Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 17:55:00 UTC

  • by Daniel Gurpide A particular animating force, the Jewish-Christian spirit, has

    by Daniel Gurpide

    A particular animating force, the Jewish-Christian spirit, has been travelling and ever moulding the outlook, the discourse, and values that today inform Western consciousness. The defining character of this spirit is egalitarianism. It has expressed an egalitarian will, an egalitarian mentality – instinctive at the beginning, but increasingly conscious of itself until, in our own times, it has become fully aware of its aspirations and final goals.

    Western civilisation is condemned because the egalitarian utopia that has inspired it for the last two thousand years is in contradiction with the demands of modern society. Enthralled by this utopia, European man can no longer assume control of the world’s destiny, or be creator of a new future.

    Ashamed of a past which over time has given it undisputed superiority, the egalitarian West now wants the ‘end of history. ‘ It desires a return to the static stage of mammalian happiness: to an Edenic pre-human past.

    Egalitarianism has passed through different phases: mythical, ideological, and synthetic. It entered history (Phase One) in the garments of the Christian myth – “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus’ (Galatians 3:28) – and, as with any other myth, without explaining itself in either its discourse or in its actions, sensing its internal dialectics still as unity and harmony.

    Then (Phase Two) the ‘contradictions’ began to be felt and rationalised: first on a religious level, when the theologies of the Reformation and Counter- Reformation became ‘ideologies’ and the dialectical contraries took social and political shape – becoming ‘parties’. In this second phase, egalitarian consciousness becomes deeper, re-conceiving the idea of ‘equality’ of souls before God’ as ‘equality of men as citizens before their institutions ‘. This has come to be called ‘the revolutionary era’, since its manifestations were sometimes, though not always, violent. Liberalism – in its Anglo-Saxon and French modalities – started here.

    Goethe was wont to say that ideas, taken to their ultimate consequences, become absurd. Egalitarianism was indeed pursued to its ultimate consequences: the aspiration and will of attaining ‘equality of men before Nature itself’. This Third Phase may be characterised as ‘theoretical’ since it claimed to merge – ‘rationally’ and ‘ecumenically’ in a superior synthesis – the ideologies that derived from the myth. It started in an embryonic manner with Hegelianism; then came a first political- manifestation: Marxism.

    In the synthetic phase in which we currently find ourselves, the dialectics of egalitarianism are felt as an obstacle to achieving a global ecumene. Hence the constant presence of terms like ‘internationalism,’ ‘cosmopolitism,’ and ‘multiculturalism’ – and the establishment of ‘political correctness ‘ as the only legitimate discourse.

    With hindsight, Marxism-Leninism may be considered a ‘deviation’ from the main current of the egalitarian tendency, since it tried to ‘force’ or ‘anticipate’ the natural evolution of egalitarianism towards a final synthesis. It was not until the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, and the peaceful ending of the Cold War – when Communism became reabsorbed into the common egalitarian matrix (partly because the objectives pursued by Marxism in the Eastern bloc had already been attained in the West) that the final and true ‘recovered unity’ of the egalitarian tendency took shape.

    Its consecration may be observed today in the unanimous acceptance of the doctrine of human rights and its expansion through liberal-capitalistic or socialist-Third Worldist globalisation – a project of planetary homogenisation which seeks to progress till the conclusive exit of humankind from history.

    Christianity and its secular derivatives – the liberal, socialist, communist, or anarcho-communist ideologies – are successive manifestations of the same egalitarian principle. They appeared in sequence historically, but they remain present in one way or another – all of them tending with different degrees of awareness – to the same end. All of them contribute to the spiritual and material decadence of Europe, to the progressive degradation of European man,and the disaggregation of Western societies. This has given rise to the more or less conscious nihilism that today permeates our culture, and the creation of a gigantic ‘mass of slaves’ alienated and devoid of any purpose.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 17:50:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 16:03:00 UTC

  • BIOLOGY OF DOMESTICATION via Matej Lovrić

    http://www.genetics.org/content/197/3/795.longTHE BIOLOGY OF DOMESTICATION

    via Matej Lovrić


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 15:35:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.genetics.org/content/197/3/795.long


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 15:28:00 UTC

  • HUMAN PERSONALITY IS EXTENSION OF THE THE PREY DRIVE (attn: Jordan Peterson foll

    HUMAN PERSONALITY IS EXTENSION OF THE THE PREY DRIVE

    (attn: Jordan Peterson followers)

    I’ve been working this for bit and while I have a lot more, this is the basic idea and I wanted to get it out there.

    The point being that of the five(six) biological personality systems, they appear to be external consequences of each phase of the Prey Drive.

    This puts our biochemistry and personality into the framework that is missing. It explains why we have those particular personality traits, and all that derives from them.

    1) SEARCH (Self): Rest

    2) STRESS: Need for Stability:

    Stress triggers your automatic nervous system, or fight-or-flight response. A period of arousal is followed by a return to normalcy and calm. Individuals with higher N scores have a shorter trigger and can’t take a lot of stress before feeling it. People with lower N scores are able to take abundant amounts of stress before feeling it.

    3) SEARCH: (Thing) Originality:

    Novelty is the trigger. Dopamine is widely considered the “creativity” chemical, with levels of dopamine and dopamine receptors related to one’s ability to hold visual images in the mind. Your O score represents the point at which you have used up your available dopamine in your pursuit of novelty and your system says “no more novelty or complexity. Take me back to the simple and familiar, the tried and true.”

    4) SEARCH: (Other) Extraversion:

    Sensation, or the five senses, is the trigger. Your E score is an estimate of the point when your motoric nervous system is aroused, becomes saturated with sensation and craves relief. Extraversion is traditionally associated with sociability because other people are the most common source of stimulation. People with higher E scores can take more sensation before becoming saturated.

    5) “STALK” – Consolidation:

    Distractions are the trigger. The arousal system supporting C behaviors is the attentional focus system, greatly impacted by levels of testosterone. High levels of testosterone are associated with a greater capacity for sustained, repetitive, goal-focused behavior. Distractions trigger the attentional system, causing loss of focus.Your C score is an estimate of the point when you finally say, “That’s enough focusing for now. Time for a break.”

    6) “KILL”/DOMINANCE/ – CHASE/RETREAT- DEFEND/SUBMISSION:

    Dominance vs Submission Excitement vs Calm Oppy vs Loss

    Accommodation:

    The trigger is dominance. The arousal system consists of sex hormones (such as testosterone and estrogen) and serotonin, the neurotransmitter involved in sleep, depression and memory. For people with a relative abundance of male hormones and a relative deficit of female hormones, defiance is the norm. Someone with an opposite balance of hormones would normally be submissive. Your A score is an estimate of the point when you tire of being defiant and turn submissive.

    7) TRANSITION: SUCCESS vs FAILURE (Self)

    Dominance reward vs submission reward

    8) EAT, SHARE, NURSE (other),RETURN TO REST(1),

    There you go.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 14:27:00 UTC

  • MARTIAL SOVEREIGNTY VS BURGHER LIBERTY Basic law of Sovereignty vs Liberty. You

    MARTIAL SOVEREIGNTY VS BURGHER LIBERTY

    Basic law of Sovereignty vs Liberty.

    You exercise your will, you don’t ask permission.

    You attack and cause your opponent to defend, you don’t request that he fence you.

    You question why your opponent is fit to live, rather than assume he has any value.

    You seek reason not to kill or enslave, not whether he wishes to cooperate or not.

    Why? Because the only answer to these questions is that PERFECT cooperation (productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange) is the only condition more beneficial than that predation.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 13:58:00 UTC

  • FWIW: I really appreciate it when you ‘save me’ from ‘yet another idiot’. So tha

    FWIW: I really appreciate it when you ‘save me’ from ‘yet another idiot’. So thank you to all of those who do.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 13:40:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY? A thing must be defined by what it is not, just as much as w

    WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY?

    A thing must be defined by what it is not, just as much as what it is, or we find people using a vague similarity as a means of either cherry picking from similar things or claiming the persuasive ability of truth content that is not present.

    As far as I know:

    There is a great difference between:

    – the true, the good, the preferable, the useful, the possible, and the not possible.

    1) Science(Truth) = the search for decidability independent of domain, individual, or group.

    2) Philosophy(Goodness) = search for decidability within a domain within a group regardless of whether it is true.

    3) Ideology(Preference) = search for allies in pursuit of a preference within a group, regardless of whether it is good or true.

    4) Technique(Utility) = the search for utility and possibility, regardless of self, or others, and regardless of preference, goodness, or truth.

    And I think it is very hard for other definitions to survive this test.

    In fact, I think it is very hard to claim other definitions are other than something between a deception and a fallacy.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 12:24:00 UTC

  • DISPLACEMENT AND EXTERMINATION DURING YAMNA EXPANSION by Alexander Zavialov Ther

    DISPLACEMENT AND EXTERMINATION DURING YAMNA EXPANSION

    by Alexander Zavialov

    There are no official numbers regarding displacement/extermination in Central Europe (yet), but I think it’s safe to say that the vast majority of all male EEF in the Corded Ware cultural region were displaced or exterminated.

    The reasoning behind this is that R1a and R1b are so utterly dominant in that region frequency-wise that the EEF Y-lineages barely exist there anymore. This means that even if the male EEF in that region weren’t displaced or exterminated, they were at least not able to pass on their genes anymore. Otherwise, we would’ve seen a lot more people with J, G2a and E1b1b1a etc.

    As for admixture, the general consensus for now is that North Europeans were approximately 75% Yamnaya (with the rest being EEF-derived admixture) up until 3000 years ago or so, and then it dropped to 50-60% on average across all of North Europe.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-18 11:45:00 UTC