Source: Facebook

  • ( Interesting feed. 😉 )

    ( Interesting feed. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 12:48:00 UTC

  • (Why do the women in my life take such joy in making me feel stupid about the ma

    (Why do the women in my life take such joy in making me feel stupid about the many obvious little things I am stupid about?)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 12:47:00 UTC

  • DRIVEN BY GENES, ELEPHANT OR RIDER? False assumption. Neither a top down or bott

    DRIVEN BY GENES, ELEPHANT OR RIDER?

    False assumption.

    Neither a top down or bottom up hierarchy.

    Instead the competition between impulses, intuition(searching), and reasoning (comparing), creates a MARKET for SUCCESS that is gradually captured by genes (impulses), intuition(memory), and reason(expertise).

    Intertemporal division of cognitive labor.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 12:27:00 UTC

  • Last one

    Last one.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 11:21:00 UTC

  • This and one more. Touches on some things, evolutionary

    This and one more. Touches on some things, evolutionary.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 11:21:00 UTC

  • “How do you feel about urban settings/big cities?”— I don’t care either way. I

    —“How do you feel about urban settings/big cities?”—

    I don’t care either way. I care about being around people. I suppose for me it is just noise level. I prefer medium cities with low noise levels. Tourist areas are best. Lots of trucks, busses, and trains just make me tired, whereas a lot of people chatting and walking is pleasant.

    I loved downtown L’viv becuase the roads are nearly impossible for trucks (or cars) and everyone walks, and it’s not too loud.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 10:32:00 UTC

  • WOMEN AND REPRODUCTION It’s just data. In middle occupations, because women are

    WOMEN AND REPRODUCTION

    It’s just data.

    In middle occupations, because women are more adaptable to changes in social circumstances (even if men are more adaptable to changes in technical and military circumstances), and given that as in any distribution, only a small number of women are genetically ‘worthy’ of reproduction (as are men), the economic value of women is higher than their reproductive value.

    A woman can only birth so many children, and is only willing to undergo the physical costs of it. And can only bear the effort of raising so many children unless spaced enough apart that they raise those younger than them (which appears to be the best education possible). This means the most able women are least incentivized to reproduce and the least able women are most incentivized to reproduce.

    This means that women are of more value in productivity than they are in maintaining replacement birth rates.

    Women are the weak link in the chain of reproduction. They choose poorly. Their in-utero variation creates defects. They overinvest in underperformance. And they reproduce dysgenically.

    If our choices are to coerce them back in the home, or to alleviate the burden of reproduction for the best, then it seems that if the technological solution is possible it is desirable. Although, I cannot see it being more ‘inexpensive’ than the traditional method, even if produced at consumer scale.

    I mean, If I could raise six sons without a woman… imagine what that would look like? I mean, men would signal by breeding their own clans….. Modernity is not good for men. And breeding a clan and obviating the need for women except as entertainment is interesting.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 10:28:00 UTC

  • THE FUTURE OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN ASIANS —“Ask one question what would be the

    THE FUTURE OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN ASIANS

    —“Ask one question what would be the future of central Asian and south asians?”— Waqas Ahmad

    I would say it is neither the east’s or the west’s responsibility to domesticate the desert, steppe and tundra peoples. That our attempts have been a tragic failure.

    Our attempts at colonization only succeeded in places where we engaged in extermination. Everywhere we have tried to modernize the desert, steppe, and tundra people has failed.

    That the desert steppe and tundra people have been disastrous for eastern, western, and subsaharan civilizations.

    That our attempts to modernize the southeast asians might have been successful if not for the superior success of islam with the underclasses (low iq peoples).

    That the semitic(arab) peoples (low iq peoples) have destroyed and consumed the north african(indo-iranian), greek (iranian-anatolian-european), anatolian (indo-iranian), persian (indo-iranian), indus (dravidian-indo-iranian) civilizations, and the mongols and turks have destroyed the kievan rus, russian, south-slavic civilizations.

    And that china’s (successful) strategy of walling off, and the roman (failed) strategy of walling off, and internalizing (Autarkic economy) was the right one for both.

    So I think it is not possible to Rule, to Domesticate peoples who have not been forced to go thru their own agrarian phase. And the best strategy for our self defense is to literally ‘wall them off’ so they can do us no more harm.

    “White Man’s Burden” was a failure. The chinese were right. We were wrong. The only way to expand into genetically inferior (low Iq) territories is extermination. Since extermination is no longer in our ethical limits, the only alternative is ‘walling them off’.

    (India is not just a people or country but a continent. but like south america, the number of ‘capable’ and moral is dwarfed by the number of the not. Without birth control or plague india has a long road. But can survive.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 10:06:00 UTC

  • WORLD NEOTONIC SELECTION RESULTS Some white women are better than all other woma

    WORLD NEOTONIC SELECTION RESULTS

    Some white women are better than all other woman. Many east asian women are better than all the remaining women. Some (white) indian women are better than all the remaining women. After that it’s a random distribution. The problem is that the undomesticated peoples have too little neotonic selection. White people have probably peaked with a balance tilting male. Slavic have peaked with a balance tilting female. And the east asians have passed the peak and taken it too far so that not enough ‘male’ remains. This is slightly beneficial for their women and punitive for their men. Unfortunately, while men favor selection for neoteny, women do NOT. And women’s selection preference is regressive (recidivist).


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 09:41:00 UTC

  • TRANSHUMANISM I have no idea what that means, but if you mean ‘increasing rates

    TRANSHUMANISM

    I have no idea what that means, but if you mean ‘increasing rates of reproduction of demonstrably superior genetic expressions, and decreasing rates of reproduction of demonstrably inferior genetic expressions’ then I understand that.

    If you mean hubristic attempts to create superior genetic combinations rather than remove failed genetic combinations I think you’re either an idiot or dangerous or both.

    If in addition you mean device-augmentation on the lines of wearing glasses and earplugs that overlay reality and dramatically increase our information availability, or suits that augment our physical abilities, then I understand that.

    If you mean dependency-adaptation to permanent mechanical augmentation then I think you’re both mentally disturbed and dangerous.

    If you mean incrementally adding (a) superior lactose processing, (b) longer telomeres, (c) heart and lung capacity, (d) increasing white matter capacity, (e) immune and inflammatory system correction and such, even if it means experimenting on human genomes with pruned brains, then I think that is ok.

    ‘Wet’ systems are superior to ‘Dry’ systems. Humans are incredibly energy efficient creatures given their size, speed, adaptability, and processing power. I can see the value of both purely wet and purely dry systems. But it is very hard to imagine that the consequences are not terrible if we do not seek self replication of wet systems in planetary and dry systems in interplanetary systems, and if we avoid at all costs the interdependence of the two. Life goes on. making it more fragile is not helping it.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 09:35:00 UTC