Source: Facebook

  • “Rule of law certainly does not depend on democratic principles, but on the mark

    —“Rule of law certainly does not depend on democratic principles, but on the market exchange of fully informed sovereign parties.

    Almost by definition democracy requires that people are duped into believing that ideology runs the world (as opposed to interests) and that politicians and their establishment colleagues form cartels to perpetuate this illusion.

    Case in point: election campaigns have very little connection to what an elected politician will actually pursue in office. The mechanisms at play in the exercise of power are not advertised.

    Instead of institutionalizing swindle we should institutionalize the pursuit of our proper interests.

    What mechanisms are at play in aristocracies?

    Well, at first glance, norms of reproduction and inheritance (multi-generational investments), a degree of nepotism and the threat of violent ousting of rulers when exchange is not reciprocal.

    Because if guns are traded for common suffrage we have a democracy instead.”—Simon Ström


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-06 17:07:00 UTC

  • “Monarchy consists of creating aristocracies within aristocracies until it is no

    —“Monarchy consists of creating aristocracies within aristocracies until it is no longer possible”— Joel Davis


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-06 16:56:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-06 16:55:00 UTC

  • Back online. Sigh

    Back online. Sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-06 16:33:00 UTC

  • Interesting

    Interesting…


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-03 07:16:00 UTC

  • Democracy is impossible. We really have only two choices: Aristocracy or an infe

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_law_of_oligarchy

    Democracy is impossible.

    We really have only two choices:

    Aristocracy or an inferior Oligarchy which calls itself ‘Democracy’.

    It is impossible to organise humans to any significant scale without hierachies, the only question which remains is, “who sits atop the hierarchy?”

    There are only two answers, the first honourable, the second dishonourable. We are either ruled those whom rule the masses by force (Aristocracy) or those whom fool the masses into surrendering rule (Oligarchy).

    Or, I should say, (((Oligarchy))).


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-02 02:24:00 UTC

  • The 20th century in art was another example of the Dutch Tulip craze, and will b

    The 20th century in art was another example of the Dutch Tulip craze, and will be remembered similarly.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 20:19:00 UTC

  • Sorry, but the queen is the head of my family, my tribe, my nation, and I do not

    Sorry, but the queen is the head of my family, my tribe, my nation, and I do not distinguish between the royal family and my kin. Nor for that matter, any of the nobility and my kin. Not because this makes me somehow better, but because I desire to protect my betters, who, in exchange, I desire to protect our kin.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 17:49:00 UTC

  • Actually, the concept I am working on is whether we have everything backwards, a

    Actually, the concept I am working on is whether we have everything backwards, and language consists entirely of measurements of different degrees of precision, and mathematics and operations are merely more precise measurements than we are familiar with speaking of.

    This appears to be the correct model.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 17:43:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://altright.com/2017/05/01/boomers-are-a-menace-to-identitarian-movements-all-around-the-white-world/

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-01 16:40:00 UTC