If you need a symbol to rally behind other than the line of your people, back to the beginning of time, then you are simply weak. If you want a cross, moon, or star, or other icon then you’re part of the problem, not part of the solution. Those symbols were invented to erase the lines between peoples not create them.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-20 08:08:00 UTC
I love my people. And it’s pretty hard to Improve upon germanic and nordic men, and our germanic and nordic woman can be beautiful. But damn. Slavic women are just so much better looking that it makes an upper middle class american suburb look like an animal farm. And yes, a LOT of it is weight. But, (a) while many of us from England were from the middle and upper middle genetic classes, the vast number of american immigrants were not. And while we were able to let loose the constrained human capital of lower middle and lower class europeans, the asymmetry of reproduction between the classes has been obvious.
Civil life in New England is quite civil so to speak. It’s still a copy of Little England in many ways – save for the effeminate lack of confidence endemic to postwar brits. our men are still manly by british terms if not russian. Thanks to a working class.
The cities are all wastelands.
The working class male preserves masculinity because he must.
The white collar effeminate male lacking military service civic responsibility and a brood of children is a threat to society.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-20 07:43:00 UTC
http://media.vidmax.com/media/video4/164334/stream.mp4MANLY: UKRAINIAN PARLIAMENT.
(fight in parliament)Updated Oct 18, 2017, 11:11 PM
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-18 23:11:00 UTC
He was right you know. We are all pirates. Whether Chariots, Triremes, Longboats, Galleys, Schooners, or Planes we are, of our nature Pirates, Vikings, Raiders. And that is what it means to be European. To Hunt(Explore), Fight(Conquer), Decimate(Domesticate), Rule(Profit From).
We are at our best when we do not lie to ourselves. 😉 Domestication of the animal man for fun and profit.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-18 16:21:00 UTC
UPDATE: It looks like we are going to move the company to the states where costs of administration are lower, legal costs and flexibility are higher, venture capital is more friendly and available.
As part of this move we will likely jump directly to phase two, and rename the product ‘Runcible’ and possibly the company to ‘Runcible’ as well. (See Neal Stephenson’s Diamond Age for reference.) I have held the company name in reserve for the second phase.
– Our product provides a single interface for every activity in every organization.
– Architecturally it’s a game engine with workflows and scripting available to ordinary power users – without developers.
– Every item can have an associated financial transaction.
– It has a social ‘economy’ and a reward system and ‘variables’.
– The general idea is that it is possible to build very large but very flat organizations – even networks of organizations.
– The novel idea is that the system gathers information and provides you feedback about yourself, your group, your company and the market – sort of like how facebook provides it to advertisers but hides it from you, we reverse that relationship and provide you with information about you relative to your peers (competitors).
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-18 11:50:00 UTC
Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-18 07:32:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/22498967_156730584923840_8030711419562394553_o_156730584923840.jpg lolz. (Curt loves being a meme) Ok. I gotta play with it tho:
—“Thankfully, what comes to mind, is categorically, logically, empirically, operationally, rationally, reciprocally and parsimoniously consistent, correspondent, coherent, and commensurable, and therefore decidable.”— Dr. DoLittle, Proper Aryan Institute, Kievlolz. (Curt loves being a meme) Ok. I gotta play with it tho:
—“Thankfully, what comes to mind, is categorically, logically, empirically, operationally, rationally, reciprocally and parsimoniously consistent, correspondent, coherent, and commensurable, and therefore decidable.”— Dr. DoLittle, Proper Aryan Institute, Kiev
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-18 07:18:00 UTC
UNDERSTANDING WESTERN vs ASIAN vs SEMITIC ETHICS
Judaism and Islam are poly-moral/poly-ethical religions. Westerners are monological and mono ethical/moral. Jewish culture relies upon a low trust (ghetto) moral system and culture. Western culture is a high trust (martial) moral system. Jewish culture produces minimum no commons. Western culture produces maximum commons. Jewish culture produces insular commons. Western culture produces universal commons. Jewish culture seeks to privatize commons. Western Culture prohibits privatization of commons. Jewish culture eschews production over arbitrage. Western culture eschews arbitrage and over production. Jewish culture ignores and costs from externalities. Western culture expressly demands responsibility for externalities. Jewish culture universally allies with the state against the people. Western culture expressly defends against the state (aristocracy).
If you stack the germanic westerners, the mediterranean westerners, the russians, chinese, the jews, and the gypsies, in that order, you move from productive individualistic, to productive clannish, to productive authoritarian, to parasitic tribal, to parasitic clannish civilizations. The only major difference between the gypsies and the jews is the IQ basis and therefore the means of parasitism upon host cultures. The only difference between the chinese and the russian is quality of the bureaucracy. The difference between the protestant and mediterranean west is familial versus militial.
And that is why the jews and arabs are always ostracized: violation of the contract of the commons. It’s not just the jews. It appears that all the peoples who originated in what is Yemen today, but which was ethiopian/arabian civilization in the prehistoric world, never went through the agrarian phase, and retained low trust parasitic pastoralist ethics. Whether it is genetic or not we don’t know yet. We will know in the span of 20-30 years.
And if I am correct it will be that the structure of the brains of the semitic peoples (or at least, the arabic/jewish/ethiopian) peoples who are a subset of the semitic speaking peoples, have either preserved the female brain structure, or reversed gender distribution of it, and as a consequence pursue the female reproductive strategy. Which is about all that is necessary to preserve cultural and genetic differences. Small things in large numbers create vast differences.
I suspect I will be correct in this. The genetic, the hormonal, data and the emerging data on sexual dimorphism is just too consistent. The only major differences between the human races that I an find is the degree of neoteny and the distribution of sexual dimorphism in the body and brain followed by the distribution of the IQ curve. Which leaves the jews as the top semites, then the various arab tribes underneath them. With the turks bridging the gap.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-17 12:21:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/ChickPhilosophy_4xSLKEBukw/22491816_156371228293109_3469449266670605055_n_156371228293109.jpg
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-16 18:16:00 UTC
Our memories evolved to predict not to recall. Recall is only useful as long as it assists in prediction.
That’s why.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-16 17:24:00 UTC