THE PURPOSE OF THE WORK
The purpose of my work, and taking it to its conclusion, is to produce the ‘bible’ of western civilization, beyond which no man or government may tread: the cult of non-submission: the philosophy of Aristocracy: sovereignty, and its ‘scripture’: natural law.
(Because this sentence seems to strike a chord)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 20:38:00 UTC
—“I cultivate crazy to compensate for my instinctual, conservative, conformity. ;)”—Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 20:24:00 UTC
Property rights are determined by those able to mass sufficient violence it to define their constituency and their limits.
Under natural law property rights ARE absolute. It is the externalities that determine their limits not whether or not one has demonstrated investment in them.
Ergo, scientifically property rights must be absolute, contingent upon the consequences of their exercise.
Practically speaking property rights evolve to suit the median of the population, which is why western europeans prior to 1900 had the worlds highest degree of property rights.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 20:23:00 UTC
THERE ARE NO PROPERTARIAN OBJECTIONS TO WHITE NATIONALISM – OR ANY OTHER NATIONALISM
(controversial)(read it all before you jump to conclusions)
Assuming it’s under our ancient group evolutionary strategy (sovereignty), and under our ancient law (rule of natural law of sovereigns), and where we produce commons by a market between the classes (multi-house-government), where we use an intergenerational judge of last resort (hereditary monarchy), and where all those with enfranchisement are trained to, and fight in a militia. (I call this market fascism).
But to just separately bring white people together again, say under communism is not to restore white civilization. And without our civilization we are nothing.
I advocate that all peoples of the world adopt nationalism and the white civilizational strategy. Not just us. In fact, I have no problem demanding it at the point of a gun.
Fascism for war and intentional reordering of the economy, Market fascism for when we are not at war. And that’s about as difficult as it gets.
Curt
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 19:52:00 UTC
THE GOOD OF GODS AND MYTHOLOGY IN DECIDABILITY
If truth is the language of the gods, as it must be, then why is not bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deceit blasphemy?
—“There might be a god archetype, in some pantheon, for almost every significant human behavioral pattern. I think that’s a helpful learning utility.”—Alex Houchens
Exactly. But that is Myth and literature, for purpose of teaching by analogy. And it is not only important but necessary. Why? Because the western man uses HYPERBOLE to exaggerate, in order to show the consequence of ‘if everyone did this then..’. Kant restates this as the categorical imperative. But it is just the western method of using exaggeration of traits of individuals in order to force every living soul to ask “what if everyone did this” or “what are the consequences of this behavior over time”.
Gods help us create general rules of decidability within a context by means of hyperbole (isolation of causal properties.)
This is why we need myths, stated hyperbolically, and literature stated analogically: to create general rules, easily employed in a wide variety of circumstances, so that we may, through the thousands of little decisions every day, guide our civilization into that which we seek: parity with the gods.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 19:44:00 UTC
Retweeted Steven Pinker (@sapinker):
Time to end the mindless, expensive, & unconstitutional control over social science research by IRB bureaucrats. https://t.co/GibQ7k0aTi
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 19:41:00 UTC
THE FAILURE OF LIBERALISM WAS FAILING TO UNDERSTAND IT.
Empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism.
The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services.
It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 19:33:00 UTC
This is hardly a group for intellectual discourse, but empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism.
The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services.
It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 19:33:00 UTC
LIBERTARIANISM WAS A DEAD END BUT PROPERTY WAS NOT.
The quest for a condition of liberty using libertarian philosophy has been a dead end. The Lockian, Jeffersonian, Rothbardian, Hoppiean, and my own arguments for creating a condition of sovereignty using the natural law of reciprocity, and its unit of measure, property, has been a profound success.
We solved what the ancients either feared to discuss or found inappropriate to discuss.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 18:38:00 UTC
A SHORT COURSE IN SOVEREIGNTY AND AGENCY
DEFINITION: AGENCY (SIMPLE): https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155063860317264
LONGER: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155029341322264
DEFINITIONS: SOVEREIGNTY
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154992876797264
NATURAL LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE RESTORATION
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155080414747264
THE DISTILLATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155077593257264
THE DEFLATIONARY SPECIALIZATION OF WESTERN CIV.
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155055652697264
NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT.
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264
ARISTOCRACY: THE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION OF AGENCY
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155053521147264
THE PROPERTARIAN TAKE ON WESTERN HISTORY
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155027904187264
THE LANGUAGE OF SOVEREIGNTY
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155019942397264
NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT.
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154987815492264
NATURAL LAW DOESN’T JUSTIFY ARISTOCRACY – IT JUSTIFIES MARKETS – IT IS JUST THAT NATURAL LAW IS ONLY POSSIBLE UNDER ARISTOCRACY
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155137947447264
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 18:17:00 UTC