Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE ARGUMENT FOR NORMATIVE DECIDABILITY IN NON-OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE (CD: for tho

    THE ARGUMENT FOR NORMATIVE DECIDABILITY IN NON-OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE

    (CD: for those that cannot make the leap to operationalism, joel does a wonderful job of using traditional language to make the point.)

    —

    by Joel Davis

    A social structure emerges from the conceptual structures held by the participants which have relevance to interpersonal interaction.

    These conceptual structures emerge from conceptual valuation, and conceptual valuation functions via relative conceptual hierarchies of valuation.

    These hierarchies of values then become the criteria from which a social structure formulates its interpersonal hierarchies.

    To peacefully preserve a particular social structure, a society must have at least a significant convergence (or ideally, a consensus) between its participants in regard to conceptual valuation relevant to interpersonal interaction.

    Without this convergence, participants in the social structure who hold competing conceptual hierarchies will support competing interpersonal hierarchies, rendering conceptual divergence doomed to social chaos and violence only resolvable via the tyrannical imposition of a victorious conceptual structure.

    In the West, we addressed this problem with markets via the superordinate metavaluation of the twin concepts of rationality and honor during antiquity and reason and liberty during modernity.

    However, rationalism and honor were defeated by Catholic (and Islamic) conceptual tyranny, and now reason and liberty are on the brink of complete disintegration via a regression to chaotic conceptual divergence as a result of the counter-enlightenment.

    The only wall that can truly protect our society is the revived convergent, superordinate metavaluations of reason and liberty. Physical walls to keep out those who challenge their superordinance would then be merely a natural consequence.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:17:00 UTC

  • China like America, is not a country but an empire. Europe is not a country but

    China like America, is not a country but an empire. Europe is not a country but a civilization. China succeeded in combining a civilization, empire, and country, due to successful conquest and administration.

    Imagine if europe had built a wall at least across the straights of gibraltar, the bosporus, the caucuses, and the Urals?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:11:00 UTC

  • “So ignorance is punishable as malice?”— A lack of due diligence is malice, ye

    —“So ignorance is punishable as malice?”—

    A lack of due diligence is malice, yes.

    And most all law is predicated upon that. the difference is that we have not applied it to information, just to services, and products.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:03:00 UTC

  • MOST ALL LANGUAGE IS EXCUSE-MAKING People don’t reason to seek the truth, they r

    MOST ALL LANGUAGE IS EXCUSE-MAKING

    People don’t reason to seek the truth, they reason to make excuses for doing what they think is in their interest.

    Language and reason evolved to negotiate in a social order, not to tell or determine the truth.

    Otherwise it would not have taken us x thousand years to develop the scientific method.

    And we would not need the scientific method. Because the entire purpose of the scientific method, is to compensate for the fact that our brains developed to negotiate, not tell the truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:01:00 UTC

  • WHY CHINA IS RIGHT. (important)(revise your values) China will dominate the futu

    WHY CHINA IS RIGHT.

    (important)(revise your values)

    China will dominate the future for the simple reasons that they have succeeded at juvenilization, succeeded at culling the lower classes, have succeeded at building an intolerant, militial ‘national’ (kinship) army, have succeeded at both building a wall AND not venturing outside of it, and succeeded at prohibiting incursion by any variation of Abrahamism, and succeeded at adopting aristotelianism, and consumer capitalism – all of that despite being UNABLE to adopt western truth, high trust, and rule of law, because it is contrary to the confucian teaching that one must preserve harmony rather than disrupt the dominance hierarchy through truthful speech.

    Conversely the west COULD dominate the future by replicating the chinese strategy of:

    (a) preserving our juvenilization,

    (b) preserving (and expanding) our culling of the underclasses

    (c) restoring our militial (kinship) National army.

    (d) building a wall between the european and non european peoples.

    (e) withdrawing from adventurism outside the wall.

    (f) suppressing, and eliminating all versions of abrahamism, and all forms of supernaturalism.

    (g) preserving our truth, high trust, and rule of law.

    In Addition

    (g) protecting our intellectual property from distribution.

    Otherwise we will, for purely genetic reasons, experience another dark age, and there exist no remaining isolated white peoples to rescue us from it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 07:57:00 UTC

  • “YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW” You mean, islam destroyed north african, levantine, byza

    “YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW”

    You mean, islam destroyed north african, levantine, byzantine, and persian civilizations. Is trying to destroy Indian civilization. And is only successfully resisted by Chinese civilization? And is only going to succeed at destroying western civilization, because of the prior conquest of western civilization by the previous generation of islam: christianity?

    So for 1400 years islam has destroyed four major advanced civilizations, and is in the process of destroying all but one: china.

    With the only ‘break’ in the conquest of the advanced civilizations has been the past 200 years, where we have had advanced technology with which to defeat their numbers, and ability to maneuver.

    And that we are reaping the sewing of our christian ethic?

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 07:45:00 UTC

  • THIS QUARTER’S MOST SUBSTANTIAL SURPRISE I think that my major surprise this yea

    THIS QUARTER’S MOST SUBSTANTIAL SURPRISE

    I think that my major surprise this year, was the understanding that Abrahamism is a feminine assault on aristocracy by the underclasses and women. And that only china has resisted it successfully. And resisted it through nationalism, and limiting expansion of their territory. The west has been expansionist.

    I think that’s the big scary insight.

    We need to build more walls, and kill everyone that comes over them.

    The great wall of europe on one end and the great wall of china on the other.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 07:38:00 UTC

  • I can say that we consider ourselves (rightfully) as possessing a superior civil

    I can say that we consider ourselves (rightfully) as possessing a superior civilization that has dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, superstition, tyranny, and disease in both the ancient and modern worlds. And I can say we finally know why that is true.

    I can say that some of us consider white people more attractive than people with less success at Juvenilization through reproductive selection.

    I can say that aside from attractiveness, it is hard to say one is superior to the Han/Korean/Japanese – although what they have gained in health and memory we have gained in language and creativity. And this tradeoff is worth studying.

    I can say that whites were disproportionately responsible for civilizations, and that non-whites have disproportionately been responsible for the Dark Ages – in particular, Abrahamism, whether Jewish/Marxist/Socialist/Libertarian, Christian/Postmodern, or Islamic/Islamist appears to be the worst thing that has every happened to mankind – it’s been more deadly than the plague.

    As the center of history, I think that the center of history is the war between white/chinese ‘aristocracy’ and everyone else’s underclass. And that an analysis of history is reducible to the see saw of that conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 20:23:00 UTC

  • ANSWERS, I’LL TRY TO IMPROVE THEM WITH THE SCIENCE OF IT 1. Greater success at r

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-most-white-people-richer-than-non-whites/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=856c23a6&srid=u4QvTERRIBLE ANSWERS, I’LL TRY TO IMPROVE THEM WITH THE SCIENCE OF IT

    1. Greater success at reproductive juvenilization. we are not sure why other than that slowing the rate of maturity is possible in colder climates, whereas accelerating the rate of maturity in warmer clients is necessary for no other reason than to survive the higher incidence of disease, parasites, and predators.

    2. Greater success at aggressive culling the size of the underclasses. While it is impolitic to say so, the wealth or poverty of a people is more dependent upon the reduction and elimination of the underclasses than it is upon the production of exceptional people and education. A good rule of thumb is that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as every person at the top is productive.

    3. Greater success at eliminating the clannishness impulse. Again, we are not sure if this is an artifact of low population density and cold climates, or purely one of cultural forces influence reproductive choice. In either event, white people (to their detriment) are less tribal and clannish.

    4. For reasons we are just beginning to understand, the west made very different cultural choices. (a) telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth as highest virtue, despite any impact it would ahve on the dominance hierarchy. (b) Sovereignty and Markets in Everything creating a market for polities, and polities led by markets, rather than monopolistic hierarchies. As a consequence a division of the state into different institutions that competed with one another. This led to deflationary literature where the rest of the world relied on conflationary literature. (c) that the gods, like men, are subject to the laws of the natural universe, and that man can defeat the folly of these gods with cunning and effort.

    5. So white people are more trusting, more trustworthy, and have institutions that depend upon more trusting, more trustworthy people, and together these reduce the frictions that constrain non white peoples to lesser conditions. The only people close to whites are the Japanese and south koreans. And even among whites, these rules apply only to whites from above the Hajnal Line (protestants and their descendants) who practiced Bipartite Manorialism.

    6. TRUST=COOPERATIVE VELOCITY=RATE OF ECONOMY

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 20:14:00 UTC

  • TRUISM —“If you won’t put a wall around your country, state, or city, you have

    TRUISM

    —“If you won’t put a wall around your country, state, or city, you have to put walls around everything inside it.”— John Rollins

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-07 18:10:00 UTC