Source: Facebook

  • by Igor Rogov —“Islam is a chimeric system; it has an appearance of masculine

    by Igor Rogov

    —“Islam is a chimeric system; it has an appearance of masculine animal but the driving force is a very powerful and securely hidden female; in fact way too powerful yet acting behind the scene, stimulating hordes of male offsprings to go and hunt, and conquer more resources and bring home, so that female of Islam can lay more eggs. Male in Islam has no rights, no power whatsoever, except a very few chosen ones it is nearly sexless, thoroughly oppressed creature, institutionalized passive homosexual, which gets out and pretends to be a real man only in large groups and in a permanent war with the rest of the world.”—

    I avoid all psychologism -its archaic and obfuscatory- but this sort of line of thinking is interesting.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 18:19:00 UTC

  • Who posted about the 120 IQ Island? Can you point me to that (I wasn’t fast enou

    Who posted about the 120 IQ Island? Can you point me to that (I wasn’t fast enough and now I can’t find it)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 18:03:00 UTC

  • “Christianity [feigning omniscience] did not admit the existence of predators an

    —“Christianity [feigning omniscience] did not admit the existence of predators and the need to protect against them, and Cultural Marxism is a predator. We, in 9ur civilisation need to realise that just because part of it never had to face the predations of islam, such predations still exist and must be accounted for with the kind of vigorous defences our ancestors employed.”—Claire Rae Randall


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:51:00 UTC

  • Why did Gandhi work against Britain? Why did Jesus work against Rome? Why are fe

    Why did Gandhi work against Britain?

    Why did Jesus work against Rome?

    Why are feminine judaism and masculine Islam working against the west?

    Would they work against China?

    Would they work against the Khan?

    The answer is very simple.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:49:00 UTC

  • Aristotle wandered around and started trouble on the streets of Athens. I do it

    Aristotle wandered around and started trouble on the streets of Athens. I do it on the streets of facebook. The point is to learn. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:47:00 UTC

  • ***Violence is neither good nor bad, it is the change in state that we seek to a

    ***Violence is neither good nor bad, it is the change in state that we seek to achieve by violence that is good or bad.***


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:46:00 UTC

  • THANKS TO EVERYONE who contributed to the discussion on religion over the past t

    THANKS TO EVERYONE who contributed to the discussion on religion over the past two days. It was about what I expected. Although what I learned was a) that we have some knowledgeable people, b) that my suspicion about the ability to argue using different techniques is very narrow, c) that people are framed by the church more than world history, and cannot understand the west in the broader context. d) that if we do suggest natural law as the basis for european christianity we can provide consistency between the teachings of jesus as a subject of hellenic and roman civilization, and and the present. e) that it is possible to separate jesus as a reformer of his own people from Paul who attacked roman civilization.. f) … lots more. gotta cut… but anyway, Mandatory Natural Law ends judaism and islamism, since any statement violating natural law is an anathema to man, and constitute a political movement, not a religious movement; …. and both jewish law and islamic law violate Natural Law.

    in other words Natural Law Fundamentalism so to speak, like Natural Law Market Fascism, preserves what we desire, but prohibits the feminins strategy parasitism of the jews by fraud, and the masculine parasitism of the islamists by ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:44:00 UTC

  • Why is non-aggression insufficient? Why do we claim we have duties such as war?

    Why is non-aggression insufficient? Why do we claim we have duties such as war?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:05:00 UTC

  • THE CONTENT OF RELIGION, AND THE FAILURE OF THE CHURCH Why did the church fail t

    THE CONTENT OF RELIGION, AND THE FAILURE OF THE CHURCH

    Why did the church fail to reform?

    – anti-intellectualism.

    – superstition rather than myth.

    – peasant rather than middle class

    – agrarian rather than industrialism

    – suffering rather than heroism and possibility.

    – Semitic rather than European.

    Why did the church fail to produce a reformer?

    – why no Augustine, or Luther?

    – why was Smith/Hume/Jefferson insufficient?

    – why no accommodation for Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Durkheim, Nietzsche?

    The answer:

    Too much of a change. The academy took possession away from the church. The academy took funding away from the church. The state took all lands from the church.

    My response:

    Then it might have been possible if not for the world wars and communism. However, the germans were very close. The british traditionalists were very close. The church could have seized the opportunity, or it could have defeated the opposition: marxism. But it did neither. It was LAZY AND INTELLECTUALLY INCOMPETENT.

    As far as I know, all that matters in a religion is:

    (a) a community setting where individual expression prohibited. (signal free environment)

    (b) a very simple set of comprehensible laws (strategy)

    (c) a method of achieving mindfulness, and excuse for it.

    (d) recitation of myths, legends, history, heroes

    (e) application of past wisdom to current issues.

    (f) participatory rituals (praying, singing, moving).

    (g) participatory holidays ( relief – vacation days )

    (h) participatory feasts (special holidays – family)

    (i) participatory festivals (sports, plays, games)

    (j) an institutional means of transference of all of the above between generations. (profession)

    The acts matter much more than the words. The acts produce the experience. The words JUSTIFY it.

    THE CHURCH WAS SO HEAVILY ANTI INTELLECTUAL IT ABANDONED THE PEOPLE TO THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE ACADEMY, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE STATE, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR, AND HID AMONG THE DEVELOPING WORLD’S POOR.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 13:53:00 UTC

  • AM GENERATION JONES, between the Boomers and GenX. The Yuppy generation. I was a

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_JonesI AM GENERATION JONES, between the Boomers and GenX. The Yuppy generation. I was a yuppie in the 80’s. I was a small child in the 60’s, and no part of it. I remember the oil crisis of the 70’s. Star Wars came out my senior year of high school. And I got out of college in 83. No affinity for boomers, and high identification with GenX’ers. First Tech Generation: Same as Gates, Ellison, and Jobs.

    FROM ELSEWHERE

    Reclassification

    When one considers that psychologists and sociologists agree any generation is defined by shared experiences of historical events and cultural influences during the developmental and formative years, and that generations generally span 10 to 12 years, the classification of Baby Boomers as a “generation” based solely on annual birth rates, from 1946 to 1964, was actually a misclassification. The emergence of so-called “late Boomers” as a subgroup of Baby Boomers was a start in correcting the error, and then Pontell’s research further revealed that the second half of the Boomers were different enough from the first half to break away from the classification altogether.

    How Jonesers Compare to Baby Boomers

    Though Boomers and Jonesers share some traits, such as idealism, they behave differently. Members of Gen Jones tend to be more practical and rational in their approach to change. Their childhood years were inspired by positive social change brought on by the Baby Boomers, but then sobering events of the 1970s—including Watergate, the oil embargo, rising inflation, and unemployment—forced them to be pragmatic as they entered adulthood. Jonesers still desire a world of equality, peace, love, and happiness, but their approach to achieving that goal runs down the middle of the road more than on the path of radical action.

    How Jonesers Behave

    Jonesers remember what life was like before the rise of technology, and they long for that simplicity. They are willing to unplug occasionally and also to use technology as a tool for social betterment and for personal gain and convenience.

    Regarding advertising, Generation Jones is turned off by hard-sell tactics and hype. They would rather have the facts and then decide for themselves if a product or service is right for them. But that doesn’t mean emotion is out of the equation altogether. If advertisers use nostalgic icons from the Jonesers’ childhood and teen years, such as the Snickers TV commercial blending Danny Trejo and Marcia Brady, or place their ads during reruns of The Monkees, they will get attention. And go ahead and include the URL in the ad because, according to Pontell, Jonesers spend more money online than Boomers do.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 12:48:00 UTC