Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Lexus demonstrates yet again, that they are the the world leaders in high qualit

    Lexus demonstrates yet again, that they are the the world leaders in high quality ugliness.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 20:50:00 UTC

  • These terms are meaningless without context. THREE POSSIBLE SYSTEMS 1) Axiomatic

    These terms are meaningless without context.

    THREE POSSIBLE SYSTEMS

    1) Axiomatic declarative statements. (mathematics) *proof* of possibility.

    Axiomatic systems consist of construction of proofs of internal consistency ONLY.

    Mathematical systems are axiomatic (declared), informationally complete, and causally trivial therefore deduction is possible.

    Deductivity requires informational completeness. Induction (guessing) requires only information sufficient to guess. Abduction requires nothing more than free association.

    2) Rational justificationary statements.(common law) *justification* of permissiveness.

    Similar to axiomatic systems, justificationary systems, allow us to state that a proposition is permitted or not, but not whether it is true or not.

    3) Theoretic descriptive statements.(science) *truth*. Survival from criticism.

    Theoretic systems: observation > free association > wayfinding > hypothesis > testing, instrumentation and measurement > theory > survival in application in reality > Law.

    Aside from reductio questions, theoretic (descriptive) systems do not allow for deduction. In those special cases we mistakenly call apriori, rather than just ‘trivial’.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 14:22:00 UTC

  • So the difference is whether we are colonized by the underclass by dysgenic repr

    So the difference is whether we are colonized by the underclass by dysgenic reproduction and superstition, or we colonize by eugenic upper class by force and law?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 14:01:00 UTC

  • Ancient history refers to the time period in which scientists have found the ear

    Ancient history refers to the time period in which scientists have found the earliest remains of human activity, approximately 60 000 BC.

    It ends with the fall of several significant empires, such as the Western Roman Empire in the Mediterranean, the Han Dynasty in China, and the Gupta Empire in India, collectively around 650 AD.

    STONE AGE EUROPE

    (why aren’t we taught this?)

    COPPER AGE EUROPE

    (why aren’t we taught this?)

    BRONZE AGE EUROPE

    (why aren’t we taught this?)

    CLASSICAL

    Classical Antiquity /Classical Period (The Mediterranean Period) ~1000 years The Iron Age

    1) Archaic period (c.8th to c.6th centuries BC)

    … Phoenicians and Carthaginians

    … Greece

    … Iron Age Italy

    … Roman Kingdom

    2) Classical Greece (5th to 4th centuries BC)

    … Hellenistic period (323 BC to 146 BC)

    … Roman Republic (5th to 1st centuries BC)

    3) Roman Empire (1st century BC to 5th century AD)

    MEDIEVAL

    Medieval Period 500-1500 (Continental Period) ~1000 years,

    1) Early Medieval Period: 500-1000

    2) High Medieval Period: 1000-1300

    3) Late Medieval Period: 1300-1500

    MODERN

    Modern Period 1500-1945 (Atlantic Period) ~500 years, The Steel Age

    1) Pre-modern: 1500-1800 (the groundwork for the Western domination is laid)

    2) Modern: 1800-1910 (the West dominates the modern-looking world)

    3) WW: 1910-1945 (the West’s domination crumbles as it wars with itself)

    LATE MODERN PERIOD (NOW)

    1) Cold War: 1945-1990 (the West is now divided along the ideological rather than purely national lines)

    2) Contemporary: 1990-now (many interrelated issues seems critical now, but we will know which were truly important only when this period ends)

    3) ?????? WHAT NEXT

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 13:23:00 UTC

  • A HIERARCHY OF ARGUMENTATIVE TRUTH (repost) (very useful) (learning propertarian

    A HIERARCHY OF ARGUMENTATIVE TRUTH

    (repost) (very useful) (learning propertarianism)

    [S]o, just take the next ten arguments that you run into (not by me, I have enough work to do, demonstrate your cunning elsewhere) try to categorize which level of truth the individual is relying upon to make his or her arguments. Once you do this a few times it will become natural for you.

    1) MEANING (Awareness)

    ….True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship

    2) PREFERENCE

    ….True enough for me to feel good about.

    3) ACTIONABILITY

    ….True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results.

    4) MORALITY

    ….True enough for me to act but not cause others to react negatively to me.

    5) RATIONALITY

    ….True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.

    6) DECIDEABILITY

    ….True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values.

    7) TRUTH

    ….True regardless of all opinions or perspectives.

    8) TAUTOLOGY

    ….Tautologically true: in that the two things are equal.

    Awareness, Preference, Actionability Morality, Rationality, Decidability, Truth(parsimony), Tautology.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 11:56:00 UTC

  • “People with culture colonize; people without culture multiculture-ize.”—Antho

    —“People with culture colonize; people without culture multiculture-ize.”—Anthony Ray Collins

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 10:07:00 UTC

  • GOVERNMENTS IN TIMES OF CONFLICT OR COOPERATION CHANGE/WAR 1) Socialism = centra

    GOVERNMENTS IN TIMES OF CONFLICT OR COOPERATION

    CHANGE/WAR

    1) Socialism = central control of private and commons for the purpose of conducting warfare on one”s own people, for the purpose of transitioning a backward people. Very strong.

    2) Fascism = Central control of the commons. Private control of production. But limited to Autarkic opportunities. Funding of nationalism. (fascism is a means of conducting economic warfare in times of stress). Very strong.

    3) Napoleonism = total mobilization of the public and private economy for military economic and institutional warfare. Very strong.

    —vs–

    STEADY STATE / COMMERCE

    3) Aristocracy / Monarchy (steady state)

    Private ownership of property and commons. but weak.

    2) Republicanism / Oligarchy / Nobility (steady state)

    Private ownership of property and commons but weak.

    1) Social Democracy (steady State)

    Private ownership of property and commons but weak.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 10:03:00 UTC

  • ISLAM HAS BEEN COLONIZING FOR 1500 YEARS And look what material hell and mental

    ISLAM HAS BEEN COLONIZING FOR 1500 YEARS

    And look what material hell and mental delusion it has wrought.

    The North Africans (the Berbers and Phoenicians)

    The Iranians ( Eastern black-haired-whites)

    The Byzantines (southern whites)

    Some of the Southern Slavs (Southern Whites)

    Everywhere islam goes, poverty ensues.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 08:08:00 UTC

  • A MANIFESTO FOR THE RETURN TO ARISTOCRACY: YOU LACK COERCIVE POWER OVER YOURSELV

    A MANIFESTO FOR THE RETURN TO ARISTOCRACY: YOU LACK COERCIVE POWER OVER YOURSELVES, SO YOU MAY NOT HOLD COERCIVE POWER OVER OTHERS.

    The only reason not to kill, enslave, beat, or take from you is if you agree at least to avoid parasitism, and at best to engage in reciprocally rewarding cooperation.

    One can walk away in silence, and mind his or her own business, and engage in boycott. This is, at a minimum, a failure to cooperate, and at a maximum, an attempt to separate and form a polity more desirous than the current one. But it is not a violation of reciprocity or sovereignty.

    But to engage in ridicule, shaming, rallying, straw men, double standards, conspiracy, propaganda, and advocacy of parasitism to actively violate sovereignty, reciprocity, meritocracy, and the transcendence of man, merely states that we are not longer cooperating, and you are engaging in parasitism and not yet engaging in violence.

    As such, as we are no longer cooperating, and you are engaging in parasitism, we no longer possess any incentive other than to engage in predation, including killing, enslaving, punishing, and taking.

    The only reason a state allows parasitism, ridicule, shaming, rallying and deceit, is to profit from the creation of conflict by expanding its totalitarian influence over that of reciprocity. The only reason not to kill, enslave, punish, and take from members of the state is if they eliminate means of parasitism, and allow markets to determine reward by merit.

    We have no reason any longer, to constrain our violence – violence that we pay the cost of forgoing the use of on a daily if not hourly basis, for the purpose of improving the lot of ourselves, our families, our kin, our nation, and mankind, by the imposition of sovereignty and the incremental evolution of agency.

    We spent over a century giving you license to join the aristocracy of meritocracy that constitutes western civilization. You have proven that you are unfit for that membership in the peerage of the sovereign. You lack agency, morality, ethical ability, character necessary for treatment as equal: as sovereigns, and therefore as ‘humans’. You are still an animal, unfit for subsidy, freedom, liberty or sovereignty.

    Our experiment was moral, ethical, and pursued out of honest belief in your ability. And our experiment failed. And so we return to our traditional rule, by and return you to domesticated animal conditions.

    We could blame you. But you are just animals. You lack the personal agency and the genetic sufficiency, to join the world of sovereign men.

    We will grant you protections under natural law, since you are capable, if disciplined, of cooperation.

    But you shall no longer hold coercive powers over others, because by your words and deeds, you demonstrably, lack the coercive power over yourselves.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Sovereigns

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Industrialization of Agency

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 08:01:00 UTC

  • Abrahamism uses three generations against Meritocracy:Judaism as a means of para

    Abrahamism uses three generations against Meritocracy:Judaism as a means of parasitic separatism, Christianity as rebellion, Islam invasion.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 07:39:00 UTC