Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT I am a pagan if 1)

    A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT

    I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.

    As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan.

    I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.

    I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.

    I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.

    As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.

    And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity

    The Propertarian Institute,

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 14:03:00 UTC

  • PERSISTENCE From idea to opportunity, opportunity to discovery, discovery to imp

    PERSISTENCE

    From idea to opportunity, opportunity to discovery, discovery to impediment, impediment to frustration, frustration to anger, anger to conviction, conviction to resolution, resolution to planning, planning to action, action to success.

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 13:43:00 UTC

  • ALL MEN WANT TO BE LED. FEW ARE WORTHY OF LEADING. I know my betters when I meet

    ALL MEN WANT TO BE LED. FEW ARE WORTHY OF LEADING.

    I know my betters when I meet them. I want to be led by my betters. If for no other reason than leadership is difficult, uncertain, and I may fail my people.

    We all want to be led. We only want to choose our leaders.

    Choose wisely. Choose your betters.

    I choose the martial aristocracy of christian monarchies.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 12:59:00 UTC

  • DEI VOLUNT!!!! (THE GODS WILL IT) For pagans rising above their abrahamic deceiv

    DEI VOLUNT!!!! (THE GODS WILL IT)

    For pagans rising above their abrahamic deceivers, it’s “DEI VOLUNT”: “The Gods Will It”, not “Deus Vult”: “God Wills It”.

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 12:57:00 UTC

  • WHAT ANSWER DOES THE RIGHT HAVE? It’s not exactly like the Right has a portfolio

    WHAT ANSWER DOES THE RIGHT HAVE?

    It’s not exactly like the Right has a portfolio of philosophers to choose from. Who is there? A bunch of failures who took stylistic clues from christian literature and mixed it with Lovecraft’s occultism? A century and a half of Abrahamic apologists still hopeful that what defeated us in the previous era, what we escaped from, and what the Abrahamists are using to attack us once again, will somehow – like generals fighting the last war – succeed this time despite failing us over and over again in the past?

    What strategy? What plan? What demands? What institutions? What will you change as meaningfully as what rescued us from Supernatural Abrahamism the last time (empiricism) and what can rescue us from SuperRational and Pseudoscientific Abrahamism this time (marxism/socialism/postmodernism/feminism)?

    What military tactics that were required in the age of arrows, in the age of cannon, in the age of rifles, in the age of armor, are now possible and necessary in the current age under the ending of the peace of westphalia where the fragility is not the army, but the infrastructure, and the illusion of power and rule? By what means can the people overthrow the state and restore nation and sovereignty and militia?

    If you are weak. I understand. But you are irrelevant. All that matters is a solution that it is possible to implement, a set of incentives by which to award the common people for changing the status quo, a set of demands to impose upon the state, a strategy for forcing their submission, command and control by which to act, and a minority of men ready to destroy that upon which the current order depends.

    Does anyone out there have anything other, than cunning words?

    No. I know so. Don’t bother pulling wishful thinking out of your backside.

    Rule or be ruled. Rule by force or be ruled by force. Rule by distributed dictatorship of the militia of sovereign men, denying rule to all others. Or be ruled by any one of the alternatives, all of which render you a freeman, serf or slave.

    The strong do not look for approval, permission, or cooperation of the weak. We act, regardless of the approval, or permission, or cooperation of the weak.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 12:54:00 UTC

  • Women buy of you what you have sold to men. It is other men’s treatment of you t

    Women buy of you what you have sold to men. It is other men’s treatment of you that determines your value to women. You don’t sell women. You sell men, and women buy using that measure.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 11:59:00 UTC

  • IT’S ‘EFEMINISM” NOT “FEMINISM” —“I think we got the spelling of ‘feminism ‘ w

    IT’S ‘EFEMINISM” NOT “FEMINISM”

    —“I think we got the spelling of ‘feminism ‘ wrong. It should be “efeminism” since the goal of feminism seems to be to remove the femininity of women.”—Anne Tripp

    (chuckle. awesome.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 11:56:00 UTC

  • I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE. SORRY. IN THAT SENSE I AM A CHRISTIAN. My point is, don’

    I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE. SORRY. IN THAT SENSE I AM A CHRISTIAN.

    My point is, don’t criticize or counter-signal me because I don’t climb on the racist bandwagon; because I counter-signal demands that I join the racist bandwagon. And i counter-signal the use of my work for the purpose of advocating racism.

    I don’t hate on people. I hate on ideas. I may hate on some genes. I may hate a bit on nature once in awhile. But I don’t hate on people because of their race. Their strategy, their government, their culture, their beliefs, and their actions.

    I am a christian to the extent that I have understood and adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive tit-for-tat before going to war. And 4) I retain the Aryan conviction that once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, and without mercy, without constraint, without remorse – defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of your enemy.

    I understand all people must follow our reproductive incentives. We have no other rational means of choice. But I try to solve the underlying problem. The underlying problem is DC/NY imperialism, a demographic government, abrahamism/marxism/postmodernism, and most of all, the lack of rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity, and the perpetual militia necessary to preserve it.

    I want EVERYONE to be free to form nations that produce the commons they NEED for their state of genetic development, and their distribution of abilities.

    And I want everyone to be accountable for the domestication of their own people rather than offloading that cost onto others (especially us).

    And if I don’t join on the “LET’S FAIL AGAIN PLEASE” bandwagon of promoting fictionalism in order to compensate for the remaining inferiority of the distribution of my own ‘white’ kin, then, understand, that’s OK with me. I’m not after the attention of the common man. I’m after creating an answer to the Frankfurt School – this time via truth, that prevents all further abrahamic deceptions. And then using small numbers to start a revolution that will spiral – not from understanding of my arguments, but from opportunity to obtain what they desire. And I hope most of all to use the very threat and possibility of it, to cause serious conversation about the restoration of natural law and markets in everything through the restoration of reciprocity and truthful speech.

    If you want to “FAIL AGAIN PLEASE” then you’re welcome to. Some of us favor voluntary religion (fictionalism) and some of us favor involuntary law (truth). We all pursue those actions within our realm of comprehension and ability. The common man is not my audience or my objective. A few angry men that need an organization to assist them is.

    I know that I can produce weapons that few can make use of. Others can adopt for their use. And others adopt from those adoptions. I have said all along that this is my strategy. It has been since I went public.

    I’m going to end abrahamism forever. And that means ending fictionalism forever. And that means ONLY THE SMART AND THE STRONG WILL RULE.

    And that is what I’m aiming for.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 11:28:00 UTC

  • IDEOLOGY VS PHILOSOPHY VS TRUTH Ideology: internally inconsistent and incomplete

    IDEOLOGY VS PHILOSOPHY VS TRUTH

    Ideology: internally inconsistent and incomplete narrative for the purpose of inspiring action necessary to seize power in order to alter the status quo.

    Philosophy: internally consistent if incomplete method of producing decidability for the purpose of obtaining an end by reason and argument.

    Truth: internally consistent, externally correspondent, operationally articulated system of decidability REGARDLESS of philosophy, ideology, or preference.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 10:25:00 UTC

  • WHY DOES CURT TALK TO ALL MANKIND RATHER THAN JUST WHITES? Any statement that is

    WHY DOES CURT TALK TO ALL MANKIND RATHER THAN JUST WHITES?

    Any statement that is universally true (reciprocity) cannot be stated as a particularism (true in the particular).

    I am not producing an ideology for the purpose of seizing power.

    I am producing a science that justifies the seizure of power by whatever ideology one chooses.

    I am happy that those of you who seek to rally by narrative have learned enough from my work to assist you in doing so.

    I am much more interested in producing a book, a constitution, an action plan, and a civil war, using a minority of ACTION oriented men, than a democratic movement of PERSUASIVELY oriented men.

    I am much more interested in causing the spread of a movement to every other country and civilization, than just to my own – I am producing the answer to marxism. An answer to the restatement of abrahamism in pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and outright falsehood.

    So let each of us work with our demographic. The Evangelists with theirs(Moralism). The populists work with theirs (Ridicule), the scientists with theirs(Truth). The via positiva and literary with theirs; the via negativa and legal with ours.

    We do not need to be united on means, only upon ends. The classes cannot be united on means, only ends. The subraces cannot be united on means, only ends.

    I am just as concerned about every other people as I am with mine.

    Because I am certain that I can only save my people if I save all people from the second wave of abrahamism.

    There is but one cancer of the mind, and it is fictionalism, by which the genes of those lacking agency are fooled by means of suggestion that their reason cannot defend them from.

    End fictionalism, and Abrahamism. End abrahamism, we have only a thousand preferences upon a single truth to work from.

    I AM IN THIS FOR MYSELF MY KIN, MY PEOPLE, AND MANKIND.

    End abrahamism: End Fictionalism: The loading framing and overloading in all its forms.

    End lies to the people. Rule them truthfully or do not rule them at all. We are the inventors and purveyors of truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 10:22:00 UTC