaningless. Sovereignty on the other hand is perfectly testable.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 16:12:00 UTC