Source: Facebook

COMPARING ABRAHAMIC PHILOSOPHY AND ARISTOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY BY OUR EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES – CONTRASTS IMPROVE COMPREHENSION

Europeans combined testimony (truthful, empirical, military reporting), horse, wheel, and bronze, took control of their destiny, and invented paternalistic sky gods and heroes, and conquered from spain to china, and arctic circle to north africa.

The research has not settled the argument yet, but Europeans either wholly replaced, or conquered these peoples and profited from ruling them. It looks increasingly like it was a process of horizontal (european plain) replacement, and vertical (north-south) rule.

But the central observation we can take away from the european expansion, is the domestication of man for profit. First displace, then enslave, then serfdom, then freedom, then liberty (property), then enfranchisement. They did it by militia. And this is their secret and the secret of the west. The militia, and the indoctrination of the ordinary man into martial epistemology (objective truthfulness upon pain of death). So truthfulness was the means of status signaling despite its disruption just as military tactics and scientific advantage are beneficial to the group despite their political distributions. when you build a hierarchy of truth it can reorganize easily because it need not expose lies.

Western man competes by deflationary (scientific) truth. And this is unique among civilizations. And truth like heroism, is rewarded, regardless of the cost to the reorganization of the status (dominance) hierarchy.

This rapid adaptability is the secret to why western civlization evolved faster than the rest in the ancient and modern worlds: lower friction of reorganization of strategy and tactics because strategy and tactics were empirical rather than authoritarian, literary, or fictitious. More rapid suppression of parasitism through the natural, common law, and independent judges. More risk taking and innovation in commerce. The continuous indoctrination of males into truth telling as a means of climbing the status hierarchy (a form of conspicuous consumption signal actually – by showing you could bear the cost of truthfulness.)

We took the strategy of outmaneuver by horse and chariot to outmaneuver across our entire civilization by increasingly rapid means of adaptation, by using truth as the central organizing principle, that allowed reorganization without threatening the overall hierarchy. The strategy of heroism, heroic truth, and jury, turns out to simply produce the least cost and least time means of adaptation humans have invented or CAN invent.

It’s not hard. You can turn all christian philosophy’s claims (submission), jewish philosophy’s claims of creating peace (safety for jews), or the musllms claims of creating peace (aggression) on its head by studying the history of the jews:

A poor, migratory, pastoral people, with high inbreeding, high clannishness, reverse sexual dimorphism, and who experienced their age of transformation as slaves, never adapted to land-holding, or developed land holding virtues, norms, institutions, laws and traditions, nor through selection developed a masculine aristocracy, or permanent warrior class, then industrialized the lying and wishful thinking of slaves, and upon obtaining literacy, selected for amplifying all their reverse sexual dimorphism (female reproductive strategy), and supporting values, and through their males, weaponized the reproductive strategy of women: wishful thinking, gossip, and deceit, by which to bring about a restored primitive matrilineal order. In other words, just as women evolved gossip to rally males against alphas, jews continued this strategy of gossiping

Just as women make their men weak if given the opportunity, jews make their hosts weak if given the opportunity.

Just as women ridicule, shame, gossip, and rally, jews do so but on an industrial scale with great deal of sophistication.

Just as women are superior at speech and men at action, jews are superior at speech, and aristocracy superior in action.

Just as women are petty and treat each other horribly if empowered, jews are petty and treat others horribly if empowered.

We have already had one jewish empire: the soviet union. And we must never have that happen to mankind again.

So, for the good of our people, if not for the good of mankind, no more Abrahamism: judaism, christianity, islam.

So no more Cosmopolitanism: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard, Rand, of the millions of jewish propagandists.

So no more postmodernism: Foucault, Derrida, and all.

So no more feminism and its history of pseudoscience. Reciprocity and Meritocracy are as they are, without the wishful thinking and parasitism of women.

We know the name of pandora: Abrahamism of the Jews, and its cancerous by the christians and muslims and by consequence, the rest of the world.

How do we stop abrahamism, cosmopolitanism, and the ridicule, shaming, rallying, and gossip of women?

Reciprocity, Truth. Testimonialism. Natural Law. Punishment. Zero Tolerance.

The via positiva law of Reciprocity (natural law):

The via negativa law is non imposition of costs

The via positiva of words is truth, of actions is exchange,

The via negativa is zero tolerance

And that is the aristocratic (white) version of Sharia.

Meaning that zero tolerance, requires mastery of violence.

Mastery of violence is expensive.

Therefore it must be profitable.

Aristocracy’s first industry is violence for the purpose of conducting zero tolerance of impositions of costs, by words or deeds, directly or indirectly,

The common people need only rule of law to protect them – when empowered they are parasites. all else can be produced by voluntary rather than coercive organizations.

The people who demonstrate productivity through reciprocity of production need means of developing commons by which to create multipliers of their productivity. They require a market for the production of commons: houses of the commons.

The people who demonstrate productivity through defense of reciprocity: militia and army, sheriff and judiciary, regional nobility and the monarchy, require a house of government to limit the houses of the commons.

With courts of reciprocity under universal standing and universal application a market for reciprocity can form without the monopoly rule of government to fabricate it. Then government can be used for its only moral purpose: the creation of contracts for the production and maintenance of commons – where these contracts must survive the market for reciprocity we call the courts.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine