Newt: Maybe you aren’t up on current events, but *we WANT the state/academy/media to defeat him – and start civil war* @newtgingrich @POTUS
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 13:51:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
BE A MAKER OF HISTORY – NOT THE VICTIM OF IT Don’t be a douchebag. Listen. It ta
BE A MAKER OF HISTORY – NOT THE VICTIM OF IT
Don’t be a douchebag. Listen. It takes about six hours, including research, planning, and prep time for one man to immobilize a city of 50-60K people for one to three days.
Now, I have a job. I am doing my job. My job is creating the set of demands that can be implemented to produce political change. I do more good at this job than that job. But there are plenty of people that are better at that job than my job. And they could divide that six hours over a work week, and five or six of those can guys take out a whole city – continuously.
Why am I saying this? So that people start thinking about transitioning from propagandizing to action. And so that we can cast out the people who won’t act act. Wars of words are over. There is only one solution left, and that is civil war.
Your civilization needs you. So be a maker of history, or disappear from it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 13:07:00 UTC
-
“Soy Boy” Slang used to describe males who completely and utterly lack all neces
“Soy Boy”
Slang used to describe males who completely and utterly lack all necessary masculine qualities. This pathetic state is usually achieved by an over-indulgence of emasculating products and/or ideologies.
The origin of the term derives from the negative effects soy consumption has been proven to have on the male physique and libido.
The average soy boy is a feminist, nonathletic, has never been in a fight, will probably marry the first girl that has sex with him, and likely reduces all his arguments to labeling the opposition as “Nazis”.
See also: cuck, beta/omega male, orbiter, kissless virgin, male feminist
—
(CURT: Ok, so I am clueless and terribly insulated from pop culture nonsense and have to ‘look it up’ most of the time, but the linguistic creativity of the common man never ceases to amaze me.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 13:00:00 UTC
-
Brits are pussies. At least the French are bitchy pretentious, and hostile pussi
Brits are pussies. At least the French are bitchy pretentious, and hostile pussies. The Brits just bend over, take it deep, thank Master for it, ask if he’s done and wants more – and consider it a good service.
(see if I can start trouble)
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 12:57:00 UTC
-
AMERICANS RAISED FOR THE SLAUGHTER What’s the difference really if you have your
AMERICANS RAISED FOR THE SLAUGHTER
What’s the difference really if you have your own home, are overfed, watch a TV in your free time, instead of having and raising six children, and being Raised for Kobe Beef, Dairy Cows, or Industrialized chickens?
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 12:51:00 UTC
-
AMERICANS: FATTENED UP LIKE CHICKENS FOR INTERGENERATIONAL GENOCIDE (Americans a
AMERICANS: FATTENED UP LIKE CHICKENS FOR INTERGENERATIONAL GENOCIDE
(Americans are fat, Naive, Children. Yes. We know. That makes them great members of the laboring, working and middle classes. They are simply herd animals being farmed for the purpose of their own destruction.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 12:48:00 UTC
-
STOP TALKING TO AND ABOUT THE LEFT. GOSSIP DEMONSTRATES FAILURE. Every word you
STOP TALKING TO AND ABOUT THE LEFT. GOSSIP DEMONSTRATES FAILURE.
Every word you expend against left’s abandonment of reason, evidence, truth, and morality is an admission that you’re a sucker.
Organize. Plan. Act. Bring the economy to a halt. Delegitimize the government even further. It’s easy. It’s never been easier.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 12:47:00 UTC
-
The 21st CENTURY QUESTION FACING EUROPEAN AND EAST ASIAN MAN The 21st Century Qu
The 21st CENTURY QUESTION FACING EUROPEAN AND EAST ASIAN MAN
The 21st Century Question Facing Anglo-European- Slavic, and Chinese-Korean-Japanese Man
“I can conquer and enslave you, and it will be profitable for me and mine, and unprofitable for you. The only reason not to conquer and enslave you and profit from it, is if we can agree to perfect reciprocity – Natural Law – such that it is more profitable to cooperate in markets than to conquer and enslave you. For the past century it has been more profitable to create markets to exchange with you, despite the high costs to us of building those markets, than it has been to conquer and enslave you. But given that due to the worldwide adoption of our technologies and the leveling of the global work force, the profitability of markets is rapidly declining, and the value of markets will shortly end, it is perhaps, no longer in our interests to tolerate the consequences of trying to trade with you, and instead, conquer and enslave you as our primary and most profitable industry. So why not, rather than allow you to exterminate us by means of our own markets, do not we simply return to conquering and enslaving you and living off of the returns of doing so?
That is the question. In fact, that is the question that American/european/slavic and chinese/korean/japanese men must answer.
Because at present, it seems much more profitable to return to colonization and enslavement than to tolerate the consequences of trying to domesticate you into adopting our markets.
And there is nothing that you could do to stop it if Western and Eastern Man decide that our attempts to civilize you have failed.
All theories have limits beyond which they fail. The value of markets is not infinite. And it appears that our limit has been reached.”
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 12:45:00 UTC
-
IDEAL METHODS OF GOVERNMENT DO NOT EXIST. THEY ARE SIMPLY TECHNOLOGIES TO APPLY
IDEAL METHODS OF GOVERNMENT DO NOT EXIST. THEY ARE SIMPLY TECHNOLOGIES TO APPLY IN DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES.
(you probably want to read this)
Ideal RULE exists: rule of natural law, and markets in everything providing perfect decidability in matters of conflict. Ideal *Government*- meaning the production of commons, must adapt as does any organization to market (conflict, peace, prosperity) demands.
—“Nazism, fascism are merely conservative and nationalistic versions of socialism. Nobody is under the illusion individuals own anything under nazism/fascism. Even men’s body’s become the property of the state. The world anti fascist war was fought from 1939-45 precisely because the sober knew the danger”— A Friend
Correct. It was an era of warfare against communism. The difference was that while napoleon had invented total war of nationalism, the marxists and bolsheviks had created a total war of the underclass by way of rebellion, a pseudoscientific religion to replace mysticism, using the promise of heaven in this life rather than the next.
Fascism responded yet again with nationalism expanded to economic and cultural warfare in return, where napoleon had responded with military fascism in the roman model.
Hitler’s ‘genius’ was to combine mussolini’s nationalism with an aesthetic religion to match or exceed that of the communist underclasses, thereby uniting classes against communism’s cult.
Neither model is economically feasible, but both are simply methods of conducting warfare by the use of propaganda made possible by rail, telegraph, radio, and cinema. The pulpit could be everywhere.
But we can learn from rome as usual: fascism (generalship) in times of war, and markets (rule of law) in times of peace. And that a government must adapt to circumstance, whether warfare (fascism), peace (classical liberalism), or surplus (social democracy). And that such adaptation is merely scientific necessity rather than pondering the folly of philosophical ideals.
In other words: Technology(Real) not philosophy(ideal).
You are, I think, as a moral man, confusing the ideal ‘good’ (classical liberalism in times of peace) with the necessary (fascism in times of war), with social democracy (redistribution of windfalls) and that governments must flex between the three models as necessary given their circumstances. And better yet, that flexibility allows for the destruction of rents accumulated under each model.
As far as I know the science of government is closed. All anyone can do is lie cheat and steal if they advocate otherwise.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 12:42:00 UTC
-
“Removing a parasite is never an unprofitable action.”—Steve Pender
—“Removing a parasite is never an unprofitable action.”—Steve Pender
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 11:39:00 UTC