Source: Facebook

  • “ITS YOUR BODY BUT THIS IS MY POLITY Just as women say ‘it’s my body’ men need t

    “ITS YOUR BODY BUT THIS IS MY POLITY

    Just as women say ‘it’s my body’ men need to say ‘it’s my polity’. Because that’s the end of the story right there. Reproductively, that’s the story in a nutshell.

    So men make women a deal: it’s your body, and children are yours, only as long politics and war are ours. Because it is that compromise (trade) that makes possible the differences in our reproductive strategies. The alternative is that it’s not your body and it’s still our polity. Because in the end, only men choose.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-08 10:10:00 UTC

  • WOMEN NEED TO PUT THEIR CARTAKING SOMEWHERE (CHILDREN) OR EVERYWHERE ELSE THEY P

    WOMEN NEED TO PUT THEIR CARTAKING SOMEWHERE (CHILDREN) OR EVERYWHERE ELSE THEY PUT IT CREATES BADNESS

    This should be obvious. But depression in women is directly proportional to gender equality. Poor women working together with children are always happier and less depressed than professional women without children.

    Men have heroism and the dominance hierarchy to direct our violence and competitiveness to hunting, craftsmanship, business, politics and war.

    Women have only children. And when that caretaking is put to political ends it destroys meritocracy and creates dysgenia at no cost to the women who cause it.

    Just as women say ‘it’s my body’ men need to say ‘it’s my polity’. Because that’s the end of the story right there. Reproductively, that’s the story in a nutshell.

    —“Similar results are found in studies of personal values, including values related to altruism and love. In a study of 127 samples in 70 countries (N = 77,528; Schwartz & Rubel-Lifschitz, 2009) women attribute consistently more importance than men do to benevolence and universalism values. National measures of gender egalitarianism predicted sex differences in benevolence and universalism values but, once again, in an unexpected direction. The greater the social, health, and employment equality of women and men in a country…the larger the sex differences (women higher) in benevolence and universalism values. That is, in countries with greater gender equity (e.g., Finland, Sweden), women attribute substantially more importance to benevolence and universalism values than men do. In more patriarchal cultures, sex differences in benevolence and universalism and much smaller. The authors of the values study speculate that increased independence and equality of women in the labor force may encourage women to express their “inherent” values rather than to accommodate their values to those of their husbands. Maybe.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-08 10:08:00 UTC

  • “People from around the world tend to believe in the same values until ideologie

    –“People from around the world tend to believe in the same values until ideologies or religion starts pitting people against each other.”— A Friend

    That’s not true. It’s that they have the same interpersonal values, but very different social values, and extremely different political values, and entirely incompatible civilizational values.

    —“It’s exceedingly difficult for women (or men with feminine biases) to understand this, because, by necessity, they perceive political and civilizational values as an extension of the interpersonal”— Daniel Gurpide


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-08 08:25:00 UTC

  • IS THERE A MARKET FOR PROPERTARIAN PROMO GOODS? —“Hey Curt random question I w

    IS THERE A MARKET FOR PROPERTARIAN PROMO GOODS?

    —“Hey Curt random question I was thinking about, have you ever thought about promoting propertarianism and/or the propertarian institute with tee shirts with a distinct symbol on said shirt with the website on the back? I’d buy one for sure lol maybe hats too.”— A Friend.

    I wanna hat, a patch for my backpack, and a coffee cup. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-07 20:44:00 UTC

  • I think I am going to do a quick video or audio or live chat tomorrow on Operati

    I think I am going to do a quick video or audio or live chat tomorrow on Operational Language. Maybe 5-10 minutes. Because I have had all of this in my head, and now that I’m trying to produce a course on it, I understand what *everyone* (not just you who follow me) have been getting ‘wrong’ with the operational revolution, and why it stalled. Its not all that complicated. But you know how anything expressible in mathematics can be expressed in ordinary language and vise-versa? But we use the symbols for purposes of brevity? Well the same is true in language. We can express in ordinary abbreviated language or in fully expanded language. And we can infer (variables) in ordinary and mathematical langauge. But by fully expanding ordinary language we can identify the variables ( inferences ). etc.

    So it’s not like I”m asking people to write in fully operational grammar. It’s that by practicing fully operational grammar you eventually won’t need to practice it any longer.

    It’s more that we need to be able to fully expand a simple sentence into operational grammar. And if we can’t do so then it can’t be ‘true’.

    So the reason to understand it is to test yourself, test others, and to write and test law. It’s not so that we actually use the stuff.

    Sort of like diagramming sentences.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-07 20:35:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.asiteaboutnothing.net/w_eprime.html


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-07 20:06:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.nobeliefs.com/eprime.htm

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-07 20:06:00 UTC

  • The Trivium (Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric) was developed to educate children. The Gr

    The Trivium (Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric) was developed to educate children.

    The Grammar Stage 1-4, the logic stage 5-8, and the rhetoric stage 9-12.

    How do we produce the same effect (Quickly) in adults?

    That’s what Propertarianism does. Or rather, learning to write operationally, testimonially, with propertarian ethics does. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-07 20:01:00 UTC

  • THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GRAMMAR AND MEANING The ball is red. (“God language”) I p

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GRAMMAR AND MEANING

    The ball is red. (“God language”)

    I prefer red. (opinion)

    I see a red ball. (statement)

    I promise I see a red ball. (promise)

    I sear that I see a red ball, and if you observe the same object you will agree that you also see a red ball. ( testimony)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-07 19:26:00 UTC

  • “Each year teachers race to cover more material faster, and the goal of intellec

    —“Each year teachers race to cover more material faster, and the goal of intellectual pursuit is forced to compete with Trivial Pursuit.”— Lynn Erickson


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-07 18:52:00 UTC