Source: Facebook

  • NOT JUST ISLAM BUT ABRAHAMISM: THE INFORMATION DISEASE: THE SOURCE OF IGNORANCE

    NOT JUST ISLAM BUT ABRAHAMISM: THE INFORMATION DISEASE: THE SOURCE OF IGNORANCE AND DECIET

    Um. No. Islam’s destroyed almost all the works of the greeks and romans that they could find. And the reintroduction of greek and roman literature into europe occurred as the academics who were about to be persecuted by the muslims fled to the west for safety.

    Islam, the Black Blague from China, are followed by communism, the mongol golden horde, as the greatest dealers of death. That means that between Abraham’s Judaism, Christianity, and Islamism, and Abraman’s new religion: the Cosmopolitianism of the Ashkenazi (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, the Frankfurt School, and) that Abrahamism is the most deadly plague every to face humanity. Even MORE SO than the black plague.

    A disease of the mind – from ‘polluted minds’, and a disease of the body (‘from polluted lands’), together are more deadly than any combination of wars in history.

    If we can struggle to end physical diseases, why do we not equally struggle to end informational diseases?

    We can. Natural Law’s Testimonial Truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 13:21:00 UTC

  • Scientifically speaking, the only ‘good’ is actually ‘zero tolerance’

    Scientifically speaking, the only ‘good’ is actually ‘zero tolerance’.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 13:13:00 UTC

  • Curt’s Version 😉 Join a militia, overthrow a government, recreate the regimenta

    Curt’s Version 😉

    Join a militia, overthrow a government, recreate the regimental system, and lift heavy weights, eat only meat and vegetables, read books, learn a craft, and socialize with other real men as part of your (admittedly spartan) job, while picking up side work to accumulate savings.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 08:29:00 UTC

  • James Augustus —“Lift heavy weights, avoid high-glycemic carbohydrates, do int

    James Augustus

    —“Lift heavy weights, avoid high-glycemic carbohydrates, do intermediate fasting, eat red meat and vegetables, read books, pick-up a hobby, and socialize as often as possible.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 08:28:00 UTC

  • The problem with spreading our social order is (a) demographic distribution and

    The problem with spreading our social order is (a) demographic distribution and (b) degree of civilization.

    In practice we should see Aryanism (markets for rule) expandable only into areas that did not have the ability to expand the underclass, and did not possess a large underclass, and face little tribal conflict.

    Conversely we should see the worst behavior among peoples who have expansive underclasses, the agrarian or pastoral ability to expand those underclasses, and lots of territorial competition from other kin groups.

    And that is what we see


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 08:24:00 UTC

  • WHY WERE WESTERNERS UNSUCCESSFUL AT EXPORTING ARYANISM (MARKETS) by Simon Ström

    WHY WERE WESTERNERS UNSUCCESSFUL AT EXPORTING ARYANISM (MARKETS)

    by Simon Ström

    By merely establishing rule, a small minority of conquerors do not have the resources to alter the basic fabric of social organization in a region that is already populous, wealthy and has a rigid socio-political system that works for them and is adapted to the local natural incentives.

    Like the Mongols in China or Iran, the conquerors are rather the ones who are subject to assimilation, although they might retain or even spread their language and symbolism as a function of its prestige.

    In order to permeate all society, the imposed, foreign evolutionary strategy must be carried by greater numbers than that, or at least powerful enough mechanisms of overcoming the inertia of “immunological rejection” of non-self cultural impulses.

    The lesser the primordial differences in genes, culture and natural incentives between conqueror and conquered, the lesser the need of great numbers in order to assimilate through elite dominance.

    1. Small minority conquest: dynastic turnover, insignificant gene flow and socio-cultural regression to the median. Examples: Yuan dynasty, Hittites, Gothic Spain, British Raj.

    (Early Indo-Aryans were close to 1, but gravitated somewhat toward 2)

    2. Sizable minority conquest: significant gene flow (amalgamation), socio-cultural regression to the mean. Examples: Corded Ware horizon, Roman Gaul, Latin America.

    3. Great majority conquest: displacement, insignificant or no gene flow, complete socio-cultural continuation of the conquerors. Examples: North America, Kosovo, West Bank (future).

    So the obstacles of exporting our strategy are:

    – They don’t want it. They can profit from modernization without Westernization.

    – Military dominance won’t cut it. You need to dominate kinship and the social fabric.

    – The cost of export is too great because we are too different. Rule might be profitable, but assimilation? Questionable. We have evolved to pursue our strategy for millennia, others have not.

    – Simon Ström

    From Curt:

    The problem with spreading our social order is (a) demographic distribution and (b) degree of civilization. In practice we should see Aryanism (markets for rule) expandable only into areas that did not have the ability to expand the underclass, and did not possess a large underclass, and face little tribal conflict.

    Conversely we should see the worst behavior among peoples who have expansive underclasses, the agrarian or pastoral ability to expand those underclasses, and lots of territorial competition from other kin groups.

    And that is what we see


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 08:23:00 UTC

  • As a few have noticed. I was making a fairly serious statement. Not the least of

    As a few have noticed. I was making a fairly serious statement. Not the least of which was de-christianizing the translation of the original quote (which, if I remember correctly was spoken in mongolian, written down phonetically using *chinese* characters, translated into persian, translated into german, and then translated into english. I’m not positive but most of the ‘secret history’ followed that route. )

    Now, in the context in which I made this post, I was trying to illustrate a few things at once:

    1) That hunting man and animal *is* his preferred profession. And that man is not Rousseauian. It is not surprising that all other variations of the semi-sentient apes were exterminated upon our arrival. Nor why the only competition the great plagues have had is Islam first and communism second.

    2) That we have spent a great deal of effort ‘regulating’ man’s preferred profession. And that the many achievements of man were made by suppressing that profession

    3) **BUT**, that to CHOOSE the method of suppressing that profession requires we preserve that profession: hunting, killing, destroying, and taking – we can construct many orders from enslavement on one end to markets on the other.

    4) And to preserve that profession such that we create the advanced order that we have in the ancient and modern worlds requires the Aryan (markets) and the Christian (the extirpation of hatred from the human heart.)

    5) Because there is a vast difference between predation and parasitism of the khan, and the conquest and rule of people by the production of markets through which they transcend the beast, the slave, the serf, the freeman, the civilian, the sovereign – and the god.

    What we have failed to learn (which I am so glad someone reminded me of yesterday) is that having conquered from spain to china, and from the arctic circle to egypt, and having tried to create markets in each of those region, that we failed among all but our own.

    Therefore the evidence suggests that there is something special about our kin group, tribe, and race that makes markets possible.

    But if we must preserve the Aryan and the Christian to rule by natural law, we must also preserve the warrior to obtain and hold the condition of natural law. And we must preserve the warrior hunter’s joy and lust in Aryan and Christian forms, so that those that cannot transcend cannot harm us. If they can harm must they can be weakened. If they cannot be weakened they can be exterminated.

    Not with hatred, and not for profit, but for defense.

    Not for defense of us alone. But for the defense of human kind.

    And the transcendence we are inspired to achieve.

    So as Allan Hernandez said above,

    (a) I want to cause you to attempt to disagree with this statement by stating it provocatively, (remember, this is the purpose of hyperbole that conservatives rely upon. the Asians use contradictions to cause you to think. Aristocracy uses hyperbole to cause you to think.

    (b) I want to force you to face a necessary truth: that violence is just a resource that we can use to create good by the incremental suppression of all means of parasitism – and that to incrementally suppress means of parasitism among hunters, requires that we maintain exceptional skill in hunting, killing, taking, destroying.

    (c) we created this world by mastering, professionalizing, and using violence to obtain and hold rule, through which we imposed markets, and the extirpation of hatred from the human heart.

    I experiment a lot. I run tests. All my arguments are tests. Each test constitutes an attempt to construct a proof. When they are complete (closed), parsimonious, and clear my tests are complete, and a proof constructed.

    But you should not dismiss the difference between an analytic list and an emotive or poetic bit of inspiration. They are attempts to make you (and i) think about those assumptions we hold, beliefs we hold, justifications we feel, and arguments we practice.

    So that not only are markets created, and not only is hatred extirpated, but that ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, pseudorationalism, and pseudoscience, are removed from our thoughts.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 08:12:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 01:51:00 UTC

  • The Greatest Happiness? To crush your enemies. To scatter and drive them before

    The Greatest Happiness?

    To crush your enemies.

    To scatter and drive them before you.

    To burn their cities to ashes.

    To take their possessions.

    To hear the wails of their women. And,

    To rape their wives and daughters.

    That is what is best in life.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 20:03:00 UTC

  • As someone pointed out today, Duchesne’s observation, is that Aryanism (markets)

    As someone pointed out today, Duchesne’s observation, is that Aryanism (markets) have been impossible to export despite our long standing military superiority. They only work on europeans.

    Why?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-27 19:35:00 UTC