Source: Facebook

  • MONUMENTAL TREES For Graveyards(Yews), Churchyards, and Sacred Groves (Oaks)

    https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/trees/THE MONUMENTAL TREES

    For Graveyards(Yews), Churchyards, and Sacred Groves (Oaks)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 09:02:00 UTC

  • AGREEMENTS, DISAGREEMENTS, DIFFERENT STRATEGIES NOT NECESSARILY TRUE: Russia. Th

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDNr8rIQXAoTHOUGHTS. AGREEMENTS, DISAGREEMENTS, DIFFERENT STRATEGIES

    NOT NECESSARILY TRUE: Russia. The question is, how do we help Russia to end her weakness. We made the mistake of not bringing her into NATO, and creating the polish/ukrainian Intermarium: a power between germanic europe, and russian eurasia. A powerful barrier is very different from a weak barrier.

    TRUE: Europe. There is no such thing as a European Union. They have nothing but a Trade union. And that’s all that there should be. Southern Europe is in a depression as great as the Great Depression in the USA. Germans are exporting 50% of their production to the rest of Europe – and they can’t continue.

    TRUE: US MIDDLE EAST WITHDRAWAL: Agreed. We need to let the borders reform.

    SOMEWHAT TRUE: MIDDLE EAST. Alternative theory Is Iran/Iraq/Syria/Pakistan with nuclear power, allied with Russia, and control of oil reserves, mandating oil in Iranian currency. TURKEY: I still don’t see Turkey. More likely Russia Restores the Orthodox Empire in cooperation with Iran/iraq/syria/kurds and turks are a minority muslim population.

    CHINA: INCOHERENT: China does not use aggression, but builds a fortress, and uses soft power. China is an extended family, not a state, or an empire. She cannot project power. But she does not need to. She needs only to return to form, and make war with her impossible.

    US NAVY: QUESTIONABLE: The US Navy is one war away from eradication. Everyone in the world knows this. It’s merely a factor of the number of missiles one can launch and at what velocity, and any battle group is gone. Submarines have value. Coast guard patrols have value. The navy is gone with the next war.

    EXISTENTIAL THREAT? : I disagree. The problem is building up the Intermarium between Russia and Germanic europe.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 18:58:00 UTC

  • I mean, it seems like british women are trying to out trailer-park Americans. I

    I mean, it seems like british women are trying to out trailer-park Americans. I can understand not even TRYING to compete with French women, and I can see raising the art of working-class ‘unkempt’ to a virtue signal. But what is going on over there across the pond? Makes the vast trailer park we call Los Angeles look the an Etiquette Academy.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 17:40:00 UTC

  • (Question. When people share my statuses I ‘like’ them – to thank them for doing

    (Question. When people share my statuses I ‘like’ them – to thank them for doing so. I’ve been doing that forever. But some people were ragging on me for ‘liking’ my own statuses. What’s your advice. Should we LIke shares or not? )


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 17:15:00 UTC

  • Philosophy without history, economics, and science is just secular religion – a

    Philosophy without history, economics, and science is just secular religion – a form of conspicuous consumption.

    Just by adding costs in to philosophy half of all questions disappear.

    Just by adding operational language to philosophy, the rest disappear.

    There really aren’t very many difficult questions: metaphysics (action), epistemology (testimony), ethics (reciprocity), politics (markets for commons), group evolutionary strategy (predation, parasitism, cooperation, or avoidance.)

    The meaningful issue is: why don’t you like the answers? 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 17:12:00 UTC

  • end of the West? No. An Opportunity That Comes Once in a Millennia!!!! Revel it

    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/879079759669538816/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=879079759669538816The end of the West? No. An Opportunity That Comes Once in a Millennia!!!! Revel it it!!! #Trump https://t.co/zwUxjGvUo0


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 16:52:00 UTC

  • REVEL IN THE OPPORTUNITY!!! What? You are worried about the end of western civil

    REVEL IN THE OPPORTUNITY!!!

    What? You are worried about the end of western civilization, instead of reveling in the opportunity for morally justified predation on a scale not possible since the Roman Empire?

    Revel in our time!!!

    We can create legends that will outlive us for thousands of years!!!!


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 16:50:00 UTC

  • WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ‘PROPERTARIANISM’? POSITIONING: PROPERTARIANISM

    WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ‘PROPERTARIANISM’?

    POSITIONING: PROPERTARIANISM IS LARGE. AS LARGE AS MARXISM.

    Propertarianism is a large program – a complete system – in which we have attempted to unite science, philosophy, morality, law, economics, and evolutionary biology(and war).

    SIMPLIFIED:

    The west, for historical reasons, both genetic, environmental, economic, and cultural, developed truth and truth telling producing trust and rapid adaptability to change, that like their military tactics allowed smaller and poorer numbers to defeat larger and wealthier numbers by maneuver.

    Using truth, meritocratic egalitarianism (class equality), sovereignty, common law, and jury, the west produced a market order of governance. And by consequence ‘markets in everything’ that continued the strategy of adaptation.

    And that just as wealth made possible by empires made migration of undomesticated underclasses mobile in the early bronze age, and in the ancient iron age, that colonialism and industrialization made underclasses mobile in the modern age.

    But, while violence has decreased, we have merely translated the visible predation of violence for the less visible predation of pervasive fraud.

    So, while we can never know that something is true or perfect, we can however, very systematically, perform all known due diligence against falsehood and deceit as rigorously as we perform mathematics.

    Testimonialism expands the scientific method to provide a means of performing sufficient due diligence that one can warranty that his speech is not false.

    By using Testimonialism we can extend the demand for due diligence we require in products and services to that of public speech (especially for money, and especially regarding politics), and we can reverse the industrialization of lying that has been made possible by our failure to regulate the industrialization of information and opinion that we call financialization, pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, pseudo-historicism (supernaturalism), propaganda, and in particular, marxism, socialism, postmodernism, and political correctness and outright lying in public.

    In other words, we can impose warranty of due diligence upon everyone for public, published (amplified, distributed) speech. And we can end, in this era the industrialization of lying.

    And with that single innovation we can reform and restore western civilization and save ourselves from a second dark age by the second abrahamic conquest of western civilization.

    THE PHILOSOPHY : SIGNIFICANT TOPICS

    While propertarianism serves as an anti-philosophy system of thought, we rely upon the traditional hierarchy of categories:

    METAPHYSICS

    1 – TIME: our first resource is time. our development of action, sentience, intelligence, cooperation, division of labor, writing, narrative, numbers, money, accounting, reason, law and science serves to produce increasing returns on time. When we increase our numbers in physical space we decrease opportunity costs (time). When we increase incremental suppression of parasitism and free riding, we decrease transaction costs (time). trades, money, savings, store time – time to trade with others.

    PSYCHOLOGY

    2 – ACQUISITIONISM: all behavior is reducible to the incentive to acquire interests. we can enumerate those categories of interests we seek to acquire. we remember those things we have invested in as costs, and defend those costs. (our complex interests some of which are our possessions )

    We provide a list of categories that explain the sum total of what people seek to acquire an ‘interest’ in.

    3 – PROPERTARIANISM: We can empathize with intent and therefore cooperate. We can remember, so we can exchange cooperation over time, as well as forgo cooperation if it’s irreciprocal. Cooperation is so much more productive than individual action that it is an un-substitutable good. So preservation of incentive to cooperate requires profitable(productive) reciprocity.

    That which we have borne costs to obtain an interest without imposing costs on the interests of others does not violate reciprocity. All non-criminal/criminal, unethical/ethical, and moral/immoral behavior can be reduced to statements of reciprocity.

    We

    We reduce most questions to “at this moment, what is a person attempting to acquire?” And then “how reciprocal(moral) or ir-reciprocal(immoral) is his action?”

    EPISTEMOLOGY

    4 – TESTIMONIALISM: humans evolved to negotiate. Negotiate given three options: avoidance, conflict, or cooperation. We did not evolve to speak truthfully, but pragmatically.

    However, we can learn to speak truthfully just as we can learn to read using symbols, write using symbols, grammar, and vocabulary, do arithmetic and mathematics answer logical questions, and write computer software.

    The reason being, that just as there are only so many existential dimensions to the universe (point, line, space, geometry, change (time/space)), there there are only so many actionable dimensions to the universe (categorical, logical, empirical, operational, rational, moral, and scope-completeness).

    Just as we can use different levels of mathematics to test our theories (count, arithmetic, accounting, ratios (‘math’), geometry and trigonometry, calculus, and algebraic geometry), we can we can test each of those actionable dimensions of reality.

    Just as it is very difficult for a statement of constant relations in mathematics to be false if it meets all the necessary dimensional criteria, it is very difficult for a statement of truth in ordinary language to be false if it meets all the necessary dimensions of criteria.

    As such, while it is almost impossible to know if we speak truth proper – meaning, the most informationally parsimonious description possible – we can however warranty we have done all available due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, deception and lies.

    So while it does take some practice to meet these criteria, the only novel dimension is the ‘operational’, which requires a very limited grammar.

    But if we use this grammar it is literally almost impossible to err, just as it is nearly impossible to write a program that will run and not err.

    Just as it is nearly impossible to construct certain proofs and still err.

    To a significant degree it is possible to construct a language, vocabulary, grammar, and syntax of truthful speech: Testimonialism.

    5 – THE COMPETITION BETWEEN VIA-POSITIVA, VIA-NEGATIVA

    5 – VIA-POSITIVA MORAL JUSTIFICATION, VIA POSITIVA LEGAL JUSTIFICATION, AND VIA-NEGATIVA TESTIMONIALISM

    5 – TRANSFORMATION OF APRIORISM TO SCIENTIFIC TERMS

    ETHICS

    5 – NATURAL LAW AND COMMON LAW (incremental suppression): There is only one law of universal morality, and that is the law of reciprocity. It is possible to construct all laws as derivations of this one law of reciprocity, using the vocabulary, grammar, and syntax of testimonial speech, producing strictly constructed original intent and textualism. If all law is written as such it is closed to interpretation on one hand, and false, dishonest, immoral, insufficient, and incomplete laws can be identified and sunset by competitive argument.

    This ends judicial activism and circumvention of the law on one hand, and limits the construction of legislation (contracts of the commons) to that which does not violate reciprocity.

    Conversely, it is possible for judges to discover new applications of the natural law of reciprocity – whether they start from the history of judgements (common law) or they start from pre-calculated judgements (canon law), or a combination of the two (common law of judgements on top of canon law).

    And for this reason, innovations in free riding, parasitism, and predation can be eradicated and added to the legal canon as soon as the first case is adjudicated.

    Moreover, the legislation can be falsified and removed, court findings can be falsified and removed.

    6 – TRUTHFUL SPEECH: Once we can test for due diligence in truthful speech, we can counter-act the media revolution’s industrialization of lying (academy, state, and media-advertising), by extending the demand for warranty of due diligence in products and services to a demand for warranty of due diligence in public speech, and grant universal standing to all citizens in defense of the ‘informational commons’.

    This means that anyone will be able to sue anyone for speech that fails the tests of due diligence. While this will not need to apply to private speech, it means that business, finance, media, academy, and state can no longer use the power of mass communications to lie and deceive the people. (This may sound strange until you have some experience with it, but it works.

    Now, if you have some idea of the difference in mankind caused by the scientific revolution in the physical sciences, you might be able to imagine the vast improvement in our lives by the scientific revolution in the social and information sciences.

    Imagine if no organization could use media to lie to you. Imagine how consumer protections would evolve. Imagine how politicians and professors would have to speak to us.

    We cannot know what is true, but we can know what is false.

    And that is enough.

    SOCIOLOGY

    9 – INTERTEMPORAL DIVISION OF PERCEPTION : Intertemporal Division of Reproductive Perception Knowledge Labor and Advocacy: The difference between the feminine (short term), libertarian (medium term) and conservative (long term) moral biases constitutes an intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy.

    The way we ‘calculate’ what is ‘good’ is through voluntary exchanges: cooperation. So the fact that we have different biases provides necessary and advantageous specializations, and our principal problem then is providing ‘markets’ by which we can cooperate and ‘calculate’ group needs through constant exchanges.

    By choice of individual sovereignty, we limit ourselves to natural law. By the choice of natural law we limit ourselves to markets in everything. By limiting ourselves to markets in everything we produce markets for association, cooperation, mating and reproduction, production commerce and trade, the production of commons (government), and the production of polities (Armies and Territories and Rule).

    10 – CLASSES: Propertarian Class Analysis: there are only three methods of coercion: force, gossip, and remuneration. Masculine force, libertarian trade, and feminine gossip, rallying, and shaming(exclusion from opportunity).

    Instead of one class hierarchy there are three. Societies are dominated by some arrangement of these three methods of coercion (Military and law, finance and commerce, priesthood and public intellectuals). Each fights for power, with the core of the population shifting under who best serves them, while at the same time protecting them from outside competition.

    Within those classes we see genetic, social, and economic classes. Genetic roughly reflecting reproductive desirability. Social roughly reflecting manners, norms, and education, and economic/political reflecting achievements.

    For all intents and purposes, with wide individual variation, physical attractiveness (which yes, is a universal), fitness, IQ, and personality, serve as a rough indicator of class.

    For all intents and purposes, intelligence serves as a personality trait – and perhaps the dominant personality trait.

    For all intents and purposes, personality and physique require exercise in order to produce individual fitness. (This being the primary failure of the 20th century – personality training. )

    POLITICS

    7 – TRANSACTION COST EVOLUTION OF GOVERNMENT

    ( undone )

    8 – MARKET GOVERNMENT. There is no reason for monopoly (majoritarianism) in the production of commons: once all legislation must satisfy the natural law of reciprocity, written testimonially, and therefore truthfully, we can construct trades between the interests (classes), and all ‘legislation’ can ascend as long as it survives the tests of natural law of reciprocity that is constructed testimonially. Likewise we can agree upon norms without imposing norms. So we can ascend agreements without ascending disagreements. As such we can change from monopoly allocation of proceeds of the commons (profits/taxes) to equidistributed allocation of proceeds (everyone votes their share of the pot), or progressive allocation of proceeds (everyone votes their contribution to the pot), and eliminate representatives.

    This makes it extremely difficult to engage in corruption since the possibility of lobbying a politician is eliminated, and the cost of lobbying the population is prohibitive, plus the requirement for truthful speech and strict construction places heavy burdens political proposals.

    Ending monopoly means that people can produce the commons they choose to fund rather than produce those commons that they don’t choose to fund.

    This eliminates the ability of politicians to subvert the population as has been done during the 20th century.

    Meanwhile it makes it almost impossible for groups of citizens to circumvent the natural law.

    9 – DEFINANCIALIZATION: Definancialization of the Financial System. There is no reason we pay interest on consumer loans (and every reason we pay it on business and industrial loans).

    By nationalizing Mastercard, and issuing one every LEGAL AND FULLY INTEGRATED citizen, we can distribute liquidity (increase the oney supply) by direct redistribution to the citizenry (in which case our homes would all be paid for because of the last recession), and consumer loans can be provided directly from the treasury.

    Furthermore, by professionalizing ‘banking’ (basically requiring series 7 for issuing loans via the treasury, and licensing as we do CPA’s), we can eliminate consumer interest, and cut payment periods in half or to one third. Additionally we make universities carry the zero interest loans on behalf of any student, and to obtain payment as a payroll deduction over a period of no more than ten years.

    This combination will mean that after about 15 years, the first time home owner will own his home free and clear, and the universities will no longer be able to offer junk degrees. I won’t go into the various extraordinary (wonderful) other consequences but this will restore the american people’s way of life and destroy the predatory financial, academic, and government sectors.

    There will be no other way to profit than the Silicon Valley (monarchy) model of investment in research, development, and industry.

    Financialism will be destroyed forever.

    10 – A NEW CONSTITUTION: A New Constitution of Natural Law – A constitution of natural law that completes the anglo law tradition and the Jeffersonian/Adams experiment by providing means of constructing and preserving natural law and market government.

    GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY

    11 – RACE: Race and Group differences are attributable almost entirely to the local ability to engage in Neotonic reproduction thereby reducing the depth of physical maturity and effectively preserving youthfulness – and therefore aggression and impulsivity PLUS the ability to cull the lower classes.

    Europeans aggressively culled the lower classes for almost 1000 years, as did the chinese and japanese, both through manorialism and aggressive hanging.

    Between Neotonic reproduction and culling of the underclasses some groups are ‘more evolved’ than others.

    However, this means that almost all groups can ‘domesticate their populations and develop advanced societies if they are able to use policy to reduce underclass rates of reproduction below the replacement level.

    12 – RESERVOIR: Genetic Reservoir: because we can adapt very rapidly by reproductive selection for different environments, different political hierarchies, and different gender traits, humans can adapt to nearly any circumstance within a few generations by modifying little more than status associated with particular traits.

    So our current gene pools provide a deep reservoir of reproductive adaptability.

    THE CYCLE OF WORLD HISTORY: TRUTH VS LIES

    13 – HISTORICAL CONTEXT – HISTORY OF IDEAS: While the scientific re-enlightenemnt (British Empirical Enlightenment) restored much of the greco-roman enlightenment, that due to particular catastrophes that were a product of the european civil war (world wars to contain germany unwisely), the innovations of the calculus (relative change) we saw propagated to other fields in the combination of Darwinian(biology,sociology), Social Science (Spencer, Weber, Pareto, Durkheim) Mengerian (economics), Mathematics (Poincare, Hilbert, Bridgman), and Law( Hayek and the originalist/textualist/stcrict-constructionists) were truncated except for the newly emergent field of computer science ( Boole, Babbage, Turing ), and the physical sciences.

    In other words, just as Abrahamism (zoroastrianism,judaism, christianity, islam) reversed the advances of the ancient world through immigration, writing, and supernatural fictionalism, Abrahamism in the form of Rousseau and the postmodernists in france, kant and the phenomenologists in germany, and the horde of pseudosciences in judaism (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, the Frankfurt School) and the protestant feminists in america, all used the economic and territorial mobility of the underclasses, and the new methods of media (‘counter-art’, advertising, propaganda, print, radio, television, and movies), to reverse the re-enlightenment.

    CLOSING – THE SECRET TO THE WEST

    14 – THE WEST: The secret to western civilization, besides being a small, relatively poor population on the edge of the bronze age, is that by the choice of voluntary militia, military tactics of maneuver requiring contractualism, and heroic sovereignty (ownership of gains), we necessitated natural law, and markets in everything. And as a consequence the west was not first, but in every era we were fastest. In other words, truth, promise(contract), natural law, and jury allow us to adapt faster than every other known method of human cooperation.

    Innovation > Heroism(Risk) > Meritocracy > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Markets in Everything > The Most Rapid Adaptation Possible > The best evolutionary strategy possible.

    15 – PROPERTARIANISM PROVIDES THE RESTORATION : With Propertarianism (a name which may or may not be appropriate), we have restored and completed the re-enlightenment, and come as close as we can to restoring western civilization’s ancient uniqueness – expressed in roman ritual and mythical religion, stoic and epicurean philosophy, scientific technology, and empirical law, and reason for our extraordinary success in the ancient and modern worlds. As well as explained the causes and consequences of the dark ages, and the competing ‘counter-enlightenments’ throughout time, as a competition between truth producing eugenic evolution of the homogenous european west and eastern Han china, and falsehood producing dysgenic devolution of the heterogeneous tribal peoples in between.

    I hope those ideas help you in distilling the program down substantially. THere are another dozen that are important but these are the most significant.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 16:46:00 UTC

  • What would you do? Would you give up your job? Would you give up your company? W

    What would you do?

    Would you give up your job?

    Would you give up your company?

    Would you give up your marriage?

    Would you give up your friends?

    Would you give up your possessions?

    What would you give up for your people?

    How far will you go for your people?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 15:30:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS THE LIMIT OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY??? (important insight) “The Limit of Chri

    WHAT IS THE LIMIT OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY???

    (important insight)

    “The Limit of Christian Charity? Like war and childbirth, charity is not subject to proxy.”

    This was the bit of profound insight I gleaned from my long morning conversation with a committed catholic ‘recruiter’. There is nothing western about christianity. It is a cult that is designed to attack the aristocracy from below. Nothing more.

    It’s just like Marxism and Postmodernism. The difference is that christianity works through building trust and extending kinship love using supernatural excuses, and marxism works by economic jealousy and pseudoscience, and postmodernism by identity (genetic) jealousy and lying.

    So christianity operates by doing material good under false pretenses of afterlife subsistence salvation;

    Marxism operates by doing substantive damage under pseudoscientific pretenses of future economic and class salvation.

    Postmodernism operates by doing substantive damage to norms under false pretenses of future economic, class, and genetic status salvation.

    Here is the truth tho: You are just virtue signaling if you proxy your charity. You are just virtue signaling if you help the immigrant rather than the old couple across the street. You are just virtue signaling if you devote the income of others to charities or redistribution. You cannot, as a proxy, determine the morality of an individual. Therefore, we might say that all of us might redistribute some portion of our dividends (pool of taxes) to deserving individuals. But if you work through a proxy you are just depriving those individuals of the full merit of your contributions.

    And virtue signaling is just another form of fraud.

    So, charity, like war, like childbirth, is not open to substitution or redistribution. You must do it yourself or you are a fraud. In other words, there exists no such option as political charity.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 14:36:00 UTC