Source: Facebook

  • All avoidance of innovation comes at the expense of the consequences of innovati

    All avoidance of innovation comes at the expense of the consequences of innovation, and all innovations come at the expense of alternative innovations.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 10:41:00 UTC

  • “Suffering from an injury does not cure the cause of the injury. It really is a

    —“Suffering from an injury does not cure the cause of the injury. It really is a perverse thought pattern we have inherited from Judeo-Christianity. They really have inverted the perception of reality, such that a victim’s pain, after the fact, somehow indicts and defeats the victor.”– Russell Moore

    Or stated differently, the only reason victimhood succeeds is in forming a resistance movement that raises the cost of administration by middle class commercial empires. That does not prevent the Chinese from conquering and ruling their buddhist neighbors. It allowed Muslims to destroy their tolerant neighbors. And allowed Christians to destroy the Roman Empire.

    Tolerance is a very, very, very, bad strategy. It is very clearly a *failed* strategy. And as far as I know, it is women who have advanced this strategy out of intuition not reason or evidence


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 10:18:00 UTC

  • ON CONSPIRACY THEORIES DEFINITION A conspiracy theory is defined by four charact

    ON CONSPIRACY THEORIES

    DEFINITION

    A conspiracy theory is defined by four characteristics: (1) a group (2) acting in secret (3) to alter institutions, usurp power, avoid blame, obscure truth, or gain utility (4) at the expense of the common good.

    COMMON

    At least 50 percent of the population believe in at least one conspiracy theory. The best predictor of belief in a conspiracy theory is belief in other conspiracy theories. The more highly educated a participant, the less likely they are to believe conspiracy theories.

    Debunking conspiracy theories leads to a “backfire effect.” Efforts to debunk inaccurate political information leave people more convinced that false information is true than they would have otherwise.

    CAUSES

    They feel a lack of control over their lives. If people feel they don’t have control over a situation, they’ll try to make sense of it and find out what happened. Ostracism increases superstition and belief in conspiracies. And it’s not because the isolation is making them insane—it’s really just a search for more meaning in life. The effort of sense-making leads them to connect dots that aren’t necessarily connected in reality. Conversely, feeling a sense of control protects against believing conspiracy theories. If you give people a feeling of control, then they are less inclined to believe those conspiracy theories.

    CONFIRMATION BIAS – SEARCH FOR CONTROL

    Human beings have a very natural tendency to take in information that fits their own perspective of the world. And we tend to reject information or reject evidence that we disagree with. And we do that for a very simple reason. We don’t like it when we feel wrong. We don’t like it when people tell us we’re wrong because that damages our psychological well-being. We don’t like thinking that our view of the world, our perspective of the world is incorrect.

    So what tends to happen is that we look for information; we look for evidence that fits what we already know or what we already believe, and we try to avoid information or evidence that we either disagree with or that we know doesn’t fit with our perspective.

    TESTING FOR MENTAL ILLNESS

    As far as I know, if you use the serial-definition method rather than cold surveys, give the above definition, give examples of those that were true and false, and categorize a selection of conspiracy theories by the following list, you would find most people are less crazy than they appear.

    0) Unlikely or simply false.

    1) Misunderstanding of events to obtain ‘sensible world’

    2) Intentional misrepresentation of events for attention and ‘sensible world’.

    3) external consequences of common interest

    4) conspiracy of common interest (following natural incentives without intention of doing bad)

    5) conspiracy of common interest in self protection.

    6) conspiracy to commit harm in excuse for creating some greater good (military nonsense).

    7) conspiracy to commit harm to achieve personal or group ends.

    8) conspiracy to achieve power for a group.

    —“Incentives drive interest which creates intent. Conspiracies look at the end result and call foul play as opposed to using full accounting and stripping back the effect from the cause.”—Nick Zito

    Curt

    (compiled from various mainstream sources)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 10:17:00 UTC

  • Going through the top ten conspiracy theories with a relative and after you get

    Going through the top ten conspiracy theories with a relative and after you get through the expression of emotional frustration the end result is ‘unintended consequences of common interest’, ‘conspiracy of common interests’, not in fact ‘conspiracies of intent’, and Which is what I want to explore. I think it’s possible to separate loonies from skeptics by asking the questions rationally.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 10:01:00 UTC

  • by Eli Harman ALTRUISTIC PUNISHMENT: “I will bear a cost in order to impose a co

    by Eli Harman

    ALTRUISTIC PUNISHMENT: “I will bear a cost in order to impose a cost on someone for imposing costs on others.”

    Directly, no one wins, it’s a lose/lose/lose; costs all the way around.

    Indirectly, we all benefit from the maintenance of a normative commons that discourages people from imposing costs, negative externalities, on others or refraining from contributing to benefits, positive externalities, which are shared.

    This is a common human behavior and it is impossible to understand human behavior, or the evolution of societies and polities, without understanding altruistic punishment.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 21:14:00 UTC

  • “What we’re seeing at Google is the irresistible force of Political Correctness

    —“What we’re seeing at Google is the irresistible force of Political Correctness meeting the immovable object of Asperger’s Syndrome. The polar extremes of feminine and masculine.”— Steve Schneider and Eli Harman


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 21:10:00 UTC

  • google is officially a cult

    google is officially a cult.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 19:34:00 UTC

  • My current view is that the scientific method is now complete; and that the disc

    My current view is that the scientific method is now complete; and that the discipline of truthful speech is now within the domain of science; and that philosophy has been relegated to the choice of common goods and personal preferences.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 18:07:00 UTC

  • You know, at present, there are two men on this earth that you do not want to be

    You know, at present, there are two men on this earth that you do not want to be given a mission to end you. Sergey Shoygu and James Mattis. Because they will end you on a scale that your people will never forget. And the only thing that saves you from either one of them is the political interest of the people who they report to: Putin and Trump. And while Trump is a traditional european monarch, and Putin is a traditional Russian Tsar – and the differences those histories entail – you really do not want to provide a moral high ground or point of honor that creates an excuse for either of those men to let loose their dogs of war.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 17:26:00 UTC

  • REVIEW: Chris Pine, Jeff Bridges, Hell or High Water. Flawless

    REVIEW: Chris Pine, Jeff Bridges, Hell or High Water. Flawless.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 17:19:00 UTC