Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • POLITICAL BIASES ARE MERELY REPRODUCTION IN ACTION Here. I’ve combined Kashif’s

    POLITICAL BIASES ARE MERELY REPRODUCTION IN ACTION

    Here. I’ve combined Kashif’s experiential and my operational diagrams.

    Personally I simply see one axis and three implementations: 1) reproductive strategy, 2) vocabulary, and 3) temporality.

    We all justify our reproductive strategies. Our reproductive strategy biases our temporal perception in the division of perception, cognition, negotiation, advocacy, and labor. Our Grammar expresses our negotiation in that division of perception that suits our reproductive strategy.

    We all need a portfolio of decidability. Our decidability is reducible to our reproductive strategy, compromised by our survival and operating strategy.

    I think the hard thing to imagine is the dream state (associating) action state (planning) spectrum. How action oriented or experience oriented we are. If you put that as a fourth criteria it would probably mirror the solipsistic autistic spectrum that mirrors the construction of female to male brains.

    Nature works with a very small number of rules that can be used to create complexity through vast permutation. As far as I know all human behavior consists of the prey drive, from which we evolved the mating drive, the cooperating drive is an extension of the mating drive, and the linguistic drive (order) is an outgrowth of the cooperating drive.

    From simple things emerge complexity.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-08 08:52:00 UTC

  • on youtubeUpdated Oct 7, 2017, 8:09 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FA6LOqipBMnow on youtubeUpdated Oct 7, 2017, 8:09 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 20:09:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline

    Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 15:39:00 UTC

  • Final Edit

    Final Edit.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 15:39:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline

    Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 15:37:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw posted in The Hot Gates

    Eric Danelaw posted in The Hot Gates.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 15:34:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline

    Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 15:34:00 UTC

  • Eric Danelaw shared a video to your timeline

    Eric Danelaw shared a video to your timeline.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 15:34:00 UTC

  • Roundtable – Western Civilization: Circumventing Postmodernism and the Frankfurt

    Roundtable – Western Civilization: Circumventing Postmodernism and the Frankfurt School – with Duchesne, MacDonald, Sunic and DoolittleUpdated Oct 7, 2017, 3:33 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 15:33:00 UTC

  • Why not both (a) take the high right position, and (b) openly advocate for a rev

    Why not both (a) take the high right position, and (b) openly advocate for a revolution that devolves the federal government so that regions, or states, or even counties can produce their own normative commons leaving the federal government responsible only for defense, central bank clearing, and insurer of last resort (disasters, old age, etc?)

    In other words, why not make revolutionary change a core tenet of the institute. Not just for America, but for all peoples in the world?

    The restoration of truth to the public discourse, politics, markets, and law, the restoration of self determination for all peoples. And the production of commons most suitable to the transcendence of individual polities.

    Openly discuss revolution on behalf of everyone.

    ( I want to keep the moral high ground until revolutionary action is necessary. There is no value in burning myself on the right’s pyre of self sacrifice. I don’t need the personal confirmation. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 13:44:00 UTC