Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • HUMANS SPECIATE AT 30 POINTS OF DIFFERENCE – ISLAMISTS ARE A DIFFERENT SPECIES –

    HUMANS SPECIATE AT 30 POINTS OF DIFFERENCE – ISLAMISTS ARE A DIFFERENT SPECIES

    —You aren’t spiritually minded—

    I don’t use drugs either. I rely on reason. I’m a european. A member of the martial class.

    islam was the means of arab (underclass) expansion, and has evolved into the worldwide method of underclass expansion. It is the religion of the -90IQ populaces.

    That’s the problem. Not so much islam. But sub 90IQ people who employ islam as a means of rebelling against reason and transcendence (domestication) by their betters.

    At every 15 points we begin to speciate. At 30 points we speciate. it’s not complicated. the Muslim countries are literally a different species because they cannot process information by the same means, therefore they cannot organize societies by the same means. They require AUTHORITY.

    The smarter your population the higher demand for libertarian sentiments because the greater the ability to self research, self analyze, and self choose in an increasingly complex division of knowledge and labor.

    That’s just a fact. It’s just how it is.

    Dunning Kruger and Islam go hand in hand.

    You might argue that christianity is an aristocratic deception, judaism a middle class deception, and islam an underclass deception and that would be accurate.

    But they are all deceptions.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 06:34:00 UTC

  • I am not interested in anti-jewish literature or arguments. I”m not interested i

    I am not interested in anti-jewish literature or arguments. I”m not interested in anti-anyone arguments. I’m interested in how we can defeat group evolutionary strategies – not how to GOSSIP about them.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 06:13:00 UTC

  • HISTORICIZE, vs FICTIONALIZE vs FICTIONALISM a) HISTORICIZE: deflate myth into h

    HISTORICIZE, vs FICTIONALIZE vs FICTIONALISM

    a) HISTORICIZE: deflate myth into history and literature for the purpose of decidability in matters of dispute.

    b) FICTIONALIZE: convert into monomyth, plot, archetype, virtues for the purpose of meaning for the self.

    c) FICTIONALISM: conflate myth, history, literature, law, science, real and ideal for the purpose of deception for political ends.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 06:11:00 UTC

  • Doing Good by Intention, Does Evil by Consequence. Women Destroyed The West

    Doing Good by Intention, Does Evil by Consequence.

    Women Destroyed The West.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 05:04:00 UTC

  • YOU CANNOT RECOVER POLLUTED GENES Greece can’t recover. Southern italy can’t rec

    YOU CANNOT RECOVER POLLUTED GENES

    Greece can’t recover. Southern italy can’t recover. Northern italy can’t recover with Southern Italy attached. The former ottoman territories can’t recover.

    Now France Can’t Recover. Britain Can’t Recover.

    America Can Still Recover. Germany maybe.

    The Slavic Lands are safe.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-22 04:51:00 UTC

  • Talking about something abstractly is very different from inciting violence. It’

    Talking about something abstractly is very different from inciting violence.

    It’s perfectly permissible to talk about something as long as you don’t actually try to ORGANIZE a deliberate action.

    My objective is to make people understand that revolutions in the current era are trivially easy, require small numbers, and have vast consequences compared to the agrarian era, and that we’re seeing around the world, the end of the peace of westphalia, the origination of 5gw, and that in that ‘war’, the primary weapons are one step above sticks and stones: fire.

    (also, you know, I know quite a bit about the legality of this kind of thing. I also know that the powers that be know me, cause i have ‘contracts’ with them as well as being a former justice department employee.)

    We still have relatively free speech in America. 😉

    ‘Cause we have guns.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-21 19:10:00 UTC

  • THE INDIAN WARS DURING THE ERA OF CONQUEST My ancestor had a fortified house in

    THE INDIAN WARS DURING THE ERA OF CONQUEST

    My ancestor had a fortified house in connecticut and his home was the first attacked by the indians in the King Phillp’s War

    —“The war was the single greatest calamity to occur in seventeenth century Puritan New England and is considered by many to be the deadliest war in the history of European settlement in North America in proportion to the population.[5] In the space of little more than a year, twelve of the region’s towns were destroyed and many more damaged, the colony’s economy was all but ruined, and its population was decimated, losing one-tenth of all men available for military service.[6]:656 [7] More than half of New England’s towns were attacked by Indians.[8]”—

    The original conflicts were between tribes for access to trade with europeans (furs).

    Further escalated because different settlements by different countries, allied with different indian tribes. The tribes were often enemies of one another. And each defended its relationship with the settlements. These spiralled.

    They further escalated as populations began to increase, there was competition, and ‘fights’ between indians and settlers.

    “…the settlers increasingly encroached on Tuscarora land, raided villages to take slaves, and introduced epidemic diseases….”

    They escalated when for example Kleft murdered the tribes for the territory of manhattan (without permission)

    Scale escalated when tribes would ally with colonists against competing tribes whose land the colonists were taking. This led to the extermination of tribes.

    THen indians allied together against colonists and … well, at that point you have wars.

    I think that we tend not to recognize that the indians nearly won many of these wars and that the losses by whites were in substantial percentages of the population.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-21 19:10:00 UTC

  • “Part of why the separation of church and state failed is because they forgot to

    —“Part of why the separation of church and state failed is because they forgot to separate Atheism and state.—Ely Harman

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-21 18:22:00 UTC

  • PHILOSOPHY(GOOD), EPISTEMOLOGY, TESTIMONY(TRUE) I categorize philosophy(preferen

    PHILOSOPHY(GOOD), EPISTEMOLOGY, TESTIMONY(TRUE)

    I categorize philosophy(preference or good) as the search for means of decidability within a domain, and epistemology(ideal) or what I instead call Testimony(real) as search for decidability (truth) regardless of domain.

    There is no reason that testimony can’t be constructed as a science like any other. The fact that it’s fairly hard to guard against our ignorances, biases, wishful thinking (and deceptions) is just the reason that it took until the 20th century to solve.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-21 18:11:00 UTC

  • PETERSON’S POSTMODERNISM Peterson is in part a postmodernist because he relies u

    PETERSON’S POSTMODERNISM

    Peterson is in part a postmodernist because he relies upon a postmodern (utilitarian) definition of truth – as if the purpose of truth was choice of good or preference when we are cooperating, rather than decidability in matters of conflict when cooperation fails.

    The more complex the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, negotiation, and advocacy, the greater requirement for decidability.

    Peterson (I assume) preserves this postmodernism, in order to preserve his fondness for literature, idealism, and supernaturalism, and especially conflationary idealism and supernaturalism (Fictionalism).

    I can understand why he needs this ‘crutch’ because the monomyth, the list of plots, the archetypes, and the virtues provide our best historical (empirically devolved) and most enduring analysis of psychology.

    However, there is a very great difference between the teaching of meaning so that we may discover and seize opportunities in reality, and the teaching of law so that we may decide conflicts without provoking retaliation cycles.

    So while Peterson COULD say “truth is truth” and “wisdom is wisdom”, and while we can CHOOSE with wisdom, we can only DECIDE with Truth – he doesn’t. Instead, he conflates the personally preferable the common good and the necessarily true.

    Otherwise, Peterson is on the way to restoring our ancient literary ‘Religion’, but he seems bent on preserving the ‘fictionalism’ (lies) of Abrahamism.

    My question is, why preserve the lies of Abrahamism, if is is the use of the techniques of Abrahamism – fictionalism as a means of deception by suggestion – that the marxists (pseudo-science) and postmodernists (pseudorationalism) used to defeat the west in both the ancient (Forcible christianization) and modern (forcible marxism and postmodernism) eras.

    Once Peterson resolves this one question I think he’s not just telling the conservatives what they want to hear. Until then, that’s all he is doing.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-21 18:00:00 UTC