Source: Facebook

  • I thought Spencer overplayed his hand last fall, but he’s upped his game, and he

    I thought Spencer overplayed his hand last fall, but he’s upped his game, and he’s exceptional.

    I’m not into racism but I’m an advocate for nationalism, monarchy, and natural law for everyone.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 21:10:00 UTC

  • ARGUMENT AND POSITIONING

    http://politi.co/2pKKdX1EXCELLENT ARGUMENT AND POSITIONING


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 21:01:00 UTC

  • LIFE COUNTER-STRIKE PISTOL ROUND…. (omg) Guy runs around with a pistol, silenc

    http://www.machovideo.com/15755/isis-executing-people-with-silencer/REAL LIFE COUNTER-STRIKE PISTOL ROUND…. (omg)

    Guy runs around with a pistol, silencer, and gopro, doing surprise hits one after the other. Insanity….


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 18:30:00 UTC

  • EQUALITY

    http://vidmax.com/video/155672-Brutal-footage-shows-bouncer-punching-woman-in-the-faceMORE EQUALITY


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 18:16:00 UTC

  • ( Personal: My big fear, which I definitely feel these days, is that I will have

    ( Personal: My big fear, which I definitely feel these days, is that I will have a period where I am less effective like Hayek did. And I just don’t have the time left for that. Still too many periods of difficulty working intensely. )


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 17:39:00 UTC

  • “I am unwilling and/or unable to pay the cognitive cost of acquiring and produci

    —“I am unwilling and/or unable to pay the cognitive cost of acquiring and producing a rational means of decidability, whereby I enumerate the existentially possible options available to me, the corresponding cost and yield (and therefor profit) of acting acting upon those options, and whereby I identify any externality (cost) that I may impose on man if I so chose to act upon those options in accordance with natural law—and in the absence of the calculable (decidable), rely on intuition instead.”—James Augustus


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 16:21:00 UTC

  • THE DECLINING VALUE OF THE LUNATIC FRINGE(EARLY ADOPTERS) So you know, the value

    THE DECLINING VALUE OF THE LUNATIC FRINGE(EARLY ADOPTERS)

    So you know, the value of idiots is that they make conventional stupid arguments giving you as an author opportunity to repeat central themes until newbies understand them.

    We don’t learn by one ‘post’ or ‘article’ or ‘paper’ or ‘argument’ but by the repeated criticism of opposing propositions from multiple angles.

    So I tend to do things like bait or attack different groups when I think something needs clarification, which attracts passionate idiots, who in turn serve as foils for those who are generally interested in learning something.

    And thankfully, every time I do, I get one or two newbies who saw that argument and said “something rings true here”. And they stay followers or friends until that ‘intuition’ develops into understanding.

    Unfortunately, there are people who are not idiots but lunatics, and while they are often very creative, and usually passionate, and therefore, participator.

    The problem is this: is once you become popular enough that you can no longer answer idiotic questions, the lunatics that liked the attention they got realize they aren’t getting it and get hostile to you.

    We see this cycle on every bbs, compuserve forum, every newsgroup, every website forum, and every facebook group. This is the normal cycle that every group goes through.

    So when the lunatic fringe gets hostile it’s usually good procedure to ignore them. Because they inhibit your market ability just as they originally assisted in promoting it. And if you can’t ignore them, then just block them.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 15:52:00 UTC

  • LUNATIC FRINGE V 2 (archive. don’t bother reading) I mean. 1) you are making an

    LUNATIC FRINGE V 2

    (archive. don’t bother reading)

    I mean.

    1) you are making an accusation that I”m copying evola, but I don’t know what it is that you think I”m copying. What I suspect is that you don’t know the history of reciprocity and natural law.

    2) You state that some article refutes me, but you don’t state what the argument is, demonstrating (as usual) that you don’t understand that argument, and can’t make it yourself. (even if there IS an argument).

    3) You post a third time stating that somehow some argument, that can’t state yourself, is somehow a refutation of an argument I’ve made against platonism.

    4) and you have a history of mental illness on a scale that I am surprised hasn’t ended you with stalking charges. I haven’t banned you out of mercy for people with mental illnesses but high information processing ability.

    So now, why is it that you think there is some argument here?

    Because all I can gather is that it’s impossible for ordinary minds to envision the deterministic consequences of algorithms, and for some reason this kind of ‘scale’ borders on magic or the occult, rather than ‘consequences of permutations beyond our ability to sense perceive, and forecast independently of symbolic and mechanical instrumentation that allows us to do so.

    I mean, the more interesting question, is, why do people with various forms of mental illness seem to hallucinate at the extremes without the ability to distinguish reality from imagination, and those people that have a problem distinguishing deterministic consequences of simple operations that CAN be at least symbolically or instrumentally measured or forecast, from reality.

    I mean, why aren’t you just saying that this is another example of Your and Dyer’s different degrees of mental illness? I mean, it fits the model of incremental detachment that evolves from schizotypal behavior, to schizophrenic behavior, right?

    I mean, there is nothing magic to order emergent from complex permutations using a small number of simple rules. Look at what Wolfram has been doing – talking about just that forever.

    Isn’t what you’re really doing trying to justify your mental illness in an attempt to restore confidence despite your borderline sanity?

    Isn’t that a more reasonable scenario than there is some sort of magical design behind the universe, or magical intention by the gods?

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 15:32:00 UTC

  • “As opportunity costs for women to enter in monogamous relations rises, men must

    —“As opportunity costs for women to enter in monogamous relations rises, men must pay more premium for exclusivity of monogamic relations in a world where there is mens value of labor in massive deflation and women’s reproductive labor on inflation. And that premium is payed with power because, women don’t need any more comfort.”–Matej Lovrić


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 14:27:00 UTC

  • “Women are hypergamous… Government is the biggest resource and thus the handso

    —“Women are hypergamous… Government is the biggest resource and thus the handsomest.”—Anne Tripp

    (genius)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-18 14:20:00 UTC