Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE ONLY CULT YOU NEED OR WANT IS THE OATH OF THE INITIATIC BROTHERHOOD OF WARRI

    THE ONLY CULT YOU NEED OR WANT IS THE OATH OF THE INITIATIC BROTHERHOOD OF WARRIORS

    Men.

    Your only western ‘cult’ is the oath of the militia: the brotherhood of warriors. This cult depends upon reciprocity. And reciprocity upon truth, trust, sovereignty, contract(oath).

    If you don’t understand what I am doing, it is this: I am denying you the comforting lies that you, your family, your kin, your nation, your race can survive under any other cult. That there is any means of survival and transcendence of you, your people, and your cult other than the cult of the militia.

    This cult is not a fantasy. Not an ideal. Not a utopia. You must make oaths to real men, with real flaws, and choose leaders from real men with real flaws. You must hold to your oath despite the flaws of real men, and follow orders from the flawed men who we choose as our leaders. You must take real risks. Develop real skills. Perform real work. Fight real wars. Transform real nature.

    All other cults in this world were developed to defeat your cult of warriors from without and within. From enemies, from our underclasses, from our women. Every single one. Organized religion was born to oppose us. To defeat us. And to exterminate us.

    And if you have invested in one of those cults that evolved for the single purpose of your defeat, it is my purpose to cleanse you of it. To cure you of the infection that you chose, or you inherited, or that was imposed upon you.

    We are all imperfect. We are all flawed. We are all unequal. We all must compromise. We all must face and overcome our weaknesses. But through our oath to one another we grant one another reciprocal insurance of sovereignty, and insure that sovereignty by through, word, and deed.

    Now we may invoke the honor of our own, of our fathers, of our ancestors, of a common hero, or that embodiment of our heroes across the ages in fictional gods. But this tells us nothing but the age of our oath, and the number and time scale of those who we give our oath to – living or dead.

    Everything uniquely good in the Western man and his civilization was present three thousand five hundred years ago. Every advancement of the west was made under that oath. Every discovery, innovation, advancement the consequence of that oath – and nothing more.

    We are men. We are the gods-in-making. And we alone have found the means of transcendence from beast, to man, to god: Truth, Oath, Sovereignty, and the extension of kinship love to our brothers in arms. And together, against the forces of man, woman, beast, and nature, we fight a war of transcendence. And the honor of having made our contribution to doing so.

    So, brothers, will we take up our arms, and save ourselves, our families, our kin, our tribes, our nations, and the transcendence of man from the Third Conquest of the West, or will we fall victim to the cults that have been the source of each dark age, each conquest, each gradual reduction of our realm?

    Any man who will fight with me shall be my brother.

    And as brothers we will restore our lands, restore our people, restore our civilization, and return to the transcendence of man, and the fulfillment of our chosen destiny as as gods.

    There is no higher purpose available to man. Available to our people, your kin, your family, nor available to you.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 10:18:00 UTC

  • WE DON”T NEED EVERYONE —“We’ll be fine as long as a few men don’t fall prey to

    WE DON”T NEED EVERYONE

    —“We’ll be fine as long as a few men don’t fall prey to their stupidity. Or maybe God pits our stupidity against one another in order to concoct His masterpiece.”— Megan K. Usui

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 10:02:00 UTC

  • “New Testament is all about miserabilism. Old Testament (Judaism) is something e

    –“New Testament is all about miserabilism. Old Testament (Judaism) is something else.”– Daniel Gurpide

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 09:40:00 UTC

  • THE REAL POLITICAL INNOVATION OF CHRISTIANITY by Daniel Gurpide I think that the

    THE REAL POLITICAL INNOVATION OF CHRISTIANITY

    by Daniel Gurpide

    I think that the real political innovation of Christianity, as opposed to Judaism, was the invention of Communism (private property is theft and commerce, its instrument), unifying three groups of people -who had been dispersed till then- by promising that the last shall be the first- 1/the idiots (“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven”)+ 2/ the poor (“blessed are those who hunger and thirst…”) + 3/the criminal (“blessed are those who are persecuted…”) and offering them a charismatic leadership (the Messiah who will bring the Kingdom of Heaven).

    This formula has been re-enacted since then whenever there has been prosperity to be coveted (Roman Empire, Renaissance, Industrial Revolution) and a powerful instrument to transmit the message has been literature: imagine the damage done by the novels of Charles Dickens or Victor Hugo. Les Misérables has been one of the biggest successes of popular culture, its author became rich by inventing a story based on falsehood, exaggeration, distortion, and sentimentalism.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 09:32:00 UTC

  • It’s because Island 120 can master testimonialism and teach it, but cannot be tr

    It’s because Island 120 can master testimonialism and teach it, but cannot be trusted with literary interpretation. That’s why. That’s why. You can’t manufacture 150s in large numbers.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 02:30:00 UTC

  • “Have the Jordan Peterson followers realized their tribalism is turning into/has

    —“Have the Jordan Peterson followers realized their tribalism is turning into/has turned into a cult yet?”—

    I am pretty sure that Peterson has restated Stoicism(self authoring), using cognitive science, and combined it with literary analysis as allegory to cognitive science, and produced a contender for a secular synthesis and restatement of the religions of our pagan, christian, and secular ages.

    So it is possible that he’s founding a Reformation – and possibly the reformation people arguably want. And a reformation we need very much, because Marxism-Postmodernism was a false and pseudoscientific religion. And to some degree I see him as attempting to provide a scientific religion in opposition to the pseudoscientific religion of marxism-postmodernism.

    I’m about the same age, and I work on the inverse of Peterson’s work – epistemology, testimony, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy. So where he tries to provide tools of meaning to teach, I try to find tools of decidability to judge.

    But I’ve come to very similar conclusions. And it is fairly hard to possess a general knowledge of the state of cognitive science, the history of evolutionary biology and psychology, the history of cooperation(economics), the history of conflict (law), and to come to very different conclusions.

    So you can frame his work as education. And maybe a cult. But if you want to frame peterson’s work as a self-help cult, well, you wouldn’t be the first person to say such a thing. But then, that is the purpose of literature, myth, and religion.

    I agree with him deeply on most subjects, but the difference is that in the choice between teaching mental discipline and teaching mental coping mechanisms, I place greater emphasis on the former and he the latter. Which is what you would expect from a Paternally biased Judge (me), and Maternally biased Teacher (him).

    Given that we can teach by science(theoretical first causes), history(evidence of our behavior), literature(temporal analogy), myth(eternal analogy) and never claim more than analogy, my frustration is that I don’t agree that the Abrahamic cults (judaism, christianity, islam, marxism-postmodernism) that move beyond analogy to the utopian, the ideal and the supernatural, are necessary or beneficial.

    I find the abrahamic religions as among the worst evils in human history, and that life prior to them, and that history tells us that life in their absence both in the far east, and in our ancient world, and in our modern world leave us little choice but to deeply question why the utopian, ideal, and supernatural produce anything except the psychological equivalent of drug addiction and addiction behavior.

    So that is the ‘debate’ I think we should have. Not whether Peterson is stumbling upon a restoration, or a reformation, but whether he will improve the modern version of abrahamic cults (marxism-postmodernism), or whether he will simply perpetuate it, such that it returns in an even more virulent form.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 02:22:00 UTC

  • “Have the Jordan Peterson followers realized their tribalism is turning into/has

    —“Have the Jordan Peterson followers realized their tribalism is turning into/has turned into a cult yet?”—

    I am pretty sure that Peterson has restated Stoicism(self authoring), using cognitive science, and combined it with literary analysis as allegory to cognitive science, and produced a contender for a secular synthesis and restatement of the religions of our pagan, christian, and secular ages.

    So it is possible that he’s founding a Reformation – and possibly the reformation people arguably want. And a reformation we need very much, because Marxism-Postmodernism was a false and pseudoscientific religion. And to some degree I see him as attempting to provide a scientific religion in opposition to the pseudoscientific religion of marxism-postmodernism.

    I’m about the same age, and I work on the inverse of Peterson’s work – epistemology, testimony, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy. So where he tries to provide tools of meaning to teach, I try to find tools of decidability to judge.

    But I’ve come to very similar conclusions. And it is fairly hard to possess a general knowledge of the state of cognitive science, the history of evolutionary biology and psychology, the history of cooperation(economics), the history of conflict (law), and to come to very different conclusions.

    So you can frame his work as education. And maybe a cult. But if you want to frame peterson’s work as a self-help cult, well, you wouldn’t be the first person to say such a thing. But then, that is the purpose of literature, myth, and religion.

    I agree with him deeply on most subjects, but the difference is that in the choice between teaching mental discipline and teaching mental coping mechanisms, I place greater emphasis on the former and he the latter. Which is what you would expect from a Paternally biased Judge (me), and Maternally biased Teacher (him).

    Given that we can teach by science(theoretical first causes), history(evidence of our behavior), literature(temporal analogy), myth(eternal analogy) and never claim more than analogy, my frustration is that I don’t agree that the Abrahamic cults (judaism, christianity, islam, marxism-postmodernism) that move beyond analogy to the utopian, the ideal and the supernatural, are necessary or beneficial.

    I find the abrahamic religions as among the worst evils in human history, and that life prior to them, and that history tells us that life in their absence both in the far east, and in our ancient world, and in our modern world leave us little choice but to deeply question why the utopian, ideal, and supernatural produce anything except the psychological equivalent of drug addiction and addiction behavior.

    So that is the ‘debate’ I think we should have. Not whether Peterson is stumbling upon a restoration, or a reformation, but whether he will improve the modern version of abrahamic cults (marxism-postmodernism), or whether he will simply perpetuate it, such that it returns in an even more virulent form.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-15 02:21:00 UTC

  • I am trying to force you to articulate a set of causal relations upon which your

    I am trying to force you to articulate a set of causal relations upon which your definitions rest as premises, and you are simply evading them.

    EXISTENCE: persistent(real and noun), demonstrated(real and verb ) potential(possible knowledge demonstrated by action), ideal(meaningful but not real), supernatural(meaningful, not real, and false.).

    What I have demonstrated is that :

    1) Rights do not exist without others to appeal to in order to enforce them. We may want or need certain rights as potentially existential. But they only exist and you can only ‘have’ them once they are brought to potential through cooperation with others.

    2) That one can physically invest in something (demonstrate an interest). One can possess something. But no concept of ‘property’ can exist without others to exchange recognition of ownership with us. One possesses something by physical control over it. One owns something when others insure it – even if by only one to one reciprocity. One possesses property only when the institution exists. One possesses property rights only when one can exercise them in a court.

    3) The scope of possession is determined by your ability to defend it.

    The scope of property is determined by the market. Whether that be one other or a whole empire. The minimum scope of property necessary for an anarchic polity is determined by the demand for authority (the state), the market for members, the market for polities – including survival against competitors.

    Now you may not realize this is an argument that the half truths of non aggression and private property and argumentation cannot survive, but that does not change the fact that they cannot survive this argument.

    Thus endeth the lesson.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-14 20:58:00 UTC

  • by Simon Ström Consider this authorative copypasta. (@Simon pls provide author)

    by Simon Ström

    Consider this authorative copypasta. (@Simon pls provide author)

    Europeans are a mix of Neolithic farmers coming in from the south, and the autochthonous Mesolithic foragers. Toward the end of the Neolithic the predominant genotype of Western Europe, extending homogeneously from Iberia to the TRB/Funnelbeaker culture in Germany, Poland and Scandinavia, was very similar to modern Basques; a mixture of what genetic literature calls Early European Farmers (EEF) and Western European Hunter-Gatherers (WHG). Notably, there was a pocket of pure WHG persistence throughout the Neolithic in the East Baltic region, which pulls Balts and Finns slightly away from their neighbors genetically today, toward the WHG. In most of Eastern Europe however, the so-called Steppe (or Yamnaya) genotype was predominant; also a mixture of northern hunter-gatherers and agriculturalists to their south, although both of these northern and southern components were more eastern shifted than their western counterparts, sharing significant affinity with Upper Paleolithic foragers from Siberia; the Ancient North Eurasians (ANE).

    When the Proto-Indo-Europeans of the Yamnaya culture (/the geographically and temporally adjacent kindred of Yamnaya) had not only domesticated the horse, but also invented the world’s first viable wheeled vehicles, they expanded rapidly across the Eurasian steppe and spread the Anatolian language family (Hittite etc.) through the Balkans and eventually across the Bosphorus; and the Proto-Tocharian language family to the east of the PIE homeland (most likely represented by the Afanasevo culture).

    All other known Indo-European languages, both living and extinct, including languages such as Latin, Greek, Sanskrit and Old Norse, share more features with each other than with the two previously mentioned branches and derive from ‘Late Proto-Indo-European’, spoken in the area of the Corded Ware phenomenon as a Western portion of Yamnaya (/Sredny Stog culture) ran over and mixed with the Late Neolithic farmers of the TRB culture (“Basques”), producing the modern North European genotype, which has not changed considerably since the Early Bronze Age. Although the area of Ukraine and south-central Russia was the Proto-Indo-European urheimat, the bifurcation hotspot (core area) of Indo-European language families shifted to the North European plain during its late phase, and the original dispersal of all currently living Indo-European languages were, therefore, profoundly implicated in the formation of the present-day North European genotype, roughly ~3,000 BC.

    No population has a better claim to the Aryan label than Europeans, and especially North Europeans, whose western (“Basque”) ancestral component lives on in modern Iberia while the eastern component (“Yamnaya”, Proto-Indo-European) went extinct during the mid-Bronze Age expansion of the Proto-Indo-Iranians from Eastern Europe to Central Asia.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-14 18:40:00 UTC

  • 1) identity tests categories. 2) logic tests internal consistency. 3) action tes

    1) identity tests categories.

    2) logic tests internal consistency.

    3) action tests correspondence. (empirical, operational)

    4) rational action tests incentives.

    5) reciprocity tests morality.

    6) Narrative analogy to perception describes reality (coherence)

    Reality is explained by narrative, and the narrative survives falsification by identity, logic, action, reason, reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-14 17:48:00 UTC