Source: Facebook

  • Natural law says “people retaliate everywhere and always even at high personal c

    Natural law says “people retaliate everywhere and always even at high personal cost, against imposition of costs against that which they have invested in. The record of torts in all cultures, and all civilization, across all time, regardless of legal systems, consists of tests of reciprocity given the portfolio of interests in the current division of labor and norms. The existential record international law, like international law throughout history is always and everywhere reducible to tests of reciprocity. Logically, no organism can both cooperate and survive competition, without developing reciprocity. Moreover, all organisms capable of cooperation demonstrate preservation of ‘cheating’ as a means of preserving the test of reciprocity such that the test of reciprocity is not lost through genetic or habitual optimism. In fact, we can find no evidence of altruism anywhere within the species that is not either kin selection, or altruistic PUNISHMENT. Furthermore, researchers cannot find a better game theory strategy than tit for tat, and increasing tolerance for cheating given the noise (error) possible in the exchanges.’

    I don’t make ‘should’ or ‘good’ arguments. I search for decidability in matters of dispute. I argue against bads and leave goods up to market choice.

    Reciprocity cannot rationally or logically be defeated that I know of, nor can it be empirically defeated that I know of. As far as I know all conflcits are decidable by tests of reciprocity against imposition of costs aginst property in toto, that has been gained by discovery and conversino (homesteading), conversion from prior states of one’s inventory, or obtained in productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs by externality.

    cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 14:25:00 UTC

  • You know, we had serious and voluminous witch trials in this civilization only 3

    You know, we had serious and voluminous witch trials in this civilization only 350 years ago. Sure, it was a means of church oppression of the remaining folk cults and superstitions. Sure, it was a good way to get rid of poor, crazy, old women. But this is the result of Abrahamism.

    We had serious inquisitions from the 1250 to 1450, in part to eradicate the remaining muslims and jewish conspirators. In part to suppress factionalism when europe was recovering from there most severe weaknesses. But that was the result of Abrahamism.

    Our first meaningful attack against abrahamism was the printing press in 1440. Our second attack against abrahamism was in the reformation from 1547 to 1648 – ending with the peace of westphalia.

    We had the english revolution – from 1640 to 1688 – or rather, our contractual evolution. Where the middle classes succeeded established the sacred rights of property (abolition of feudal tenures, no arbitrary taxation), gave political power to the propertied (sovereignty of Parliament and common law, abolition of prerogative courts), and removed all impediments to the triumph of the ideology of the men of property – the “protestant ethic.” Or the ‘rights of anglo saxons’, or the ‘rights of englishmen’ had been ‘restored’. The monarchy had already destroyed the academy (monasteries). The bourgeoisie then destroyed the rents of the agrarian nobility, centralizing government further (which was a mistake). So we had restored our pre-christian order once again, but preserved its public rituals.

    And we had the french counter-revolution against protestantism and science. And we had the Kantian and German counter-revolution against science. And the ashkenazi reformation to resist science. We had the French, German, and Jewish attempts to restore abrahamism in non-supernatural, but merely rational prose. But it was simply a set of justificationary restatements.

    Then we had three events in the western world simultaneously as 1) the french horrors of napoleon were launched. 2) The british divorced from german civilization evolving in to merchants like the jews; but along with the americans continued their empiricism, producing Maxwell, Darwin, Spencer. 3) The germans united and began the process of the second enlightenment, this time in both the physical and social sciences, as well as the arts and literature contributing weber and nietzsche in particular. For the first time, envisioning a future free of Abrahamism. 4) The jews united and began the process of revolting against the second enlightenment by converting abrahamism from a religious movement to a pseudoscientific and pseudorational one, via Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, and the Frankfurt School – followed by Rand/Rothbard and Leo Strauss. 5) the Jews succeeded in Russia where they failed elsewhere, and created the bolshevik revolution, and their reign of destruction and terror.

    In the chaos of this change and absent the monarchies to resolve conflicts the powers went to war and destroyed one another, leaving europe in ashes, and only america and russia capable of asserting power in the world.

    The germans gave up hope and dropped from the world stage. The ‘childish’ americans took over the british empire and eventually her banking and investment markets. and in the chaos.

    The french, realizing the falure of the jewish/soviet catastrophe, doubled down on their pseudo-rationalism and pseudoscience with the postmodernists culminating in Derrida. Each of these pseudoscientific movements.

    The jews, russians and the french spent their energies on using ‘intellectuals’ (non producers) to weaponize propaganda to leverage democracy, and bring about the abrahamic promise of the ancient second coming, and the medieval afterlife, with the future of free goods and services, as well as equality as long as the ‘intellectuals’ were empowered.

    But by the mid 60’s the only solution the left could adopt was to immigrate third worlders in vast numbers, and they opened the doors to the USA. By the mid 70’s the great society movement had failed, and by 1980 we returned to traditional social order once again. But between the dissolution of the family, the decline in births, and the rapid immigration of third worlders, the restitution of our society from ‘the plague of the abrahamic century – the jewish century’ was prevented.

    And so today, we must finally finish the enlightenment – the restoration of our ancient civlization, by casting off all vestiges of abrahamism, and once again restore our ‘anglo saxon contractualism’ under it’s proper name: the natural law of reciprocity, and the demand for sovereignty, created by the only means possible: the reciprocal insurance against loss of sovereignty by the warranty that any violation of sovereignty against any member will be met with overwhelming violence.

    There is only one religion of the west and that is transcendence into gods, and only one law of the west by which to do so: Natural Law. And only one means of achieving both: heroism, and violence for the purpose of denying all the ability to rule, leaving only natural law, and therefore rule of law, and markets in everything as possible means of survival.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 13:12:00 UTC

  • Deflationary (Analytic) description of western group evolutionary strategy. Hero

    Deflationary (Analytic) description of western group evolutionary strategy.

    Heroism(Risky investment) > Sovereignty (meritocracy) > Natural Law (reciprocity) > Markets (contract) > Adaptive Velocity > Profiting from the Genetic Domestication of the animal man (colonization).

    ( Contrast with Abrahamism: the resistance against the genetic domestication of animal man. )

    Where “>” means “causes”.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 12:13:00 UTC

  • The reasioning through of politics is quite simple when you solve for sovereignt

    The reasioning through of politics is quite simple when you solve for sovereignty and nationalism, rather than make excuses in order to create some uniform common good. Peoples need different normative commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 11:48:00 UTC

  • THE VALUE OF FEDERAL, REGIONAL, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. The only value in a feder

    THE VALUE OF FEDERAL, REGIONAL, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.

    The only value in a federal government is:

    1) Efficiency of the cost and necessity of coordination of defense of territorial borders.

    2) Insurer of last resort for regional ‘order’ (government).

    3) Treasury of last resort for regions (central bank services)

    4) Necessary resolution of disputes of TORTS between regions.

    The only value in a regional government:

    1) Efficiency in the financing, coordination, and cost of production of transportation and communication infrastructure.

    2) Insurer of last resort for natural disasters and local ‘order’.

    3) Registry of property of last resort.

    4) Necessary Resolution of disputes of torts between locales.

    The responsibility and value in local government is:

    1) Efficiency and Decidability in the cost of production of commons.

    2) Insurer against incapacity (illness, employment, age)

    3) Treasury

    4) Registry of property titles

    The responsibility and value in family (familial ‘government)

    1) insurance against unearned offspring,and the production, raising, education, training of earned offspring.

    2) insurance against the vicissitudes of age.

    3) efficiency in the production of that commons we call ‘household’


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 11:34:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://nypost.com/2017/05/26/how-team-obama-tried-to-hack-the-election/


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 11:31:00 UTC

  • EUROPEAN (GERMAN/FRENCH/ITALIAN) MILITARY COSTS WILL BE, LIKE THE USA’S, THE PRE

    EUROPEAN (GERMAN/FRENCH/ITALIAN) MILITARY COSTS WILL BE, LIKE THE USA’S, THE PREVENTION OF CARTELS AND INVASION

    European social goods are possible because of a lack of european defense spending, and while it may be true that europe lacks territorial enemies other than perhaps russia militarily and islam via immigration and conversion, the vast costs of policing the world that are borne by the USA have been Jewish/Communist expansion via russia. THe adoption of jewish/commuist expasion by china. The adoption of jewish communist expansion by the arabs. And the simple fact that while Russia and China conducted that war militariliy and politically, the muslim nations do so economically by oil. So america pays for maintaining the market price of oil and preventing cartels from forming. This is the reason for the great western military expenditure over the past century: the expansion of the market and the prevention of cartels. THis is extremely expensive, and no, europe does not pay its part.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 11:18:00 UTC

  • Seguidores de habla hispana: Gracias por su apoyo durante mucho tiempo. Gracias

    Seguidores de habla hispana: Gracias por su apoyo durante mucho tiempo. Gracias por amar a su gente. Gracias por su nobleza. Que Dios nos deje salvar a nuestro pueblo.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 11:07:00 UTC

  • Conservatives use Hyperbole so frequently because it assists in the illustration

    Conservatives use Hyperbole so frequently because it assists in the illustration of the question ‘what happens if everyone did this, and what are th long term consequence?’ which is the first principle of conservative thought. Hyperbole allows us to use common language to very simply ask this low time preference question.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 10:59:00 UTC

  • JA, UND GUTES GLÜCK, DEUTSCHLAND Ja, Angela. Deutschland muss ihr Schicksal und

    JA, UND GUTES GLÜCK, DEUTSCHLAND

    Ja, Angela. Deutschland muss ihr Schicksal und ihre Kosten in die Hand nehmen. Deshalb haben die Amerikaner unseren derzeitigen Präsidenten gewählt. Aber viel Glück in deiner Sowjetunion Version zwei.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-28 10:16:00 UTC