SMALLER IS BETTER
(this is profoundly powerful)
Or in technical terms, questions are decidable because costs and returns are calculable, because coincidences of want are marginal, and consequences are perceivable.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 18:17:00 UTC
Why can’t we have a Pope of Natural Law?
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:50:00 UTC
ABRAHAMIC ARGUMENTS ARE ALL FEMINIST.
Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Cosmopolitan(Jewish), and Postmodern (French).
The weaponization of the female strategy of undermining alphas through shaming, gossip, lying and rallying large numbers of the inferior and the weak, so that capital is not concentrated in the best for the purposes of evolutionary transcendence, but distributed to those lacking merit for the purpose of evolutionary regression.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:49:00 UTC
USE THE PEJORATIVE “ABRAHAMISM”: THE FEMALE STRATEGY
That’s why I tell people to use the pejorative ‘Abrahamism’ so that we can take down lying no matter what sect makes use of it. they’re all liars. They cannot hide behind our defense of christianity any longer, if we no longer defend the church, only natural law which predates the church.
Abrahamism: the use of the feminine reproductive strategy, (r-selection) and the use of feminine means of argument: gossip and deceit.
Abrahamism is the only successful method of rebelling against aristocracy whether a peerage of markets by europeans, or a monolithic bureaucracy by the chinese.
THe hindus aryanized aristocracy with castes. The buddhists tried, but could only invent buddhism not Stoicism. The chinese developed reason and bureaucracy and command. The west developed reason, and science and law, and markets in everything, and because of that we could develop Stoicism.
But in 3500 years of dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty, we and the chinese have only encountered one successful strategy: the weaponization of the female strategy of gossip, deceit, henpecking, and parasitism, and the weaponization of reproduction without merit of one’s offspring: dysgenia. r-selection.
All of history can be reduced to the invention of Aristocracy, the domestication of primitive peoples, and the successful rebellion by the semitic underclass’s use of the weaponization of the female reproductive strategy, just as women rally against and undermine alphas.
That’s all of the history of civilization right there. It’s that simple.
Evolution by K. Devolution by R.
The female was the first animal we tamed, and we didn’t do a good enough job.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:46:00 UTC
AN APHORISM ISN’T AN ARGUMENT, BUT AN INDEX
One doesn’t try to make an argument via an aphorism, but merely to draw one’s attention to the vehicle by which he may investigate that which he might use as an argument.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:37:00 UTC
AN ARGUMENT WITH A MUSLIM: HERE IS HOW IT IS DONE. STAY ON MESSAGE. REPEAT THE TRUTH. EXPOSE THEIR LIES JUST LIKE WE DO AGAINST LIBERTARIANS AND LEFTISTS.
(You see, they sold their lies on the presumption that empirical evidence would accumulate more slowly their means of conquest of the underclasses. It worked among the jews, it worked in the ancient world via the christians. It worked in the medieval world by the church, and it ALMOST worked in the modern world by the jewish cosmopolitans and their french allies.)
(I also want to interject that this fellow relies on feminine argument techniques such as NAXALT, False moral equivalency, and shaming, and straw men. And this leads us to repeat the observation that the jews (communists), the french (the most effeminate of europeans) and women (feminist, socialists), all make use of the female reproductive strategy, and the female means of argument. As such we must understand that it is the attempt to devolve society again by the reintroduction of matrilenalism, and if possible, matriarchy, that is being empoyed by islam, judaism, christianity, feminism, communism, socialism, postmodernism… all the ism’s against aristocracy here and in china are means of rebelling against our invention of aristocracy.)
Jahan Khalili If Islam and poverty always existed there, but the radicalization never appeared until you started poking the hornet’s nest, the source of the radicalization is yourselves.
(CURT: Um. Islam, evolved out of christianity as a means of resistance against the roman empire, the same way that judaism evolved out of zoroastrianism as a means of resisting the persian and egyptian and hittite and … every other superior people.
Curt Doolittle This isn’t right. No one is very honest about these things so here is the very, very simple answer:
(a) The purpose of american involvement was to prevent the soviets and the chinese from exporting communism and militarism to the oil lands.
(b) the purpose of american policy since the end of world communism has been to transform the muslim world into a civilized rule of law and consumer capitalism and drag it out of ignorance and poverty as we did european, sinic, hindu, and christian african civilization.
The problem is that muslims neither possessed the demographics (most muslim nations have near subsaharan african IQ’s), nor the history of quality rule (outside of persia) as did china and india (and less so russia). Nor any have muslims adopted literacy as had those countries, nor education. Nor had muslims adopted
The USA’s supposition that persia could secularize, restore it’s heritage and develop into a core state for islam. WHen this failed americans tried to do the same with Turkey. However, it appears that demographically this is nearly impossible and that we must treat islamic countries (or at least the arab muslim countries) as just a militant version of subsaharan africa, that must be contained and allowed to mature at their own rate, just as we contained Russia and China.

Curt Doolittle Islam was never able to break kin, clan, tribal, and national bonds, nor able to nor able to develop a professional governemnt, nor develop deflationary thought, and was unable to modernize in response to the industrial revolution.
Jahan Khalili “The purpose of american involvement was to prevent the soviets and the chinese from exporting communism and militarism to the oil lands. “
OK, so the purpose of terrorists who attack the West is to change the West.
What are you trying to say? That purpose = right to do something?
Curt Doolittle The only hope was Persia. The second hope was Turkey. But the ethnic arabs are, and seemingly have been, unable to develop land-holder (agrarian) ethics, and to develop agrarian genetics, and without these is having difficulty transitioning to industrial, and not even informational era ethics.

Jahan Khalili Islam is not something monolithic. Muslims are fighting with each other.
Curt Doolittle I have a very precise and scientific definition of right. So yes, they had teh ‘right’ to do something, since islam has been at war with the west for 1400 years, and has destroyed roman, north african, persian, byzantine, and north indian civilizations.
Jahan Khalili Islamic imperialists judge the West just as harshly. The Westerners have been unable to stop spreading corruption like porn and alcohol. What do we do about these problematic corrupters and vice-spreaders?

Curt Doolittle Islam is monolithic in the the sense that it is, like the other two abrahamic religoins, a set of lies, the purpose of which is to create ignorance, so that simple bpeople can be subjeted to rule.
Curt Doolittle Porn and alcohol and nude women and all other temptations are designed to entrap weak people of weak character so that we can imprison or kill or punish them, and prevent them from reproduction.
(CD: he moved on too fast, but this was a great opportunity to show that islam actually PREVENTS the acccumulation of the skills necessary for the suppression of implsiveness, which is why it is so useful for inferior peoples.)

Jahan Khalili Can you explain how ISIS murders Shi’ites and Saudi Arabia persecutes them, if Islam is monolithic?
(CD: Note the use of NAXALT)

Curt Doolittle WHat does infighting have to do with the fact that islam has destroyed at least four superior more advanced civilizations, lost two standard deviations of intelligence, and impoverished everyone it touches, buy the mandatory indoctrination of people into a set of falsehooods, and fictional history, the purpose of which is merely to make them easeir to rule?

Jahan Khalili The Islamic fanatics view the West as monolithic, too, with its many countries, cultures and very different and formerly fighting forms of Christianity. Would you agree with them?

Curt Doolittle You know, a scientist doesn’t use ‘ideal’ terms like ‘monolithic’ because they are like religious terms, means of lying. Instead, we use deflationary language in order to prevent lying.

Jahan Khalili Dude, you’re not an authority on this subject. You’re repeating propaganda that the Muslim-haters use as self-justification for further intervention, which caused this mess in the first place.
Curt Doolittle So, the west has had conflcits. The musim world has had conflicts. But the fact of the matter is that arabs are the dumbest and most ignorant people in the world outside of south africa, and that they have destroyed four major successful civlivations, and reversed the evolution by down breeding.
Islam has caused more death, ignorance, and harm than every other event otehr than the black plague and malaria.

Curt Doolittle I am, in fact, an authority on this subject.

Jahan Khalili That’s what you say
Curt Doolittle I am in fact, quite possibly THE authority on truth.

Jahan Khalili Catholic-Protestant wars
Curt Doolittle And you are, as is typical, like an Abrahamist, avoiding any sense of empirical or logical argument by attempting to create moral equivalency by suggesting equality between things that are empirically and logically not equal in consequence.

Jahan Khalili “I am in fact, quite possibly THE authority on truth.”
Ridiculous. What’s the difference between you and prophet Mohammad?
Jahan Khalili I have a beard and dark complexion and an Iranian name. That makes me an Abrahamist?
(Note the suggestion that his appearance rather than his method of argument identifies him. Your method of argument determines your allegiance. )

Curt Doolittle Mohammed, if he existed, was never mentioned during his lifetime, and every stitch of what is attributed to him is appropriated from christian and jewish sects. What separates me from ‘fictionalism’ is called ‘science’ or what is more accurately called ‘measurement’ rather than ‘analogy’, ‘parable’ and ‘fiction.

Jahan Khalili
There is no such a thing as a person who has the whole truth. Maybe you should be more humble. Have you ever even lived in an Islamic country?
(CURT: Straw Man. Hyperbole.)

Jahan Khalili
I wouldn’t take an “expert on the West” who has never lived in the West seriously. We have plenty of those fake experts in Iran.
(CURT: Note the fallacy: becuase you don’t know this particular, you can’t make claims about the general – ie: the consequences. Thats similar to saying that one’s intentions have some bearing on the consequences of one’s words and actions.)

Curt Doolittle
You are DEMONSTRATING abrahamic deceit by attempting to avoid answering the argument. This is the secret to abrahamic lying. Is or is it not true that the west rationally contained islamic peoples from adopting communism, and rationally still contains them because in the pre-modern era, for 1400 years, islam was a plague upon this earth causing more death and the destruction of more civilizations than the great diseases of malaria and the great plague, and the islamic peoples are still ignorant, illiterate, superstitious, poor, and expansionary, and violent, and harmful to more developed civilizations?
THESE ARE SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC FACTS.
Jahan Khalili
Nonsense. You don’t know me or my motivations and are behaving like a fanatic yourself by projecting your ideas on me.
(CURT: wait. A muslim… ‘projecting your ideas on me’. lol. No. I’m just trying to determine if he is a liar by intent or by habituation due to indoctrination into the lies Abrahamism.)

Curt Doolittle
You are demonstrating you are an Abrahamist (jew) by appealing to AUTHORITY (expert) rather than making an argument, or refuting an argument.
Jahan Khalili
LOL. I’m accused of appealing to authority after you claimed to be one?
(CURT: Note that he stated that i needed to be an authority to have an opinion. lol So he made the appeal to authority, and I countered it.)

Curt Doolittle
I do not care what your motivations are. Your motivations are meaningless. (a) you are in fact making fraudulent arguments in the abrahamic tradition (b) you are in fact denying that islam has been the most destructive decivilizing force in history, and (c) you are denying that islam was a cancer on this earth and was the principle cause of the european dark ages because of raiding and plunder.

Curt Doolittle
So you are demonstrating abrahamism (jewishness) by your use of fraudulent argument, straw men, appealing to argument, denial of facts, use of moral equivalence between objectively moral and immoral civilizations.

Curt Doolittle
You are owned. You are had. You are defeated. You are a liar, an Abrahamist, and a justifier of lies, Abrahmism, violence, and the cancer of islamic civilization.
Jahan Khalili
Yes, everything is meaningless except your ideas which are golden cannon. No one – not even people who lived with actual Muslims – has any input that can be useful towards understanding the subject except yourself.
(CURT: Ah. You don’t know how I feel fallacy. Straw man.)

Jahan Khalili
You are an angry man who is lashing out at someone you don’t even know over the internet.
(CURT: Ad hom. Psychologism. Feminine. )
Curt Doolittle
So you again demonstrate that you are an abrahamic by making a false moral equivalency rather than answering the criticism that islam has been the most destructive influence on humanity other than the great plagues?

Jahan Khalili
You are aware that argument alone is insufficient to learn the truth, and that experience and gathering data play a role?
(CURT: I kinda wonder how the empirical evidence of 1400 years of history and the destruction of four major civilizations has not been a matter of experience and data…. sigh)

Curt Doolittle
I dont’ care who you are because, it is my job as a moral man to stop evil in this world, and if you are an evil abrahamic justifier of parasitism devolution and death then it is my job to prosecute you.

Jahan Khalili
LOL. Whatever.

Curt Doolittle
Thank you for this discourse, so I can publish it and show others what it is like to argue with abrahamism.

Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 17:20:00 UTC
ARGUMENT WITH A SOLIPSIST (NON-RATIONAL FEMALE): ITS GENETICS
Kathy.
Why do you hold an opinion if you don’t even know the most trivial statistical descriptions of the economy? Except for Luxembourg the whole world is worse off. The difference is that the USA (as DESIGNED) is better for middle class people, and europe is better for working class people, and the global elite are not affected by policy, and the underclass is genetically inferior and unwanted and a drag on everyone else’s attempt to get INTO economic security.
You can’t have both. Attempts to increase the security of the underclasses and increase the power of the political and underclasses, will merely reduce america to european levels of disposable income (much poorer), and our poor to their levels of poverty. Why? Because we have heavier underclass burdens. The europeans are just now experiencing the problems that we have had since ending slavery: genes matter. Why? whether yuo like it or not the overall wealth of your people is dependent upon the size of the underclass, and northern europe was just more effective at killing off the underclass through manorialism, hanging 1% per year, plague, war, and winter starvation.
With lower burdens the middle class expanded downward and northern europeans were, by the early modern era, nearly all members of the genetic middle class no matter what economic class.
By importing those people into the states, and making use of fiat credit (fiat money) we were able to finance the conversion of middle class genetics to middle class income.
This doesn’t work with people who are not capable of middle class performance because of their genetics.
Deal with it. People were not ‘oppressed’. They were domesticated. And the reason chinese, jews, and northern europeans were more prosperous and built higher evolved societies, is simply because between cold weather, harsh farming, wars and plagues, and intolerance for crime, they killed off or exported their underclasses.
yet now well intentioned fools, fond of pseudoscience, are trying to reverse the very means by which our prosperity – your luxury – has been made possible.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 16:37:00 UTC
RESTORING AND WEAPONIZING THE CHURCH
There is nothing in the natural law that is not in the roman catholic church.
There is nothing in natural law that is false.
There is a great deal in the catholic church that is false, and therefore not in natural law.
There is no reason we cannot teach the church’s history of natural law, and the myths of our people, rather than the lies of the conspirators who imposed ignorance and serfdom upon our people.
There is no reason we cannot Aryanize the rituals. There is no reason we cannot restore the church to its prior status. There is no reason we cannot eliminate any competitors to it.
I have finally solved the means of weaponizing the church. And the method will surprise you….
But the false pope must go, and the (((heretics))) within her must be burned at the stake.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 15:45:00 UTC
ALL MEN HAVE VOICE, BECAUSE ALL MEN HAVE VIOLENCE
(read this)
All men have influence. They just assume that means voice rather than violence. But one can ignore voice. One can compromise with protesters. But one cannot ignore or compromise when dead.
As I told the Ukrainian people, at every opportunity, and repeatedly. The only reason you have bad people in government is because you don’t kill enough of them that only good people remain.
All men are born with a natural wealth of violence, the application of which we lend to the state, to exercise on our behalf, in a division of labor.
But when the government no longer acts in the interests of ourselves, our families, our kin, our tribes, and our nations, then it is just another form of war, by slow means of attrition. It is the most dishonest and dishonorable of weapons of war.
So take back your violence from the parasites who war against you, apply your violence once again to the incremental suppression of parasitism and predation, and take one step closer to the imposition of the Natural Law of Reciprocity, beyond which none may venture without restitution, punishment, and bloody constraint.
It seems that the long line of Aryans, Europeans, Germania, Celts, Itals, Hellenes, Romans, Franks, Anglo Saxons, and Americans must once again, as we must every few generations, overthrow those who usurp our natural law, by one excuse or another, and thereby restore and reinforce the contract of employment for those whom we hire to rule justly, by restoring the terms of contract to the only moral terms of for rule that are possible: the natural law of reciprocity of sovereign men, and its incremental improvement and application by the judge discovered common law of testimony before a jury of our peers, and the voluntary exchange in markets for association, reproduction, cooperation, production, production of commons, and production of polities, in the only civilization to discover rule of law: the eradication of discretion in the adjudication of differences.
Do you ancestors, your family, your kin, your tribe, your nation, and your people justice and continue the costly investment that they have made for 3500 years, in raising you, your kin, your nation and all mankind out of superstition, ignorance, tyranny, poverty, disease, and dysgenia.
Kill those who would prey, steal, destroy, and commit genocide against you and your people. Kill them until they stop coming. Kill them until they stop trying. Kill them until they stop scheming. Kill them until they remember nothing but the great crimes that they have committed against you, yours and ours.
Truth is enough. Restore Natural Law. Impose strict construction, decidability, and our standing before the courts in matters public and private. Extend the involuntary warranty on products and services, to the involuntary warranty against information placed into the commons. Defend not just our genes, not just our families, not just our property, not just our territory, not just our water, not just our air,but the very information that surrounds us as do the rest.
Restore our accountability in both word and deed. Prohibit word and action for which a man may not perform restitution in matters private or public. Demand due diligence against fraud, as well as ignorance, error, bias, wishful-thinking, suggestion, overloading, fictionalism, and outright deceit.
Let no man in word or deed repeat the crimes of the prophets and Abrahamists, or the secular prophets we call the philosophers of deceit, or the secular frauds we call social pseudoscientists – all of whom who have attempted as they have in the ancient world, to promise a heaven in this world or the next by the systematic advocacy of parasitism by a host of methods and contrivances, at the cost of civilization and the transcendence of man through continuous domestication of his parasitism.
Every dark age has been preceded by a mass migration of the undomesticated animal man to the lands of those tho speak truthfully either in China or Europa. We must never allow this again.
Never again. Truth is enough. Truth is enough if demand it or violence.
Use your wealth of violence. Transcend yourself. Transcend your people, and transcend mankind in the process.
Kill them all until none remain.
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
Deus Vult.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 15:01:00 UTC
WE SHALL, IN SHORT ORDER, BRING YOU TO HEEL, OR BREAK IT ALL TO PIECES.
—“We aren’t taking to the streets. We aren’t rallying or protesting. We’re going to impoverish, starve, freeze, silence and immobilize you. We’re coming for you in your homes, in your places of work, while you’re traveling, for your wives, husbands, parents, uncles, cousins, and those who come to defend you. Because we do not want your approval, or your submission, but your defeat, removal, and punishment. You have participated in the attempted genocide of our people. You must pay restitution. And you have never seen fifth generation civil war with this era’s possibilities of command and control. No empire in history has ever been this fragile, and your confidence in its continuity is mistaken. We shall, in short order, bring you to heel, or break it all to pieces.”—-
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 13:51:00 UTC